ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03745339Updated Oct 26, 2026

Outcome Inference in the Sensory Preconditioning Task in Opioid-Use Disorder

An observational study in Opioid-Related Disorders and Drug Addiction, sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2019; still recruiting 7 years 5 months later.
Updated Oct 15, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150
Ages
21 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

People with addictions often find it hard to choose the long-term benefits of abstinence over the short-term effects of using drugs. Researchers think this is partly due to parts of the brain involved in certain types of learning and decision-making. Researchers want to test these basic functions using a simple task with pictures and odors.

Objective:

To see if performance in a learning task differs between people who have opioid-use disorder and people who don t.

Eligibility:

Adults 21-60 years old who are willing to fast for at least 6 hours and smell food odors. Those with an opioid-use disorder must either not use for at least 3 weeks or be in treatment.

Design:

Participants will have 1 visit that will take up to 5 hours.

Before the visit, participants will be asked to not eat or drink anything except water for at least 6 hours.

At the visit, participants will be checked for signs of intoxication.

Participants will give urine and breath samples.

Participants will have tests of learning and behavior. They will look at shapes on a computer screen. The shapes will be paired with different food odors.

The odors will come from a sterile tube placed under the nose.

Participants will have their breathing monitored with a belt around the upper abdomen.

About 30 days and 60 days later, participants will be called and asked about their drug use over the past 30 days.

Read the detailed description

Background. People with substance-use disorders may have difficulty guiding their behavior on the basis of not-yet-experienced outcomes such as long-term effects of substance use. Use of mental inferences about future outcomes can be tested in a relatively simple laboratory task called sensory preconditioning.

Objective. To test whether sensory-preconditioning performance is worse in people with opioid use disorder (OUD) than in healthy, demographically matched controls. To increase generalizability, we will examine OUD participants who are in agonist treatment (abstinent or not) and OUD participants who are abstinent but not in treatment. We do not have a hypothesis about differences between those two groups, but we hypothesize that among agonist-treated OUD participants, performance will correlate with degree of abstinence.

Participant population. We will enroll 3 groups of men and women: (1) history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment, (2) OUD being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone), (3) no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes.

Experimental design. Between-groups cross-sectional single-session laboratory study, with telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days.

Methods. Each participant will participate in a sensory preconditioning task conducted in a single session. The task uses food odors delivered via nasal cannula and paired with visual cues on a computer screen. There are three phases: (1) Preconditioning, in which 2 pairs of visual cues (A+B, C+D) are shown on the computer screen; participants should acquire automatic associations between A+B and between C+D. (2) Conditioning, in which participants learn associations between the second cue of each pair (B and D) and either a sweet odor (B1), a savory odor (B2), or no odor (D); and (3) Probe Test, in which participants predict whether a visual cue will be paired with the sweet odor, the savory odor, or no odor, by pressing a left, middle, or right button. No odors are actually delivered in the probe test. The test of inference-guided behavior is the ability to associate visual cues A and C with an odor despite their never having been directly paired with an odor. In telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days, participants will be asked to report drug use and associated problems since the session or follow-up call.

Primary outcome measures. (1) Value-based outcome inference as measured using responding to cues A minus C in the probe test. It is defined as the percentage of trials in which behavioral responses indicate a prediction of any odorant (sweet or savory), independent of whether this prediction is correct. Responding to cues B minus D will be used as a covariate to control for differences in olfactory acuity and non-inference-based task performance.

Secondary outcome measures. (1) The percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct. (2) Response latency per cue type. (3) Amplitude and (4) latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type. (5) Acquisition (% responding to B minus D in the last run of conditioning) during the training portion of the inferencing task. (6) Drug use and associated problems at follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Drug Addiction

Keywords

  • Addiction
  • Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Associative Learning
  • Implicit Learning
  • Natural History
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,472 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 129 across 184 observational studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community sample

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

The enrollment target for the protocol is 120 (40 healthy controls, 40 patients on agonist maintenance, and 40 participants who have met DSM 5 criteria for OUD, but are now abstinent (for at least 3 weeks) and not on agonist maintenance.

All Participants

  • Age between 21 and 65 years inclusive. Rationale: objective olfactory impairment grows more prevalent with age; after age 53, the prevalence is 24.5%, increasing to 62.5 % in people aged 80-97 years.
  • Willing to fast for at least 6 hours prior to the study session and be exposed to food odors. These will be assessed with the "019 Additional History Form" questionnaire.

Additional Criteria for Abstinent OUD group

  • History of opioid-use disorder (), to be assessed via the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) or the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). History of SUDs can include substances in addition to opioids (e.g., cocaine).
  • Abstinent > 3 weeks from all illicit substances (tobacco smoking and nondependent drinking permissible), to be assessed via 30-day timeline follow-back calendar. (Current abstinence will be confirmed via urine screen: see exclusion criteria.) Rationale: Although heterogeneity will be considerable, what all enrollees will have in common is having become abstinent from opioids long enough to be past withdrawal symptoms. Their heterogeneity in duration of abstinence and other drug-history measures will enable us to examine relationships between those things and inferencing performance.

Additional Criteria for In-treatment OUD group

-Current enrollment in treatment for OUD with buprenorphine or methadone (>3 weeks on stable dose). Current use of illicit substances during treatment is permissible but not required. Rationale: Again, heterogeneity will be considerable, but what all enrollees will have in common is having sought treatment for their OUD and being currently maintained on an agonist that permits adaptive everyday functioning. Their heterogeneity in ongoing use of illicit substances will enable us to examine relationships between inferencing performance and treatment response.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

All participants

  • Anosmia, dysosmia, or hyposmia (poor olfactory function), to be assessed via Sniffin Sticks threshold test \<4 or via Sniffin Sticks odor identification test \<10.
  • History of any neurological condition resulting in inability to perform study task. Examples include but not limited to degenerative processes of the CNS (Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease); other neurologic diseases (Huntington disease, multiple sclerosis, other motor-neuron diseases); inflammatory conditions (sarcoidosis, Wegener granulomatosis); or significant cerebrovascular disease including (but not limited to) epilepsy, stroke, or meningitis; traumatic brain injury (TBI) or major head trauma with sustained loss of consciousness (>30 min). To be assessed by history and physical and evaluation to sign screening consent. Eligibility will be determined based on MAI review of participants ability to perform study task. MAI will consider but is not limited to H and P results for mental status exam, language exam, and attention span exam. Rationale: any of these could impair task performance.
  • History of current (past 12 months) uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder including major affective disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, and PTSD. (Candidates will not be excluded for a history of major psychiatric disorder that is now being successfully treated.) To be assessed by MINI or SCID interview. Rationale: could impair task performance.
  • History of anaphylaxis due to, e.g., significant asthma, food or non-food allergy, or intolerance to odors (including latex, detergents, soaps, etc.). To be assessed by history and physical. Rationale: could make odorant exposure risky.
  • Current use of medications or substances that affect alertness and that cannot be withheld on the morning of the study visit (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.). To be assessed by history and physical. Whether candidate will be requested to withhold any medication will be determined based on MAI judgment. Additionally, if participant has a BrAC >0.08, MAI will use clinical judgement to determine if participant should be rescheduled. Rationale: could impair task performance.
  • For women: pregnancy. To be assessed by history and physical and by urine testing. Rationale: Could affect task performance-physiological and hormonal changes during pregnancy influence rhinological function.
  • Any other medical illness or condition that in the judgment of the investigators is incompatible with study participation.

Additional criteria for Control Group

  • History of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes), or current use of any drug for nonmedical purposes. Controls, who cannot have a history of OUD, will be assessed by their medical history and physical examination for the presence of any signs or symptoms consistent with opioid withdrawal. Any Control with any sign or symptom consistent with opioid withdrawal will be evaluated by the MAI to rule out opioid withdrawal if possible.
  • Urine positive for any illicit drug. Rationale: Controls should have no drug use. A UDS that is positive for a prescribed medication that the MAI has determined is not due to illicit drug use will not be exclusionary.

Additional criteria for Abstinent Group

  • Urine positive for any illicit drug. Rationale: Abstinent OUD group should have no drug use in the last 3 weeks which would include the several-day time frame to which urine screens are sensitive. A UDS that is positive for a prescribed medication that the MAI has determined is not due to illicit drug use will not be exclusionary.
  • Current signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal. These will be assessed in the Abstinent group via the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and the Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS).

Additional criteria for In-treatment OUD group

-Urine negative for opioid agonist that the participant is taking as part of their OUD treatment. Rationale: In-treatment OUD group should be in treatment. A negative test suggests the participant is not adhering to their treatment plan. In-treatment OUD participants may test positive for other substances as well as their opioid agonist because they may have ongoing illicit drug use.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • Abstinent OUD

    Men and women with history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment

  • Controls

    Men and women with no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes

  • In-treatment OUD

    Men and women with opioid use disorder (OUD) being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome inferencing in the probe test

    Percentage of trials with cues A and C in which the participant predicts any odor (sweet or savory), regardless of whether the prediction is correct.

    Time frame: During task

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct.

    Task-performance measure of secondary interest

    Time frame: During task

  2. Response latency per cue type

    Task-performance measure of secondary interest

    Time frame: During task

  3. Amplitude of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type

    Task-performance measure of secondary interest

    Time frame: During task

  4. Latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type

    Task-performance measure of secondary interest

    Time frame: During task

  5. Drug use at follow-up

    Clinical-outcome measure

    Time frame: 30 and 60 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schoenbaum G, Chang CY, Lucantonio F, Takahashi YK. Thinking Outside the Box: Orbitofrontal Cortex, Imagination, and How We Can Treat Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Dec;41(13):2966-2976. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.147. Epub 2016 Aug 11. PubMed 27510424 ↗
  • Jones JL, Esber GR, McDannald MA, Gruber AJ, Hernandez A, Mirenzi A, Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal cortex supports behavior and learning using inferred but not cached values. Science. 2012 Nov 16;338(6109):953-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1227489. PubMed 23162000 ↗
  • BROGDEN WJ. Sensory pre-conditioning of human subjects. J Exp Psychol. 1947 Dec;37(6):527-39. doi: 10.1037/h0058465. No abstract available. PubMed 18920626 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

5 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Jun 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 99 months after the start.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 15, 2026: primary completion Oct 2026 → Oct 2027 and completion Oct 2026 → Oct 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2018
First posted
Nov 19, 2018
StartActual
Jun 7, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2027was Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027was Oct 2026
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026→Oct 1, 2027
Oct 15, 2026
Study completion
Oct 1, 2026→Oct 1, 2027
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 5 updates
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  2. Oct 20, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  3. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  4. Oct 15, 2026
    Primary completion Oct 1, 2026→Oct 1, 2027
    Study completion Oct 1, 2026→Oct 1, 2027
  5. Oct 2, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03745339
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2018
Start date
Jun 7, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

NIDA IRP Screening Team
Contact
researchstudies@nida.nih.gov
(800) 535-8254
Thorsten Kahnt, Ph.D.
Contact
thorsten.kahnt@nih.gov
(667) 312-5175
Thorsten Kahnt, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion