An observational study in Corneal Ectasia of Both Eyes, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-19.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
Cross-linking of collagen refers to the ability of collagen fibrils to form strong chemical bonds with adjacent fibrils. In the cornea, collagen cross-linking occurs naturally with aging due to an oxidative deamination reaction that takes place within the end chains of the collagen. It has been hypothesized that this natural cross-linkage of collagen explains why keratectasia (corneal ectasia) often progresses most rapidly in adolescence or early adulthood but tends to stabilize in patients after middle-age.
Human studies of UV-induced corneal cross-linking began in 2003 in Dresden, and early results were promising. The initial pilot study enrolled 16 patients with rapidly progressing keratoconus and all of the patients stopped progressing after treatment. Additionally, 70% had flattening of their steep anterior corneal curvatures (decreases in average and maximum keratometric values), and 65% had an improvement in visual acuity. There were no reported complications.
Per the typical cross-linking protocol, 0.1% riboflavin solution with 20% dextran is added to the de-epithelialized cornea and then photoactivated with UV-A light at 365 nm with irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. The cornea is de-epithelialized to allow adequate penetration of riboflavin into the corneal stroma. Riboflavin acts as photosensitizer; it creates free radicals, forms new molecular crosslinks, and ultimately increases the cornea's mechanical strength.
Collagen cross-linking experienced a rapid transition from laboratory procedure to clinical intervention because of the method's apparent safety and broad array of potential applications. One such clinical application is the treatment of keratoconus which is a degenerative disorder of the eye associated with thinning and subsequent bulging of the cornea, causing poor vision. Collagen cross-linking stops the progression of keratoconus in patients with mild disease, presumably by strengthening the cornea and preventing further bulging.
Collagen cross-linking has also been used successfully in the treatment of pellucid marginal degeneration and to treat iatrogenic (postoperative) ectasia. Studies have shown that CXL causes a reduction in corneal edema and thickness with improvement in visual acuity in patients with bullous keratopathy due to different causes. However, these changes last for only about six months and due to this transient effect, CXL may only have a palliative role, if at all, for now.
The effect of cross linking can be assessed postoperatively clinically and also by some devices such as Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Inc., Buffalo, NY, USA). The depth of treatment can be measured by the demarcation line, which usually appears at 10 to 14 days after CXL and can be monitored using corneal topography and tomography.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a modality that uses low-coherence interferometry to enable non-contact, in vivo imaging of ocular structures. Since its introduction, OCT imaging has become a key part of clinical evaluation of the cornea, and the anterior eye segment.
As improvements to the technology have increased, e.g. the speed and resolution of the images captured, the impact of anterior segment OCT (AS OCT) imaging on clinical practice, has been rapidly increasing and the clinical potential of the technique in evaluating the cornea had been realized. Specific to the cornea, AS OCT now allows us to image corneal layers and structures in greater detail i.e. epithelium, Bowman's layer, stroma, Descemet membrane and endothelium.
The AS OCT is extremely useful in studying anterior segment pathology through an edematous cornea such as in Descemet membrane detachments , corneal stroma itself and corneal infiltrates secondary to infections.
AS OCT is also useful in assessing changes in cornea postoperative including corneal changes after cross linking. The most widely reported change seen on cross-sectional OCT following CXL has been the appearance of a 'demarcation' line within the corneal stroma. This line has been postulated to represent the depth of the CXL treatment, separating the treated anterior stroma and untreated posterior stroma. The demarcation line is hyper-reflective when viewed with OCT, Scheimpflug imaging and on slit lamp biomicroscopy. OCT provides the ability to measure the depth of the demarcation line and has been used as an important outcome parameter when comparing various CXL protocols. The demarcation line usually fades by three months and, in some corneas, is replaced with faint, irregular, hyper-reflective lines in the deep stroma.
Other changes that can be noted on OCT images following CXL include increased reflectivity of the treated stroma, and the appearance of fainter, secondary stromal demarcation lines.
120 studies on the registry are indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic; 18 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 144 across 30 observational studies indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic.
Browse Dilatation, Pathologic studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients who underwent classic corneal collagen cross-linking
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
ant segment oct before and after corneal collagen cross-linking
Also known as: collagen cross linking
corneal thickness after collagen cross linking OCT study
corneal thickness measurement in mm
Time frame: 12 months
corneal demarcation line after collagen cross linking OCT study
measurement of the depth of demarcation line from tear film in mm
Time frame: 12 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.