ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05366712NEPTUNEUpdated Feb 13, 2026

Nexus Evaluation Primary Trident II Uncemented Shell

An interventional study of Stryker Trident® II HA coated cementless acetabula component in Arthritis of Hip, Hip Dysplasia and Hip Arthropathy, sponsored by NHS Lothian. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-13.

Sponsored by NHS Lothian · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective cohort study assessing the survival of a new acetabula component which is based on the original Trident acetabular system (cementless shell) which is used for Total Hip Arthroplasty. The manufacturer recently introduced the evolution of this product, the Trident® II acetabular shell which was launched in 2017. This implant is CE marked and is now widely available for the UK market, however has minimal clinical outcomes data to support its use. As part of a stepwise introduction of devices to orthopaedic practice. This study will report the 10 year implant survival and patient functional outcomes of this new implant.

Read the detailed description

125 patients will be recruited at a single-centre as part of a, phase-4 post-market surveillance, prospective cohort study

This is a 10-year study of the Trident II acetabular component as part of total hip replacement at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian.

Patients will receive a Trident® II acetabular component as part of primary total hip arthroplasty at the study centre. This component is CE marked and widely available for use by UK surgeons. The Trident® II shells are HA coated, cementless, press-fit acetabular shells composed of a Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) substrate featuring a CpTi roughened surface with PureFix™ HA. The cup is available in a range of sizes and is indicated for primary and revision procedures.

A standard operative technique will be employed by all study surgeons, using the posterior approach. The routine post-operative patient care protocol of the study centre will be employed.

10 year implant survival is the primary aim, but in addition functional and radiographical outcome will be assessed a 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis of Hip
  • Hip Dysplasia
  • Hip Arthropathy
  • Hip Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Uncemented
  • Hip
  • Trident II
03

In context

Hip Dislocation

107 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Dislocation; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is above the median of 86 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Hip Dislocation.

Browse Hip Dislocation studies →

Lead sponsor

NHS Lothian is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients undergoing planned primary total hip arthroplasty with standard implants, suitable for the use of the uncemented Trident® II acetabular component.
  2. Patients aged 18-75
  3. Patients willing and able to comply with the study protocol
  4. Patients that provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients not meeting study inclusion criteria
  2. Bone stock that is inadequate for support or fixation of the prosthesis
  3. Patients with a (kg/m2) >40
  4. Procedures performed for pain relief in those with severely restricted mobility
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trident® II HA coated shells

    Patients will receive a Trident® II acetabular component as part of primary total hip arthroplasty at the study centre. This component is CE marked and widely available for use by UK surgeons. The Trident® II shells are HA coated, cementless, press-fit acetabular shells composed of a Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) substrate featuring a CpTi roughened surface with PureFix™ HA.

    Device: Stryker Trident® II HA coated cementless acetabula component

Interventions

  • DeviceStryker Trident® II HA coated cementless acetabula component

    New acetabula component.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implant survival

    All failures or revision of the Trident® II components as well as liner revisions will be documented.

    Time frame: 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oxford hip score

    The Oxford Hip Score is a patient reported outcome measure that was developed specifically to measure the impact of pain and functional disability in patients undergoing hip replacement. It consists of 12-questions and is scored using a 5-item Likert response format, reported on a 0 (worst) to 48 (best) scale with higher scores representing better outcomes. It is an extensively validated and widely adopted outcome measure in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  2. Forgotten Joint Score

    The Forgotten Joint Score-12 is a patient-reported outcome scale to assess joint awareness in hips during various activities of daily living. It uses a 5-point Likert response format, consists of 12-questions and the raw score is transformed to range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) points. High scores indicate good outcome, i.e. a high degree of being able to forget about the affected joint in daily life. The FJS has a low ceiling effect and especially discriminates between good, very good and excellent outcome after THA and TKA. In its validation study it showed high internal consistency and discriminated well between patient groups known to show different outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  3. Short Form 12

    The Short Form 12 is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. The SF-12 results in two summary scores: the physical and mental components summary (PCS and MCS) scores. This score is calculated using norm-based methodology and population mean scores. Both PCS and MCS have a population mean score of 50 with an standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  4. EuroQol 5-dimension

    The EuroQol 5-dimension is a standardised instrument with five items for use as a measure of self-reported general health. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. This index for the UK population is on a scale of -0.594 to 1, where 1 represents perfect health and 0 represents death, with a utility of less than 0 being worse than death. It is one of the most frequently used measures to gain quality of life scores for analysis in health economy as utility weights for calculating quality of life adjusted life years (QALYs) can be obtained

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  5. Hip pain

    Global hip pain severity will be assessed using an 11 point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. The validity and sensitivity of the NRS has been well documented. As it has been suggested that using multiple measurements of pain status as opposed to a single value of 'current pain' may provide more realistic and meaningful measurements of pain intensity, separate assessments will be made of 'worst pain' and 'perceived mean daily pain' as has been specifically recommended for use in OA clinical trials.

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  6. Patient satisfaction

    Satisfaction questions are reported using a 5-point Likert response format hip (very satisfied, satisfied, unsure, dissatisfied or very dissatisfied). Specifically, questions will ask patients as to their 1. overall satisfaction with their operated hip 2. how well the surgery relieves pain in the operated joint 3. how well surgery increases the ability to perform regular activities of daily living and to perform heavy work or sport activities

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

  7. Radiographic (x-ray) assessment

    Plain radiographs will be obtained for assessment of fixation of the device evaluating radiolucent lines (mm), cup abduction angle (degrees), anteversion (degrees) and cup-centre-edge angle (degrees). Plain radiographs will be divided into the three acetabular zones according to those defined by DeLee and Charnley. Radiolucent lines will be defined as less then 2mm, more than this will be defined a lysis. Lysis in all three acetabular zone will define a loose cup. Acetabular component inclination and version will be calculated from anteroposterior radiographs of the hip and/or hip and pelvis using established and validated techniques. The safe zones for acetabular component positioning were assessed using the commonly adopted parameters defined by Lewinnek et al. (inclination of 30° to 50° and anteversion of 5° to 25°) and Callanan et al. (inclination of 30° to 45° and anteversion of 5° to 25°).

    Time frame: Preoperatively, 1, 5 and 10 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90. PubMed 8666621 ↗
  • Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13. PubMed 22000572 ↗
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. PubMed 8628042 ↗
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. PubMed 10109801 ↗
  • DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):20-32. PubMed 991504 ↗
  • Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS. A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Oct;451:134-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223988.41776.fa. PubMed 16721351 ↗
  • Park YS, Shin WC, Lee SM, Kwak SH, Bae JY, Suh KT. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 2;13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0767-4. PubMed 29609639 ↗
  • Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20. PubMed 641088 ↗
  • Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1. PubMed 20717858 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to patient confidentiality there is no plans to share patient level data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 29 months.

Of 32 interventional studies with no phase under Hip Dislocation, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18. This study's 29 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 4, 2022
First posted
May 9, 2022
StartActual
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Nov 25, 2024
CompletionEst.
Nov 25, 2034
Last update
Feb 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05366712
Lead sponsor
NHS Lothian
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 25, 2024
Completion
Nov 25, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 13, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Gaston, MBChB, FRCS
principal investigator · NHS Lothian

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion