ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05317390Updated Dec 2, 2025

Clinical Validation of DystoniaNet Deep Learning Platform for Diagnosis of Isolated Dystonia

An interventional study of DystoniaNet-based diagnosis of isolated dystonia in Dystonia, Drug Induced Dystonia and Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Primary conditionTorticollisRegistry: DystoniaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Dystonia — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Torticollis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Torticollis, a narrower term within Dystonia.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research involves retrospective and prospective studies for clinical validation of a DystoniaNet deep learning platform for the diagnosis of isolated dystonia.

Read the detailed description

Isolated dystonia is a movement disorder of unknown pathophysiology, which causes involuntary muscle contractions leading to abnormal, typically patterned, twisting movements and postures. A significant challenge in the clinical management of dystonia is due to the absence of a biomarker and associated 'gold' standard diagnostic test. Currently, the diagnosis of dystonia is guided by clinical evaluations of its symptoms, which lead to a low agreement between clinicians and a high rate of diagnostic inaccuracies. It is estimated that only 5% of patients receive an accurate diagnosis at symptom onset, and the average diagnostic delay extends up to 10.1 years. This study will conduct retrospective and prospective studies to clinically validate the performance of DystoniaNet, a biomarker-based deep learning platform for the diagnosis of isolated dystonia.

The retrospective studies will clinically validate the diagnostic performance of the DystoniaNet algorithm (1) in patients compared to healthy subjects (normative test), and (2) between patients with dystonia and other neurological and non-neurological conditions (differential test).

The prospective randomized study will validate the performance of DystoniaNet algorithm for accurate, objective, and fast diagnosis of dystonia in the actual clinical setting.

This research is expected to advance the DystoniaNet algorithm for dystonia diagnosis into its clinical use for increased accuracy of dystonia diagnosis. Early detection and diagnosis of dystonia will enable its early therapy and improved prognosis, having an overall positive impact on healthcare and patients' quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dystonia
  • Drug Induced Dystonia
  • Parkinson Disease
  • Essential Tremor
  • Dyskinesias
  • Myoclonus
  • Tic Disorders
  • Torticollis
  • Ulnar Nerve Entrapment
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Dysphonia
03

In context

Torticollis Reclassified

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Torticollis; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 50 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Torticollis.

Browse Torticollis studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (54%) have results posted.

Compared within Torticollis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Dystonia. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, with age across the lifespan;
  2. Patients will have at least one of the forms of dystonia, including focal dystonia (e.g., laryngeal, cervical, oromandibular, blepharospasm, focal hand, musicians), segmental dystonia, or generalized dystonia;
  3. Patients will have other movement disorders (Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dyskinesia, myoclonus) and other non-neurological conditions (tic disorders, torticollis, ulnar nerve entrapments, temporomandibular disorders, dysphonia) that mimic dystonic symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients who are incapable of giving ;
  2. Patients who are unable to undergo brain MRI due to the presence of certain tattoos and ferromagnetic objects in their bodies (e.g., implanted stimulators, surgical clips, prosthesis, artificial heart valve) that cannot be removed or due to pregnancy or breastfeeding at the time of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Retrospective clinical validation of DystoniaNet

    Retrospective studies will (1) clinically validate the diagnostic performance of DystoniaNet compared to a normal neurological state (normative test), and (2) develop and test DystoniaNet extensions in comparison with other neurological and non-neurological conditions (differential test).

  • Experimental
    Prospective clinical validation of DystoniaNet

    Prospective randomized studies will validate DystoniaNet performance for accurate, objective, and fast diagnosis of dystonia in the actual clinical setting.

    Diagnostic Test: DystoniaNet-based diagnosis of isolated dystonia

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDystoniaNet-based diagnosis of isolated dystonia

    DystoniaNet will be used for the diagnosis of dystonia and its differential diagnosis from other neurological and non-neurological disorders mimicking symptoms of dystonia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correctness of clinical diagnosis of dystonia using the DystoniaNet algorithm

    Correctness of dystonia diagnosis (yes dystonia/no dystonia) will be established using the DystoniaNet machine-learning algorithm

    Time frame: 4 years

  2. Time of clinical diagnosis of dystonia using the DystoniaNet algorithm

    The length of time (in months) from symptom onset to clinical diagnosis will be established using the DystoniaNet machine-learning algorithm

    Time frame: 4 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 70 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2021
First posted
Apr 7, 2022
StartActual
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
Last update
Dec 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05317390
Responsible party
Kristina Simonyan (Professor of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Kristina Simonyan, MD, PhD
Contact
simonyan_lab@meei.harvard.edu
617-573-6016
Kristina Simonyan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts Eye and Ear

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion