ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07125313HYUpdated Jun 22, 2026

Effect of Yoga Training on Cardiovascular and Mental Health Parameters in Hypertensive Patients

An interventional study of YOGA and Control in Hypertension, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study will be to analyze the effect of 16 weeks of Yoga training on cardiovascular, autonomic, mental health, and cognitive parameters in hypertensive individuals. This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial to be conducted with adults and elderly (40 years or older), of both sexes, diagnosed with High Blood Pressure (HBP), who will be randomized into two groups: Yoga Group (YG) and Control Group (CG). The YG will undergo a Yoga training program involving breathing techniques, mobility, physical postures, relaxation, and meditation for 16 weeks. In the first eight weeks (phase 1), three supervised weekly sessions will be held. In the last eight weeks of the study (phase 2), the training will consist of three supervised weekly sessions and the delivery of an asynchronous video lesson, with the weekly frequency then increasing (from three to four sessions per week). The video lesson will be available on a digital platform. Before, after eight weeks, and after 16 weeks, cardiovascular, autonomic, mental and cognitive health parameters will be assessed. Furthermore, the biomarkers Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), serotonin, and nitric oxide will be analyzed at different assessment times of the study, as well as biochemical profile tests (glucose, total cholesterol, among others), functional capacity tests, and body composition. This project is expected to contribute to the literature by better elucidating the effects of Yoga on the cardiovascular, mental, and cognitive health of hypertensive individuals. The SPSS (21.0) statistical package will be used for data analysis. After confirming the appropriate assumptions, generalized estimating equations will be used, followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, with a significance level of 5%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hypertension

6,114 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 912 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 100 across 4,575 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults or elderly individuals
  • >= 40 years
  • Both sexes
  • Diagnosis of hypertension controlled by up to three medications
  • Who do not present high cardiovascular risk
  • Who have not engaged in a physical exercise program in the six months prior to the start of the study will participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adherence of less than 75% of training sessions
  • Diagnosis of other diseases during the study
  • Adherence to another physical exercise program
  • Change in the class and/or dose of antihypertensive medication during the study
  • Worsening of the disease (resting systolic blood pressure (BP) > 180 mmHg).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    YOGA

    The GY will receive an intervention involving Yoga Training (TY), which will be divided into two phases: Phase 1 (first eight weeks), which will be supervised, with three weekly sessions lasting 60 minutes, and Phase 2 (the following eight weeks), which will consist of three supervised sessions per week and the delivery of an asynchronous video lesson via a digital platform, with an incremental session of one session per week. Classes will also be 60 minutes long. The supervised sessions will take place at the UFSC CDS rehabilitation center. TY sessions will follow the following structure: breathing techniques (Pranayama), warm-up (Pavana Muktasana), physical postures in standing, sitting, and lying positions (Asanas), and relaxation (Yoganidrá). The postures will be prescribed by holding time in seconds (30 to 40 seconds), number of sets, and rest between sets. Each session will include beginner, intermediate, and advanced postures.

    Behavioral: YOGA

  • Other
    CONTROL

    The CG will not receive any intervention during the study and, like the GY subjects, will be instructed not to change their routines.

    Behavioral: Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralYOGA

    The participants randomized to the yoga group will perform 16 weeks of yoga training, three times/week for 60 minutes.

  • BehavioralControl

    Usual care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure

    Clinical BP (Systolic and Diastolic) will be measured using an oscillometric device (Omron HEM 742) (OMRON Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan), according to current recommendations, while ambulatory BP will be assessed over 24 hours using a DynaMAPA device (Cardios), both in accordance with current recommendations (FEITOSA et al., 2024).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) (EUROQOL, 2025; VAN ROTTERDAM, HENSLEY, HAZELTON, 2021). This questionnaire was introduced by the EuroQol Group in 2009. This questionnaire assessed quality of life and health perception, consisting of a page with an objective questionnaire and another page with a visual analog scale. The objective questionnaire is divided into five aspects: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each aspect has five levels ranging from "no problem" (1) to "extreme problem" (5), thus, higher scores denote a worse quality of life. The scale allows participants to record their overall health perception on a vertical scale, from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health) (BAGATTINI, 2015).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  2. Cognitive function

    Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire, which comprises eight domains. The maximum score is 30 points, corresponding to the best cognitive ability (HOBSON, 2015).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  3. Sleep Quality

    Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-BR) (BERTOLAZI et al., 2011; BUYSSE, 1989). It consists of a questionnaire composed of 19 self-administered questions, followed by five questions to be answered by the bed partner, if available. This questionnaire is composed of seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction (BERTOLAZI et al., 2011). Minimum: 0 points → excellent sleep and Maximum: 21 points → very poor sleep.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  4. Depressive Symptoms

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (APA, 2000; SANTOS et al., 2013), containing nine questions that assess the presence of symptoms of a major depressive episode, described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV): depressed mood, anhedonia, problems with sleep, fatigue or lack of energy, changes in appetite or weight, feelings of guilt or worthlessness, trouble concentrating, feeling sluggish or restless, and suicidal thoughts (APA, 2000). The PHQ9 assesses the frequency of symptoms in the past two weeks, assessed on a scale with the possible responses of "none of the time," "several days," "more than half the days," and "almost every day" (SANTOS et al., 2013). Values can range from 0 to 27, with higher values indicating a greater presence of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  5. Stress

    Perceived stress will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) (SIQUEIRA REIS, FERREIRA HINO \& RODRIGUEZ AÑEZ, 2010). It is an instrument that assesses the level of stress perceived by the person in recent weeks, that is, how they interpret and feel life situations as stressful. There are 10 items, each with answers from 0 to 4 points. Minimum possible: 0 points → no perceived stress and Maximum possible: 40 points → very high perceived stress. Higher values = greater perception of stress

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  6. Attention and inhibitory response capacity

    The Stroop Test will assess attention and inhibitory response capacity, calculating response time and accuracy. Better results are associated with shorter response times and fewer errors. By comparing congruent and incongruent conditions, cognitive interference and inhibitory control will be assessed (STROOP, 1935). Shorter reaction time and fewer errors → better cognitive performance and Longer reaction time and more errors → worse performance (may reflect attention difficulties, but not necessarily anxiety). There is no single universal minimum and maximum value.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  7. Health related quality of life

    The Short Form Health Survey - 36 items (SF-36) It is a questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life in a broad way, covering physical, emotional and social aspects. Assesses 8 domains: Functional capacity, Physical aspects, Pain, General health, Vitality, Social aspects, Emotional aspects and Mental health. The SF-36 has a scoring system in which higher values indicate better, not worse, quality of life. Score for each domain: ranges from 0 to 100 0 → worst possible state 100 → best possible state Summary scores (physical and mental components) are also typically converted to this 0-100 scale (Ware; Sherboune, 1992).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

  8. Anxiety

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) is an instrument used to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients. HAD-A → Anxiety Subscale (7 items) and HAD-D → Depression Subscale (7 items). Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Subscale score: Minimum: 0 points (no symptoms) and Maximum: 21 points (very severe symptoms). Higher values indicate more symptoms of anxiety or depression, depending on the subscale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 and 16 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 16 months after the start.

Of 1,403 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypertension, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,498 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 23, 2025
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
StartActual
Aug 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2026
Last update
Jun 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07125313
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Responsible party
Aline Mendes Gerage (PhD, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
Start date
Aug 11, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Aline Gerage, PhD
Contact
alinegerage@yahoo.com.br
554837218554

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion