An observational study in Red Blood Cells, Schistocytes and Artificial Intelligence, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Observational
Erythrocyte morphology analysis is a key step in the diagnosis flowchart of anemia. It is performed on a peripheral blood smear after May Grümwald Giemsa staining. In the context of hemolytic anemias for example, it allows the recognition of therapeutic emergencies such as sickle cell disease crisis, malaria-induced hemolysis and thrombotic microangiopathy, the latter being characterized by the presence of schistocytes and justifying an immediate clinical care. However, cytological analysis of erythrocyte morphology requires pre-analytical interventions (smear spreading + staining), the quality of which determines the accuracy of the result. Moreover, it requires a good cytological expertise and may be sometimes subjective. For several years, alternative methods for erythrocyte morphology evaluation have been developed, based on automated hematology machines or automated microscopy. Nevertheless, none of them has yet proven itself in comparison with cytology, especially in the diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathies. By combining the advantages of flow cytometry and microscopy, flow imaging appears to be a promising technology for the diagnosis of anemias: it does not require any pre-analytical intervention, does not require any spreading and analyzes a large number of events. Moreover, it can be coupled with artificial intelligence via the generation of an apprenticeship by the constitution of a large image data base, which then allows the recognition of the different red blood cells morphologies without human eyes. The objective of this study is to build a data base containing the main red blood cell morphologies relevant in anemia, and to validate it through a comparison in anemic patients of erythrocyte morphological assessment either directly on whole blood by flow imaging or routinely by cytological analysis of peripheral blood smear after by a trained operator.
43 studies on the registry are indexed under Sickle Cell Trait; 11 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 109 across 20 observational studies indexed under Sickle Cell Trait.
Browse Sickle Cell Trait studies →Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens is the lead sponsor of 586 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Any patient for whom a blood test including a cytological evaluation of RBC morphology is performed in the routine laboratory of CHU Amiens
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
in order to develop a diagnostic assay using an innovative technology by imaging flow cytometry to identify red blood cell morphological anomalies in the diagnosis flowchart of anemia.
Concordance between classical cytological erythrocyte analysis and ImageStream flow imaging erythrocyte analysis
The investigators will characterize by flow imaging the normal and pathological erythrocyte morphologies by creating a bank of images representative of the main red blood cell abnormalities observed during anemias. The images will be classified manually by the investigators in order to create a morphological data base allowing apprenticeship via artificial intelligence. Once the database will be created, the investigators will validate it prospectively by comparison between classical cytological analysis and flow imaging on samples for which a blood test will be prescribed for anemia.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens →