ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05351060Updated Apr 28, 2022

Novel Splinting Technique Using 3D Models

An interventional study of Custom Fabricated Splint in Arthritis, Osteoarthritis Hand and Scleroderma, Systemic, sponsored by Giovanna Fichera. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-28.

Primary conditionArthritis, RheumatoidRegistry: ArthritisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Arthritis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Arthritis, Rheumatoid, a narrower term within Arthritis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Giovanna Fichera · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of a non-contact custom splint fabrication method for patients with chronic diseases suffering from hypersensitive skin or compromised skin integrity. Custom splinting by occupational therapists involves molding low-temperature thermoplastic material directly on patients' skin; however, skin sensitivity is a contraindication for splint fabrication. The study aims to recruit 10 male or female patients with either a diagnosis of scleroderma (SSc) or arthritis. A scan of the patient's hand and a 3D printer will be used to create a precise model of a patient's hand on which a custom splint will be fabricated. By taking this approach, traditional splinting is substituted by avoiding direct contact with the material on the surface of the patient's upper extremity. This technique creates therapeutic opportunities for underserved patients by expanding splinting options for patients with scleroderma and arthritis, and addressing the challenges associated with managing chronic diseases.

Read the detailed description

Arthritis is an inflammatory disease that occurs in the joints of the body. Scleroderma is a disease of the autoimmune system in which the body produces excess collagen in the skin and organs. Depending upon a patient's needs, occupational therapists (OTs) make custom hand splints to support individual goals and promote independence. Conventional splinting methods involve molding low-temperature thermoplastic material directly on a patients' skin; however, many chronic diseases including arthritis and scleroderma carry a predisposition for skin sensitivity or compromised skin integrity, leaving these populations with no alternative. The study will recruit 10 male or female patients with either a diagnosis of arthritis or scleroderma for a 14-week study. Researchers will use a scanner and 3D printer to create a model of a patient's hand prior to splinting, which will allow therapists to custom-fit the 105-degree splinting material on the model. Traditional splinting is substituted by avoiding fabricating the splint directly on the patient's hand and providing the opportunity for patients with hypersensitive skin to benefit from a custom-made splint. Implementing this technique creates opportunities by expanding splinting options for patients with chronic diseases. The goals of this study are to evaluate effectiveness, support positive engagement in daily activities, improve patient outcomes, and promote best practice. The research will also establish a foundation for future studies with custom splinting using 3D printed material.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis
  • Osteoarthritis Hand
  • Scleroderma, Systemic
  • Scleroderma, Diffuse
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Splints
  • Occupational Therapy, Hand
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional
  • Contracture
  • Rheumatology
  • Ulcer
  • Orthotic Devices
  • Range of Motion, Articular
03

In context

Arthritis, Rheumatoid Reclassified

3,332 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid; 443 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 96 across 2,220 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid.

Browse Arthritis, Rheumatoid studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Giovanna Fichera as lead sponsor.

Compared within Arthritis, Rheumatoid, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Arthritis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of either scleroderma, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis
  • Must have the potential to benefit from wearing a resting hand splint as determined by a certified hand therapist
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients exhibiting any open wounds on their hands or forearms
  • Exhibiting impaired decision making and ability to understand splint care and wear instructions as determined by the ability to answer the questions the student researcher asks after the participant has reviewed the splint education handout
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Unable to secure reliable transport for the duration of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3D model splinting intervention group

    The researcher will scan the participant's forearm, wrist, and hand with an iPhone camera through the Comb O\&P Scan App. Scans will be completed individually to maintain privacy. The entire Comb O\&P platform is HIPAA compliant. The data is de-identified encrypted when it moves from the iPhone app to the computer through the cloud. Precision Valve Automation (PVA) will use the de-identified scans to print the 3D models which are a precise replica of the participant's hand. Once the researcher obtains the 3D models, resting hand splints will be fabricated on the 3D models to provide custom-made hand splint(s) to each participant. The participants will receive the splint(s) to wear during the hours of sleep for six weeks.

    Other: Custom Fabricated Splint

Interventions

  • OtherCustom Fabricated Splint

    Participants will wear a customized splint on their affected hand(s)during the hours of sleep for the duration of the study.

    Also known as: Orthotic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in range of motion of the hand (measured with a goniometer)

    The active range of motion of the participant's affected forearm, wrist, and fingers will be assessed with a goniometer. A change in range of motion across two weeks is being assessed (before the intervention begins).

    Time frame: During the initial visit (two weeks before the intervention begins) and again during the second clinical visit (the day before the intervention begins)

  2. Change in range of motion of the hand (measured with a goniometer)

    The active range of motion of the participant's affected forearm, wrist, and fingers will be assessed with a goniometer. A change in range of motion across the six week intervention period will be assessed.

    Time frame: Every other week throughout the intervention period, a total of three times during the intervention which is six weeks long.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of reported comfort level (in hand) measured through a survey

    Patients will document their perceived comfort level in their affected hand in a questionnaire twice, across two weeks, before the study intervention begins. The scale is 0-10. 0 being least uncomfortable to 10 being very comfortable. The change in comfort across two weeks is being assessed before the intervention begins.

    Time frame: During the initial visit (two weeks before the intervention begins) and again during the second clinical visit (the day before the intervention begins)

  2. Change of reported comfort level (in hand) measured through a survey

    Patients will report their perceived comfort level in their hand each morning after wearing the splint in an online or hard copy questionnaire. The scale is 0-10. 0 being least uncomfortable to 10 being very comfortable. The change in comfort in the hand across the six week intervention period is being assessed.

    Time frame: Daily throughout the six week intervention period

  3. Change in hours of sleep measured through a survey

    Participants will log their hours of sleep and hours they wear their splint each night to determine if they are able to sleep longer when wearing the splint compared to before they wore the splint. This data will be tracked to ensure the intervention is not decreasing hours of sleep significantly. The change in hours of sleep across two weeks (before the intervention begins) will be assessed.

    Time frame: During the initial visit (two weeks before the intervention begins) and during the second clinical visit (the day before the intervention begins)

  4. Change in hours of sleep measured through a survey

    Participants will log their hours of sleep and hours they wear their splint each night to determine if they are able to sleep longer when wearing the splint compared to before they wore the splint. This data will be tracked to ensure the intervention is not decreasing hours of sleep significantly. The change in hours of sleep across the six-week intervention period will be assessed.

    Time frame: Daily throughout the six week intervention period

  5. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire

    Self-administered outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. This will be used to assess the participant's ability to complete occupation based tasks with their affected hand.

    Time frame: One time before the intervention begins (During the initial visit)

  6. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire

    Self-administered outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. This will be used to assess the participant's ability to complete occupation based tasks with their affected hand.

    Time frame: One time within a week of completing the six week intervention

  7. Number of patients with intact skin integrity of the hands through photographs

    Photographs of the wrist and hand will be taken to assess the skin integrity of the hand that is wearing the splint. Intact skin integrity is indicated by the absence of ulcers, sores, and redness.

    Time frame: Photographs of the hand will be taken one day before the six week intervention begins

  8. Change in the number of patients with intact skin integrity of the hands through photographs

    Photographs of the wrist and hand will be taken to assess the skin integrity of the hand that is wearing the splint. Intact skin integrity is indicated by the absence of ulcers, sores, and redness.

    Time frame: Every other week throughout the intervention period, a total of three times during the intervention which is six weeks long.

  9. Patient satisfaction with splinting process - Individual Interview

    The participants will complete a brief 15 minute interview to assess their overall satisfaction with the novel splinting method and splinting intervention. The interview will occur via Zoom or phone call. The participant will answer the following questions: 1. How do you feel the scanning process went? 2. Were you uncomfortable at all throughout the scanning process? (ie. Did your arm feel discomfort at any point? If so on a scale from 0-10 what was the discomfort level?) 3. How do you feel the splint intervention is going? 4. Do you have any questions or concerns?

    Time frame: Half way through the six week intervention period the participants will be interviewed (at week three)

  10. Patient satisfaction with splinting process - Individual Interview

    The participants will complete a brief 15 minute interview to assess their overall satisfaction with the novel splinting method and splinting intervention. The interview will occur via Zoom or phone call. The participant will answer the following questions: How do you feel the splint intervention went? 2. What would you have wished would have been different throughout this process? 3. Do you feel as though this process was beneficial for you?

    Time frame: Within a week of completing the six week intervention, the participants will be interviewed

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Russell Sage College
    Troy, New York 12180, United States
    • Christine Mulligan, Doctorate · Contactmullic@sage.edu · 518-244-4591
    • Debra Collette, Doctorate · Contactcolled@sage.edu · 518-244-4591
    • Giovanna Fichera, B.S · Sub investigator
    • Celeste Freeman, B.S · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2022; primary completion for Jul 2022, 1 month later.

Of 292 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Arthritis, Rheumatoid, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 348 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2022
First posted
Apr 28, 2022
StartEst.
May 16, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jul 15, 2022
CompletionEst.
Aug 19, 2022
Last update
Apr 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05351060
Lead sponsor
Giovanna Fichera
Collaborators
Precision Valve Automation, St Peters Health Partners, Ann Steffens Scleroderma Foundation, Russell Sage College
Responsible party
Giovanna Fichera (Co-Investigator, Russell Sage College) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 28, 2022
Start date
May 16, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 19, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 28, 2022

Study contacts

Christine Mulligan, OTD
Contact
mullic@sage.edu
518-244-2266
Debra Collette, OTD
Contact
colled@sage.edu
518-244-4591

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion