ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05624931Updated Jul 17, 2026

Reducing Psychological Barriers to PrEP Persistence Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Cape Town, South Africa

An interventional study of Brief CBT-Based Intervention and Enhanced Treatment as Usual in Depression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Pregnancy Related, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 15 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pregnant women in South Africa (SA) are at high risk of HIV acquisition. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use during pregnancy is both safe and effective in preventing HIV. However, posttraumatic stress (associated with intimate partner violence and/or other traumas) and depression negatively impact PrEP adherence among women in SA. Addressing posttraumatic stress and depression will likely improve PrEP adherence and persistence (i.e., sustained PrEP adherence over time) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, which are periods of dramatically increased HIV risk. The overarching goal of this proposal is to develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioral intervention that targets common underlying factors of posttraumatic stress and depression to improve PrEP adherence and persistence during pregnancy and the postpartum transition. The specific aims of the project are to (1) explore the mechanisms by which posttraumatic stress and depression impact PrEP adherence and persistence during pregnancy via qualitative interviews; (2) develop a brief PrEP adherence and persistence intervention (\~4 sessions) that reduces the negative impact of psychological mechanisms common to posttraumatic stress and depression on PrEP use, and builds behavioral skills to improve self-care; and (3) evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and signals of preliminary efficacy of the intervention, which will be integrated into antenatal care, in a pilot randomized controlled trial. All data will be collected in the Midwife Obstetrics Unit (MOU) in Gugulethu, a peri-urban settlement and former township community outside of Cape Town, SA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  • Pregnancy Related
  • Medication Adherence

Keywords

  • HIV, pregnancy, PrEP
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 118 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston University Charles River Campus is the lead sponsor of 159 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • For participants across all three aims are:

    • Female sex
    • Aged 15+
    • Pregnant and presenting antenatal care at the Gugulethu MOU
    • -negative
    • Recent PrEP initiation (\<1 month ago) or PrEP adherence challenges, either documented (>2 weeks late to pick up PrEP refill) or self-reported
    • Moderate to severe symptoms of posttraumatic stress and/or depression (defined as a score of ≥31 on PTSD Checklist for (PCL-5) and/or a score of ≥13 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Cutoff scores may be adjusted by 3-5 points to facilitate recruitment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclusion criteria with respect to parity or gravidity.

    • Participants who are unable to provide or assent in English or Xhosa
    • Have a significant psychiatric illness (e.g., active psychotic disorder or untreated bipolar disorder) that could interfere with participation will be excluded. Positive symptoms of active psychosis or mania will be assessed by the research assistants. They will be trained to identify delusions, hallucinations, disorganized or pressured speech, flight of ideas, and grandiosity as they speak to potential participants.
    • Potential participants will also be asked if they have any health conditions that make it difficult for them to travel to the clinic.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
118 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Condition: Brief CBT-Based Intervention

    This group (n=30) will be guided through an adaptation of Life Steps, a single-session, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based medication adherence intervention that has been used to increase PrEP adherence. Participants will also receive four additional intervention sessions.

    Behavioral: Brief CBT-Based Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Control Condition: Enhanced Treatment as Usual

    Participants randomized to the control condition (n= 30) will receive enhanced treated as usual.

    Other: Enhanced Treatment as Usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralBrief CBT-Based Intervention

    Aims 1 (n=30) and 2 (n=18) will inform the Aim 3 intervention. We anticipate that the intervention will be comprised of four treatment sessions. These sessions will likely target two pathways to PrEP adherence and persistence: (1) decreased withdrawal and avoidance and (2) behavioral skill building to increase self-care/health behaviors. To decrease withdrawal and avoidance, we will likely include CBT-based exercises that improve distress tolerance and coping. To help participants build new behavioral skills, we will likely incorporate behavioral activation and problem-solving. Behavioral activation is a CBT strategy that promotes scheduling activities that align with an individual's values, which will also break maladaptive patterns of withdrawal and avoidance. Problem-solving is an empirically-supported treatment for depression; training patients to problem-solve adaptively will help them "approach" PrEP use by navigating barriers.

  • OtherEnhanced Treatment as Usual

    This is the control intervention. Participants will receive antenatal care as usual, which is monthly visits to the MOU, information about using PrEP during pregnancy (information sheet or pamphlet), and a psychological services referral.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Intervention

    Feasibility will be assessed by (1) interventionist fidelity to the protocol, (2) treatment session attendance, and (3) participant retention at 3-months postpartum (T3). Feasibility will be demonstrated if at least (1) 80% of the reviewed sessions addressed 90% of the key session components, (2) 75% of the participants (at least 23 of 30) attended at least two of the four treatment sessions; and (3) 60% of the participants (at least 18 of 30) completed the three-month postpartum assessment (T3). To measure fidelity, we will review 20% of the session audio-recordings randomly selected from each of the four sessions and determine whether key session components were addressed.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline

  2. Acceptability

    Acceptability will be assessed (1) in the qualitative exit interviews and (2) with the brief acceptability questionnaire completed after each intervention session. Acceptability data from the qualitative exit interviews will be described, and the intervention will be deemed acceptable if at least 75% of the participants rate three or more of the items on the acceptability questionnaires with "high satisfaction" (4 or 5 on the Likert-style scale).

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. PrEP Adherence

    PrEP adherence during the previous week will be assessed at the end of the intervention/2 months post-baseline (T2) and at 3-months postpartum (T3) via an adapted version of the Wilson three-item self-report adherence scale, which includes (1) number of missed doses, (2) the percentage of time that PrEP was taken as prescribed, and (3) a rating of one's ability to take PrEP.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline and at 3 months postpartum

  2. PrEP Persistence

    PrEP persistence at T2 and T3 will be determined via dried blood spot (DBS) testing and defined as tenofovir- diphosphate (TVF-DP) concentrations of at least 650 fmol/punch for pregnant women and 1050 fmol/punch for postpartum women, which are indicative of 7 doses per week over a period of up to eight weeks.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline and at 3 months postpartum

  3. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

    Changes in PTSD symptom severity from baseline will be measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). A cutoff score of ≥31 will be used to determine moderate or severe PTSD symptoms.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline and at 3 months postpartum

  4. Depression

    Changes in depression from baseline will be measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scales. A cutoff score of ≥13 will be used to determine moderate or severe depression symptoms.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at 2 months post-baseline and at 3 months postpartum

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Boston University
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • Gugulethu Midwife Obstetric Unit (MOU)
    Cape Town, Western Cape 8001, South Africa
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 22 months after the start.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2022
First posted
Nov 22, 2022
StartActual
Apr 17, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05624931
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2022
Start date
Apr 17, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Study contacts

Amelia M Stanton, PhD
Contact
stantona@bu.edu
617-353-2580
Amelia Stanton, PhD
principal investigator · Boston University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion