ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05352087Updated Apr 28, 2022

Effect Of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Patients With Grade II Cholecystitis

An interventional study of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cholecystitis, sponsored by Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-28.

Sponsored by Tepecik Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2019, registered Apr 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The timing ofthe cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis is still controversial. In our study, we aimed toinvestigate the effect of early and delayed cholecystectomy on difficultcholecystectomy, morbidity and mortality in patients diagnosed with Grade IIcholecystitis according to Tokyo 2018 guidelines.

Read the detailed description

The timing ofthe cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis is still controversial. In our study, we aimed toinvestigate the effect of early and delayed cholecystectomy on difficultcholecystectomy, morbidity and mortality in patients diagnosed with Grade II cholecystitis according to Tokyo 2018 guidelines.

Patients that applied to the emergency department and diagnosed with Grade II acute cholecystitis between December 2019 and June 2021 were included in this study. Cholecystectomy was performed within 7 days and 6 weeks after symptom onset. The effect of early and delayed cholecystectomy was observed. The study is single-centered and the patient group graded as Grade II according to the Tokyo 2018 guideline acute cholecystitis diagnostic criteria will be included in the study. Patients will decide on the treatment method to be applied with their consent. The patients will be divided into two groups as those operated in the early period (first 7 days) and those operated in the late period (>6 weeks). The parameters to be compared were the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open, bile duct injury and bile leakage rate, grade II-III complication rate in the Clavien Dindo complication scoring system, morbidity rate in the first 30 days postoperatively, and difficult cholecystectomy rate based on intraoperative imaging findings according to the Parkland scoring system. The research will be terminated when the number of 120 patients determined by the power analysis result is reached.

Chi-square and Student's t test will be used for the statistical evaluation of the results of the patients, respectively, for quantitative and continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test (two samples) or Kruskal-Wallis test (more than two samples) will be used for the analysis of abnormally distributed variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystitis

Keywords

  • Acute cholecystitis
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
03

In context

Cholecystitis

272 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is close to the median of 87 across 172 interventional studies indexed under Cholecystitis.

Browse Cholecystitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Grade II cholecystitis according to Tokyo 2018 guidelines
  • Patients older than 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age
  • Patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis
  • Patients with Grade I or Grade III cholecystitis
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients unable to comply with the treatment or who could not consent to the treatment due to their mental state
  • Patients that refused the treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    early cholecystectomy

    In early cholecystectomy group after antibiotherapy was started with ceftriaxone and metronidazole, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in the first 7 days following the hospitalization.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Active comparator
    delayed cholecystectomy

    Patients who accepted delayed surgery were also given the same antibiotherapy and operated after 6 weeks following their discharge

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is minimally invasive surgery to remove the gallbladder.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. mortality, morbidity and difficult cholecystectomy rates between two groups

    effect of the timing on mortality, morbidity and difficult cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis

    Time frame: patients will be followed up to the first 30 day period from discharge.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Health Sciences Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
    Izmir, Konak 35180, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, Kozaka K, Endo I, Deziel DJ, Miura F, Okamoto K, Hwang TL, Huang WS, Ker CG, Chen MF, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Noguchi Y, Shikata S, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Gabata T, Mori Y, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Jagannath P, Jonas E, Liau KH, Dervenis C, Gouma DJ, Cherqui D, Belli G, Garden OJ, Gimenez ME, de Santibanes E, Suzuki K, Umezawa A, Supe AN, Pitt HA, Singh H, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Teoh AYB, Honda G, Sugioka A, Asai K, Gomi H, Itoi T, Kiriyama S, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Matsumura N, Tokumura H, Kitano S, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9. PubMed 29032636 ↗
  • Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, Buchler MW, Kiriyama S, Kimura Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Yamashita Y, Okamoto K, Gabata T, Hata J, Higuchi R, Windsor JA, Bornman PC, Fan ST, Singh H, de Santibanes E, Kusachi S, Murata A, Chen XP, Jagannath P, Lee S, Padbury R, Chen MF; Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):578-85. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0548-0. PubMed 22872303 ↗
  • Borzellino G, Sauerland S, Minicozzi AM, Verlato G, Di Pietrantonj C, de Manzoni G, Cordiano C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9511-6. Epub 2007 Aug 18. PubMed 17704863 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Dec 10, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2019 to primary completion in Jun 2021, 18 months.

Of 79 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cholecystitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26. This study's 18 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 19, 2022
First posted
Apr 28, 2022
StartActual
Dec 14, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jun 14, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 14, 2021
Last update
Apr 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05352087
Lead sponsor
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Gizem Kilinc Tuncer (General Surgery Consultant, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 28, 2022
Start date
Dec 14, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 14, 2021
Completion
Jul 14, 2021
Last update
Apr 28, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion