ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07637201VNOTES-LS-FSFIUpdated Sep 8, 2026

V-NOTES Versus Laparoscopy for Sterilization and Sexual Function

An interventional study of V-NOTES Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy and Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy in Sexual Function Scores and Postoperative Recovery, sponsored by Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Tepecik Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare two minimally invasive surgical approaches, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) and conventional laparoscopy, in women undergoing bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does V-NOTES have a different effect on postoperative sexual function compared with conventional laparoscopy?
  • Does V-NOTES improve postoperative recovery, including pain, discharge time, and return to normal activity?
  • What surgical or medical problems occur with each surgical approach?
  • Researchers will compare V-NOTES with conventional laparoscopy to see whether one approach provides better postoperative sexual function and recovery outcomes after sterilization surgery.

Participants will:

  • Undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy using either V-NOTES or conventional laparoscopy.
  • Complete sexual function questionnaires before surgery, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 6 months after surgery.
  • Be evaluated for postoperative pain, discharge time, return to normal activity, need for additional pain medication, complications, and perioperative laboratory changes.
  • Attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
02

Conditions studied

  • Sexual Function Scores
  • Postoperative Recovery

Keywords

  • FSFI
  • V-NOTES
  • Laparoscopy
  • Sterilization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 30 to 45 years
  • Sexually active women
  • Women who have completed childbearing and request permanent surgical sterilization
  • Scheduled to undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for purposes
  • Able and willing to attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 6 months
  • Able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage 2 or higher pelvic organ prolapse
  • Active vaginal infection
  • History of rectal surgery
  • Suspected rectovaginal endometriosis
  • Suspected
  • Pregnancy
  • Menopause
  • Unable or unwilling to attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    V-NOTES

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo sterilization surgery, either bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy, using the V-NOTES approach.

    Procedure: V-NOTES Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy

  • Active comparator
    Laparoscopy

    Participants in this arm will undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization using conventional laparoscopy.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureV-NOTES Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy

    Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) will be used to perform bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization. In this approach, the peritoneal cavity will be accessed through a posterior vaginal fornix incision. A single-port transvaginal access platform will be inserted, and the sterilization procedure will be completed under endoscopic visualization. At the end of the procedure, the posterior vaginal fornix incision will be closed with absorbable suture.

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy

    Laparoscopy will be used to perform bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization. In this approach, the procedure will be performed through standard abdominal trocar access, including an umbilical trocar for laparoscope insertion and two additional lower abdominal trocars for surgical instruments. The sterilization procedure will be completed under laparoscopic visualization, and the abdominal skin incisions will be closed at the end of the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in postoperative sexual function as assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index total score

    The Female Sexual Function Index is a 19-item self-reported questionnaire that evaluates female sexual function across six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The total score ranges from 2.0 to 36.0, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. The outcome will be reported as the change in total Female Sexual Function Index score from baseline to 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. A positive change indicates improvement in sexual function, whereas a negative change indicates worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline, postoperative 6th week, and postoperative 6th month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body mass index (BMI)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. History of previous obstetric and non-obstetric surgery

    Previous surgical history will be assessed preoperatively using a structured case report form and review of the participant's medical records. Obstetric surgery includes previous cesarean section or surgery for pregnancy-related indications. Non-obstetric surgery includes previous gynecologic, abdominal, pelvic, or other surgical procedures unrelated to pregnancy. The number and percentage of participants with previous surgery will be compared between the V-NOTES and laparoscopy groups.

    Time frame: Baseline/preoperative assessment

  3. Participants With Pre-existing Comorbidities Assessed by Medical History and Medical Record Review

    Pre-existing comorbidities will be assessed at baseline using participant medical history and medical record review. Comorbidities will include chronic systemic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, thyroid disease, pulmonary disease, and other relevant chronic conditions. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one pre-existing comorbidity in each study group.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Duration of the surgical prosedure

    Defined as the time in minutes from the initial incision to completion of skin closure

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  5. Estimated intraoperative blood loss volume measured in milliliters

    Estimated intraoperative blood loss will be assessed during surgery and recorded in milliliters (mL). Blood loss will be estimated based on the volume of blood collected in the suction canister.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  6. Postoperative inflammatory marker - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: Preoperative and postoperative first day

  7. Postoperative inflammatory marker

    platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: Preoperative and postoperative first day

  8. Time to return to normal activity (day)

    Time frame: Postoperative (up to 6 months)

  9. Length of hospital stay (hour)

    Time frame: Postoperative (up to 1 week)

  10. Need for additional analgesic doses

    Time frame: Postoperative (up to 3 days)

  11. Complications

    Intraoperative (bleeding, organ injury) Postoperative (infection, wound dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula, readmission within the first 6 weeks, dyspareunia)

    Time frame: Intraoperative, postoperative (up to 6 months)

  12. Visual analog scale (VAS)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point pain intensity scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse postoperative pain. The mean Visual Analog Scale score will be compared between the V-NOTES and conventional laparoscopy groups.

    Time frame: Postoperative 6th and 24th hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Izmir Tepecik TRH
    Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tanaka M, Sagawa T, Yamazaki R, Myojo S, Dohi S, Inoue M. Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7. PubMed 23389066 ↗
  • Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar 16;4(3):65-74. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i3.65. PubMed 22442743 ↗
  • Li YC, Ku FC, Kuo HH, Tseng HJ, Wang CJ. Transvaginal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adnexectomy (TVEA vs. CLA): A propensity-matched study and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):336-341. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.013. PubMed 28600044 ↗
  • Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I. Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Jan;398(1):139-45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0993-x. Epub 2012 Aug 26. PubMed 22922839 ↗
  • Huang YT, Yang LY, Pan YB, Huang HY, Wu KY, Wang CJ, Weng CH. Learning Curve Analysis of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Adnexal Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb;27(2):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10. PubMed 30980993 ↗
  • Kaya C, Alay I, Cengiz H, Baghaki S, Aslan O, Ekin M, Yasar L. Conventional Laparoscopy or Vaginally Assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Pathologies: A Paired Sample Cross-Sectional Study. J Invest Surg. 2021 Nov;34(11):1185-1190. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1789246. Epub 2020 Jul 7. PubMed 32633168 ↗
  • Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. PubMed 10782451 ↗
  • Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466. PubMed 28186223 ↗
  • Kaya C, Aktoz F, Gunes AC, Tercan C, Sacinti KG, Yassa M, AlAli H. Evaluating the efficacy and benefits of vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Sep;313:114596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114596. Epub 2025 Jul 22. PubMed 40712463 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Jia Y, Dai X, Wang F, Gong Y. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. A randomized controlled trial. Ginekol Pol. 2024;95(5):343-349. doi: 10.5603/gpl.95422. Epub 2023 Dec 15. PubMed 38099663 ↗
  • Yan J, Zhou D, Zhang S, Zhang B, Tuo X, Meng Q, Lv Q. Clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign adnexal disease: a prospective trial. BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03226-5. PubMed 38969995 ↗
  • Mollahuseyinoglu Kullac F, Ozdemir AZ, Yildiz C. A single center retrospective study of vNOTES hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy operations. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40881. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040881. PubMed 39686461 ↗
  • Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):818-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 25. PubMed 24681063 ↗
  • Baekelandt J. Total Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy: A New Approach to Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1088-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 22. PubMed 26009278 ↗
  • Ahn KH, Song JY, Kim SH, Lee KW, Kim T. Transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign uterine adnexal pathologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jul 3. PubMed 22763314 ↗
  • Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):114-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01309-4. PubMed 15229442 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2025 to primary completion in Sep 2026, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2026
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
StartActual
Aug 6, 2025
Primary completionActual
Sep 3, 2026
CompletionActual
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07637201
Lead sponsor
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Onur Ada (Obstetrics and Gynecology Specialist, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
Aug 6, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 3, 2026
Completion
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion