ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05585411Updated Jan 5, 2026

PReventive Effect Of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus righT vEntricular paCing on All Cause deaTh, Heart Failure Progression, and Ventricular dysSYNChrony in Patients With Substantial Ventricular Pacing (PROTECT-SYNC): Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Left bundle branch area pacing and Right ventricular pacing in Bradyarrhythmia, Atrioventricular Block and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, sponsored by Yonsei University. Recruiting at 8 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-05.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PROTECT-SYNC study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 7 medical centers across Republic of Korea will enroll 450 patients during 2 years of enrollment period, and followed for 2 years of follow-up period. The purpose of this study to compare the clinical outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) compared to Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) in bradyarrhythmia patients who require high burden of ventricular pacing (>40%).

Read the detailed description

PROTECT-SYNC study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that is designed to assess whether LBBAP may reduce the risk of composite primary endpoint including all cause mortalty, HF hospitalization and/or urgent HF related visit, occurrence of pacing induced CMP, and CRT-upgrade event, compared to RVP in patients who require substantial (>40%) ventricular pacing. Patients who require pacemaker and substantial (>40%) ventricular pacing will be randomized to LBBAP or RVP group, and a total of 7 medical centers across Republic of Korea will enroll 450 patients during 2 years of enrollment period, and followed for 2 years of follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bradyarrhythmia
  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Keywords

  • Left Bundle Branch Area pacing
  • Right Ventricular Pacing
  • Heart Failure
  • Atrioventricular block
03

In context

Bradycardia

317 studies on the registry are indexed under Bradycardia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 100 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Bradycardia.

Browse Bradycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,418 studies on the registry; 241 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. At least 19 years old and willing and capable to give
  2. Patients who is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations.

3 Scheduled to receive a pacemaker implant 4. Substantial percentage of V pacing rate (>40%) is anticipated

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Incapacitated or unable to read or write
  2. Patient who is an indication of ICD or CRT
  3. History of prosthetic valve surgery on tricuspid valve
  4. Prior myocardial infarction including ventricular septum
  5. \< 12 months due to any condition
  6. Unavailable for at least 24 months of follow-up visits
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of signing consent
  8. Prior Heart transplant surgery
  9. Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava (PLSVC)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
450 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LBBAP group

    In this arm, a left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) lead will be attempted to be placed.

    Procedure: Left bundle branch area pacing

  • Active comparator
    RVP group

    In this arm, a Right ventricular pacing (RVP) lead will be attempted to be placed.

    Procedure: Right ventricular pacing

Interventions

  • ProcedureLeft bundle branch area pacing

    LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing. LBB capture is defined if fulfilling criterion 1 and at least one in criteria 2. 1. RBBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing 2. One of the following should be met: 1. Abrupt shortening of Stim-LVAT (stimulus to peak of the R wave in V6 \[LV activation time\]) of \>10ms during increasing output 2. Short and constant stim-LVAT and the shortest stim-LVAT \<75ms in non-LBBB and \<85ms in LBBB 3. Programmed stimulation by pacing lead changes QRS morphology from nonselective LBB to LV septal capture 4. LBB potential (LBB-V interval of 15 to 35ms) 5. Transition from nonselective LBB capture to selective LBB capture at near threshold outputs If criterion 1 is fulfilled but none in criteria 2 is met, the procedure is considered to be deep septal pacing (DSP).

  • ProcedureRight ventricular pacing

    Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. Implantation of a RV pacing lead (apex or septum of right ventricle) will be attempted using the standard-of-care technique first

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, occurrence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy

    All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Heart failure hospitalization: An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy. Occurrence of Pacing induced cardiomyopathy : LVEF \<50% and absolute LVEF decline ≥10% or increase in LVESV ≥15% Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. all cause mortality

    All cause deaths including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths.

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

  2. Cardiovascular mortality

    Cardiovascular death

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

  3. Heart failure hospitalization

    An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy.

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

  4. success rate of LBBAP implantation

    LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing.

    Time frame: during 3days after pacemaker implantation

  5. LBBAP related complications

    Loss of lead function or need for lead revision, extraction, replacement for any reason

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

  6. LBB capture failure

    failed LBB capture, confirmed by investigator

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

  7. Short-term procedure and Device related complications

    composite of device and procedure related complications until 7 days after procedure

    Time frame: during 1wk after pacemaker implantation

  8. Long-term procedure and Device related complications

    composite of device and procedure related complications after 7 days after procedure

    Time frame: during 1wk after pacemaker implantation

  9. Rate of LV systolic dysfunction

    LVEF \<50% and absolute reduction in LVEF \>10%, and/or an increase in LVESV ≥15%.

    Time frame: 6month and 2yr after pacemaker implantation

  10. Changes in cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters

    (VO2 peak, Exercise intensity, Peak Respiratory Exchange Ratio (Peak RER), Exercise time, age predicted aerobic capacity, VE/VCO2 slope, Lactate threshold, Max predicted HR, Max HR / Max predicted HR, presence of ST change , AF at Baseline, Incident AF during exercise

    Time frame: 6month and 2yr after pacemaker implantation

  11. Incidental atrial fibrillation

    Newly developed atrial fibrillation in patients without documented atrial fibrillation

    Time frame: during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

07

Study locations

7 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006. PubMed 19695453 ↗
  • Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 15;29(4):744-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4. PubMed 9091519 ↗
  • Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOde Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2. PubMed 12782566 ↗
  • Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, Kutalek SP, Sharma A; Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3115-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3115. PubMed 12495391 ↗
  • Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10. PubMed 29535066 ↗
  • Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available. PubMed 30586772 ↗
  • Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available. PubMed 34455430 ↗
  • Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Mao G, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019 Jan;105(2):137-143. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313415. Epub 2018 Aug 9. PubMed 30093543 ↗
  • Vijayaraman P, Ponnusamy S, Cano O, Sharma PS, Naperkowski A, Subsposh FA, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Dal Forno AR, Young W, Nanda S, Beer D, Herweg B, Jastrzebski M. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28. PubMed 33602393 ↗
  • Sharma PS, Patel NR, Ravi V, Zalavadia DV, Dommaraju S, Garg V, Larsen TR, Naperkowski AM, Wasserlauf J, Krishnan K, Young W, Pokharel P, Oren JW, Storm RH, Trohman RG, Huang HD, Subzposh FA, Vijayaraman P. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 3. PubMed 34481985 ↗
  • Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, Chung ES, Niazi I, Sherfesee L, Shinn T, Sutton MS; Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial Investigators. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1585-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356. PubMed 23614585 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05585411
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2022
Start date
Nov 1, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 5, 2026

Study contacts

TaeHoon Kim
Contact
thkimcardio@yuhs.ac
+82 02-2228-8467
TaeHoon Kim
principal investigator · Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion