ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07227662Updated Sep 25, 2026

Feasibility, Usability and Preliminary Efficacy of Home-based FES Fro Adhesive Capsulitis

An interventional study of Home based FES in combination with usual therapy in Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility, usability and preliminary efficacy of a home-based Functional Electrical Stimulation(FES) in individuals with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. The main question it aims to answer is if combining home-based FES to usual therapy at the clinic will improve pain and improve function of the impaired shoulder.

Read the detailed description

Individuals with shoulder adhesive capsulitis will be recruited. All participants will complete clinical assessments at 3 time points(baseline, 2 weeks into the intervention and 4 weeks after). Each participant will be asked to complete either one 60min or 2x30 min duration of FES daily for 4 weeks.

The following assessments will be performed:Likert rating scales and open-ended questions,The Disabilities the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire,Active and passive shoulder range of motion (ROM) will be assessed using goniometric measurements for shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation,Pain rating at rest, night, and end range movement using a visual analogue scale (0-10 points)

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional Electrical Stimulation
  • Home-based
  • Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis
03

In context

Bursitis

383 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 111 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 44 across 346 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 700 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.

Of its 92 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Individuals diagnosed with shoulder adhesive capsulitis
  3. Shoulder pain, limited shoulder mobility for more than 4 weeks, normal shoulder x-ray findings, and normal neurological exam
  4. Can tolerate electrical stimulation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of shoulder tumors or bone lesions
  2. History of shoulder fracture or subluxation
  3. History of shoulder surgery
  4. Severe osteoporosis,
  5. Rheumatic disease
  6. Radiating pain from cervical radiculopathy
  7. Participation in other clinical trial, and/or intraarticular injections within 6 weeks
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Home-based FES

    The intervention will include home use of Genesis Flex FES device alongside usual rehabilitation care. Participant education in Genesis FES use will be conducted during the baseline assessment session. FES parameters will be initially adjusted at the lowest possible current for patient comfort with the constraint that they should not elicit a tetanic contraction. FES will be provided via two self adhesive electrodes attached across shoulder joint.A shoulder harness adjustable neoprene padding will be provided to enable anatomical contouring for patient comfort and support for positioning of stimulator and electrodes to the affected shoulder.

    Device: Home based FES in combination with usual therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceHome based FES in combination with usual therapy

    Participants diagnosed with shoulder adhesive capsulitis and being treated at a local physical and occupational therapy outpatient clinic will be deemed eligible for inclusion in the study.The intervention will include home use of Genesis Flex FES device alongside usual rehabilitation care. Usual care therapy may consist of manual therapy, hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, ultrasound treatments, daily home-based shoulder exercises, and/or acetaminophen for pain, which will be documented.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant Acceptability and Satisfaction

    Participant-reported satisfaction, comfort, and ease of use assessed using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended qualitative feedback.A Likert scale is a rating scale used in surveys to measure opinions, attitudes,and perceptions by asking respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a statement. It consists of a series of statements with a symmetric range of response options, such as a five-point scale from 0="Strongly Disagree" to 5="Strongly Agree". This method allows for the collection of quantitative data to analyze subjective experiences.

    Time frame: At the end of 4 weeks

  2. Usability of the FES device for home-based use

    Percentage of participants able to correctly and independently use the portable FES device for ≥80% of prescribed home sessions, as verified by device logs and participant self-report.

    Time frame: At the end of 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score

    The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire is a 30-item self-report measure assessing symptoms and functional limitations related to upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. It also includes two optional 4-item modules (Work and Sports/Performing Arts). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale and converted to a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates the most severe disability. Changes in DASH total and optional module scores will be compared from baseline to 4 weeks.

    Time frame: Change from baseline DASH at 4 weeks

  2. Change in Active and Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    Active and passive shoulder ROM will be assessed using goniometric measurements for shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation.

    Time frame: Change from baseline ROM at 4 weeks

  3. Change in Shoulder Pain using Visual Analog Scale

    Change in shoulder pain intensity assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Pain will be rated at rest, during the night, and at end-range shoulder movement.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline VAS at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rehman ZI, Khan S, Abbas M. Effect of FES with and without Mulligan's technique in adhesive capsulitis. J Health Rehabil Res. 2024;4(3):Article 1408
  • Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29581. PubMed 33326025 ↗
  • Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, Johnston RV, McBain B, Buchbinder R. Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):CD011324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011324. PubMed 25271097 ↗
  • Casarino V, Ciatti P, Martini A. Weighted spectral cluster bounds and a sharp multiplier theorem for ultraspherical Grushin operators. International Mathematics Research Notices. 2022;2022(12):9209-9274. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab007
  • Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, Michener LA, Seitz AL, Uhl TL, Godges JJ, McClure PW. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):A1-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0302. Epub 2013 Apr 30. No abstract available. PubMed 23636125 ↗
  • Corbacho B, Brealey S, Keding A, Richardson G, Torgerson D, Hewitt C, McDaid C, Rangan A; UK FROST trial team. Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatments compared with early structured physiotherapy in secondary care for adults with primary frozen shoulder : an economic evaluation of the UK FROST trial. Bone Jt Open. 2021 Aug;2(8):685-695. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO-2021-0075.R1. PubMed 34420365 ↗
  • Kim DH, Kim YS, Kim BS, Sung DH, Song KS, Cho CH. Is frozen shoulder completely resolved at 2 years after the onset of disease? J Orthop Sci. 2020 Mar;25(2):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 2. PubMed 30952550 ↗
  • Page P, Labbe A. Adhesive capsulitis: use the evidence to integrate your interventions. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;5(4):266-73. PubMed 21655385 ↗
  • Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Apr;9(2):75-84. doi: 10.1177/1758573216676786. Epub 2016 Nov 7. PubMed 28405218 ↗
  • Cao W, Chen J, Pu J, Fan Y, Cao Y. Risk Factors for the Onset of Frozen Shoulder in Middle-Aged and Elderly Subjects Within 1 Year of Discharge From a Hospitalization That Involved Intravenous Infusion: A Prospective Cohort Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 20;9:911532. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.911532. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35795630 ↗
  • Sun G, Li Q, Yin Y, Fu W, He K, Pen X. Risk factors and predictive models for frozen shoulder. Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 3;14(1):15261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66360-y. PubMed 38956312 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 217 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bursitis, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 17. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 217 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 17.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2025
First posted
Nov 13, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Sep 25, 2026
Sites
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland is now Recruiting
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland is now Recruiting
    + 1 other change: date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07227662
Responsible party
Kelly Westlake (Professor, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Sanjana Rao, PhD
Contact
sanjana.rao@som.umaryland.edu
4438256349

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion