CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05450471Updated Jul 8, 2022

Effectiveness of Endonasal Polymeric Implant for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Corticosteroid Topical and Placebo in Rhinosinusitis Chronic, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-08.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2021, registered Jan 2022).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate a steroid-embedded Terpolymers polymer implant of L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) at the level of disease control in patients with eosinophilic and central compartment chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after placement of the endonasal device, compared to a control group (placebo). The secondary objectives of this study are to assess comfort, perception of improvement and satisfaction, as well as adverse events.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial will be carried out, with a blinded participant, therapist and evaluator. Patients over 18 years of age, with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who have already undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CENS), but who do not have the disease under control and, therefore, with an indication for a new CENS, will be selected. Participants will come from the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic of the academic and public service of the University of São Paulo - USP. Eligible patients will receive either the Terpolymers L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) polymer implant placement or the placebo polymer. The primary outcome will be the control of the symptoms of chronic uncontrolled rhinosinusitis that will be evaluated through the NOSE Questionnaire, a nasal endoscopic evaluation based on the Lund-Kennedy criteria and the SNOT-22 Questionnaire. The sample size calculation was performed based on a difference between the intervention and placebo groups of 30% for cases that achieved disease control, resulting in a sample of 36 participants (18 in each group). Data will be analyzed using mixed linear models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhinosinusitis Chronic
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery, but who do not have the disease under control. The uncontrolled disease and its respective classification regarding the degree of the disease will be carried out through 3 assessments: 1) Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Questionnaire (NOSE) validated version in Portuguese; 2) nasal endoscopic evaluation; and, 3) Sino Nasal Outcome Test Questionnaire (SNOT-22). Through the NOSE questionnaire, the patient's disease will be classified as "Controlled", "Partially Controlled" or "Uncontrolled (Uncontrolled)". Any variation in the endoscopic evaluation score based on the Lund-Kennedy Criteria will be considered an alteration. And for the SNOT-22 Questionnaire, changes will be considered when the total score varies by at least 11 points. Patients who present these 3 alterations will be considered to have the 'uncontrolled disease' and, therefore, will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malformations, trauma and/or tumors in the nasal and paranasal sinuses will be excluded;
  • Patients with a history of recent nasal surgery up to 6 months previously, with glaucoma and cataracts.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate Terpolymers polymer implant

    The polymer implant will be placed in the ethmoidal region, at the same time that the nasal endoscopic examination will be performed. The polymer in this study is biocompatible. The polymers will be made in the biomaterials laboratory located at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP), located in the city of Sorocaba-SP. Polymers will be provided free of charge for the study.

    Drug: Corticosteroid Topical

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo polymer implant

    Placebo polymer implant

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCorticosteroid Topical

    The L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) Terpolymers polymer implant will be placed in the ethmoidal region, at the same time that the nasal endoscopic examination will be performed.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nasal Obstruction

    Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids). The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  2. Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation

    The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  3. Sino Nasal Outcome Test

    Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Morning serum level of cortisol, albumin and serum globulin

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  2. Morning serum level of cortisol, albumin and serum globulin

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  3. ACTH - adrenocorticotropic hormone

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 15 and 60 aftern intervention

  4. ACTH - adrenocorticotropic hormone

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  5. Complete blood count

    A complete blood count (CBC) is a blood test used to evaluate your overall health and detect a wide range of disorders, including anemia, infection and leukemia. A complete blood count test measures several components and features of your blood, including: Red blood cells, which carry oxygen White blood cells, which fight infection Hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells Hematocrit, the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component, or plasma, in your blood Platelets, which help with blood clotting

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  6. total and serum IgE (blood test)

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  7. total and serum IgE (blood test)

    blood test

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  8. Cortisol level in 24-hour urine

    urine test

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  9. Cortisol level in 24-hour urine

    urine test

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  10. Intraocular pressure profile - IOP

    ophthalmologic assessment - fluid overload test and the lens by slit lamp examination

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  11. Intraocular pressure profile - IOP

    ophthalmologic assessment - fluid overload test and the lens by slit lamp examination

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  12. Patient comfort

    self-reported on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates very uncomfortable and 100 indicates very comfortable

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  13. Patient comfort

    self-reported on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates very uncomfortable and 100 indicates very comfortable

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  14. Patient self-reported perception of improvement and satisfaction with the implant

    Measured on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no change in symptoms and dissatisfaction, and 100 indicates resolved symptoms and satisfaction

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  15. Patient self-reported perception of improvement and satisfaction with the implant

    Measured on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no change in symptoms and dissatisfaction, and 100 indicates resolved symptoms and satisfaction

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  16. Adverse events

    Adverse events will be measured through changes in blood and urine tests and also on a self-reported basis.

    Time frame: Day 15 after intervention

  17. Adverse events

    Adverse events will be measured through changes in blood and urine tests and also on a self-reported basis.

    Time frame: Day 60 after intervention

  18. Nasal Obstruction

    Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids). The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

    Time frame: Day 45 after intervention

  19. Nasal Obstruction

    Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids). The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

    Time frame: Day 90 after intervention

  20. Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation

    The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.

    Time frame: Day 45 after intervention

  21. Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation

    The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.

    Time frame: Day 90 after intervention

  22. Sino Nasal Outcome Test

    Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.

    Time frame: Day 45 after intervention

  23. Sino Nasal Outcome Test

    Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.

    Time frame: Day 90 after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Luiz Eduardo Flório Junior
    Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05450471
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Responsible party
Luiz Eduardo Florio Junior (Principal Investigator, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2022
Start date
Aug 20, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion