ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06044259RADARUpdated Sep 30, 2026

Study Comparing Hemiarch Replacement and Hemiarch Plus Stent Implantation in Acute Aortic Dissection

An interventional study of AMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, US and Conventional hemiarch replacement in Aortic Dissection, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Updated Sep 30, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (ATAD) is one of the most lethal surgical emergencies. The conventional operative strategy is hemiarch replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass support to replace the diseased segment of the ascending aorta. However, in patients with dissection involving the whole aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta, the presence of the persistently perfused false lumen can lead to late aneurysm formation and require a second-stage operation, and this reduces long-term survival. In the surgical literature, there is growing evidence that the presence of Distal Anastomosis New Entry (DANE), which is a new intimal defect related to the trauma created by surgical sutures, is associated with persistent perfusion of the false lumen, aortic size growth, and the need of re-operation. The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, USA) is a hybrid prosthesis with a proximal sewing collar and distal nitinol self-expanding un-covered stent system designed to reduce the occurrence of DANE and hopefully depressurize the false lumen and lead to remodeling of the aortic wall.

The investigators plan to prospectively recruit consecutive patients with acute ascending thoracic aortic dissection patients (Excluding DeBakey II) and randomized them, after informed consent, into either the conventional hemiarch replacement group (Hemiarch-C) or the hemiarch replacement plus AMDS implantation group (Hemiarch-AMDS). The participating team will collect pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative clinical and radiological parameters for two groups of patients. Written informed consent, specifically allowing the use of clinical records for this randomized study, will be obtained from every patient prior to data collection. Complete DICOM image files of the CT scans will be evaluated by two independent fully qualified Radiologists. Our primary outcome is the radiological detection of DANE in Hemiarch-C and Hemiarch-AMDS groups within the 12-month follow-up period.

This study will be the world's first randomized control trial in ATAD to compare the prevalence of DANE in Hemiarch-C and Hemiarch-AMDS. It could be a guideline-changing study for the treatment of ATAD and its impact on the immediate survival, second-stage treatment, and long-term survival of patients suffering from ATAD.

Read the detailed description

Project Objectives

  1. To compare the occurrence of Distal Anastomosis New Entry (DANE) after conventional hemiarch replacement group (Hemiarch-C) and the hemiarch replacement plus AMDS implantation group (Hemiarch-AMDS).
  2. To compare the rate of all-cause mortality and aortic related mortality (at 30 days, 3-6, 12 months follow-up) between the study groups
  3. To compare the rate of patients who are free from the following Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (new permanent disabling stroke, new permanent (> 30 days) paraplegia or paraparesis, reintervention, all-cause mortality) (at 12 months follow-up)
  4. To compare radiological outcomes in terms of the rate of stenosis in supra-aortic head vessels, increasing (≥ 5 mm), stable or decreasing (≥ 5 mm) in true lumen in in both groups (at 3-6, 12 months follow-up).
  5. To compare the radiological outcomes in terms of obliterated, completely thrombosed, partially thrombosed, or patent false lumen at various segments of aorta in both groups (at 3-6, 12 months follow-up).Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and their complications (i.e. dissection, rupture, etc.) cause more than 1400 hospital admissions and 300 deaths every year in Hong Kong. Acute aortic dissection involving the ascending thoracic aorta is a highly lethal surgical emergency that warrants immediate surgical intervention. It can be classified according to DeBakey classification (DeBakey Type I, II, or III). The ascending thoracic aorta is involved in DeBakey Type I and II aortic dissections. In DeBakey Type I (ATAD), the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta are also involved in the dissection process, therefore conventional hemiarch replacement is only considered "palliative".

Data from international registries showed the mortality of surgically treated ATAD was around 17-26% and those with mal-perfusion had even higher mortality. A significant number of patients of ATAD after conventional hemiarch replacement still have a persistent pressurized false lumen and this is related to the presence of distal anastomotic new entry (DANE).The presence of DANE leads to persistent pulsatile flow and pressurization of the false lumen in 70% of cases after hemiarch replacement.The persistently patent FL will in turn cause mal-perfusion, the need for aortic re-intervention involving the aortic arch, and, most importantly, reduced long-term survival by up to 50%.

To avoid the occurrence of DANE and downstream aortic mal-perfusion, Bozso and colleagues advocated the use of a novel Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, US) hybrid prosthesis which comprises a proximal sewing collar and a distal self-expanding nitinol un-covered stent. From a prospective trial utilizing AMDS in ATAD, the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation (DARTS) trial, by Boszo and colleagues, the positive remodeling of the aortic arch occurred in 100% of cases with complete obliteration or thrombosis of the false lumen in 74%. In their series of 47 patients, there was no DANE after the AMDS implantation.

Work done by the principal investigator's unit is a major referral center for acute and complex aortic disease in Hong Kong, with more than 100 cases of operated aortic cases and 200 aortic referrals each year. The investigator's unit also operated on an average of 40-50 cases of ATAD each year.

The incidence of DANE in the investigator's unit is 19.5% from a retrospective reviewed of the institution's ATAD patients who received hemiarch replacement from Jan 2017 to Dec 2021. Although the incidence of DANE is lower than the reported literature, given the presence of DANE will significantly increase the risk of long-term mortality. The investigators believe a randomized control trial to compare the incidence of DANE after hemiarch replacement with or without AMDS implantation in ATAD can answer our research question and potentially be practice-changing.

Main research question is to compare the incidence of DANE after hemiarch replacement with or without AMDS implantation in acute DeBakey Type I aortic dissection.

Research methods Study Design: Single-center randomized control trial Methodology In this study, the investigators plan to prospectively recruit consecutive patients with acute DeBakey Type I aortic dissection and randomized them, after informed consent, into either the conventional hemiarch replacement group (Hemiarch-C) or the hemiarch replacement plus AMDS implantation group (Hemiarch-AMDS). The participating team will collect pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative clinical and radiological parameters for two groups of patients. Written informed consent, specifically allowing the use of clinical records for this randomized study, will be obtained from every patient prior to data collection. The period of data collection will be from the first recruited patient to 12 months after the last recruited patient, which will be around 36 months. Source data verification will be performed on 100% of the patients; data from all the visits that were provided in the database will be reviewed and verified against existing source documents by a dedicated research assistant. Complete DICOM image files of the CT scans will be evaluated by two independent fully qualified Radiologists. The expected patient loss rate is approximately 5% at 12 months of follow-up.

Study population Screening and randomization A computer-generated randomization sequence will be generated by the research assistant using the online randomization software. A total of 72 patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms. Block randomization with block size of 8 is used to maintain good balance in each treatment group. The randomization list will be kept in a set of tamper-evident envelopes. The envelopes will be identical and sealed. The trial identifier with a sequential number will be printed on each envelope and the inside will contain the treatment allocation. Envelopes will be unsealed by the on-call surgeon to reveal the allocation treatment prior to the surgery.

Patients, with their consent, will be recruited to participate by investigators after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Blinding of the study After randomization, the recruited patient will be allocated to either AMDS or Hemiarch group. There will be no blinding of the randomization result to the recruited patients, the operating surgeons, and the clinician-in-charge.

Pre-treatment Investigations and Assessments:

  1. Blood tests: complete blood count, liver and renal function tests, coagulation profile
  2. Radiological imaging: CT aortogram involving the thorax and abdomen
  3. ECG and/or other cardiac assessment as requested by anesthetist for general anesthesia assessment Treatment Procedures

Hemiarch-AMDS group:

Under general anesthesia and trans-esophageal echocardiogram monitoring, a median sternotomy will be performed. Patients will be put on cardiopulmonary bypass with arterial inflow from femoral artery/axillary artery/direct aortic cannulation and right atrial appendage venous two-stage cannulation. Systemic cooling to 25 Degree Celsius will commence. At a temperature of 25 Degree Celsius and thiopentone coma, the circulatory arrest will begin. The aorta will be trimmed to the level of the distal ascending or proximal arch The AMDS device will be implanted into the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. The distal anastomosis will be done between a vascular graft and the distal ascending aorta/aortic arch including the AMDS device sewing cuff. After the distal anastomosis is completed, visceral and cerebral systemic perfusion and rewarming will be started. The proximal ascending aorta will be anastomosed with the proximal end of the vascular graft. After de-airing and aorta will be de-clamped and the patient will be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass and decannulated. Hemostasis and sternal closure will be done as per routine protocol.

Hemiarch-C group:

Same as above except no AMDS is implanted. The perioperative management of all recruited patients is standardized. All patients receive prophylactic antibiotics during induction and until all drains are removed in the postoperative period. All patients will have invasive blood pressure monitoring with an arterial line and intravenous antihypertensive medications aiming to control systolic blood pressure to below 140mmHg.

Sample size calculation The occurrence of DANE was estimated to be around 70% and it caused persistent false lumen perfusion, mal-perfusion, early mortality, and decreased long-term survival. From a prospective trial by Moon and colleagues, the positive remodeling of the aortic arch occurred in 100% of cases with complete obliteration or thrombosis of the false lumen in 74%. In their series of 47 patients, there was no DANE after the AMDS implantation. Our own unpublished cohort of 167 cases revealed the occurrence of DANE in 19.5% after our hemiarch procedures. Based on a previous report and our own cohort of DANE rate of 19.5% and 70% respectively, and assumed DANE rate of 0% after AMDS, 36 patients need to be recruited for each arm (a total of 72 patients) in order to demonstrate a statistically significant difference with an 80% power at the 0.05 level of 1-sided significant difference between Hemiarch-AMDS and Hemiarch-C by a superiority time-to-event study design.

Data analysis Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 28.0.0.0 (IBM, NewYork, USA) on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary analysis set for statistical reporting will be the ITT population with no replacement of missing data planned in the statistical analysis to provide unbiased results. Missing data will be checked, and the imputation of the missing data will be used to preserve statistical power. The investigators will use the log-rank test to compare the time from randomization to the endpoints of occurrence of DANE. A Cox proportional-hazards model to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. The investigators will use Schoenfeld residual test to verify the assumption of proportional hazards in the Cox analysis, to fulfill the endpoint of the occurrence of DANE. Secondary endpoints will be compared between groups with a chi-square test for difference in proportions with student's t-test and a Mann-Whitney U test for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively. All tests of significance were two-tailed, and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered to indicate statistical significance for the primary endpoint. Percentages will be calculated on the number of non-missing observations. When applicable, bilateral asymptotic or exact confidence intervals (CIs) for binomial distributions will be calculated at the 95% level (unadjusted 95% CI). For analysis of data where the outcome variable is the time until the occurrence of an event of interest (for example, death, myocardial infarction etc.), the non-parametric estimator of these survival functions will be presented using the Kaplan-Meier method, together with a graphical presentation.

The investigator's unit operate on an average of 40-50 cases of acute aortic dissection each year. Assuming DeBakey Type I (ATAD) constitutes around 87% of all acute aortic dissection and acceptance of study by patients of 90%. It is therefore expected that recruitment can be completed in about 24 months. The last recruited patient will be observed for at least 12 months after the procedure. Hence, the total period of study including follow-up is 3 years, which is also the funding period for the grant application. After completion of the funding period, the recruited patients will be followed up to 2 years with interval investigations with CT scans to assess the aortic remodeling of both groups.

All clinical data will be collected in the principal investigator's center by a dedicated research assistant. Continuous clinical data monitoring and interim and final analysis will be performed by the principal investigator and co-investigators with the help of a research assistant.

Ethical consideration This study shall be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki. This protocol is approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong and New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committees (CREC:2023.075-T)). Written informed consent, specifically allowing the use of clinical records for study purposes, will be obtained from every patient prior to data collection.

Patients can withdraw from the study without any prejudice at any time during the study. Data will be kept confidential in secure offices of the Department of Surgery for seven years.

Potential risks of the study Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening emergency condition with mortality of around 17-26% from the world registries. In the principal investigator unit, from a retrospective record review of 2017-2021, the investigator's center has 167 Acute aortic dissection. Among this cohort, there was 87.1% of patients with DeBakey Type I (ATAD). Our operative mortality for ATAD is 4.3%. The incidence of DANE in our patients is 19.5%. According to the DARTS trial, the placement of AMDS device increases circulatory arrest time by an average of 3 minutes with 100% technical success rate. The implantation of AMDS is simple and much more generalizable than the complicated TARFET. The investigators do not anticipate there will be any increase in mortality or morbidity with AMDS implantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemiarch replacement
  • AMDS implantation
03

In context

Aortic Dissection

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is below the median of 114 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Sep 30, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient´s age is between 18 and 80 years.
  2. Patient is willing and able to give .
  3. Patient has acute DeBakey Type I and requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the ascending aorta.
  4. Patient not in coma/irreversible end organ failure/cardiac massage for resuscitation, at the time of consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has aortic arch diameter of more than 4.5 cm
  2. Patient has known connective tissue disease or genetically linked aortopathy
  3. Patient has entry tear over aortic arch
  4. Patient with DeBakey Type II aortic dissection
  5. Patient has co-morbidity (i.e. active (progressive, stable or partial remission)) causing expected survival to be less than 2 years.
  6. Patient has any other medical, social, or psychological problems, that in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participating in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hemiarch-AMDS

    Patient with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection will be put on GA and conventional CPB. During circulatory arrest, the aorta will be trimmed to the level of the distal ascending or proximal arch The AMDS device will be implanted into the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. The distal anastomosis will be done between a vascular graft and the distal ascending aorta/aortic arch including the AMDS device sewing cuff. After the distal anastomosis is completed, visceral and cerebral systemic perfusion and rewarming will be started. Proximal anastomosis will be performed and the patient will be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass and decannulated.

    Procedure: AMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, US

  • Active comparator
    Hemiarch-C

    Patient with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection will be put on GA and conventional CPB. During circulatory arrest, the aorta will be trimmed to the level of the distal ascending or proximal arch The AMDS device will be implanted into the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. The distal anastomosis will be done between a vascular graft and the distal ascending aorta/aortic arch as per routine. After the distal anastomosis is completed, visceral and cerebral systemic perfusion and rewarming will be started. Proximal anastomosis will be performed and the patient will be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass and decannulated.

    Procedure: Conventional hemiarch replacement

Interventions

  • ProcedureAMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, US

    Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS; Artivion, Atlanta, Georgia, US) hybrid prosthesis which comprises a proximal sewing collar and a distal self-expanding nitinol un-covered stent.

  • ProcedureConventional hemiarch replacement

    Coventional open hemiarch replacement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of DANE

    The presence of Distal Anastomosis New Entry (DANE) diagnosed by Computed Tomography in post-operative imaging within the 12-month follow-up period

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality of the patients

    Rate of death in the whole cohort

    Time frame: At discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  2. Percentage of patient with aortic-related mortality

    Percentage of patient that die from aortic related event

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  3. Percentage of patients with Major Adverse Events

    Rate of patients who are free from the following Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (new permanent disabling stroke), new permanent (\> 30 days) paraplegia or paraparesis, reintervention (excluding reoperation for bleeding or planned or unplanned additional intervention), visceral mal-perfusion, limb(s) ischemia

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  4. Percentage of patients requiring additional aortic intervention

    Rate of patients with aortic rupture and additional intervention (planned / unplanned)

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  5. Percentage of patients with Renal failure

    Renal failure requiring permanent (\> 90 days) dialysis or hemofiltration in a patient with a normal pre-procedure serum creatinine level

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  6. Percentage of patients with radiological head and neck vessels patency

    Radiological patency in supra-aortic head vessels (0 - 30 %, \>30 % - 50 %, \> 50 % - 70%, \> 70%) (kink-, suture line-, dissection-related, other)

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  7. Percentage of patient with failure of AMDS

    Failure of the integrity of the AMDS

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

  8. Percentage of patients with radiological true and false lumen status of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta

    Radiological findings of the true lumen, false lumen thrombosis

    Time frame: At Discharge(0-14days), 30-day, 3-6 month, 12 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Suzuki T, Oh JK, Moore AG, Malouf JF, Pape LA, Gaca C, Sechtem U, Lenferink S, Deutsch HJ, Diedrichs H, Marcos y Robles J, Llovet A, Gilon D, Das SK, Armstrong WF, Deeb GM, Eagle KA. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):897-903. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.897. PubMed 10685714 ↗
  • Czerny M, Schoenhoff F, Etz C, Englberger L, Khaladj N, Zierer A, Weigang E, Hoffmann I, Blettner M, Carrel TP. The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2628-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030. PubMed 26088302 ↗
  • Bozso SJ, Nagendran J, Chu MWA, Kiaii B, El-Hamamsy I, Ouzounian M, Kempfert J, Starck C, Moon MC. Midterm Outcomes of the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):463-470. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.090. Epub 2020 Jul 13. PubMed 32673661 ↗
  • Rylski B, Hahn N, Beyersdorf F, Kondov S, Wolkewitz M, Blanke P, Plonek T, Czerny M, Siepe M. Fate of the dissected aortic arch after ascending replacement in type A aortic dissectiondagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;51(6):1127-1134. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx062. PubMed 28369453 ↗
  • Evangelista A, Salas A, Ribera A, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Cuellar H, Pineda V, Gonzalez-Alujas T, Bijnens B, Permanyer-Miralda G, Garcia-Dorado D. Long-term outcome of aortic dissection with patent false lumen: predictive role of entry tear size and location. Circulation. 2012 Jun 26;125(25):3133-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090266. Epub 2012 May 21. PubMed 22615344 ↗
  • Kobuch R, Hilker M, Rupprecht L, Hirt S, Keyser A, Puehler T, Amman M, Zink W, Schmid C. Late reoperations after repaired acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.052. Epub 2011 Nov 12. PubMed 22078710 ↗
  • Halstead JC, Meier M, Etz C, Spielvogel D, Bodian C, Wurm M, Shahani R, Griepp RB. The fate of the distal aorta after repair of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.043. Epub 2006 Dec 4. PubMed 17198797 ↗
  • Kimura N, Itoh S, Yuri K, Adachi K, Matsumoto H, Yamaguchi A, Adachi H. Reoperation for enlargement of the distal aorta after initial surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2 Suppl):S91-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PubMed 25224548 ↗
  • Shrestha M, Pichlmaier M, Martens A, Hagl C, Khaladj N, Haverich A. Total aortic arch replacement with a novel four-branched frozen elephant trunk graft: first-in-man results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Feb;43(2):406-10. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs296. Epub 2012 May 31. PubMed 22653445 ↗
  • Shrestha M, Haverich A, Martens A. Total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissections. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(suppl 1):i29-i34. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw341. PubMed 28108566 ↗
  • Dohle DS, Tsagakis K, Janosi RA, Benedik J, Kuhl H, Penkova L, Stebner F, Wendt D, Jakob H. Aortic remodelling in aortic dissection after frozen elephant trunkdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):111-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv045. Epub 2015 Feb 24. PubMed 25715431 ↗
  • Tsagakis K, Dohle DS, Wendt D, Wiese W, Benedik J, Lieder H, Thielmann M, Jakob H. Left subclavian artery rerouting and selective perfusion management in frozen elephant trunk surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(5):311-6. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1069358. PubMed 26358834 ↗
  • Bozso SJ, Nagendran J, Chu MWA, Kiaii B, El-Hamamsy I, Ouzounian M, Kempfert J, Starck C, Shahriari A, Moon MC. Single-Stage Management of Dynamic Malperfusion Using a Novel Arch Remodeling Hybrid Graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1768-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.121. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed 31254509 ↗
  • Bozso SJ, Nagendran J, MacArthur RGG, Chu MWA, Kiaii B, El-Hamamsy I, Cartier R, Shahriari A, Moon MC. Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation trial: Canadian results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1763-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.120. Epub 2018 Oct 26. PubMed 30501947 ↗
  • Montagner M, Kofler M, Heck R, Buz S, Starck C, Kurz S, Falk V, Kempfert J. Initial experience with the new type A arch dissection stent: restoration of supra-aortic vessel perfusion. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jul 26;33(2):276-283. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab085. PubMed 34010408 ↗
  • Mehdiani A, Sugimura Y, Wollgarten L, Immohr MB, Bauer S, Schelzig H, Wagenhauser MU, Antoch G, Lichtenberg A, Akhyari P. Early Results of a Novel Hybrid Prosthesis for Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A With Distal Anastomosis Line Beyond Aortic Arch Zone Zero. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 14;9:892516. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.892516. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35911517 ↗
  • Wong RH, Baghai M, Yu SC, Underwood MJ. Aortic arch/elephant trunk procedure with Sienna(TM) graft and endovascular stenting of thoraco-abdominal aorta for treatment of complex chronic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;2(3):358-61. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.05.03. PubMed 23977606 ↗
  • Wong RH, Yu SC, Lau RW, Ng CS, Hui JW, Wan IY, Wan S, Ho AM, Underwood MJ. Delayed stent deformity and fracture of Djumbodis dissection system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):e17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.127. PubMed 24384216 ↗
  • Wong RH, Ho JY, Underwood MJ. Multimodality imaging assessment for Thoraflex hybrid total arch replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016 Jun;24(5):496-501. doi: 10.1177/0218492316643844. Epub 2016 Apr 11. PubMed 27072867 ↗
  • Ho JYK, Chow SCY, Kwok MWT, Fujikawa T, Wong RHL. Total Aortic Arch Replacement and Frozen Elephant Trunk. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Autumn;33(3):656-662. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.016. Epub 2020 Nov 9. PubMed 33181309 ↗
  • Ho JYK, Bashir M, Jakob H, Wong RHL. Management of left subclavian artery in total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk procedure. JTCVS Tech. 2021 Mar 29;7:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.03.020. eCollection 2021 Jun. No abstract available. PubMed 34318200 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized clinical and radiological outcome data will be shared

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will become available when we complete our analysis and for a 12-month period

Access criteria: Approval needs to be sought from the Principal Investigator

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 47 months after the start.

Of 49 interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Dissection, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23. This study's planned 47 months is close to that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 30, 2026: primary completion Sep 2026 → Sep 2027 and completion Sep 2027 → Sep 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 5, 2023
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
StartActual
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2027was Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2028was Sep 2027
Last update
Sep 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026→Sep 30, 2027
Sep 30, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2027→Sep 30, 2028
Sep 30, 2026
Eligibility
1 exclusion criterion edited
What changed in the criteria
Exclusion criteria
  • EditedPatient has entry tear more than 2 cm over aortic arch
Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 30, 2026→Sep 30, 2027
    Study completion Sep 30, 2027→Sep 30, 2028
    Eligibility 1 exclusion criterion edited
    What changed in the criteria
    Exclusion criteria
    • EditedPatient has entry tear more than 2 cm over aortic arch
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06044259
Responsible party
Randolph Wong (Professor and Chief of Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Randolph Wong
Contact
wonhl1@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
+85255699431
Jacky Ho
Contact
jackyho@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
+85235052629

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion