ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05427448ALZANUpdated Dec 31, 2025

Validation of Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease

An interventional study of Measurement of amyloid and pTau blood biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Completed at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-31.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
342
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has gradually become one of the major global public health issues due to its prevalence, which increases with age and life expectancy, and the economic cost of caring for patients whose cognitive decline progressively leads to loss of functional autonomy.

The diagnosis of AD is based on a multidisciplinary approach, involving, among other things, evaluation of the medical history together with clinical symptoms and signs, neuropsychological tests and neuroimaging. The quantification of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core biomarkers (amyloid beta peptides [Ab1-40 and Ab1-42], total tau [t-tau] and its phosphorylated form on threonine 181 [p-tau(181)]) has progressively proven utility for the diagnosis of AD and its prodromal forms. CSF biomarkers are now included in international guidelines for the diagnosis of AD in research settings and clinical practice and the Alzheimer's Association appropriate use criteria for the use of lumbar puncture and CSF testing in the diagnosis of AD have been published. Such biochemical diagnostics are currently implemented in many specialized centers around the world.

Recent progress in the biological diagnosis of AD is considerable, with the possibility, thanks to ultra-sensitive tests realized notably with the SIMOA technology, of having Ab1-40, Ab1-42, t-tau and p-tau(181) also detectable in the blood using commercial kits. The performance for AD detection has been evaluated by many groups including on retrospective samples.

It is now essential to evaluate the interest of blood-based biomarkers of AD, prospectively and in real life condition to confront them with pre-analytical and analytical variabilities. It is also important to position them in relation to CSF analysis and AD management, from risk assessment, diagnosis, to therapeutic strategies.

Read the detailed description

Rationale of the project:

Recent progress in the biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is considerable, with the possibility, thanks in particular to ultra-sensitive tests, of having relevant blood biomarkers. These biomarkers, mainly represented by amyloid peptides, tau proteins and neurofilaments, make it possible to consider a stratification of patients according to different classifications, including the ATN scale. Their diagnostic value has been mainly tested on retrospective samples and it is now essential to use them prospectively to confront them with pre-analytical and analytical variability. It is also important to position them in relation to CSF analysis and AD management, from risk assessment, diagnosis, to therapeutic strategies.

Main objective:

To evaluate, in a prospective consecutive enrollment clinical trial, the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Secondary objectives:

  • Interest of blood biomarkers for detection of normal/pathological CSF profiles.
  • Interest of blood biomarkers for other disease including, amyloid angiopathy, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) or lewy body disease (LBD).

Methodology:

The investigator's laboratory daily receives CSF samples from regional "memory clinics" (mainly from Montpellier, Nîmes, Perpignan) for Aß40, Aß42, t-Tau and p-Tau(181) assays. The results of these tests performed weekly on an automated platform are used by neurologists for the diagnosis of AD. In this non-interventional multi-center clinical trial, with the informed consent of patients, one tube of plasma in addition to CSF is collected. In parallel with the CSF, amyloid peptides and plasma p-Tau is measured. The ApoE4 status will also be determined using MS as previously published by the investigator's group. Plasma biomarkers will then be combined to confirm the presence of AD, as has already been done on retrospective samples by the investigator's laboratory and others. Considering a disease prevalence rate of 20% in the screened population, and to reach a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity close to 90%, it is necessary to include a total of 311 patients in order to obtain an estimate of sensitivity and specificity with a 95% accuracy of +/- 10%. The lost to follow-up rate of about 10% requires the enrollment of 342 patients. The diagnostic performance of this profile will be compared to that of CSF, as well as to the diagnosis assessed by a multidisciplinary team one year after sampling.

Expected benefit:

The confirmation that blood biomarkers of AD achieve satisfactory diagnostic performance in a clinical setting allows them to be considered in routine use, as a less invasive method, thus with greater acceptance and also the possibility of longitudinal use. The benefit also lies in the evaluation of the interest of supplemental biomarkers such as NfL, for related diseases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Dementia
  • Tauopathies

Keywords

  • blood
  • Alzheimer
  • biomarker
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 342 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,261 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients consulting in memory clinics from Montpellier, Nîmes, or Perpignan.
  • Age >= 18 years old
  • CSF AD biomarkers performed for diagnostic purpose in clinical routine practice
  • Having given their written and enlightened consent
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of the national health insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • or refusal of lumbar puncture
  • Patient deprived of freedom, by court or administrative order, or major protected by law
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
342 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospective multisite clinical trial with consecutive recruitment.

    Patients consulting in memory clinics from Montpellier, Nîmes, or Perpignan. CSF AD biomarkers performed for diagnostic purpose in clinical routine practice

    Diagnostic Test: Measurement of amyloid and pTau blood biomarkers

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMeasurement of amyloid and pTau blood biomarkers

    Detection of plasma Amyloid beta 1-40 and 1-42 peptide and phosphorylated tau isoforms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

    Calculate the performance (sensitivity, specificity) of biomarkers, alone or in combination, for the detection of Alzheimer's disease as defined by the McKhann criteria.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prediction of CSF profile

    Calculate the performance (sensitivity, specificity) of biomarkers, alone or in combination, for the detection of normal vs pathological CSF profile (ATN)

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Diagnostic performance of blood biomarkers for FTD or LBD

    Calculate the performance (sensitivity, specificity) of biomarkers, alone or in combination.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Montpellier University Hospital
    Montpellier, Occitanie 34000, France
  • Nîmes University Hospital
    Nîmes, Occitanie 30000, France
  • Perpignan Regional Hospital
    Perpignan, Occitanie 66000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Delaby C, Alcolea D, Hirtz C, Vialaret J, Kindermans J, Morichon L, Fortea J, Belbin O, Gabelle A, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Lleo A, Lehmann S. Blood amyloid and tau biomarkers as predictors of cerebrospinal fluid profiles. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Feb;129(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s00702-022-02474-9. Epub 2022 Feb 15. PubMed 35169889 ↗
  • Lleo A, Zetterberg H, Pegueroles J, Karikari TK, Carmona-Iragui M, Ashton NJ, Montal V, Barroeta I, Lantero-Rodriguez J, Videla L, Altuna M, Benejam B, Fernandez S, Valldeneu S, Garzon D, Bejanin A, Iulita MF, Camacho V, Medrano-Martorell S, Belbin O, Clarimon J, Lehmann S, Alcolea D, Blesa R, Blennow K, Fortea J. Phosphorylated tau181 in plasma as a potential biomarker for Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome. Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 14;12(1):4304. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24319-x. PubMed 34262030 ↗
  • Alcolea D, Delaby C, Munoz L, Torres S, Estelles T, Zhu N, Barroeta I, Carmona-Iragui M, Illan-Gala I, Santos-Santos MA, Altuna M, Sala I, Sanchez-Saudinos MB, Videla L, Valldeneu S, Subirana A, Pegueroles J, Hirtz C, Vialaret J, Lehmann S, Karikari TK, Ashton NJ, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Belbin O, Blesa R, Clarimon J, Fortea J, Lleo A. Use of plasma biomarkers for AT(N) classification of neurodegenerative dementias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;92(11):1206-1214. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326603. Epub 2021 Jun 8. PubMed 34103344 ↗
  • Mondesert E, Cristol JP, Bargnoux AS, Duchiron M, Busto GU, Hirtz C, Barnier-Figue G, Perrein F, Turpinat C, Jurici S, Gabelle A, Bennys K, Lehmann S, Delaby C. Influence of Decreased Kidney Function on Plasma Biomarkers of Neurodegenerative Disorders in Routine Care: Confirmation of the Interest of Ratios. Neurology. 2026 May 12;106(9):e214931. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214931. Epub 2026 Apr 14. PubMed 41980230 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2022 to primary completion in May 2025, 29 months.

Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's 29 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 959 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2022
First posted
Jun 22, 2022
StartActual
Nov 24, 2022
Primary completionActual
May 20, 2025
CompletionActual
May 20, 2025
Last update
Dec 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05427448
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2022
Start date
Nov 24, 2022
Primary completion
May 20, 2025
Completion
May 20, 2025
Last update
Dec 31, 2025

Study contacts

Sylvain Lehmann, MD PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion