ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05331417Updated Apr 15, 2022

Bronchoscopic Score for Prediction of Herpes Simplex-virus Type 1 (HSV-1) Reactivation

An observational study in Tracheobronchitis and Herpes Simplex Infection, sponsored by University Hospital Muenster. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-15.

Sponsored by University Hospital Muenster · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2023, 3 years 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2021; still recruiting 5 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tracheobronchial reactivation of HSV-1 is a common finding in critically ill patients and is associated with longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay and mechanical ventilation. At present it is unclear whether the presence of HSV-1 reactivation can be predicted by the clinical phenotype. In the present study, the performance of a bronchoscopic score of tracheobronchial inflammation for prediction of tracheobronchial HSV-1 reactivation is investigated

Read the detailed description

Critically ill adult patients having a first diagnostic or therapeutic bronchoscopy are included. A standardized bronchoscopic score (values from 0 to 6) is assessed by an experienced ICU physician.

The score compounds are mucosal redness, mucosal swelling and vulnerability on contact. Compounds are quantified as "none" = 0, "some, disseminated" = 1, or "profound, ubiquitous" = 2 and added.

HSV-1 reactivation is detected by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of HSV-1-DNA from standardized bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

In addition, HSV-1-DNA from blood and markers of immunocompetence (lymphocyte subtype count, monocyte count and Human Leukocyte Antigen - DR isotype (HLA-DR) expression, immunoglobulins) are measured for secondary analyses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tracheobronchitis
  • Herpes Simplex Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bronchoscopy
03

In context

Herpes Simplex

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Simplex; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 300 across 36 observational studies indexed under Herpes Simplex.

Browse Herpes Simplex studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Muenster is the lead sponsor of 192 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Critically ill patients

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    1. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) 2. Indication for bronchoscopy during intensive care unit stay 3. Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Solid organ transplantation 2. Present coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection 3. Previous bronchoscopy during present hospital stay 4. Pregnancy 5. Known primary or secondary severe immunodeficiency
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPatients with herpes-simplex infection requiring bronchoscopy

    Due to the observational design of the study, no study-specific interventions are performed. The indication for bronchoscopy is determined by the responsible ICU physicians. Except for the above mentioned laboratory analyses, the treatment of the patients is completely guided by the responsible ICU physicians.

    Also known as: Observation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bronchoscopic score for prediction of tracheobronchial HSV-1 reactivation

    The score has values from 0 to 6, and for the primary analyses, HSV-1 reactivation is used as a binary variable (yes vs. no) dependent on the presence vs. absence of HSV-1-DNA in bronchoalveolar fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as best cut-off score values for prediction will be calculated

    Time frame: at study inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of the bronchoscopic score value with quantitative tracheobronchial HSV-1-DNA load

    Time frame: day of study inclusion

  2. Correlation of the bronchoscopic score value with quantitative blood HSV-1-DNA load

    Time frame: day of study inclusion

  3. 3. Correlation of tracheobronchial and blood HSV-1-DNA load with markers of immunosuppression (lymphocyte count, lymphocyte subgroups, monocyte count, monocyte HLA-DR expression, immunoglobulin concentration)

    Time frame: day of study inclusion

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2023, 18 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2022
First posted
Apr 15, 2022
StartActual
Sep 30, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2023
CompletionEst.
Aug 2025
Last update
Apr 15, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05331417
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2022
Start date
Sep 30, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2022

Study contacts

Christian Ertmer, MD
Contact
ertmer@anit.uni-muenster.de
+49-251-8347255
Kathrin Sperling, MD
Contact
sperlink@uni-muenster.de
Ertmer, MD
study chair · University Hospital Muenster, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Therapy and Pain Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion