ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06658730TGR 23-02TAUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Long-term Characterization of GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft With ACTIVE CONTROL System Performance

An observational study in Vascular Disease, Dissection and Dissection Aortic Aneurysm, sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates. Recruiting at 37 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Primary conditionAortic DissectionRegistry: Vascular DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Vascular Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Aortic Dissection
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Aortic Dissection, a narrower term within Vascular Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. This post-market registry for the GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System (CTAG w/AC) is intended to demonstrate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for lesions of the descending thoracic aorta continues to be a suitable treatment option for appropriately selected patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vascular Disease
  • Dissection
  • Dissection Aortic Aneurysm
  • Dissection of Aorta
  • Aneurysm Thoracic
  • Aneurysm Dissecting
  • Transection Aorta
  • Intramural Hematoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Endovascular
  • CTAG
  • Post-market Registry
  • Observational
  • Multi-regional
  • Real world data
  • Together Registry
  • Gore Together Registry
  • Gore Together Aortic Registry
  • Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft
  • TGR 23-02TA
  • TGR23-02TA
  • GORE TAG
03

In context

Aortic Dissection Reclassified

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 230 across 115 observational studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

W.L.Gore & Associates is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Compared within Aortic Dissection, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Vascular Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target registry population is patients who are treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL at participating sites. This includes initial procedures and reinterventions (regardless of original intervention).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements.
  2. Patient has been or is intended to be treated with an eligible registry device.*
  3. Patient is age ≥ 18 years at time of signature.

    • The intent to treat a patient with a Gore product must be made prior to soliciting for possible registry participation. If pre-procedure consent is not feasible due to emergent situation, consent prior to the time of discharge for the index procedure is acceptable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who is, at the time of consent, unlikely to be available for standard of care (SOC) follow-up visits as defined by the site's guidelines and procedures.
  2. Patient with exclusion criteria required by local law.
  3. Patient is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent drug and/or investigational device study* within 12 months of Together Registry enrollment. Subjects cannot be enrolled in another Together Registry module protocol.

    • The term "study" does not apply to other observational registries or quality improvement projects. Collection of Registry Device performance from interventional studies may be permissible provided device application is not investigational and there are no novel requirements that alter follow-up conduct (i.e., protocol-mandated interventions).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Aneurysm/Other Isolated Lesion

    Device: Endovascular

  • Dissection

    Device: Endovascular

Interventions

  • DeviceEndovascular

    TEVAR - thoracic endovascular aortic repair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Deployment Technical Success

    * Successful access, delivery, and accurate deployment of the device to the intended location, and retrieval of the delivery system. * The absence of any additional corrective procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Events will not include interventions at the access site(s), lumbar drains to address spinal cord ischemia, or additional interventions to address non-treatment areas.

    Time frame: Index Procedure

  2. Lesion-related Mortality

    Death meeting at least one of the following characteristics: * Death within 30 days of the index procedure or following conversion to open repair. * Death within 30 days following a complication from a secondary procedure associated with the index lesion or registry device. * Any death where the treated disease / index lesion or registry device caused or significantly contributed to the death, including lesion-rupture, aortic-related complications, disease progression involving the index lesion.

    Time frame: From time of index procedure through 10 years of follow-up

  3. Lesion Rupture (treated area)

    Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  4. Lesion Enlargement (treated area)

    An increase in maximum vessel (e.g., aorta or treated branch) diameter of \> 5 mm in the region encompassed by the initial lesion as compared to baseline using orthogonal (i.e., perpendicular to the centerline) measurements on CT / CTA scans.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  5. Endoleaks

    Perfusion of a treated lesion via: * Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment zones of the graft to the vessel wall, whereby arterial flow perfuses the treated lesion via a perigraft channel: * Type Ia: Proximal aortic attachment zone * Type Ib: Distal aortic attachment zone * Type Ic: Distal attachment zone for branch component * Type II: Retrograde flow from native aortic branch arteries * Type III endoleak: Component disconnection or fabric disruption resulting in arterial flow into the perigraft space * Type IIIa: Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic) * Type IIIb: Fabric tear or disruption * Type IIIc: Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch * Type IV: Late endoleak due to flow through porous fabric * Type V/Endotension: Aneurysm sac enlargement \> 5 mm with no imaging evidence of an endoleak * Indeterminate: Endoleak is identified, but source cannot be ascertained

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  6. Device Migration

    Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥ 10 mm, as confirmed by CTA scan, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative CTA scan.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  7. Loss of aortic / branch patency

    No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic and/or branch component (for branched devices) confirmed with imaging and/or direct observation.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  8. Stroke (All, Serious, Non-Serious)

    Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal Central Nervous System (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that: * Persists for \> 24 hours or until death -or- * Symptoms lasting \< 24 hours, with pathology or neuroimaging confirmation of CNS infarction

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  9. Paraplegia (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset spinal cord injury rendering a subject non-ambulatory within 30 days of the index procedure

    Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure

  10. Paraparesis (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset spinal cord injury causing a minor motor deficit of the lower extremities within 30 days of the index procedure

    Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure

  11. New onset renal failure (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset sustained renal failure identified within 30 days of the index procedure, combined with requiring dialysis for \> 4 weeks

    Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure

  12. Renal function deterioration

    New onset of a decrease in eGFR \> 30% following treatment when compared to baseline eGFR.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure

  13. Device integrity events (e.g., fracture, kinking, compression)

    Defined as any of the following: * Wire fractures, including stents, hooks, or barbs * Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow * Disruption/tears in the graft component of the stent graft Stent compression or invagination: Transient or permanent stent-graft collapse following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the vessel luminal diameter

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  14. Reintervention

    Additional surgical or interventional procedure related to the treated disease / index lesion, the registry device, or to the treatment / procedure. This may include surgical or interventional treatment for endoleaks, access site(s) complications, disease progression (including interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implantation to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection), spinal drains for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management, or conversion to open surgery.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Access-related complications

    Complications associated with the access sites used during treatment that may include pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, thrombosis, or complications associated with percutaneous closure devices.

    Time frame: Intra-operatively

  2. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

    Transient focal neurological signs or symptoms (lasting \<24 h) presumed to be due to focal brain ischemia but without evidence of acute infarction by neuroimaging or pathology (or in the absence of imaging)

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  3. New Dissection

    A new arterial tear either caused by a stent graft, natural disease progression or iatrogenic injury from endovascular manipulation. This can include the propagation, or extension, of a previous dissection that was not present at the time of initial presentation.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  4. False Lumen Status - treated segment

    Status of the false lumen within the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft: * Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging. * Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging. * Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  5. False Lumen Status - untreated segment

    Status of the false lumen outside of the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft: * Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging. * Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging. * Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

  6. False Lumen Perfusion

    Flow into the false lumen via: * Type IA entry flow: flow between the proximal endograft and aortic wall allowing systemic pressure antegrade flow into the primary entry tear and proximal false lumen * Type IB entry flow: distal entry tear adjacent to endograft due to septal fenestration or a new intimal tear at the distal aspect of the stent graft (dSINE) allowing systemic pressure direct flow into the false lumen * Type II entry flow: retrograde entry flow through arch vessel branches (innominate, carotid, subclavian) or thoracic bronchial and intercostal arteries into the false lumen * Type R entry flow: antegrade entry flow from the true lumen into the false lumen through distal branch fenestrations (uncovered intercostal arteries, visceral or renal arteries, lumbar arteries, iliac branches) or septal fenestrations (excluding SINE)

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Health Economic and Quality of Life Data Analysis

    A Health Economic analysis is planned as part of the clinical registry. Initial analyses will only involve data that is collected within the registry CRFs. The objective of the Health Economic analysis is to understand the short- and long-term healthcare resource use and costs of the treatment(s) studied during the period of the clinical registry. Quality of life will also be evaluated at some sites within the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) regions and Asia-Pacific (APAC) regions, as applicable, using a standard survey.

    Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure

07

Study locations

32 of 37 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06658730
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2024
Start date
Jun 19, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2038 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2038 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Ashley Hoedt, MS
Contact
ahoedt@wlgore.com
+1 928-864-3987
Ali Azizzadeh, M.D.
principal investigator · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Timothy Resch
principal investigator · Univ. of CPH - Denmark
Kazuo Shimamura
principal investigator · Osaka University Hospital - Japan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion