CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05415397INFLAMEDUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Treating Immuno-metabolic Depression With Anti-inflammatory Drugs

A Phase 3 interventional study of Celecoxib 400mg and Placebo in Depressive Disorder, Major and Inflammation, sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As the role of (neuro)inflammation in depression is emerging, augmentation of antidepressant treatments with anti-inflammatory drugs such as celecoxib has shown encouraging preliminary results. However, inflammation is not present in all depressed patients. Depression is heterogeneous: patients express diverse and sometimes opposing symptoms and biological profiles. The investigators of the present trial recently introduced the concept of ImmunoMetabolic Depression (IMD), characterized by the clustering of inflammatory/metabolic dysregulations and atypical, energy-related symptoms (hyperphagia, weight gain, hypersomnia, fatigue and leaden paralysis), and present in approximately 30% of cases. Converging evidence suggests that in this subgroup of depression cases, inflammation may exert a crucial pathobiological mechanism, representing therefore an actionable therapeutic target. In this trial IMD will be applied as a tool to personalize treatment, by matching depressed subjects with IMD with a targeted anti-inflammatory add-on treatment.

In this study, 140 persons with IMD will be selected. In this specific group of patients, the investigators will test whether celecoxib add-on (400 mg/d) is more effective than placebo in the treatment of depression through a 12-week double-blind, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial. By selecting specifically depressed patients with IMD, the proposed treatment selectively targets key inflammatory pathophysiological pathways to enhance clinical outcome for depression. This personalized approach is expected to lead to large health gains for a sizable proportion of patients. The main hypothesis is that the group of patients with IMD receiving TAU + celecoxib, as compared to the TAU + placebo, will show a better symptom course over the 12-week follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Depression is a major driver of disability and related health-care costs. Available treatment options are far from optimal, with only \~60% response. Developing effective treatments requires new treatment targets to depression pathophysiology. As the role of (neuro)inflammation in depression is emerging, augmentation of antidepressant treatments with anti-inflammatory drugs such as celecoxib has shown encouraging preliminary results. However, inflammation is not present in all depressed patients. Depression is heterogeneous: patients express diverse and sometimes opposing symptoms and biological profiles. The investigators of the present study recently introduced the concept of ImmunoMetabolic Depression (IMD), characterized by the clustering of inflammatory/metabolic dysregulations and atypical, energy-related symptoms (hyperphagia, weight gain, hypersomnia, fatigue and leaden paralysis), and present in 30% of cases. Converging evidence suggests that in this subgroup of depression cases, inflammation may exert a crucial pathobiological mechanism, representing therefore an actionable therapeutic target. In this study IMD will be applied as a tool to personalize treatment, by matching depressed subjects with IMD with a targeted anti-inflammatory add-on treatment. The underlying hypothesis is that this personalized intervention in subjects with IMD, through a reduction of inflammation, lowers depressive symptoms and associated physical fatigue, while increasing functioning compared to placebo.

Objective: Among patients under treatment for depression, 140 persons with IMD will be selected. In this specific group of patients, the investigators will test whether celecoxib add-on (400 mg/d) is more effective than placebo in the treatment of depression through a 12-week double-blind, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial.

Study design:12-week double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial Study population: 140 persons with major depressive disorder (DMS-5) with atypical, energy-related symptoms (≥6 on IDS atypical, energy-related symptoms) AND low-grade inflammation (CRP>1mg/L) (e.g. ImmunoMetabolic Depression), and under treatment with SSRI or SNRIs.

Intervention: celecoxib add-on (400 mg/d) vs placebo Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome parameter is the difference in trajectories of depression symptoms, as measured with the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - self-report during follow-up. Secondary outcome parameters include amongst others, response on the IDS, remission, anxiety, fatigue, food craving, sleep and adverse side events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder, Major
  • Inflammation

Keywords

  • INFLAMED
  • Depression
  • Inflammation
  • Immuno-metabolic Depression
  • Celecoxib
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

2,740 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 558 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 80 across 2,282 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc is the lead sponsor of 302 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD confirmed with clinical interview (MINI-S voor DSM-5 Nederlandse versie 2019)
  • Currently using pharmacotherapy (e.g., SSRI, SNRI, TCA, TetraCA, MAOI, other antidepressant [bupropion, vortioxetine, agomelatine])) and/or psychotherapy. Subjects should be on the current treatment for at least 4 weeks
  • IDS-SR score ≥26 (moderate to severe depressive symptoms) and a score ≥6 on atypical, energy-related symptoms scale from IDS
  • CRP > 1mg/L
  • A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and one of the following conditions applies: 1) is not a woman of child bearing potential (WOCBP); 2) Is a WOCBP and agrees to use, or is already using, a contraceptive method during the intervention period and up to 1 month after the intervention
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for celecoxib (history of: peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding, ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, allergic reactions to aspirin/NSAIDs/coxibs; impaired kidney function (creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min), impaired liver function (ALT > 2x ULT)
  • ECT in the past 3 months
  • Being on other psychotropic drugs
  • Clinically overt alcohol/drug dependence or other primary psychiatric diagnoses (schizophrenia, schizoaffective, OCD, or bipolar disorder)
  • Chronic use of anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids
  • Current use of anticoagulants
  • Not speaking Dutch
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Celecoxib

    Celecoxib 400 mg/day, 2 capsules (200 mg) daily, 12 weeks

    Drug: Celecoxib 400mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo, 2 capsules daily, 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCelecoxib 400mg

    Celecoxib add-on (400mg daily) add-on to treatment as usual (standard antidepressant treatment)

    Also known as: Celecoxib, ATC M01AH01

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo add-on to treatment as usual (standard antidepressant treatment)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depressive symptoms severity

    Depressive symptoms severity measured with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR; score ranging from 0 to 84, higher scores indicate higher severity of depressive symptoms). Trajectories of depressive symptoms will be modeled via mixed models including bi-weekly assessments

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants achieving Response

    Response is defined as 50% reduction in depressive symptoms severity measured with Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR; score ranging from 0 to 84, higher scores indicate higher severity of depressive symptoms)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Number of participants achieving Remission

    Remission is defined as absence of DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), identified using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview - Simplified (MINI-S voor DSM-5 Nederlandse versie 2019)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Symptom profile: atypical, energy-related depressive symptoms (AES)

    AES measured with 5 items (N 4, 12, 14, 20, 30) of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR). AES score ranging from 0 to 15, higher scores indicate higher severity of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Fatigue

    Fatigue measured by the Checklist Individuele Spankracht (CIS), which assess fatigue in 4 subscales: subjective experience of fatigue, reduction in motivation, reduction in activity and reduction in concentration. In each domain, higher scores indicate higher fatigue

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Food craving

    Food craving measured with General Food Craving Questionnaire Trait (G-FCQ-T; score ranging from 21 to 126, higher scores indicate more intense food craving)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Daytime sleepiness

    Daytime sleepiness measured with the Epsworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; score ranging from 0 to 24, higher scores indicates higher propensity to daytime sleepiness)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Night-time sleep

    Sleep Duration measured with items 1,2,3 and 4 (self reports of bed time, asleep time, wake-time, sleep duration) of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Anxiety symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms measured with General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7, score ranging from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate higher anxiety)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Functionality

    General functioning and disability measured with the WHO Disability Schedule (WHODAS, score ranging from 12 to 60, higher scores indicate more disability)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Pain severity

    Pain measured by numeric rating scale (score ranging from 0 to 10, higher scores indicate higher pain)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Therapy compliance

    Pill count

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Inflammatory and metabolic blood markers

    CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Side effects

    Side effects measured with the list applied in the PREDDICT RCT and theThe Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC-21)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Psychiatry Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, 1081 HJ, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Milaneschi Y, Lamers F, Berk M, Penninx BWJH. Depression Heterogeneity and Its Biological Underpinnings: Toward Immunometabolic Depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;88(5):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Jan 28. PubMed 32247527 ↗
  • Lamers F, Milaneschi Y, Vinkers CH, Schoevers RA, Giltay EJ, Penninx BWJH. Depression profilers and immuno-metabolic dysregulation: Longitudinal results from the NESDA study. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 6. PubMed 32272220 ↗
  • Penninx BW, Milaneschi Y, Lamers F, Vogelzangs N. Understanding the somatic consequences of depression: biological mechanisms and the role of depression symptom profile. BMC Med. 2013 May 15;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-129. PubMed 23672628 ↗
  • Milaneschi Y, Kappelmann N, Ye Z, Lamers F, Moser S, Jones PB, Burgess S, Penninx BWJH, Khandaker GM. Association of inflammation with depression and anxiety: evidence for symptom-specificity and potential causality from UK Biobank and NESDA cohorts. Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;26(12):7393-7402. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01188-w. Epub 2021 Jun 16. PubMed 34135474 ↗
  • Kohler O, Benros ME, Nordentoft M, Farkouh ME, Iyengar RL, Mors O, Krogh J. Effect of anti-inflammatory treatment on depression, depressive symptoms, and adverse effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 1;71(12):1381-91. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1611. PubMed 25322082 ↗
  • Kohler-Forsberg O, N Lydholm C, Hjorthoj C, Nordentoft M, Mors O, Benros ME. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment on major depressive disorder or depressive symptoms: meta-analysis of clinical trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 May;139(5):404-419. doi: 10.1111/acps.13016. Epub 2019 Mar 28. PubMed 30834514 ↗
  • Osimo EF, Baxter LJ, Lewis G, Jones PB, Khandaker GM. Prevalence of low-grade inflammation in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of CRP levels. Psychol Med. 2019 Sep;49(12):1958-1970. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001454. Epub 2019 Jul 1. PubMed 31258105 ↗
  • Baune BT, Sampson E, Louise J, Hori H, Schubert KO, Clark SR, Mills NT, Fourrier C. No evidence for clinical efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib with vortioxetine in the treatment of depression: A 6-week double-blind placebo controlled randomized trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;53:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.07.092. Epub 2021 Aug 8. PubMed 34375789 ↗
  • Strawbridge R, Arnone D, Danese A, Papadopoulos A, Herane Vives A, Cleare AJ. Inflammation and clinical response to treatment in depression: A meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;25(10):1532-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 20. PubMed 26169573 ↗
  • Zwiep JC, Bet PM, Rhebergen D, Nurmohamed MT, Vinkers CH, Penninx BWJH, Milaneschi Y, Lamers F. Efficacy of celecoxib add-on treatment for immuno-metabolic depression: Protocol of the INFLAMED double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022 Dec 30;27:100585. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100585. eCollection 2023 Feb. PubMed 36655056 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual data collected during the study of participants explicitly agreeing on this possibility trough written informed consent; data will be de-identified

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05415397
Lead sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Netherlands Brain Foundation
Responsible party
Yuri Milaneschi (Assistant Professor, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
Start date
Sep 28, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 19, 2026
Completion
Jun 19, 2026
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Yuri Milaneschi, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Femke Lamers, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion