An observational study in Opioid-Related Disorders and Drug Addiction, sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.
Sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) · Observational
Background:
People with addictions often find it hard to choose the long-term benefits of abstinence over the short-term effects of using drugs. Researchers think this is partly due to parts of the brain involved in certain types of learning and decision-making. Researchers want to test these basic functions using a simple task with pictures and odors.
Objective:
To see if performance in a learning task differs between people who have opioid-use disorder and people who don t.
Eligibility:
Adults 21-60 years old who are willing to fast for at least 6 hours and smell food odors. Those with an opioid-use disorder must either not use for at least 3 weeks or be in treatment.
Design:
Participants will have 1 visit that will take up to 5 hours.
Before the visit, participants will be asked to not eat or drink anything except water for at least 6 hours.
At the visit, participants will be checked for signs of intoxication.
Participants will give urine and breath samples.
Participants will have tests of learning and behavior. They will look at shapes on a computer screen. The shapes will be paired with different food odors.
The odors will come from a sterile tube placed under the nose.
Participants will have their breathing monitored with a belt around the upper abdomen.
About 30 days and 60 days later, participants will be called and asked about their drug use over the past 30 days.
Background. People with substance-use disorders may have difficulty guiding their behavior on the basis of not-yet-experienced outcomes such as long-term effects of substance use. Use of mental inferences about future outcomes can be tested in a relatively simple laboratory task called sensory preconditioning.
Objective. To test whether sensory-preconditioning performance is worse in people with opioid use disorder (OUD) than in healthy, demographically matched controls. To increase generalizability, we will examine OUD participants who are in agonist treatment (abstinent or not) and OUD participants who are abstinent but not in treatment. We do not have a hypothesis about differences between those two groups, but we hypothesize that among agonist-treated OUD participants, performance will correlate with degree of abstinence.
Participant population. We will enroll 3 groups of men and women: (1) history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment, (2) OUD being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone), (3) no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes.
Experimental design. Between-groups cross-sectional single-session laboratory study, with telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days.
Methods. Each participant will participate in a sensory preconditioning task conducted in a single session. The task uses food odors delivered via nasal cannula and paired with visual cues on a computer screen. There are three phases: (1) Preconditioning, in which 2 pairs of visual cues (A+B, C+D) are shown on the computer screen; participants should acquire automatic associations between A+B and between C+D. (2) Conditioning, in which participants learn associations between the second cue of each pair (B and D) and either a sweet odor (B1), a savory odor (B2), or no odor (D); and (3) Probe Test, in which participants predict whether a visual cue will be paired with the sweet odor, the savory odor, or no odor, by pressing a left, middle, or right button. No odors are actually delivered in the probe test. The test of inference-guided behavior is the ability to associate visual cues A and C with an odor despite their never having been directly paired with an odor. In telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days, participants will be asked to report drug use and associated problems since the session or follow-up call.
Primary outcome measures. (1) Value-based outcome inference as measured using responding to cues A minus C in the probe test. It is defined as the percentage of trials in which behavioral responses indicate a prediction of any odorant (sweet or savory), independent of whether this prediction is correct. Responding to cues B minus D will be used as a covariate to control for differences in olfactory acuity and non-inference-based task performance.
Secondary outcome measures. (1) The percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct. (2) Response latency per cue type. (3) Amplitude and (4) latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type. (5) Acquisition (% responding to B minus D in the last run of conditioning) during the training portion of the inferencing task. (6) Drug use and associated problems at follow-up.
1,472 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 129 across 184 observational studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.
Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (43%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Community sample
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
The enrollment target for the protocol is 120 (40 healthy controls, 40 patients on agonist maintenance, and 40 participants who have met DSM 5 criteria for OUD, but are now abstinent (for at least 3 weeks) and not on agonist maintenance.
All Participants
Additional Criteria for Abstinent OUD group
Additional Criteria for In-treatment OUD group
-Current enrollment in treatment for OUD with buprenorphine or methadone (>3 weeks on stable dose). Current use of illicit substances during treatment is permissible but not required. Rationale: Again, heterogeneity will be considerable, but what all enrollees will have in common is having sought treatment for their OUD and being currently maintained on an agonist that permits adaptive everyday functioning. Their heterogeneity in ongoing use of illicit substances will enable us to examine relationships between inferencing performance and treatment response.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
All participants
Additional criteria for Control Group
Additional criteria for Abstinent Group
Additional criteria for In-treatment OUD group
-Urine negative for opioid agonist that the participant is taking as part of their OUD treatment. Rationale: In-treatment OUD group should be in treatment. A negative test suggests the participant is not adhering to their treatment plan. In-treatment OUD participants may test positive for other substances as well as their opioid agonist because they may have ongoing illicit drug use.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Men and women with history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment
Men and women with no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes
Men and women with opioid use disorder (OUD) being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone)
Outcome inferencing in the probe test
Percentage of trials with cues A and C in which the participant predicts any odor (sweet or savory), regardless of whether the prediction is correct.
Time frame: During task
Percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct.
Task-performance measure of secondary interest
Time frame: During task
Response latency per cue type
Task-performance measure of secondary interest
Time frame: During task
Amplitude of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type
Task-performance measure of secondary interest
Time frame: During task
Latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type
Task-performance measure of secondary interest
Time frame: During task
Drug use at follow-up
Clinical-outcome measure
Time frame: 30 and 60 days
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Jun 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 99 months after the start.
Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 15, 2026: primary completion Oct 2026 → Oct 2027 and completion Oct 2026 → Oct 2027.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) →