CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05440539Updated Jun 19, 2025Results posted

Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy

An interventional study of Written Handouts and Interactive Workshop in Pelvic Floor Disorders, Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-19.

Sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2020, registered Jun 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the increase in knowledge of pregnant patients regarding pelvic floor disorders when comparing two educational interventions: written handouts vs interactive workshops.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) are common and significantly affect the quality of life of many women as they age. Pregnancy has been identified as a major risk factor for developing PFDs later in life. Educating women about PFDs is essential to ensuring that they present to care in a timely manner. No study has investigated different education tools during pregnancy. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial in pregnant patients comparing two educational tools: written materials about PFDs versus an educational workshops led by pelvic floor physical therapists (PFPTs). Pregnant patients will be recruited in the first and second trimester and randomized at that time. Knowledge will be assessed at baseline and again 6 weeks postpartum using the validated Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be evaluating referral patterns to urogynecology and to PFPTs from general OBGYNs and assessing any pelvic floor symptoms with the pelvic floor disability index (PFDI-20) at baseline and at 6 weeks postpartum.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Stress Urinary Incontinence
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • education
  • prolapse
  • incontinence
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 157 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant (prior to 27 weeks gestation)
  • English speaking
  • Greater than 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-english speaking
  • unable to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Written Group

    Participants received only written handouts with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive these handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery.

    Other: Written Handouts

  • Experimental
    Workshop Group

    Participants received written handouts and attend a virtual interactive workshop with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive the handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery. The workshop is conducted prior to completion of pregnancy.

    Other: Written Handouts · Other: Interactive Workshop

Interventions

  • OtherWritten Handouts

    The written materials were generated using the collaboration of healthcare communication specialists to generate content that is tailored to a younger age demographic of childbearing age regarding their risk of developing a pelvic floor disorder and what can be done to prevent or treat them in the future.

  • OtherInteractive Workshop

    Participants logged onto a virtual meeting platform and listened to a live 20 minute presentation by a pelvic floor physical therapist followed by time for questions, which were answered live. Participants anonymity was maintained by not allowing participants to view each other's name and disabling sharing of video feeds.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)

    Validated 24 question questionnaire with two sections to test knowledge on pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Scored out of 24 with higher scores indicating an increase in knowledge. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 24. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.

    Time frame: < 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)

    Validated questionnaire measuring presence and degree of both of pelvic floor disorder symptoms. Three sub sections with a possible score of 100 for each sub section. Scaled score is a combination of the 3 sub section scores for a total possible score of 300. Higher scores indicates increased symptom bother. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 300. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.

    Time frame: < 5 minutes

  2. Phone Interview

    One-on-one phone interviews conducted with participants in the workshop education group who experienced both educational tools. A research team member called them after completion of the study and conducted a brief 3 question interview to understand their opinion of the educational tools.

    Time frame: < 10 minutes

07

Results

Posted Jun 19, 2025

Participant flow

Recruited between August 2020 and Sept 2021. Patients were identified via medical records and approached in an obstetrics clinic at a single institution.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWritten GroupWorkshop Group
Started6159
Completed5451
Not completed78
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up44
Withdrew: Fetal demise, no longer pregnant34

Outcome measures

PrimaryProlapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)

Validated 24 question questionnaire with two sections to test knowledge on pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Scored out of 24 with higher scores indicating an increase in knowledge. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 24. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.

Time frame:
< 5 minutes
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
score on a scaleWritten GroupWorkshop Group
Pre-PIKQ17 (14 to 22)17 (13 to 20)
Post-PIKQ21 (19 to 23)21 (17 to 22)
SecondaryPelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)

Validated questionnaire measuring presence and degree of both of pelvic floor disorder symptoms. Three sub sections with a possible score of 100 for each sub section. Scaled score is a combination of the 3 sub section scores for a total possible score of 300. Higher scores indicates increased symptom bother. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 300. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.

Time frame:
< 5 minutes
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)
score on a scaleWritten GroupWorkshop Group
Pre-PFDI29.17 (12.50 to 64.58)36.47 (17.71 to 62.50)
Post-PFDI14.58 (0 to 25)9.89 (3.13 to 22.92)
SecondaryPhone Interview

One-on-one phone interviews conducted with participants in the workshop education group who experienced both educational tools. A research team member called them after completion of the study and conducted a brief 3 question interview to understand their opinion of the educational tools.

Time frame:
< 10 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phone Interview
ParticipantsWritten GroupWorkshop Group
Preferred workshop format—20
Preferred written format—14

Adverse events

Collected over August 2020 until September 2021 Participants were recruited in the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy and remained in the study until 6 weeks postpartum. The estimated time of involvement in the study was between 6-8 months depending on the point in pregnancy at which they were recruited.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Written Group0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)
Workshop Group0/59 (0%)0/59 (0%)0/59 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
Median32 (30 to 37)32 (29.5 to 35)32 (19 to 53)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
Female6159120
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
White283260
Hispanic201333
Black8715
Asian4711
Other (unspecified)101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
United States6159120
Income Level
Income Level(Participants)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
<10,000156
10,000-49,9996511
50,000-100,000161329
>100,000383674
Gravida
Gravida(Number of Pregnancies)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
Median1 (1 to 2.5)2 (1 to 3)2 (1 to 6)
Para
Para(Number of Deliveries)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
Median1 (1 to 2)1 (1 to 2)1 (1 to 5)
Pre-Pregnancy BMI
Pre-Pregnancy BMI(kg/m2)Written GroupWorkshop GroupTotal
Median27.1 (24.1 to 30.9)25.5 (22.65 to 30.35)26.2 (19.6 to 55.8)

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Houston Methodist Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Durnea UA, Dornan JC, O'Sullivan SM, O'Reilly BA. What is to blame for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women-Pre-pregnancy or intrapartum risk factors? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul;214:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Apr 23. PubMed 28525825 ↗
  • McLennan MT, Melick CF, Alten B, Young J, Hoehn MR. Patients' knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jan;17(1):22-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2. Epub 2005 Jul 8. PubMed 16003482 ↗
  • Koury H, Corral J, Bastow BD, Sheeder J, Muffly TM. A 3-Dimensional Anatomical Education Model in Postpartum Perineal Laceration Care: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):e23-e27. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000698. PubMed 30807431 ↗
  • Gagnon LH, Boucher J, Robert M. Impact of pelvic floor muscle training in the postpartum period. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2822-6. Epub 2015 Aug 19. PubMed 26282094 ↗
  • Shah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Braaten KP, Hoyte L. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0631-x. Epub 2008 May 15. PubMed 18480958 ↗
  • Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025. PubMed 16021067 ↗
  • Haller J, Keller Z, Barr S, Hadden K, Oliphant SS. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000653. PubMed 30807416 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 1, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05440539
Lead sponsor
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completion
May 5, 2021
Completion
Sep 10, 2021
Results posted
Jun 19, 2025
Last update
Jun 19, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion