CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05369884Updated May 11, 2022

Efficacy and Safety of WPQW Granule for Overlap of NERD and IBS-D

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of WPQW granule and WPQW granule simulant in Non-erosive Reflux Disease and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, sponsored by Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-11.

Sponsored by Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2021, registered May 2022).
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non-erosive reflux disease(NERD)and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome(IBS-D)are both the common refractory gastrointestinal diseases. Patients, who suffered from overlapping symptoms of NERD and IBS-D, present more serious symptom manifestation, anxiety, and worse life quality than those with solely disease. There is lack of effective treatment for overlapping gastrointestinal symptoms. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome differentiation and treatment has the advantages of overall regulation and individualized treatment, but lack of high-level evidence. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WPQW granule for the treatment of NERD overlapping IBS-D.

Read the detailed description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic relapsing acid-peptic disorder that is caused by the reflux of gastric or duodenum content. Non-erosive reflux disease(NERD), which account for 70%, is the most common type of GERD in the Asian population. Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome(IBS-D)is the mainly subtype of IBS, and the prevalence was found to be 46% in IBS. Both diseases aforementioned are common and frequent chronic diseases in the world, and the pathogenesis of which has not been fully defined. Current studies have shown that GERD can present in patients with IBS, vice versa. Up to 79% of patients with IBS co-exist with GERD-like symptoms, and 71% of patients with GERD co-exist with IBS-like symptoms. For those patients, they suffer from more serious symptom manifestation, anxiety, and worse life quality those with solely disease. The diagnosis and treatment of Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) mostly based on the idea of segmental diagnosis and single-target therapy in modern medicine, and there is lack of effective treatment for overlapping gastrointestinal symptoms. The advantages of holistic diagnosis therapy and individualized treatment in Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)have attracted international attention, but there is still lack of high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment of symptom overlap in FGIDs in TCM. In this study, we propose to conduct a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study of WPQW granule for the treatment of NERD overlapping IBS-D to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WPQW granule with the aim of obtaining high-level evidence-based medical evidence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-erosive Reflux Disease
  • Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 216 is above the median of 72 across 712 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients diagnosed with NERD and IBS-D simultaneously
  2. Patients who present cardinal symptoms like reflux, heartburn, abdominal pain/bloating, diarrhea, etc
  3. Patients diagnosed with syndrome of intermingled cold and heat of traditional Chinese medicine
  4. Patients have informed consent and are willing to receive corresponding treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with hiatal hernia
  2. Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, gastrointestinal tumor, chronic atrophic gastritis with dysplasia
  3. Patients with other serious organic diseases, such as acute cardiovascular disease, acute and chronic pancreatitis, cirrhosis, abnormal liver function (transaminases more than 1.5 times of normal value), abnormal thyroid function, diabetes mellitus with a history of more than 10 years, chronic renal insufficiency, hematologic disorders, and hematologic disorders, etc
  4. Patients with neurological disease or psychiatric impairment like severe anxiety, depression requiring long-term drug treatment
  5. Patients who cannot stop taking acid suppressants for a long time
  6. Alcohol or drug dependency or abuse
  7. Pregnant or lactating women
  8. Patients who have a history of allergies to all the test drugs
  9. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials or have participated in other clinical trials within 3 months
  10. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not suitable to participate in clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
216 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Oral administration of WPQW granule with warm water,2 sachets each time, 3 times a day, 1.5-2 hours after a meal. The medication period was 4 weeks.

    Drug: WPQW granule

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Oral administration of WPQW granule simulant,which containing 5% WPQW granule,with warm water,2 sachets each time, 3 times a day, 1.5-2 hours after a meal. The medication period was 4 weeks.

    Drug: WPQW granule simulant

Interventions

  • DrugWPQW granule

    WPQW granule, 2 sachets / time, 3 times / day.

  • DrugWPQW granule simulant

    WPQW granule simulant, 2 sachets / time, 3 times / day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of visual analogue scale (VAS) score of symptoms of reflux and heartburn

    During the medication period, the patients recorded the reflux and heartburn episodes (frequency and duration) within 24 hours per day on the symptom diary card, and VAS scores for reflux and heartburn symptoms was calculated as the mean score of each symptom in the past week. The episodes in the week before medication were used as the baseline, the mean score of any symptom decreased ≥50% from the baseline was recorded as response after weekly treatment, and the number of response weeks was considered effective if it was greater than 50% of the weeks of the whole treatment period.

    Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks during treatment period, 4 weeks during follow-up period

  2. Change of visual analogue scale (VAS) score of symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea

    During the medication period, the patients recorded the of abdominal pain (pain severity and frequency) and diarrhea (stool consistency and frequency based on Bristol stool form scale) within 24 hours per day on the symptom diary card. VAS score was conducted for the most severe abdominal pain, and the mean score was calculated for each week, with the week of episodes prior to medication administration as the baseline. It was considered effective when the weekly mean score decrease of at least 30% from baseline and the days of at least once type 6 or type 7 stool Bristol stool form every week decrease of at least 30% from baseline, referring to the efficacy evaluation of the technical guidelines for clinical studies of Chinese medicine for IBS published in 2017.

    Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks during treatment period, 4 weeks during follow-up period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome score

    The symptoms related to syndrome of intermingled cold and heat were scored. The cardinal symptom was scored 0, 2, 4, 6 and the secondary symptom scored 0, 1, 2, 3 respectively according to severity of each symptom. Total symptom score represented the syndrome score. Reduction in syndrome score represented Improvement.

    Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4 during treatment period, week 6 and week 8 during follow-up period

  2. Change of 36-item short-form (SF-36) score

    Health status was evaluated by a 36-item short-form (SF-36) containing eight health concepts. If the score descends, it indicates that the patient's condition has improved.

    Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4 during treatment period, week 6 and week 8 during follow-up period

  3. Change of FGI-checklist score

    A 20-item FGI-checklist was used to evaluate comprehensive symptom severity of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder (FGID), which covering esophageal, dyspeptic and bowel symptoms. If the score descends, it indicates that the patient's condition has improved.

    Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4 during treatment period, week 6 and week 8 during follow-up period

  4. Change of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) score

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) score was used to evaluate the efficacy of experimental drug. Reduction in total score represented Improvement

    Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4 during treatment period, week 6 and week 8 during follow-up period

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
    Beijing, Beijing 100091, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05369884
Lead sponsor
Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Collaborators
Tianjin Nankai Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Provinical Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2022
Start date
Dec 1, 2021
Primary completion
May 2023 (estimated)
Completion
May 2023 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2022

Study contacts

Beihua Zhang, M.D
Contact
zhangbeihua888@163.com
+86(010)62835248
Fengyun Wang, M.D
Contact
wfy811@163.com
+86(010)62835248
Xudong Tang, M.D
principal investigator · China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion