ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05642143Updated Feb 7, 2024

Deep Phenotyping of Bone Disease in Type 2 Diabetes and Relations to Diabetic Neuropathy

An observational study in Type 2 Diabetes, Bone Disease and Osteoporosis, sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-07.

Sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
300
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objectives:

The goal of this cross sectional clinical trial is to examine the phenotype of bone disease in type 2 diabetes.The main aims are to:

  1. Compare bone microarchitecture, bone biomechanical competence, and bone turnover markers as well as postural control in T2D patients with and without fractures.
  2. Examine how autonomic and peripheral neuropathy affects bone microarchitecture, bone material strength and bone turnover markers as well as postural control in T2D.

Methods:

The trial is of cross-sectional design and consists of examinations including

  • Blood samples to analyze bone markers, glycemic state i.e.
  • Bone scans including dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) to evaluate Bone Mineral Density, t-score and bone structure.
  • Microindentation to evaluate bone material strength
  • Skin autofluorescence to measure levels of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in the skin
  • Assesment of nerve function (peripheral and autonomic)
  • Assesment of postural control, muscle strength and gait

Participants:

A total of 300 type 2 diabetes patients divided to three groups:

  • 160 with no history of fractures or diabetic neuropathy
  • 100 with a history of fracture(s)
  • 40 with autonomic neuropathy or severe peripheral neuropathy
02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Bone Disease
  • Osteoporosis
  • Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral
  • Autonomic Neuropathy, Diabetic
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is close to the median of 300 across 1,741 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Aalborg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

T2D with and without fractures and neuropathy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women with minimum 40 years of age.
  2. Diagnosis of T2D. At least one of the following criteria must be met at diagnosis:

    1. ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6,5 %)
    2. Plasma glucose ≥ 11,1 mmol/l
    3. Fasting plasma glucose ≥7,0 mmol/l Clinical effect of oral antidiabetic medication strengthens the diagnosis.
  3. Diagnosis of diabetes at least one year prior to inclusion of the study to avoid honeymoon diabetes.
  4. A history of fracture(s) (confirmed by radiographs analyzed by radiologist) following the diabetes diagnosis (T2D F+ group)
  5. Diagnosed with severe peripheral (VPT ≥ 50) or autonomic neuropathy defined by cardiac autonomic reflex tests or severe abnormalities in orthostatic blood pressure (T2D N+ group)
  6. Signed the .
  7. Not defined by the exclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe decreased liver function (Alanin amino-transaminase (ALAT) >250 U/l, Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) >150 U/l).
  2. Moderate to severe kidney dysfunction, estimated (eGFR) \<15 mmol/L/1,73m2.
  3. Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  4. Active or terminal ill.
  5. Previous chemotherapy or immunomodulating treatment
  6. Known severe vitamin deficiency
  7. Current or previous alcohol- or drug abuse.
  8. Not being able to understand Danish written and/or verbally.
  9. Terms according to investigators judgement that makes subjects unsuitable to participate including lack of ability to understand and comply with instructions and/or reduced physical ability, limiting the ability to participate in the examinations.
  10. Participating in other clinical studies utilizing experimental treatment or medication.
  11. Subjects with pathologic fractures (defined as fractures due to local tumors, tumor-like lesions, or focal demineralization as visualized on radiographs).
  12. Primary hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease and other metabolic bone diseases, uncontrolled thyrotoxicosis, celiac disease not controlled by diet, known hypogonadism, severe , hypopituitarism, Cushing's disease.
  13. Fracture \< 6 month ago
  14. Initiation of antiresorptive or bone anabolic drugs \<12 months ago to ensure stable bone turnover markers.
  15. History of fractures following the diagnosis of diabetes (T2D F-/N- and T2D N+ groups).
  16. History of peripheral or autonomic neuropathy defined by cardiac autonomic reflex tests or severe abnormalities in orthostatic blood pressure (T2D F-/N- group).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • T2D F-/N-

    Subjects with T2D and no previous history of any fractures or diabetic neuropathy (n=160)

    Diagnostic Test: Dual Energy X-ray Absorbtiometry scan · Diagnostic Test: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography · Diagnostic Test: Microindentation · Diagnostic Test: Thermal perception thresholds · Diagnostic Test: Nerve conduction studies · Diagnostic Test: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 · Diagnostic Test: Skin biopsies with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density · Diagnostic Test: Perception Threshold Tracking · Diagnostic Test: Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy · Diagnostic Test: Handgrip strength · Diagnostic Test: Force plate platform · Diagnostic Test: Biospecimen collection · Diagnostic Test: Isometric leg extension strength · Diagnostic Test: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

  • T2D F+

    Subjects with T2D with a previous history of a fracture(s) (any fracture, major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and peripheral) (n=100)

    Diagnostic Test: Dual Energy X-ray Absorbtiometry scan · Diagnostic Test: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography · Diagnostic Test: Microindentation · Diagnostic Test: Thermal perception thresholds · Diagnostic Test: Nerve conduction studies · Diagnostic Test: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 · Diagnostic Test: Perception Threshold Tracking · Diagnostic Test: Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy · Diagnostic Test: Handgrip strength · Diagnostic Test: Force plate platform · Diagnostic Test: Biospecimen collection · Diagnostic Test: Isometric leg extension strength · Diagnostic Test: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

  • T2D N+

    Subjects with T2D matched by age and sex with severe peripheral (vibration perception threshold (VPT) \> 50) or a history of autonomic neuropathy (n=40)

    Diagnostic Test: Dual Energy X-ray Absorbtiometry scan · Diagnostic Test: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography · Diagnostic Test: Microindentation · Diagnostic Test: Thermal perception thresholds · Diagnostic Test: Nerve conduction studies · Diagnostic Test: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 · Diagnostic Test: Skin biopsies with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density · Diagnostic Test: Perception Threshold Tracking · Diagnostic Test: Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy · Diagnostic Test: Handgrip strength · Diagnostic Test: Force plate platform · Diagnostic Test: Biospecimen collection · Diagnostic Test: Isometric leg extension strength · Diagnostic Test: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDual Energy X-ray Absorbtiometry scan

    Evaluation of body composition and bone mass density

    Also known as: DXA

  • Diagnostic testHigh-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

    High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) assesses both volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and trabecular and cortical microarchitecture.

    Also known as: HR-pQCT

  • Diagnostic testMicroindentation

    Measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone.

    Also known as: Osteoprobe, ActiveLife, Santa Barbara, CA

  • Diagnostic testThermal perception thresholds

    Heat and cold perception thresholds

    Also known as: Quantitative Sensory Testing

  • Diagnostic testNerve conduction studies

    Nerve conduction and amplitude of sural nerve

    Also known as: NCStat-DPN-Check

  • Diagnostic testComposite Autonomic Symptom Score 31

    A validated self-assessment questionnaire quantifying the severity and distribution of autonomic symptoms across six domains (orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder and pupillomotor functions) by scoring 31 clinically selected questions

    Also known as: COMPASS 31

  • Diagnostic testSkin biopsies with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density

    Skin biopsy

    Also known as: PGP9.5, antibodies for subsets of ion-channels ect

  • Diagnostic testPerception Threshold Tracking

    Transcutaneous stimulation of large and small nerve fibres using weak electrical currents

    Also known as: PTT

  • Diagnostic testAssessment of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy

    Electrocardiographic recordings at rest and during cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests.

    Also known as: Vagus device, Medicus Engineering ApS, Aarhus, Denmark

  • Diagnostic testHandgrip strength

    Evaluation of muscle strength

    Also known as: Hydraulic dynamometer, Saehan Corporation, Gyungnam, South Korea

  • Diagnostic testForce plate platform

    Evaluation of balance while standing still

    Also known as: Plux Biosignals, S.A, Arruda dos Vinhos, Portugal

  • Diagnostic testBiospecimen collection

    Biochemistry including bone turnover markers, glycemic status, inflammation markers i.e

    Also known as: Blood samples, Urine samples

  • Diagnostic testIsometric leg extension strength

    Evaluation of muscle strength

    Also known as: EasyForce Digital Dynamometer

  • Diagnostic testMichigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

    MNSI is used to assess status of peripheral neuropathy. It includes two separate assessments: a 15-item self-administered questionnaire and a lower extremity examination that includes inspection and assessment of vibratory sensation and ankle reflexes.

    Also known as: MNSI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of differences in bone microarchitecture between T2D patients with and without previous fractures assessed by HRpQCT.

    Bone microarchitecture is a composite outcome assessed by HRpQCT at radius and tibia: Total volumetric mineral density, Trabecular volumetric mineral density, Cortical volumetric mineral density, Trabecular number, Trabecular thickness, Cortical thickness, Trabecular separation, Cortical porosity, bone stiffness and failure load.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  2. Differences in Bone material strength index (BMSi) between T2D patients with and without previous fractures measured by microindentation.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  3. Evaluation of differences in bone turnover markers between T2D patients with and without previous fractures by biochemical analysis of different bone markers (CTX, P1NP, osteocalcin (OC), ucOC, sclerostin, osteoglycin and osteopontin).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. The impact of autonomic neuropathy on bone microarchitecture in T2D assessed by HR-pQCT.

    Compare bone microarchitectural parameters (assessed by HR-pQCT) in T2D patients with and without autonomic neuropathy (assessed by CAN-score from Vagus™ device, COMPASS31-score, intraepidermal nerve fiber density, orthostatic BP and ECG).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  2. The impact of autonomic neuropathy on bone material strength in T2D assessed by microindentation.

    Compare bone material strength (assessed by microindentation) in T2D patients with and without autonomic neuropathy (assessed by CAN-score from Vagus™ device, COMPASS31-score, intraepidermal nerve fiber density, orthostatic BP and ECG).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  3. The impact of autonomic neuropathy on bone turnover markers in T2D.

    Compare bone turnover markers in T2D patients with and without autonomic neuropathy (assessed by CAN-score from Vagus™ device, COMPASS31-score, intraepidermal nerve fiber density, orthostatic BP and ECG)

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  4. The impact of peripheral neuropathy on bone microarchitecture in T2D assessed by HR-pQCT.

    Compare bone microarchitectural parameters (assessed by HR-pQCT) in T2D patients with and without peripheral neuropathy (assessed by MNSI, PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction study and intraepidermal nerve fiber density)

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  5. The impact of peripheral neuropathy on bone material strength in T2D assessed by microindentation.

    Compare bone material strength (assessed by microindentation) in T2D patients with and without peripheral neuropathy (assessed by MNSI, PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction study and intraepidermal nerve fiber density)

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  6. The impact of peripheral neuropathy on bone turnover markers in T2D.

    Compare bone turnover markers in T2D patients with and without peripheral neuropathy (assessed by MNSI, PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction study and intraepidermal nerve fiber density).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  7. Compare postural control between T2D patients with and without fractures assessed by force platform.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  8. Compare postural control between T2D patients with and without peripheral/autonomic neuropathy.

    Neuropathy assessed by PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction study, skin biopsies, COMPASS-31, MNSI and Vagus device. Postural control assessed by force platform.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  9. Compare muscle mass and strength in T2D patients with and without fractures

    Compare muscle mass (assessed by DXA scan) and muscle strength (assessed by hand grip, leg extension strength and functional tests) in T2D patients with and without fractures.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  10. Compare muscle mass and strength in T2D patients with and without neuropathy

    Compare muscle mass (assessed by DXA scan) and muscle strength (assessed by hand grip, leg extension strength and functional tests) in T2D patients with and without neuropathy (assessed by PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction study, skin biopsies, COMPASS-31, MNSI and Vagus device).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Co-existence of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy

    Presence of autonomic neuropathy (assessed by CAN-score from Vagus™ device, COMPASS31-score, intraepidermal nerve fiber density, orthostatic BP and ECG) will be compared with presence of peripheral neuropathy (assessed by PTT, QST, sural nerve conduction test and intraepidermal nerve fiber density) in T2D.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  2. The impact of insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR and -%B) on bone microarchitecture (assessed by HR-pQCT) in T2D.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  3. The impact of insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR and -%B) on bone material strength (assessed by microindentation) in T2D.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  4. The impact of insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR and -%B) on bone turnover markers in T2D.

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

  5. The correlation between levels of Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) (assessed by skin autofluorescence) and bone material strength (assessed by microindentation).

    Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 3.5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Potential analysis of skin biopsies in external lab

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05642143
Responsible party
Julie Lindgård Nielsen (Principal Investigator, Aalborg University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2022
Start date
Feb 24, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 7, 2024

Study contacts

Julie Lindgård Graversen, MD
Contact
j.lindgaard@rn.dk
97663651 ext. +45
Peter Vestergaard, MD, PhD, Professor
Contact
peter.vestergaard@rn.dk
97663673 ext. +45

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion