CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05630040Updated Nov 8, 2024

VNS for Long-COVID-19

An interventional study of Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation and Sham Intervention in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Dysautonomia, sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-08.

Sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Oct 2024, 2 years ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this proposed clinical case series is to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation paradigm on: 1) Symptom reporting via validated patient reported outcomes, and 2) objective clinical biomarkers of autonomic nervous system function.

This will be a placebo controlled, randomized controlled trial with a crossover design built in. This study will aim to recruit 40 people with Long COVID to be a part of this research.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be randomized into one of two arms. Those in the "active VNS" arm will be sent home with a portable VNS device and asked to perform a daily VNS protocol designed to down regulate sympathetic nervous system activity for six weeks.

Those in the "sham VNS" arm will be asked to use the VNS device daily on a sham setting for six weeks. Those randomized to the sham group will be given the opportunity to "crossover" into the active VNS arm once they have completed the sham arm (Week 12). The participant and assessor will be blinded.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is the lead sponsor of 764 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 121 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 82 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Clinical diagnosis of dysautonomia following an acute COVID-19 infection at least 3 months prior. See below for criteria:

    • clinical diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction as evaluated by a qualified healthcare provider
  • 2 or more if the following clinical assessment findings
  • symptomatic exacerbation during active stand test
  • tachycardia on active stand test
  • tachycardia on orthostatic vitals assessment
  • hypotension on orthostatic vitals assessment
  • hypertension in orthostatic vitals assessment
  • symptom exacerbation on orthostatic vitals assessment
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation:
  • Pregnant persons will not be included in this study for the following reasons:

    • There is not sufficient data surrounding the hormone cycle changes during pregnancy and its effects on the condition being studied (PCD). The results could be skewed due to pregnancy.
    • Of note, there are no risks for pregnant persons to participate.

According to the device manufacturer, the following contraindications will be followed during the screening process:

  • Patients with an active implantable medical device, such as a cardiac pacemaker, heading aid implant, or any implanted metallic or electronic device
  • Patients with a history of baseline cardiac disease or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including congestive heath failure (CHF), known severe coronary artery disease or recent myocardial infarction (within 5 years)
  • Patients with diagnosed bradycardia
  • Patients who have had surgery to cut the vagus nerve in the neck (cervical vagotomy) Patients diagnosed with narrowing of the arteries (carotid atherosclerosis)
  • Patients whose pain syndromes are undiagnosed
  • Pediatric patients
  • Pregnant women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Participants in the Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation arm will have devices calibrated to a therapeutic setting.

    Device: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    Participants in the "sham VNS" arm will be asked to use the VNS device daily on a sham setting for six weeks and will be given the opportunity to "crossover" into the active VNS arm once they have completed the sham arm.

    Device: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation · Device: Sham Intervention

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-invasive vagus nerve stimulation

    Participants will take the VNS device home and asked to perform a daily VNS protocol designed to down regulate sympathetic nervous system activity for 6 weeks.

    Also known as: Vagus nerve stimulation

  • DeviceSham Intervention

    Participants will take a placebo device home for 6 weeks and use daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Dysautonomia Symptom Score (COMPASS 31)

    COMPASS-31 (the composite autonomic symptom) score is a self-rating questionnaire evaluating six domains of autonomic function: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor domains. The total score will be between 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and COMPASS, is internally consistent and applies a much-simplified scoring algorithm suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  2. Composite Dysautonomia Symptom Score (COMPASS 31)

    COMPASS-31 (the composite autonomic symptom) score is a self-rating questionnaire evaluating six domains of autonomic function: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor domains. The total score will be between 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and COMPASS, is internally consistent and applies a much-simplified scoring algorithm suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

    Time frame: Week 2

  3. Composite Dysautonomia Symptom Score (COMPASS 31)

    COMPASS-31 (the composite autonomic symptom) score is a self-rating questionnaire evaluating six domains of autonomic function: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor domains. The total score will be between 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and COMPASS, is internally consistent and applies a much-simplified scoring algorithm suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

    Time frame: Week 5

  4. Composite Dysautonomia Symptom Score (COMPASS 31)

    COMPASS-31 (the composite autonomic symptom) score is a self-rating questionnaire evaluating six domains of autonomic function: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor domains. The total score will be between 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and COMPASS, is internally consistent and applies a much-simplified scoring algorithm suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Composite Dysautonomia Symptom Score (COMPASS 31)

    COMPASS-31 (the composite autonomic symptom) score is a self-rating questionnaire evaluating six domains of autonomic function: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor domains. The total score will be between 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and COMPASS, is internally consistent and applies a much-simplified scoring algorithm suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale measures fatigue severity. The total score of the FSS ranges from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  2. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale measures fatigue severity. The total score of the FSS ranges from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Week 2

  3. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale measures fatigue severity. The total score of the FSS ranges from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Week 5

  4. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale measures fatigue severity. The total score of the FSS ranges from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale measures fatigue severity. The total score of the FSS ranges from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Week 12

  6. Neuro Quality of Life Score

    The NeuroQOL is a self-report of health-related quality of life in 17 domains and sub-domains for adults. Item banks consist of 302 items in total (range from 5 to 45) which are used adaptively to test a variable number and content of items in a computer assisted testing format. All items are rated on a five-option scale based on intensity (e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = somewhat, 4 = quite a bit, 5 = very much) or frequency ("never" to "always"). Raw scores are converted based on consistent metric (T-distribution) with data from the US general population with a T-score mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  7. Neuro Quality of Life Score

    The NeuroQOL is a self-report of health-related quality of life in 17 domains and sub-domains for adults. Item banks consist of 302 items in total (range from 5 to 45) which are used adaptively to test a variable number and content of items in a computer assisted testing format. All items are rated on a five-option scale based on intensity (e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = somewhat, 4 = quite a bit, 5 = very much) or frequency ("never" to "always"). Raw scores are converted based on consistent metric (T-distribution) with data from the US general population with a T-score mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Week 2

  8. Neuro Quality of Life Score

    The NeuroQOL is a self-report of health-related quality of life in 17 domains and sub-domains for adults. Item banks consist of 302 items in total (range from 5 to 45) which are used adaptively to test a variable number and content of items in a computer assisted testing format. All items are rated on a five-option scale based on intensity (e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = somewhat, 4 = quite a bit, 5 = very much) or frequency ("never" to "always"). Raw scores are converted based on consistent metric (T-distribution) with data from the US general population with a T-score mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Week 5

  9. Neuro Quality of Life Score

    The NeuroQOL is a self-report of health-related quality of life in 17 domains and sub-domains for adults. Item banks consist of 302 items in total (range from 5 to 45) which are used adaptively to test a variable number and content of items in a computer assisted testing format. All items are rated on a five-option scale based on intensity (e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = somewhat, 4 = quite a bit, 5 = very much) or frequency ("never" to "always"). Raw scores are converted based on consistent metric (T-distribution) with data from the US general population with a T-score mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Week 8

  10. Neuro Quality of Life Score

    The NeuroQOL is a self-report of health-related quality of life in 17 domains and sub-domains for adults. Item banks consist of 302 items in total (range from 5 to 45) which are used adaptively to test a variable number and content of items in a computer assisted testing format. All items are rated on a five-option scale based on intensity (e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = a little bit, 3 = somewhat, 4 = quite a bit, 5 = very much) or frequency ("never" to "always"). Raw scores are converted based on consistent metric (T-distribution) with data from the US general population with a T-score mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Week 12

  11. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    The MRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5). Full scale from 1-5, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  12. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    The MRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5). Full scale from 1-5, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 2

  13. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    The MRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5). Full scale from 1-5, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 5

  14. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    The MRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5). Full scale from 1-5, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 8

  15. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    The MRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5). Full scale from 1-5, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) Screener

    Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. The PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Total score ranges 0-40, with higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  17. Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) Screener

    Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. The PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. Total score ranges 0-40, with higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 2

  18. Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) Screener

    Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. The PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. Total score ranges 0-40, with higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 5

  19. Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) Screener

    Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. The PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Higher scores indicate worse health outcomes. Total score ranges 0-40, with higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 8

  20. Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) Screener

    Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is the worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. The PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Total score ranges 0-40, with higher scores indicate worse health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 12

  21. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score

    The EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state, thus, higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  22. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score

    The EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state, thus, higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 2

  23. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score

    The EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state, thus, higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 5

  24. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score

    The EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state, thus, higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 8

  25. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score

    The EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state, thus, higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

    Time frame: Week 12

  26. Plasma IL-6 levels

    Plasma IL-6 levels as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  27. Plasma IL-6 levels

    Plasma IL-6 levels as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body in different ways.

    Time frame: Week 2

  28. Plasma IL-6 levels

    Plasma IL-6 levels as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 5

  29. Plasma IL-6 levels

    Plasma IL-6 levels as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 8

  30. Plasma IL-6 levels

    Plasma IL-6 levels as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 12

  31. Plasma IL-1 levels

    Plasma IL-1 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  32. Plasma IL-1 levels

    Plasma IL-1 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 2

  33. Plasma IL-1 levels

    Plasma IL-1 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 5

  34. Plasma IL-1 levels

    Plasma IL-1 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 8

  35. Plasma IL-1 levels

    Plasma IL-1 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 12

  36. Plasma IL-10 levels

    Plasma IL-10 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  37. Plasma IL-10 levels

    Plasma IL-10 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 2

  38. Plasma IL-10 levels

    Plasma IL-10 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 5

  39. Plasma IL-10 levels

    Plasma IL-10 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 8

  40. Plasma IL-10 levels

    Plasma IL-10 levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 12

  41. Plasma HS-CRP levels

    Plasma HS-CRP levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  42. Plasma HS-CRP levels

    Plasma HS-CRP levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 2

  43. Plasma HS-CRP levels

    Plasma HS-CRP levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 5

  44. Plasma HS-CRP levels

    Plasma HS-CRP levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 8

  45. Plasma HS-CRP levels

    Plasma HS-CRP levels: as a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Plasma testing evaluates for evidence of inflammation in the body.

    Time frame: Week 12

  46. Morning salivary cortisol levels

    Morning salivary cortisol levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Morning salivary cortisol levels evaluate changes in the body's waking hormone responses, which indicate changes in nervous system activation in response to the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  47. Morning salivary cortisol levels

    Morning salivary cortisol levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Morning salivary cortisol levels evaluate changes in the body's waking hormone responses, which indicate changes in nervous system activation in response to the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 2

  48. Morning salivary cortisol levels

    Morning salivary cortisol levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Morning salivary cortisol levels evaluate changes in the body's waking hormone responses, which indicate changes in nervous system activation in response to the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 5

  49. Morning salivary cortisol levels

    Morning salivary cortisol levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Morning salivary cortisol levels evaluate changes in the body's waking hormone responses, which indicate changes in nervous system activation in response to the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 8

  50. Morning salivary cortisol levels

    Morning salivary cortisol levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation. Morning salivary cortisol levels evaluate changes in the body's waking hormone responses, which indicate changes in nervous system activation in response to the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 12

  51. End-tidal CO2 levels

    End-tidal CO2 levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation measured using a capnograph. Patients with post-COVID dysautonomia will be hypocapnic (low end-tidal CO2). High or low levels of end-tidal CO2 can drive symptoms in patients.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

  52. End-tidal CO2 levels

    End-tidal CO2 levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation measured using a capnograph. Patients with post-COVID dysautonomia will be hypocapnic (low end-tidal CO2). High or low levels of end-tidal CO2 can drive symptoms in patients.

    Time frame: Week 2

  53. End-tidal CO2 levels

    End-tidal CO2 levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation measured using a capnograph. Patients with post-COVID dysautonomia will be hypocapnic (low end-tidal CO2). High or low levels of end-tidal CO2 can drive symptoms in patients.

    Time frame: Week 5

  54. End-tidal CO2 levels

    End-tidal CO2 levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation measured using a capnograph. Patients with post-COVID dysautonomia will be hypocapnic (low end-tidal CO2). High or low levels of end-tidal CO2 can drive symptoms in patients.

    Time frame: Week 8

  55. End-tidal CO2 levels

    End-tidal CO2 levels: As a metric of sympathetic nervous system activation measured using a capnograph. Patients with post-COVID dysautonomia will be hypocapnic (low end-tidal CO2). High or low levels of end-tidal CO2 can drive symptoms in patients.

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Abilities Research Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · May 17, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05630040
Lead sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Responsible party
David Putrino (Director of Rehabilitation Innovation, Mount Sinai Health System Associate Professor of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2022
Start date
Nov 11, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2024
Completion
Oct 3, 2024
Last update
Nov 8, 2024

Study contacts

David Putrino, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion