CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05568745RUBAPRO2Updated Jan 25, 2023

Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of PROM (RUBAPRO2)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Balloon for cervical ripening (Teleflex French Dufour catheter CH20 reference 174000) and Oxytocin in Induction of Labor, Cervical Ripening and Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Recruiting at 5 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
520
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term complicates 6 to 22% of singleton pregnancies. Spontaneous labour occurs in 60-67% of these patients within 24h. If no effective uterine contraction occurs, induction of labour (IOL) is the strategy recommended by the French as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The optimal strategy for IOL in case of PROM with an unfavourable cervix remains unknown and none of the studies conducted in nulliparous women showed the superiority of one induction method over another.

In the current project, we aimed to determine (1) if IOL with association of balloon catheter and oxytocin after 6 hours could increase the rate of delivery \< 24h versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2h) in case of PROM at term in nulliparous women and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT survey assessed before hospital discharge.

Read the detailed description

Context : Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term complicates 6 to 22% of singleton pregnancies. Spontaneous labour occurs in 60-67% of these patients within 24hours. If no effective uterine contraction occurs, induction of labour (IOL) is the strategy recommended by the French as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The optimal strategy for IOL in case of PROM with an unfavourable cervix remains unknown and none of the studies conducted in nulliparous women showed the superiority of one induction method over another1. Oral misoprostol (ProstaglandinE1, PGE1) usually demonstrated the lowest rate of c-section after IOL in general population and balloon catheter was associated with the lowest rate of uterine hyperstimulation. Recently, a comparison 1 to 1 between these two methods was conducted in singletons with comparable results. Despite recent studies demonstrating no higher risk of infectious complications using mechanical device in the context of PROM, only prostaglandins and oxytocin are usually recommended. Recently, Devillard et al. demonstrated that the combination of balloon catheter plus oxytocin systematically infused after 6 hours increased the rate of delivery \<24h compared to dinoprostone vaginal insert group (90% versus 57.5% respectively) and decreased the time between induction and delivery in nulliparous group (17.0hours versus 26.5hours).

In the current project, we aimed to determine (1) if IOL with association of balloon catheter and oxytocin after 6 hours could increase the rate of delivery \< 24hours versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2h) in case of PROM at term in nulliparous women and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT (EXperience of Induction Tool) survey assessed before hospital discharge.

We hypothesized that the rate of delivery \< 24hours will be 15% higher in the group induced with balloon + oxytocin (estimated around 85 %) compared to the misoprostol group (estimated around 70 %). Patient satisfaction concerning experience of IOL will be assessed using a validated survey- the EXperience of Induction Tool (EXIT) - translated in French language (Beckman et al., 2017). We aimed to demonstrate a difference greater than an effect-size of 0.25.

Objectives: The main objective is to demonstrate higher rate of vaginal birth \<24hours by insertion of a balloon catheter + oxytocin after 6hours, versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2hours) in case of unfavorable cervix beyond 12 hours of PROM in nulliparous and to compare patient satisfaction using EXIT survey translated in French language before hospital discharge.

The secondary objectives are:

  • To compare the rate of caesarean sections in the two groups.
  • To compare the safety related to women of both induction methods in terms of maternal morbidities, uterine hyperstimulation, maternal infections and other reported adverse events (AEs).
  • To compare the safety related to neonates of both induction methods in terms of neonatal morbidities, neonatal infections and other reported AEs.

Study type: Multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label therapeutic trial with two parallel arms.

Number of centers: 5

Study Description:

The study group is the balloon catheter group with addition of oxytocin as early as 6h after the catheter insertion. After 12 hours of balloon insertion, induction of labour is continued by oxytocin alone. The control group corresponds to induction with misoprostol 25µg given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose is delivered every 2 hours until labour onset with a maximum of 8 administrations. Oxytocin can be started at least 4 hours after the last misoprostol administration.

Patients will be assigned by random allocation on a 1:1 basis in permuted blocks to either treatment group or control group using a dedicated, password-protected, SSL-encrypted website. To minimize the risk of imbalance between the study groups, the randomization will be stratified by trial site.

Primary endpoint: Hierarchical primary endpoint: (1) Proportion of patients vaginally delivered \<24h and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT survey assessed before hospital discharge.

Number of patients: 520

02

Conditions studied

  • Induction of Labor
  • Cervical Ripening
  • Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes
  • Nulliparous

Keywords

  • premature rupture of membranes
  • labour induction
  • unfavourable cervix
  • cervical ripening balloon
  • pharmacological cervical ripening
  • misoprostol
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 520 is above the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 841 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years old,
  • Pregnant, Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
  • Singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation
  • Nulliparous
  • PROM without labour beyond 12 hours
  • Unfavourable cervix (Bischop score \< 6)
  • Able to give her informed consent
  • Ability to comply with the requirement of the study
  • Covered by the French Social Security welfare system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to understand French language
  • Contraindication for vaginal delivery
  • Loss of meconium amniotic fluid (LA)
  • Temperature > 38.2°C
  • Intrauterine infection
  • IUGR with Doppler anomaly
  • Fetus with expected polymalformative syndrome
  • Scarred womb
  • Suspicion of genital herpes
  • Known HIV seropositivity
  • Placenta praevia
  • Fetal death
  • Abnormal FHR (Fetal Heart Rate)
  • Contraindication to misoprostol:

    • Allergy or hypersensibility
    • Suspicion or confirmation of a scarred uterus following past surgical intervention
    • Renal insufficiency
    • Malformation of the uterus
  • Contraindication to balloon:

    • Vasa praevia, placenta praevia
    • Invasive cervical cancer
  • Contraindication to oxytocin

    • Allergy or hypersensibility
    • Dystocia
    • Fragility or excessive distension of the uterus
    • Uterine hypertonia or fetal distress when delivery is not imminent
    • Cardiovascular disorders and severe preeclampsia
    • Predisposition to amniotic embolism (in utero fetal demise, abruption).
  • Patient subject to a legal protection order (curatorship or tutorship)
  • Refusal to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
520 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Balloon+oxytocin

    Mecanical cervical ripening will be done by transcervical balloon (Teleflex French Dufour catheter CH20 reference 174000). Oxytocin will be started 6 hours after balloon insertion. At H12 balloon will be removed and induction continued by oxytocin alone.

    Device: Balloon for cervical ripening (Teleflex French Dufour catheter CH20 reference 174000) · Drug: Oxytocin

  • Active comparator
    Oral misoprostol

    Patients will receive misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations. (Oxytocin can be started at least 4 hours after the last misoprostol administration if patient remains not in labour.)

    Drug: Misoprostol Oral Tablet

Interventions

  • DeviceBalloon for cervical ripening (Teleflex French Dufour catheter CH20 reference 174000)

    Balloon catheter is inserted by a resident or a physician under visual control. The expected volume injected in the balloon probe is 60 mL. No traction is performed on the catheter. The catheter is left in place for a maximum of 12 hours.

  • DrugOxytocin

    Intravenous oxytocin addition (preceded or followed by epidural analgesia on patient's request) will be performed 6 hours after insertion of balloon catheter. Oxytocin is administered as an intravenous infusion (5 IU of oxytocin in 49 mL of 5% glucose\*) at the lowest possible dose with the aim of achieving a maximum of three to four contractions per ten minutes. After appropriate uterine activity has been achieved, the rate of the oxytocin infusion is decreased or stopped.

  • DrugMisoprostol Oral Tablet

    Patients will receive misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vaginal delivery <24hours

    Proportion of patients vaginally delivered \<24hours (in %)

    Time frame: at birth

  2. Patient satisfaction

    Satisfaction of women concerning method of induction by the EXperience of Induction Tool (EXIT) validated in french language.

    Time frame: up to 4 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration from rupture to beginning of induction

    in hours

    Time frame: at birth

  2. Duration between IOL and delivery

    in hours

    Time frame: at birth

  3. Duration of balloon exposure or misoprostol exposure

    in hours

    Time frame: at birth

  4. Misoprostol received

    Total dose of misoprostol received (in µg)

    Time frame: at birth

  5. Bishop score on balloon removal

    (comprised between 0 and 13)

    Time frame: at birth

  6. Balloon in place (yes/no)

    Rate of balloon in place (%) at 12 hours after the beginning of induction

    Time frame: at birth

  7. Duration between induction and full cervical dilatation

    Duration (in hours)

    Time frame: at birth

  8. Mode of delivery

    Rate in %

    Time frame: at birth

  9. Post-partum hemorrhage

    Rate in %

    Time frame: up to 4 days

  10. Rate of fever

    Rate in %

    Time frame: during labor

  11. Rate of patients experiencing episode(s) of uterine hyperstimulation

    Rate of patients experiencing episode(s) of uterine hyperstimulation (%) during labour (defined by the necessity to interrupt oxytocin and/or to inject pharmacological agents in the context of excessive number of contractions with or without abnormal FHR),

    Time frame: during labor

  12. Endometritis

    Rate of endometritis in %

    Time frame: up to 4 days

  13. Duration of hospital stay

    Duration (in days)

    Time frame: up to 4 days

  14. Birth weight of the newborn

    in grammes

    Time frame: at birth

  15. Apgar score < 7

    Neonatal endpoint (yes/no)

    Time frame: 5min after birth

  16. pH umbilical artery

    pH at the umbilical artery

    Time frame: at birth

  17. Base defect and lactate (umbilical artery)

    mmol/L

    Time frame: at birth

  18. Neonatal tranfer

    Rate of neonatal transfer to intensive care unit or neonatology unit

    Time frame: up to 4 days

  19. maternal-fetal infection

    Rate of maternal-fetal infection in %

    Time frame: up to 4 days

07

Study locations

1 of 5 sites recruiting
  • CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
    Recruiting
  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris- CHU Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Saint Etienne
    Saint-Étienne, 42270, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, 31059, France
    Not yet recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05568745
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 25, 2023

Study contacts

Lise LACLAUTRE
Contact
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
+33473754963
Denis Gallot
principal investigator · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion