CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05459402Updated Feb 3, 2026

Divided or Single Exposure (DOSE) Study

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Methadone (100% dose) and Methadone (50% dose) in Opioid Use Disorder, Chronic Pain and Methadone, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-03.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether once versus twice daily dosing of methadone will be an effective method for managing comorbid pain and opioid use disorder.

Read the detailed description

This study follows a successfully completed project (NCT03254043) to now pursue the investigators overarching goal of optimizing methadone dosing as a method for managing comorbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) among persons receiving methadone for the treatment of OUD. Up to 62% of persons maintained on methadone for OUD experience clinically significant pain, versus 31% in the general population. Pain in methadone-maintained persons (MMP) is associated with poor OUD treatment outcomes and severe distress. No effective treatment for comorbid pain and OUD currently exists; though preclinical and human data suggest divided methadone dosing may be a more optimal strategy for managing pain than once daily dosing, this has never been empirically examined. This study will evaluate an intervention for comorbid chronic pain among MMP using a Phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of treatment as usual (TAU) versus split daily methadone dosing for 12-weeks. Methadone will be remotely managed via an electronic pillbox. Outcomes will include weekly assessments of pain and OUD outcomes, ecological momentary assessment of pain before and after dosing, and point-prevalence measures of laboratory-induced pain to explore mechanism of effects. If effective, this approach could transform the care of MMP with pain because it would be feasible to implement within the operational structure of a methadone clinic and would impose low provider burden. Results could provide a high magnitude treatment for the substantial number of MMP who experience daily pain with no reliable form of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Chronic Pain
  • Methadone
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years of age or older
  • Currently receiving methadone for treatment of OUD for >90 days and have been consuming the same dose for >30 days
  • Have previously received a take-home dose of methadone as part of routine care
  • Willing to comply with study schedule
  • Report pain (specific definition blinded)
  • Have a cellular phone or be willing to carry phone provided by the study during one phase of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Presence of acute medical problem that requires immediate and intense medical management
  • Presence of a serious and unstable mental illness that interferes with provision of voluntary informed consent and/or adherence to study visits
  • Plans to leave methadone treatment during the study period
  • Maintained on a dose of methadone that would prevent effective splitting of doses
  • Currently receiving split doses of methadone
  • Currently receiving treatment for pain for which the split-dosing of methadone is judged by medical staff to be contraindicated or otherwise interfere with study conduct or integrity
  • Does not meet criteria for mild-severe disability (definition blinded)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment as Usual (TAU)

    Participants in treatment as usual group will receive 100% active methadone in AM + placebo in PM.

    Drug: Methadone (100% dose)

  • Experimental
    Split-dosing

    Participants in split dosing group will receive 50% active methadone + placebo twice daily.

    Drug: Methadone (50% dose)

Interventions

  • DrugMethadone (100% dose)

    Methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder

  • DrugMethadone (50% dose)

    Methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in worst pain rating- past 24 hour as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory scale

    Using the Brief Pain Inventory rating of "Worst Pain" in the past 24 hours, rated on a scale of 1-10, collected once weekly during weeks 1 through 12 of the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 1 up to week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Tolerance Latency

    Time in seconds (0-300) to removal of hand from cold pressor measure of laboratory-induced pain, collected point-prevalence during weeks 1, 6, and 12 of the intervention.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 6, and 12

  2. Change in Pain Interference- past 7 days as assessed by Pain-related Disability Scale Total Score

    Past 7 day Pain-related Disability Scale Total Score (range 0-70), collected once weekly during weeks 1 through 12 of the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 1 up to 12

  3. Change in Opioid Withdrawal Severity- past 24 hours as assessed by the Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale

    Past 24 hour total score (range 0-64) for the Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS), collected once weekly during weeks 1 through 12 of the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 1 up to 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Addiction Treatment Services (ATS)
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
    • Denis Antoine, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McKendrick G, Davis W, Sklar M, Brown N, Pattillo E, Finan PH, Antoine D, Walters V, Dunn KE. The IMPOWR Network Divided or Single Exposure Study (DOSE) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Once Versus Split Dosing of Methadone for the Treatment of Comorbid Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Jan;46(1):197-200. doi: 10.1177/29767342241239167. Epub 2024 Mar 25. PubMed 38528704 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05459402
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2022
Start date
Feb 21, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2026

Study contacts

Kelly E Dunn, PhD, M.B.A.
Contact
kelly.dunn@som.umaryland.edu
802-922-1682
Kelly E Dunn, PhD, M.B.A.
principal investigator · University of Maryland
Denis Antoine, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion