CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05517356Updated Aug 26, 2022

Prospective Study of Tailored Management Strategies for Malperfusion Syndrome

An interventional study of Tailored management strategies in Aortic Dissection, sponsored by Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-26.

Sponsored by Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Aug 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Management strategy of malperfusion syndrome in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients remains controversial, with different views on when the surgery should be offered. At present, the mortality of ATAAD patients complicated with malperfusion is stubbornly high.

The purpose of this study is to improve the outcomes of ATAAD with malperfusion syndrome. The investigators formulated tailored management strategies for malperfused patients based on the duration of symptoms onset.

Read the detailed description

ATAAD complicated with malperfusion syndrome Malperfusion syndrome is the most devastating complication of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), which has a poor clinical outcome and has operative mortality ranging from 29% to 89%. However, different views on management of malperfusion exist, with debating on addressing the dissection or the organ malperfusion in priority.

Current different treatment strategies for ATAAD with malperfusion syndrome Immediate central repair, restoration of true lumen flow and depressurization of the false lumen, is the most widely practiced approaches for treating ATAAD regardless of malperfusion syndrome. Nevertheless, with very high operative mortality by the conventional approach for patients with malperfusion, several studies have suggested that patients undergo endovascular reperfusion first until the malperfusion resolves, followed by delayed central repair. This strategy has produced better outcomes for patients, however, it also carries risks of interim mortality due to aortic rupture or multiple-organ failure before central repair. Moreover, a recent study suggested an alternative strategy, which performed aortic surgery and endovascular reperfusion in a hybrid approach for static malperfusion or dynamic malperfusion symptoms more than 6 hours symptoms onset. This alternative strategy improved outcomes with a mortality rate of 16.7%, which was still a little bit high. Overall, the outcomes of ATAAD patients with malperfusion syndrome still need to be improved.

Tailored management strategies The tailored management strategies were: for malperfused patients with symptom onset within 6 hours, the immediate central repair was performed followed by repeat CTA postoperatively, and endovascular reperfusion was applied if the malperfusion persisted. While for patients with symptom onset beyond 6 hours, delayed central repair were performed after the organ functions improved.

Study Rationale As noted above, malperfusion syndrome is a rapidly lethal condition that every cardiovascular surgeon is faced with at some point. Despite the optimization of approaches for ATAAD presented with malperfusion in recent years, there appears to be some room to improve our outcomes even further. The investigators believe that the tailored management strategies, which aimed at reducing the duration of end-organ ischemia, may provide a promising treatment option for these patients. However, further prospective study and follow-up data are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of this new strategy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tailored management strategies; Aortic dissection; Malperfusion syndrome; Central repair; Endovascular reperfusion.
03

In context

Aortic Dissection

386 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 84 across 198 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute type A aortic dissection is confirmed by CTA;
  • The symptoms onset time \< 2 weeks;
  • Patients diagnosed with an ATAAD , with a new diagnosis of malperfusion syndrome, by meeting both of the following criteria:

    1. Radiographic findings reveal occlusion of the corresponding arteries (including either coronary artery, either carotid artery, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery or either iliac artery)
    2. Clinical features of end organ ischemia (abnormal left ventricular wall motion, disorder of consciousness or paralysis, abdominal pain, distended abdomen, pulselessness, loss of sensory or motor function of the lower extremities) OR Laboratory findings suggestive of end organ ischemia (elevated troponin, elevated creatine kinase, lactic acidosis, elevated myoglobin).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The branch arteries did not involved by ATAAD (non-malperfusion);
  • Patients presented with bloody stools or melena on admission;
  • Patients presented with bilaterally fixed dilated pupils, hemorrhagic infarction or herniation of brain;
  • Patients and (or) their families refused surgery;
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Malperfusion Cohort

    Patients presenting to hospital with ATAAD meeting criteria for malperfusion syndrome which includes both components: 1. Radiographic findings reveal occlusion of the corresponding arteries (including either coronary artery, either carotid artery, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery or either iliac artery). 2. Clinical features of end organ ischemia (abnormal left ventricular wall motion, disorder of consciousness or paralysis, abdominal pain, distended abdomen, pulselessness, loss of sensory or motor function of the lower extremities) OR Laboratory findings suggestive of end organ ischemia (elevated troponin, elevated creatine kinase, lactic acidosis, elevated myoglobin).

    Procedure: Tailored management strategies

Interventions

  • ProcedureTailored management strategies

    Our basic surgical strategies for the central repair operations for ATAAD are as follows. As arterial lines for cardiopulmonary bypass, side branches of the axillary and femoral arteries were used. Circulatory arrest was established when the nasopharyngeal temperature reached 25°C. Anterograde selective cerebral perfusion was performed through the right axillary artery, and the brain was perfused at approximately 5 mL/kg/min. The extent of aortic replacement was determined according to the extent of dissection involvement. For malperfused patients with symptom onset within 6 hours, the immediate central repair was performed followed by repeat CTA postoperatively, and endovascular reperfusion was applied if the malperfusion persisted. While for patients with symptom onset beyond 6 hours, delayed central repair were performed after the organ functions improved.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality (number of all cause death)

    All cause death

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Low cardiac output syndrome

    Number of participants complicated with low cardiac output syndrome after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. New cerebrovascular events

    Number of participants complicated with new cerebrovascular events after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Intestinal necrosis

    Number of participants complicated with intestinal necrosis after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Lower limb necrosis

    Number of participants complicated with lower limb necrosis after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Multiple organ failure

    Number of participants complicated with multiple organ failure after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    Number of participants requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University
    Xiamen, Fujian 361008, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deeb GM, Williams DM, Bolling SF, Quint LE, Monaghan H, Sievers J, Karavite D, Shea M. Surgical delay for acute type A dissection with malperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Dec;64(6):1669-75; discussion 1675-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01100-4. PubMed 9436553 ↗
  • Geirsson A, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, McGarvey ML, Keane MG, Woo YJ, Augoustides JG, Bavaria JE. Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Aug;32(2):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 May 17. PubMed 17500002 ↗
  • Girdauskas E, Kuntze T, Borger MA, Falk V, Mohr FW. Surgical risk of preoperative malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.059. Epub 2009 Sep 5. PubMed 19733865 ↗
  • Ahmed Y, van Bakel PAJ, Patel HJ. Addressing malperfusion first before repairing type A dissection. JTCVS Tech. 2021 May 4;10:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.04.029. eCollection 2021 Dec. No abstract available. PubMed 34977693 ↗
  • Fann JI, Sarris GE, Mitchell RS, Shumway NE, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Miller DC. Treatment of patients with aortic dissection presenting with peripheral vascular complications. Ann Surg. 1990 Dec;212(6):705-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199012000-00009. PubMed 2256762 ↗
  • Ehrlich MP, Ergin MA, McCullough JN, Lansman SL, Galla JD, Bodian CA, Apaydin A, Griepp RB. Results of immediate surgical treatment of all acute type A dissections. Circulation. 2000 Nov 7;102(19 Suppl 3):III248-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-248. PubMed 11082396 ↗
  • Girardi LN, Krieger KH, Lee LY, Mack CA, Tortolani AJ, Isom OW. Management strategies for type A dissection complicated by peripheral vascular malperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1309-14; discussion 1314. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.056. PubMed 15063257 ↗
  • Uchida K, Karube N, Kasama K, Minami T, Yasuda S, Goda M, Suzuki S, Imoto K, Masuda M. Early reperfusion strategy improves the outcomes of surgery for type A acute aortic dissection with malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;156(2):483-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 13. PubMed 29548594 ↗
  • Yang B, Rosati CM, Norton EL, Kim KM, Khaja MS, Dasika N, Wu X, Hornsby WE, Patel HJ, Deeb GM, Williams DM. Endovascular Fenestration/Stenting First Followed by Delayed Open Aortic Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion Syndrome. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2091-2103. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036328. PubMed 30474418 ↗
  • Chiu P, Tsou S, Goldstone AB, Louie M, Woo YJ, Fischbein MP. Immediate operation for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by visceral or peripheral malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;156(1):18-24.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.096. Epub 2018 Feb 21. PubMed 29615333 ↗
  • Tsagakis K, Janosi RA, Frey UH, Schlosser T, Chiesa R, Rassaf T, Jakob H. True Lumen Stabilization to Overcome Malperfusion in Acute Type I Aortic Dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Winter;31(4):740-748. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 8. PubMed 30529161 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05517356
Lead sponsor
Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University
Responsible party
Xijie Wu (Director, Head of Cardiosurgery, Clinical Professor, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2022

Study contacts

Xijie Wu, PhD
Contact
wxjusa@163.com
+86-13799959630
Shuangkun Chen, MD
Contact
757450275@qq.com
+86-15695904322

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion