ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05619653MYOFLAME-19Updated Dec 9, 2025

Myocardial Protection in Patients With Post-acute Inflammatory Cardiac Involvement Due to COVID-19

A Phase 3 interventional study of Prednisolone and Losartan in COVID-19 Associated Cardiac Involvement, Remodeling, Left Ventricle and Remodeling, Vascular, sponsored by Valentina Puentmann. Active, not recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-09.

Sponsored by Valentina Puentmann · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
279
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Long COVID or Postacute sequelae of COVID-19 infection (PASC) are increasingly recognised complications, defined by lingering symptoms, not present prior to the infection, typically persisting for more than 4 weeks. Cardiac symptoms due to post-acute inflammatory cardiac involvement affect a broad segment of people, who were previously well and may have had only mild acute illness (PASC-cardiovascular syndrome, PASC-CVS). Symptoms may be contiguous with the acute illness, however, more commonly they occur after a delay. Symptoms related to the cardiovascular system include exertional dyspnoea, exercise intolerance chest tightness, pulling or burning chest pain, and palpitations (POTS, exertional tachycardia).

Pathophysiologically, Long COVID relates to small vessel disease (endothelial dysfunction) vascular dysfunction and consequent tissue organ hypoperfusion due to ongoing immune dysregulation. Active organs with high oxygen dependency are most affected (heart, brain, kidneys, muscles, etc.). Thus, cardiac symptoms are often accompanied by manifestations of other organ systems, including fatigue, brain fog, kidney problems, myalgias, skin and joint manifestations, etc, now commonly referred to as the Long COVID or PASC syndrome.

Phenotypically, PostCOVID Heart involvement is characterised by chronic perivascular and myopericardial inflammation. We and others have shown changes using sensitive cardiac MRI imaging that relate to cardiac symptoms (Puntmann et al, Nature Medicine 2022; Puntmann et al, JAMA Cardiol 2020; Summary of studies included in 2022 ACC PostCOVID Expert Consensus Taskforce Development Statement, JACC 2022, references below).

Early intervention with immunosuppression and antiremodelling therapy may reduce symptoms and development of myocardial impairment, by minimising the disease activity and inducing disease remission. Low-dose maintenance therapy may help to maintain the disease activity at the lowest possible level. The benefits of early initiations of antiremodelling therapy to reduce symptoms of exercise intolerance are well recognised, but not commonly employed outside the classical cardiology contexts, such as heart failure or hypertension. As most patients with inflammatory heart disease only have mild or no structural abnormalities, they are left untreated (standard of care).

The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of a combined immunosuppressive / antiremodelling therapy in patients with PASC symptoms and inflammatory cardiac involvement determined by CMR, to reduce the symptoms and inflammatory myocardial injury and thereby stop the progression to reduced LVEF, HF and death.

Read the detailed description

Patients with documented COVID-19 infection, experiencing new cardiac symptoms in the aftermath of COVID-19 infection, fulfilling predefined CMR criteria for PostCOVID myocardial involvement and no previously known or demonstrable cardiovascular disease will be randomised to 16-week treatment with Losartan/Prednisolon or placebo. All imaging is conducted with fidelity to standardised imaging protocol. All images are analysed in a dedicated core-lab to confirm eligibility for inclusion. Investigators and participants remain blinded to group allocation and imaging results.

The primary outcome is a change in LVEF from the baseline to 16 weeks measured by MRI.

Secondary outcomes include changes in clinical symptom scores, imaging parameters, CPET (VO2max), as well as outcomes after 1 years time.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19 Associated Cardiac Involvement
  • Remodeling, Left Ventricle
  • Remodeling, Vascular
  • Left Ventricular Dysfunction
  • Exercise Intolerance
  • Vascular Inflammation
  • Microvascular Angina
  • Long COVID
  • Myocarditis, Pericarditis

Keywords

  • long COVID
  • postCOVID
  • endothelial dysfunction
  • myocarditis
03

In context

Ventricular Remodeling

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Remodeling; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 279 is above the median of 81 across 72 interventional studies indexed under Ventricular Remodeling.

Browse Ventricular Remodeling studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Valentina Puentmann as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with documented recent COVID19 infection (>4 weeks)
  • PASC Syndrome, defined by persistence or new symptoms, not present prior to the infection.
  • CMR evidence of inflammatory cardiac involvement at BL by any of the following criteria:
  • Increased native T1≥ 1130 ms at 3.0 Tesla (or 1030 ms at 1.5 Tesla) and/or;
  • Increased native T2 ≥39.5 ms at 3.0 Tesla (or 49.5 at 1.5 Tesla) and/or
  • present non-ischaemic myopericardial LGE and/or;
  • ≥45 - ≤50%.
  • Willingness to comply with the study procedures and study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe acute COVID illness requiring hospitalisation
  • Known allergy to or intolerance of the study medications
  • Symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg), not reversible with oral hydration
  • Any previous or current use of ACE inhibitors, AR Blockers
  • Any previous oral prednisolone, or any other or biological treatment (within prior 10 weeks)
  • History or CMR evidence of pre-existing significant heart disease, including:

    1. Known cardiac impairment with ≤44%
    2. Congestive heart failure ( III-IV)
    3. Active heart failure treatment
    4. Established ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease and/or cerebrovascular disease
    5. Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation or significant heart rhythm abnormalities
    6. Congenital or valvular heart disease (moderate or severe)
    7. Specific cardiomyopathy (hypertrophic, hypertensive heart disease, amyloidosis, previous myocarditis, non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, non-compaction cardiomyopathy, etc).
  • Known significant concomitant diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and of the study outcome (e.g. diabetes, lung or hepatic disease, epilepsy, psychiatric disorders, renal disease with a current estimated \<30 mL/min/1.73 m² using MDRD formula, chronic systemic infection or immunocompromise)
  • Exceeding scanner bore and table-holding capacity: Weight >125 kg, > 35 kg/m2
  • to contrast-enhanced CMR imaging, e.g.

    1. MR-unsafe implantable device
    2. known allergy to gadolinium-based contrast agent (CBGA)
  • For female participants:

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
    2. Persons of not willing to use effective (defined as PEARL index \<1 - e.g. contraceptive pill, IUD)
  • Known alcohol, drug or chemical abuse
  • Patients currently participating in an study or for whom participation is planned.
  • Unable to provide written

Patients with CMR evidence of structural heart disease or incidental heart rhythm abnormalities will be advised to see their own doctor for further investigation.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
279 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Verum

    Prednisolone and Losartan

    Drug: Prednisolone · Drug: Losartan

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo 1 and Placebo 2

    Drug: Prednisolone · Drug: Losartan

Interventions

  • randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 1:1 randomisation

  • randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 1:1 randomisation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Left ventricular ejection fraction

    absolute change of LVEF from baseline

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scar burden by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)

    mean LGE extent (%) and change thereof from baseline

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Achieved Work rate, VO2max, VCO2 max, RER, AT and Slope and change thereof compared to baseline

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  3. Mean T1 and T2 mapping

    Mean T1 and T2 mapping values (ms) and absolute change thereof compared to baseline

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  4. LV Volume (ml/m2) and LV mass (g/m2)

    Average LV Volume (ml/m2) and average LV mass (g/m2) and change there of measures from baseline

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  5. LV strain %

    absolute change of measures from baseline

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  6. Aortic stiffness (PWV)

    absolute change of measures from baseline

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  7. Aortic wall imaging (LGE)

    absolute change of measures from baseline

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  8. Average Symptom Score (Modified CCS, NYHA, MRC Dyspnea Score, LC Questionnaire (Sudre et al, NM 2020)

    change thereof compared to baseline

    Time frame: at all available time points compared to baseline

  9. HF and MACE Endpoints

    proportion of patients with endpoints

    Time frame: 1 year

  10. Quality of Life assessment

    Quality of Life assessment (RAND 36-Item health survey V2.0)

    Time frame: at all available time points compared to baseline

  11. Compliance and Tolerance of Therapy

    Compliance and Tolerance of Therapy

    Time frame: at all available time points compared to baseline

  12. Assessment of Treatment Response

    Number of responders achieving partial or full recovery by imaging markers

    Time frame: 16 weeks

07

Study locations

5 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Puntmann VO, Martin S, Shchendrygina A, Hoffmann J, Ka MM, Giokoglu E, Vanchin B, Holm N, Karyou A, Laux GS, Arendt C, De Leuw P, Zacharowski K, Khodamoradi Y, Vehreschild MJGT, Rohde G, Zeiher AM, Vogl TJ, Schwenke C, Nagel E. Long-term cardiac pathology in individuals with mild initial COVID-19 illness. Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2117-2123. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02000-0. Epub 2022 Sep 5. PubMed 36064600 ↗
  • Writing Committee; Gluckman TJ, Bhave NM, Allen LA, Chung EH, Spatz ES, Ammirati E, Baggish AL, Bozkurt B, Cornwell WK 3rd, Harmon KG, Kim JH, Lala A, Levine BD, Martinez MW, Onuma O, Phelan D, Puntmann VO, Rajpal S, Taub PR, Verma AK. 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Cardiovascular Sequelae of COVID-19 in Adults: Myocarditis and Other Myocardial Involvement, Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, and Return to Play: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1717-1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Mar 16. No abstract available. PubMed 35307156 ↗
  • Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, Wieters I, Fahim M, Arendt C, Hoffmann J, Shchendrygina A, Escher F, Vasa-Nicotera M, Zeiher AM, Vehreschild M, Nagel E. Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1265-1273. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3557. PubMed 32730619 ↗
  • Puntmann VO, Beitzke D, Kammerlander A, Voges I, Gabbert DD, Doerr M, Chamling B, Bozkurt B, Kaski JC, Spatz E, Herrmann E, Rohde G, DeLeuw P, Taylor L, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Harz C, Santiuste M, Schoeckel L, Hirayama J, Taylor PC, Berry C, Nagel E. Design and rationale of MYOFLAME-19 randomised controlled trial: MYOcardial protection to reduce post-COVID inFLAMmatory heart disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance Endpoints. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Summer;27(1):101121. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101121. Epub 2024 Oct 29. PubMed 39481808 ↗
  • Puntmann VO, Nagel E, Beitzke D, Kammerlander A, Voges I, Doerr M, Chamling B, Bozkurt B, Kaski JC, Spatz E, Herrmann E, Rohde G, DeLeuw P, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Eckhardt S, Taylor PC, Berry C. Losartan and prednisolone for post-COVID syndrome and cardiac inflammation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nat Commun. 2026 Jul 30;17(1):7599. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-75991-w. PubMed 42533000 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05619653
Lead sponsor
Valentina Puentmann
Collaborators
Bayer, Alcedis GmbH
Responsible party
Valentina Puentmann (Principal Investigator, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2022
Start date
Dec 12, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 8, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 9, 2025

Study contacts

Valentina Puntmann, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Goethe University Frankfurt
Eike Nagel, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Goethe University Frankfurt

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Prednisolone · Losartan

Start the discussion