ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05543720Updated Jun 1, 2026

Evaluation of Nurse-led Integrated Care of Complex Patients Facilitated By Telemonitoring: The SMaRT Study

An interventional study of Medly in Heart Failure,Congestive, Mental Health (Depression) and Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Canada, 3 out of 4 Canadians aged 65 and older have at least one chronic condition, while 1 in 4 seniors reported having three or more. Caring for complex patients who usually have multiple chronic conditions (MCC) is one of the biggest challenges facing our healthcare system. For patients, the lack of coordination and continuity of care as they transfer between healthcare settings and healthcare providers (HCPs) often results in a higher risk of readmission, suboptimal and fragmented care plans, delays in required medical intervention, inadequate self-care, and confusion on whom they should contact when they have questions. For the patient's care team, they often have no indication how patients are doing between clinic visits unless the patient can provide a log of their home measurements (e.g., blood pressure). Therefore, they are unable to detect and intervene if their patient's health is worsening between visits.

In order to address this increasing need to bridge the current gap in clinical management and self-care of complex patients during their transition from healthcare settings to home care, our team aims to design, implement and evaluate the SMaRT (Safe, Managed, and Responsive Transitions) Clinic, a nurse-led integrated care model facilitated by telemonitoring (TM). Specifically, the SMaRT Clinics aim to meaningfully introduce a nurse (or nurse practitioner) role to improve clinical coordination across patient care teams and reinforce proper self-care education through the use of telemonitoring. This project will be conducted in two phases across four years; Phase I: Design and Development, and Phase II: Implementation and Effectiveness Evaluation. Phase II research activities include enrolling 350 patients with complex chronic conditions in the SMaRT clinics across four study sites. The implementation and effectiveness of the SMaRT clinics will be evaluated through a mix of semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observation, patient questionnaires, and analyses of health utilization outcomes using propensity-matched controls from the ICES provincial database.

Read the detailed description

The overall objective of this study is to design, implement, and evaluate SMaRT Clinics at four hospitals across Ontario serving complex patients transitioning home from the hospital in urban, suburban and rural settings. Instead of developing new technology for the nurse-led SMaRT Clinic, an existing validated TM system that is able to monitor patients with multiple chronic conditions, named Medly, was chosen. Medly was developed at eHealth Innovation (now called the Centre for Digital Therapeutics), UHN and was designed to monitor a medley of chronic conditions, and has been evaluated in trials for single chronic conditions and multiple chronic conditions. For the purposes of this trial, Medly will enable the TM of heart failure, COPD, diabetes, hypertension, and depression.

The patient-facing technology includes the Medly smartphone application (app). The app enables patients to complete symptom surveys and record physiological measures using peripheral devices relevant to their chronic condition (e.g., weight scale, blood pressure monitor, and/or blood glucose monitoring). Designed as a modular app, features and parameters to be monitored can be added and removed, and target values for each parameter (e.g. blood pressure) can be individualized according to the needs of each patient. The inputted measures are processed by an embedded rules-based algorithm (customized to the patient by the setting of target thresholds) which triggers appropriate self-care messages being displayed to the patient within the app (e.g., instructing patients to take their prescribed medication, informing patients to contact their care team, etc.). Other features of the Medly app include the ability to view a historical record of their inputted readings, view graphical trends of blood glucose and blood pressure values, and to assist with adherence, an automated phone call to remind patients if they have not yet taken their readings by the appropriate time for their condition.

The clinician-facing technology includes the Medly dashboard. To support clinical decision-making, clinicians are alerted to clinically significant changes to patient health status and are able to assess alerts generated by the embedded algorithm and review patient data, including which parameters triggered the alert, prescribed medications, graphical trends of lab results and relevant measures, and contact information. Clinicians may also be informed of triggered alerts through email notifications. Information presented on the Medly dashboard may be leveraged to inform clinical decision-making throughout the patient's follow-up care journey.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure,Congestive
  • Mental Health (Depression)
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • Telemonitoring
  • Smartphone application
  • Chronic disease management
  • Remote monitoring
  • Multiple chronic conditions
  • mHealth
  • Nurse-led
  • Holistic care
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,438 studies on the registry; 297 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Discharged from hospital or seen within 48 hours of discharge at Health Sciences North (HSN), William Osler Health Systems (WOHS), Women's College Hospital (WCH), and Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH).
  3. Have at least one complex chronic condition (i.e., heart failure, complex obstructive pulmonary disease (), hypertension, diabetes, and/or depression) that would benefit if monitored through telemonitoring.
  4. Able to comply with use of the telemonitoring application and applicable peripheral devices (e.g., able to stand on the weight scale, able to answer symptom questions, etc.)
  5. Able to read, write and speak English or have a caregiver who is able to do so on their behalf.
  6. Patients must have been discharged from hospital within 2 weeks during their recruitment into the study (or will be recruited prior to their discharge).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who are discharged from hospital with the intent to be admitted to a long-term care facility will be excluded.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control groups will be compared to 350 patients who received standard of care via propensity-matched controls from the ICES provincial database.

  • Experimental
    Telemonitoring (Medly MCC)

    Medly is a smartphone application allows patients with heart failure, diabetes, depression, hypertension, and/or COPD to measure and record their daily self-reported symptoms. This monitoring information is then transmitted wirelessly to a data server where an algorithm is used to generate an alert to a healthcare provider as necessary. The patient also receives an automated self-care message based on their measurements and reported symptoms.

    Device: Medly

Interventions

  • DeviceMedly

    Medly will enable patients with HF, COPD, Hypertension, Mental Health, or Diabetes to input measurements with wireless home medical devices and to answer symptom questions on the smartphone. The measurements will be automatically and wirelessly transmitted to the mobile phone and then to a data server. Automated self-care instructions/messages will be sent to the patient based on the readings and reported symptoms. If there are signs of their status deteriorating, an alert will be sent to a clinician that is responsible for the particular chronic condition of concern. The clinicians will have all the relevant patient data sent to them and will be able to access (through a secure web portal) to view historical and trending data for their patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Death and/or all-cause unplanned readmission

    The primary outcome measure for effectiveness evaluation will be a composite of death and all-cause unplanned readmission over 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Death and/or all-cause unplanned readmission

    The secondary outcome measure for effectiveness evaluation will be a composite of death and all-cause unplanned readmission over 6 months and 1 year.

    Time frame: 6 months and at 1-year

  2. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Over 30 days, at 6 months, and at 1-year follow-up

  3. Readmissions

    The number of Readmissions to Hospital

    Time frame: Over 30 days, at 6 months, and at 1-year follow-up

  4. Days alive and out-of-hospital

    Days alive and out-of-hospital

    Time frame: Over 30 days, at 6 months, and at 1-year follow-up

07

Study locations

4 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Van Spall HGC, Rahman T, Mytton O, Ramasundarahettige C, Ibrahim Q, Kabali C, Coppens M, Brian Haynes R, Connolly S. Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1427-1443. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.765. Epub 2017 Feb 24. PubMed 28233442 ↗
  • Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219. PubMed 14630762 ↗
  • Seto E, Leonard KJ, Cafazzo JA, Masino C, Barnsley J, Ross HJ. Self-care and quality of life of heart failure patients at a multidisciplinary heart function clinic. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):377-85. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31820612b8. PubMed 21263339 ↗
  • Liddy C, Blazkho V, Mill K. Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: systematic review of the qualitative literature. Can Fam Physician. 2014 Dec;60(12):1123-33. PubMed 25642490 ↗
  • Gordon K, Gray CS, Dainty KN, deLacy J, Seto E. Nurse-Led Models of Care for Patients with Complex Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2019 Sep;32(3):57-76. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2019.25972. PubMed 31714207 ↗
  • Gordon K, Dainty KN, Steele Gray C, DeLacy J, Shah A, Seto E. Normalizing Telemonitoring in Nurse-Led Care Models for Complex Chronic Patient Populations: Case Study. JMIR Nurs. 2022 Apr 28;5(1):e36346. doi: 10.2196/36346. PubMed 35482375 ↗
  • Gordon K, Dainty KN, Steele Gray C, DeLacy J, Shah A, Resnick M, Seto E. Experiences of Complex Patients With Telemonitoring in a Nurse-Led Model of Care: Multimethod Feasibility Study. JMIR Nurs. 2020 Sep 29;3(1):e22118. doi: 10.2196/22118. PubMed 34406972 ↗
  • Gordon K, Steele Gray C, Dainty KN, DeLacy J, Ware P, Seto E. Exploring an Innovative Care Model and Telemonitoring for the Management of Patients With Complex Chronic Needs: Qualitative Description Study. JMIR Nurs. 2020 Mar 6;3(1):e15691. doi: 10.2196/15691. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. PubMed 34345777 ↗
  • Ware P, Shah A, Ross HJ, Logan AG, Segal P, Cafazzo JA, Szacun-Shimizu K, Resnick M, Vattaparambil T, Seto E. Challenges of Telemonitoring Programs for Complex Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 26;24(1):e31754. doi: 10.2196/31754. PubMed 35080502 ↗
  • Seto E, Leonard KJ, Cafazzo JA, Barnsley J, Masino C, Ross HJ. Mobile phone-based telemonitoring for heart failure management: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 16;14(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1909. PubMed 22356799 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 50 months after the start.

Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 50 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2022
First posted
Sep 16, 2022
StartActual
Oct 17, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Jun 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05543720
Collaborators
Markham Stouffville Hospital, William Osler Health System, Health Sciences North, Women's College Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2022
Start date
Oct 17, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Emily Seto, PhD
principal investigator · University of Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion