An interventional study of Cervical Ripening Balloon and Osmotic Dilators in Dilation and Evacuation, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.
Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a cervical ripening balloon (Foley balloon) works to prepare the cervix before same-day outpatient dilation and evacuation (D\&E). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
120 studies on the registry are indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic; 18 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 82 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic.
Browse Dilatation, Pathologic studies →University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 313 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.
Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Cervical Ripening Balloon
Device: Osmotic Dilators
30 milliliter Foley balloon
Dilapan-S
D&E procedure length (minutes)
From insertion of first instrument to removal of speculum
Time frame: during procedure
Starting dilation (French gauge)
Pratt dilator size in French gauge (sequential numbered instruments with size corresponding to diameter)
Time frame: during procedure
Additional dilation (French gauge)
Pratt dilator size in French gauge (sequential numbered instruments with size corresponding to diameter)
Time frame: during procedure
Estimated blood loss (milliliters)
Amount of blood loss, measured in milliliters throughout the procedure
Time frame: during procedure
Additional sedation medication administered
yes/no
Time frame: during procedure
Pain (Visual Analog Scale)
10 point visual analog scale with values from 0-10, with 0 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst possible pain." Electronic slider measure so participants can specify up to 0.001 value.
Time frame: during procedure
Administration of uterotonic medications
yes/no
Time frame: during procedure
Cervical laceration
yes/no
Time frame: during procedure
Estimated blood loss > 500 milliliters
yes/no
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Hospital transfer
yes/no
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Feasibility of cervical preparation (physician-reported)
Yes/ No: "Is this type of cervical prep feasible for future patients" and qualitative free-text responses
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Likelihood to recommend cervical preparation (participant-reported)
Modified Likert scale: Very unlikely, Somewhat unlikely, Neither likely nor unlikely, Somewhat likely, Very likely
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Acceptability of cervical preparation (physician-reported)
Yes/ No: "Is this type of cervical prep acceptable for future patients" and qualitative free-text responses
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Satisfaction with level of pain management (participant-reported)
Yes/ No: "Are you satisfied with your level of pain management..." and qualitative free-text responses
Time frame: From enrollment to 24 hours after enrollment
Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 25 months after the start.
Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Dilatation, Pathologic, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 25 months is close to that.
Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 13, 2026: primary completion Aug 2026 → May 2027 and completion Jul 2027 → Dec 2027.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.