ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05364606Updated Sep 16, 2026

Patient Specific Talus Spacer Post Approval Study

An observational study in Avascular Necrosis of the Talus, sponsored by Paragon 28. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Paragon 28 (part of Zimmer Biomet) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Humanitarian Device Exemption Approved Patient Specific Talus Spacer Post Approval Study.

Read the detailed description

This is a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) approved device called the Patient Specific Talus Spacer. This is a post approval study to determine the safety and probable benefit of the Patient Specific Talus Spacer in commercial use. The Patient Specific Talus Spacer is a solid polished replica of the patient's bone to allow the patient to regain motion and reduce pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Avascular Necrosis of the Talus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Avascular Necrosis
  • Talus
  • Ankle
03

In context

Osteonecrosis

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteonecrosis; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 121 across 127 observational studies indexed under Osteonecrosis.

Browse Osteonecrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Paragon 28 is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

First submitted before Paragon 28 became part of Zimmer Biomet.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with Avascular Necrosis of the Ankle Joint.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject plans to undergo implantation of the Patient Specific Talus Spacer for avascular necrosis of the ankle joint independent of this research protocol;
  2. Avascular necrosis of the ankle joint;
  3. Age 21 years old or older;
  4. Subject has good general health; and
  5. Subject signs a written form (ICF) prior to the surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of any identified in the device Instructions for Use;
  2. Surgeon determines that the patient is not appropriate for the Talus Spacer procedure based on the device IFU (including the enumerated Warnings and Precautions);
  3. Based on the medical opinion of the surgeon, the patient is not appropriate for the Talus Spacer procedure;
  4. For female subjects, pregnancy;
  5. Active systemic disease, such as AIDS, , or active infection;
  6. Active infection or the skin is compromised at the surgical site; and
  7. Systemic disease that would affect the subject's welfare;
  8. Is a prisoner, incarcerated, or has been coerced to participate in the study that could impact the validity of results;
  9. Is currently participating in an therapy (device and/or pharmaceutical) within 30 days prior to entering the study or such treatment is planned during the time course of follow-up.
  10. If the Sponsor has notified the site that 30 subjects have been enrolled in the study with a Cobalt Chromium Patient Specific Talus Spacer, and the surgeon believes that a Cobalt Chromium Patient Specific Talus Spacer is the best option for the patient.
  11. If the Sponsor has notified the site that 30 subjects have been enrolled in the study with a Titanium (Ti6Al4V) with Titanium Nitride (TiN) coating Patient Specific Talus Spacer, and the surgeon believes that a Titanium (Ti6Al4V) with Titanium Nitride (TiN) coating Patient Specific Talus Spacer is the best option for the patient.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 50 Subjects

    50 Subjects Receiving the Patient Specific Talus Spacer.

    Device: Patient Specific Talus Spacer

Interventions

  • DevicePatient Specific Talus Spacer

    Patient Specific Talus Spacer is a solid polished replica of the patient's bone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinically Significant Improvement in Pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Clinically Significant Improvement in Pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 5 years compared to baseline on the 0 to 100mm scale. A lower score will indicate an improvement in pain.

    Time frame: At 5 years compared to Baseline

  2. A lack Secondary Subsequent Surgical Intervention at 5 years Post Operative assessed during the subject's visits

    A lack Secondary Subsequent Surgical Intervention (SSSI) at 5 years Post Operative

    Time frame: A patient will achieve the primary probable benefit endpoint only is they do not undergo a Secondary Subsequent Surgical Intervention at 5 years Post Operative as assessed during the subjects visits for the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Additional Analyses at 5 years Post Operative compared to baseline, Range of Motion of the Ankle.

    Additional analyses will be performed to observe improvement at 5-years post-procedure compared to baseline on ankle range of motion (ROM) as assessed by the surgeon at each follow up visit through 5 years Post Operative.

    Time frame: 5 Years Post Procedure compared to baseline.

Other outcomes

  1. Additional Analyses at 5 Years Post Operative compared to Baseline for Foot and Outcome Score FAOS

    Additional analyses will be performed to observe improvement at 5-years post-procedure compared to baseline on Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS - which include Pain, Other Symptoms, Sport and Recreation Function, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Foot and Ankle related Quality of Life (QOL). This is a series of questions for each sub section that the subject will answer at the subjects visits.

    Time frame: 5 Years Post Procedure compared to baseline

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Sutter Health Santa Rosa
    Santa Rosa, California 95403, United States
    Recruiting
    • Thomas Chang, DPM · Contact707-544-3400
    • Thomas Chang, DMP · Principal investigator
  • Fort Wayne Orthopedics
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804, United States
    Recruiting
    • Faith Etherington, PA-C · Contact260-436-8686
    • Matthew Beuchel, MD · Principal investigator
  • Mercy Institute for Foot & Ankle Reconstruction
    Baltimore, Maryland 21202, United States
    Recruiting
    • Katherine Convery · Contactkconvery@mdmercy.com · 410.332.9035
    • Patrick Maloney, MD · Principal investigator
    • Clifford Jeng, MD · Sub investigator
    • Lew Schon, MD · Sub investigator
    • Rebecca Cerrato, MD · Sub investigator
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
    Recruiting
    • Hana Hashioka · Contacthashiokah@musc.edu
    • Christoper Gross, MD · Principal investigator
    • Daniel Scott, MD · Sub investigator
  • UT Physicians Orthopedics - Pearland
    Pearland, Texas 77584, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — After study completion and data analysis, results of the study will be shared with the Investigator's who participated. Individual Patient Identifiers will not be provided. Only specific numbers from the statistical analysis will be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2033, 133 months after the start.

Of 59 observational studies under Osteonecrosis, half reached primary completion within 141 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 93 and three quarters within 184. This study's planned 133 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 4, 2022
First posted
May 6, 2022
StartActual
Jul 8, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2033
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2033
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05364606
Lead sponsor
Paragon 28
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2022
Start date
Jul 8, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Jacy Legue
Contact
jlegue@paragon28.com
720-399-3400
Caleigh Bates
Contact
cbates@paragon28.com
720-399-3400

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion