ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03885635HEADSTARTUpdated Sep 28, 2026

Hemiarch vs Extended Arch in Type 1 Aortic Dissection

An interventional study of Hemiarch repair and Extended arch repair in Aortic Dissection, sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation. Recruiting at 5 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Updated Sep 28, 2026Study contact changed1 site addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

HEADSTART is a prospective, open-label, non-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compares a composite of mortality and re-intervention in patients undergoing hemiarch and extended arch repair for acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection. Eligible patients will be randomized to one or the other surgical strategy and clinical and imaging outcome data will be collected over a 3 year follow up period.

Read the detailed description

DeBakey Type 1 aortic dissections continue to have high operative mortality and morbidity and there is equipoise in available literature with regards to the best operative strategy and patient selection criteria. Hemiarch repair is current standard of care in most centers but extended arch repair is gaining popularity aiming to address early post-operative malperfusion and improve long term aortic remodeling.

HEADSTART is a randomized controlled prospective trial of patients presenting to participating institutes with acute DeBakey 1 aortic dissection. Patients will be enrolled and randomized into one of two groups - 'hemiarch repair' and 'extended arch repair'. Pre-operative, early post-operative and long term follow clinical and CT imaging data will be collated on a centralized database and at a core lab respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection

Browse trials for

03

In context

Aortic Dissection

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 114 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Emergent surgical repair of Acute DeBakey Type 1 aortic dissection
  2. Age >18 years and \<70 years
  3. Operating surgeon believes that both surgeries could be safe and effective

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Hemodynamic instability/shock defined as systolic BP \< 90 mm Hg
  2. Previous cardiac surgery with sternotomy or thoracic endograft placement
  3. Aortic arch diameter > 6cm in which a concomitant arch replacement is judged necessary
  4. Procedures deemed to be "salvage operations" where the patient is unlikely to survive hospital discharge.
  5. GCS \< 8 for more than 6 hours
  6. History of cirrhosis.
  7. History of chronic renal failure (baseline \< 50)
  8. Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hemiarch repair

    Standard hemiarch repair with open distal anastomosis in the proximal arch without replacement of the head vessels.

    Procedure: Hemiarch repair

  • Active comparator
    Extended arch repair

    Ascending aortic and arch replacement with or without head vessel re-implantation and single TEVAR device placement within 1 week.

    Procedure: Extended arch repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureHemiarch repair

    Current standard of surgical repair consisting of ascending aortic replacement with open distal anastomosis at level of proximal arch under a period of hypothermic circulatory arrest . No surgical or endovascular intervention is carried out in the mid arch or descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.

  • ProcedureExtended arch repair

    Surgical replacement of the ascending aorta along with intervention on the arch and descending aorta. Techniques for distal aspect of extended arch technique include but are not limited to total arch replacement along with TEVAR, Frozen Elephant Trunk procedure or surgical proximal arch replacement with bare metal stents in arch and descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients experiencing a composite end-point of mortality or re-intervention

    Compare the proportion of patients between the two groups who over a 3 year follow up period attain a composite clinical end-point of 1) mortality, 2) late aortic re-intervention, either surgical or endovascular (\> 30 days from index procedure) or 3) early (\< 30 days from index procedure) re-intervention for branch malperfusion

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients achieving complete false lumen thrombosis on CT imaging

    Compare the proportions of patients achieving complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis in the proximal, mid and distal descending thoracic aorta at 3 years after intervention between the two groups

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL: Ao)

    Compare delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL:Ao) in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta from pre-operative to first post-operative CT scans, between the two groups.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Delta change in maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic aortic dimension

    Compare delta change in the maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic dimension between the two groups over 3 years

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Number of patients experiencing the listed peri-operative complications

    To compare the proportion of patients experiencing the following peri-operative complications between the two groups: mortality, stroke, paraplegia/paraparesis, vascular injury, renal ischemia, bowel ischemia warranting operative intervention, peripheral limb ischemic changes and re-operation for bleeding.

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Number of patients requiring open surgical or endovascular re-intervention

    Compare the proportion of patients requiring open surgical and endovascular re-intervention over 3 years in both groups

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Preoperative malperfusion and perioperative mortality/early re-intervention

    Correlate pre-operative CT signs of malperfusion with peri-operative mortality and early post-operative re-intervention in both groups

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Elbatarny M, Stevens LM, Dagenais F, Peterson MD, Vervoort D, El-Hamamsy I, Moon M, Al-Atassi T, Chung J, Boodhwani M, Chu MWA, Ouzounian M; Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative Investigators. Hemiarch versus extended arch repair for acute type A dissection: Results from a multicenter national registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):935-943.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 20. PubMed 37084820 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 32 months after the start.

Of 49 interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Dissection, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23. This study's planned 32 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2019
First posted
Mar 21, 2019
StartActual
Jul 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
1 site added
Show site
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute · Ottawa, Canada
Sep 28, 2026
Contact
Study contact changed: A•••@ottawaheart.ca · •••8958→n•••@ottawaheart.ca · •••7230. See the current contact
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • University of Ottawa Heart Institute · Ottawa, Canada
    Contact Study contact changed: A•••@ottawaheart.ca · •••8958→n•••@ottawaheart.ca · •••7230. See the current contact
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03885635
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2019
Start date
Jul 30, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Khatira Mehdiyeva
Contact
kmehdiyeva@ottawaheart.ca
613-696-7000 ext. 18328
Nahya Awada
Contact
naawada@ottawaheart.ca
613-696-7230
Munir Boodhwani, MD
principal investigator · Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Jehangir Appoo, MD
principal investigator · University of Calgary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion