CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05443009Updated Nov 25, 2024

Self-Reported Pain in Children Submitted to Single Infiltration of Articaine During Primary Molar Extraction

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine and Articaine in Dental Pain and Anesthesia, Local, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Completed at 4 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of articaine in controlling self-reported pain compared with conventional lidocaine anesthesia in children requiring extraction of deciduous maxillary molars. Only one extraction will be performed on each child. At least two consultations will be necessary to carry out the present controlled, randomized, and blinded study. All participants will be treated by the same dentist. Self-reported pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.

Read the detailed description

In the present study, self-reported pain during extraction of a maxillary primary molar with one buccal infiltration anesthesia with articaine will be compared with the conventional technique (buccal infiltration and palatal supplementation) with lidocaine. The study design will be a blind, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. The anesthetic will be administered according to the weight of the child, using a table with the amount of anesthetic per weight group and the maximum recommended dose as reference. The hypothesis is that articaine, due to its anesthetic properties, is able to anesthetize as well as lidocaine with only one oral infiltration, without the need for additional anesthesia, which may guarantee better participant comfort, less dental anxiety, and less chair time. The use of the Visual Analogue Scale is important to assess the pain perceived by the children and to ensure the reliability of the responses. Participant comfort will be evaluated at each stage of the proposed treatment, and withdrawal from participation will be guaranteed at any time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Pain
  • Anesthesia, Local

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • articaine
  • lidocaine
  • child
  • pain
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical criteria: the presence of coronary destruction precluding restoration or adequate use of absolute isolation for endodontic and restorative procedures; perforation of the pulp chamber floor.
  • Radiographic criteria: deciduous molars with at least one non-resorbed half-length root presenting carious lesions or defective restorations associated with signs or symptoms suggestive of pulp necrosis with endodontic contraindication (periapical or interradicular lesion extending over more than half of the roots or involving the crypt of the permanent successor tooth; the presence of pathologic resorption of more than 1/3 of one or more roots; failure of endodontic treatment with the persistence of periapical or inter-radicular lesion with or without clinical signs and symptoms; internal resorption).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with acute pain or presence of odontogenic infection associated with systemic signs and symptoms and in cases of urgency;
  • History of bleeding or blood clotting problems or taking medications that alter blood clotting prior to the procedure;
  • Hypersensitivity or history of allergy to the drugs used in the research;
  • Asthma;
  • History of liver disease;
  • History of sulfite allergy;
  • Report of post-traumatic stress disorders or recurrent hospitalizations, personality or anxiety disorders, diagnosis of phobias or definite uncooperative behavior;
  • Neurological disorders or communication difficulties;
  • Use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications up to 5 hours before the procedure;
  • Parents or guardians unable to be available for follow-up and/or respond to information necessary for the survey within 24 hours of the procedure.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine

    Thirty-eight (38) children will receive conventional infiltration anesthesia (buccal infiltration injection followed by complementary injections on the palatal region) with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine at a dose previously calculated by weight. Two-thirds of the anesthetic will be injected into the buccal area and 1/3 into the palatal area. Other Names: Control Group

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Articaine

    Thirty-eightt (38) children will receive a single buccal infiltration injection with 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine at a dose previously calculated by weight. Other Names: Test Group

    Drug: Articaine

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine

    A buccal infiltration injection followed by palatal injections and interpapillary injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.

    Also known as: Control Grup

  • DrugArticaine

    A single buccal infiltration injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.

    Also known as: Test Grup

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dental Pain

    Self-assessment of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100mm, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Immediately after the maxillary primary molar extraction

Other outcomes

  1. Dental Pain

    Pain is evaluated by the outcome assessor using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale (FLACC 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome) and the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FBRS 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: During the injection of local anesthesia and the surgical procedure

  2. Dental Pain

    Self-assessment of pain using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FACES 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia and the maxillary primary molar extraction

  3. Dental Pain

    Self-assessment of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100mm, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia

  4. Heart rate variability

    Heart rate variability to be verified and recorded with the heart rate sensor (Polar H-10)

    Time frame: Immediately before, durin, and immediately after the surgical procedure

  5. Heart rate

    Heart rate to be verified and recorded at moments described above carried out with the heart rate sensor (Polar H-10) and pulse oximeter

    Time frame: Immediately before, durin, and immediately after the surgical procedure

  6. Evaluation of Post-surgical Pain

    Self-assessment of pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100 mm, higher values represent a worse outcome) and the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FBRS 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome) in the postoperative period. It will be applied through teleconsultation

    Time frame: 24 hours after the surgical procedure

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO)
    Florianópolis, Brazil
  • Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO)
    Palhoça, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - USFC
    Santa Catarina, Brazil
  • Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO)
    São José, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Can single buccal infiltration with 4% articaine induce sufficient analgesia for the extraction of primary molars in children: a systematic literature review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):179-186. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.179. Epub 2020 Aug 27. PubMed 32934983 ↗
  • Taneja S, Singh A, Jain A. Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul 15;42(4):273-281. PubMed 32847666 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05443009
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Responsible party
Danielle Cristina Alves Rigo (Principal Investigator, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 5, 2022
Start date
Jun 30, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2024
Completion
Nov 21, 2024
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Study contacts

Mariane Cardoso, PhD
study director · Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC
Carla Santana, PhD
study director · Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion