ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05368038ScreenPlusUpdated Jul 28, 2026

ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program

An observational study in Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2 and Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis, sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Enrolling by invitation at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 4 Weeks, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Primary conditionNiemann-Pick Disease, Type CRegistry: Niemann-Pick DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Niemann-Pick Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C, a narrower term within Niemann-Pick Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100,000
Ages
Up to 4 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. The study has three primary objectives: 1) define the analytic and clinical validity of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, 2) determine disease incidence in a large newborn population, and 3) assess the impact of early diagnosis on health outcomes. Over a nine-year period, ScreenPlus aims to screen 100,000 infants born in eight high birthrate hospitals in New York for a flexible panel of rare genetic disorders. This study will also evaluate the Ethical, Legal and Social issues pertaining to NBS for complex disorders, which will be done via online surveys that will be directed towards ScreenPlus parents who opt to participate and qualitative interviews with families of infants who are identified through ScreenPlus.

Read the detailed description

Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States have a newborn screening (NBS) test to check for certain medical conditions. All babies are screened, even if they appear healthy, because most of these conditions have no obvious physical findings in a newborn and might otherwise be diagnosed only after the development of serious problems, such as brain damage, organ damage, or death. In fact, NBS has been an integral part of preventable health care for over five decades, ever since the discovery that phenylketonuria is an easily diagnosed, preventable cause of intellectual disability.

Over the past two decades, there have been dramatic advances in screening technology, with a resulting increase in the number and complexity of disorders on NBS panels. This enhanced ability to screen brings questions about what types of disorders are appropriate for NBS. To that end, the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) was established in 2003 to make evidence-based recommendations at the national level regarding the suitability of various disorders for NBS. At present, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) includes 35 core disorders. The RUSP nomination process uses information about disease incidence and severity, natural history, benefits of early detection, safety and efficacy of treatment, analytic and clinical validity of the screening tests, as well as consideration of potential harms associated with screening and public health impact to determine whether a particular disorder is appropriate for NBS. However, there are many disorders for which this data is insufficient or missing. There are other disorders that challenge traditional NBS criteria by having predominantly later-onset phenotypes, poorly defined natural history, or unclear treatment outcomes. As these potentially life-threatening disorders might benefit from early detection, gathering and analyzing this data is both critical and timely. Accordingly, there is a great deal of interest in pilot NBS studies as a means to gather objective evidence about whether a disorder is appropriate for widespread screening.

ScreenPlus is a comprehensive, fluid, pilot NBS program that will screen 100,000 consented infants for specific disorders that are under consideration for universal NBS. This study will generate critical data about the validity of testing for these candidate disorders and provide estimates of disease incidence in a large newborn population. The investigators will evaluate different consent and engagement models, including direct, in-person interaction and the use of an electronic consent framework to educate parents about pilot NBS. The investigators will also collect nuanced information about the ethical implications of NBS, by conducting qualitative interviews with parents of children who have received a positive or uncertain NBS result. Parents who are eligible to participate in ScreenPlus will also have the opportunity to complete a flexible set of surveys of parent opinions about expanded NBS, research using dried blood spots, and other relevant topics. Furthermore, newborns who screen positive will be followed by a ScreenPlus physician. Through thoughtful collaboration with disease experts, the investigators will help systematically collect disease specific measures through detailed long-term follow-up which will enable us to critically evaluate how affected children identified through ScreenPlus are faring, allowing objective assessment of the impact early diagnosis has on outcome.

The investigators will share this important data with the NBS community to help inform objective decision-making about widespread screening recommendations. The ScreenPlus panel is fluid and disorders may be added/removed as disorders satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Additionally, recognizing that the NIH, advocacy groups, academics, and private industry all share a desire for clean, consented pilot NBS data, the investigators created a unique financial infrastructure. This investigator-driven arrangement permits all stakeholders to obtain aggregate data of interest in a mutually beneficial and cost-effective manner. ScreenPlus is guided by Scientific and Community Advisory Boards, who are comprised of rare disease experts, biochemistry specialists, physicians, bioethicists, and patient advocates. Overall, the investigators anticipate that ScreenPlus will become the premier consented pilot NBS program in the United States.

In sum, ScreenPlus will provide critical data about the appropriateness of NBS for candidate disorders, the feasibility and effectiveness of consented screening models, and parent informational needs and preferences as they relate to NBS for complex disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency
  • Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2
  • Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis
  • Fabry Disease
  • GM1 Gangliosidosis
  • Gaucher Disease
  • Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency
  • Metachromatic Leukodystrophy
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis II
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis III-B
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis IV A
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis VI
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis VII
  • Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C

Keywords

  • Newborn Screening
  • Rare Diseases
  • Families
  • Genetics
  • ELSI
03

In context

Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C Reclassified

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C; 8 are open to participants now.

Browse Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C studies →

Lead sponsor

Albert Einstein College of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 46 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 37 (80%) have results posted.

Compared within Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Niemann-Pick Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 4 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Newborns born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital who are less than four weeks old.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
  • Infants who are less than four weeks old, regardless of sex, gestational age, or health status.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A newborn screening sample is unavailable
  • Infants who are more than four weeks old
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital

    Parents who give permission will have their infant's sample screened for the ScreenPlus panel. Infants who screen positive after multi-tiered testing will be referred to a ScreenPlus doctor for confirmatory testing and care coordination.

    Diagnostic Test: Confirmatory Testing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testConfirmatory Testing

    All positive screens will be referred using standard notification procedures, where the New York State NBS reporting team contacts the ScreenPlus site medical geneticist, who will contact the newborn's pediatrician and family. The initial evaluation will include a clinical examination and confirmatory molecular studies, enzymatic and biomarker studies, when available. All aspects of the confirmatory testing will be at no cost to the participants. If confirmed to have a ScreenPlus disorder, the investigators will counsel the family and help connect them with treatment, clinical trials and disease specialists. The investigators will also provide emotional and social support resources to help in this journey.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the accuracy of the screening assays.

    Accuracy of the screening assay will be defined in terms of positive predictive value (proportion of confirmed cases comparative to the total number of infants who screened positive).

    Time frame: Through study completion up to 9 years.

  2. Define disease incidence in a large newborn population.

    Disease incidence will be calculated as the proportion of infants with a disorder comparative to the total population of infants screened.

    Time frame: Through study completion up to 9 years.

07

Study locations

9 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kelly NR, Orsini JJ, Goldenberg AJ, Mulrooney NS, Boychuk NA, Clarke MJ, Paleologos K, Martin MM, McNeight H, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Eiland LR, Ganesh J, Kupchik G, Lumba R, Nafday S, Stroustrup A, Gelb MH, Wasserstein MP. ScreenPlus: A comprehensive, multi-disorder newborn screening program. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2023 Dec 14;38:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101037. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38173711 ↗
  • Calonge N, Green NS, Rinaldo P, Lloyd-Puryear M, Dougherty D, Boyle C, Watson M, Trotter T, Terry SF, Howell RR; Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children. Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04. PubMed 20154628 ↗
  • Wasserstein MP, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Desnick RJ, Edelmann L, Estrella L, Holzman I, Kelly NR, Kornreich R, Kupchik SG, Martin M, Nafday SM, Wasserman R, Yang A, Yu C, Orsini JJ. The New York pilot newborn screening program for lysosomal storage diseases: Report of the First 65,000 Infants. Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):631-640. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0129-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10. PubMed 30093709 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05368038
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Cure Sanfilippo Foundation, Dana's Angels Research Trust (DART), Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Orchard Therapeutics, Passage Bio, Inc., Genzyme, a Sanofi Company, Sio Gene Therapies, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., The FireFly Fund, The Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Family Foundations, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Ara Parseghian Medical Research Fund, New York State Department of Health, Case Western Reserve University, Chiesi USA, Inc., Mayo Clinic Biopharma Diagnostics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2022
Start date
May 10, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Melissa Wasserstein, MD
principal investigator · Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion