ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05726747Updated Jun 15, 2026

QOL and Sarcopenia in Patients With Ascites

An observational study in Ascites Hepatic and Ascites, Malignant, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinical data regarding quality of life in patients with refractory ascites is limited and preceded the development of newer questionnaires that may be more robust. One primary objective of this study is to study changes in quality in life in a prospective fashion using newer general and ascites-specific quality of life survey instruments specific to benign and malignant etiologies.

Sarcopenia is a condition that is prevalent in cancer and cirrhosis. Current data is retrospective and associative, evaluating heterogeneous patient populations at different stages within the timeline of refractory ascites. The other primary objective of this study is to study sarcopenia in a prospective fashion and to understand its kinetics once a patient develops refractory ascites.

Prospectively-obtained measures of deterioration in patient-reported outcomes and in muscle mass will form the basis for the next stage of investigation of interventions to mitigate these declines.

Read the detailed description

Patients with refractory ascites defined as requiring >1 paracentesis within a 6 week period will be prospectively enrolled. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10) and ascites-specific (Ascites Q and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: Ascites Modification) quality of life questionnaires will be obtained at baseline, then at 1-, 2-, 4- and 6 months. Sarcopenia will be assessed by muscle area measurement from a single CT image at the L4 level at baseline, 2- and 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ascites Hepatic
  • Ascites, Malignant

Keywords

  • ascites
  • sarcopenia
03

In context

Ascites

247 studies on the registry are indexed under Ascites; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 100 across 54 observational studies indexed under Ascites.

Browse Ascites studies →

Lead sponsor

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine is the lead sponsor of 460 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

35-40 unique patients are seen by interventional radiology in the Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine or the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for a therapeutic paracentesis per month in an outpatient setting. Approximately half of these patients (\~20 per month) meet criteria for refractory ascites requiring frequent large volume paracentesis (i.e. more than 1 therapeutic paracentesis in a 6 week period).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >/=18
  2. (ECOG) performance score \< 3
  3. ascites due to cirrhosis or , requiring more than 1 therapeutic paracentesis in a 6 week period within 3 months of enrollment.
  4. Capable of giving

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. less than 3 months
  2. Unable to participate in neuropsychological tests/questionnaires
  3. Pregnant or nursing women. .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testQuality of Life surveys

    QoL and sarcopenia assessments

    Also known as: Abdominal CT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Health-Related Quality of Life scores as measured by the PROMIS-10 questionnaire

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10) survey scores physical and mental health on a 4-20 point scale which are combined into an overall score with higher scores reflecting better quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Sarcopenia as measured by psoas, paraspinal, and total abdominal wall muscle areas

    assessed by a limited CT scan of the abdomen at the level of L4. Cross-sectional muscle area is measured.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ascites-specific QOL scores as measured by the Ascites Q for patients with cirrhotic ascites.

    Ascites Q asks 11 questions on a 2-11 scale. Total is normalized to a 0-100 point scale with higher score reflecting worse symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Ascites-specific QOL scores as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: Ascites Modification for patients with malignant ascites,

    11 questions on a 0-10 scale, total score range 0-110 with higher score reflecting worse symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 47 months after the start.

Of 28 observational studies under Ascites, half reached primary completion within 50 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20. This study's planned 47 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2023
First posted
Feb 14, 2023
StartActual
May 23, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Jun 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05726747
Responsible party
Michael C Soulen, MD (Director Interventional Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 14, 2023
Start date
May 23, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Michael C Soulen, MD
Contact
michael.soulen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
2154218647
Kathleen Thomas, MS
Contact
kathleen.thomas@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
215-746-0352
Michael Soulen, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion