ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05272579Updated Nov 15, 2024

PrePhage - Faecal Bacteriophage Transfer for Enhanced Gastrointestinal Tract Maturation in Preterm Infants

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Fecal Filtrate Transfer and Placebo in Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Microbial Substitution, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-15.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PrePhage - Fecal bacteriophage transfer for enhanced gastrointestinal tract maturation in preterm infants

This pilot triol has the primary goal of demonstrating the safety of transferring viruses and proteins from healthy term infants to preterm infants born between gestational age (GA) 26 + 0 and 30+6. The long-term goal is to develop a safe and effective treatment to prevent the severe gut disease called necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

NEC is a common disease in neonatal intensive care units affecting 5-10% of all admitted patients. 15-30% of the affected children die from the disease, and many of the survivors suffer from the effects of extensive gut surgery.

While the disease is caused by many different factors, recent research has shown the gut microbiome to be a central factor in the development of NEC. Furthermore, in the recent years special viruses called bacteriophages have shown potential in the treatment of various diseases.

By collecting feces from healthy, term infants and filtering it thoroughly, the investigators can provide a treatment that contains practically only viruses, proteins and nutrients. It is our belief that giving the preterm infants a mix of viruses including bacteriophages will prevent NEC.

To do this, the investigators will go through 3 stages:

  1. Recruiting and following healthy donor infants to study the microbiota and use feces from them to donate in stage 2 and 3
  2. Examining the safety of the treatment as well as how it works in preterm piglets
  3. Testing the treatment in preterm infants. 10 preterm infants will receive the treatment and 10 preterm infants will receive placebo. The investigators expect to see no serious side effects to the treatment. The investigators hope, but do not expect to be able to see a beneficial effect of the treatment.

If this pilot trial shows promising results, it will be followed be a larger clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

PrePhage - Fecal bacteriophage transfer for enhanced gastrointestinal tract maturation in preterm infants

This pilot trial aims to investigate if fecal filtrate transfers (FFT) to preterm infants is safe and tolerable. To investigate this, the investigators will recruit 20 donor infants and their mothers from time of delivery, and both will be subjected to a novel screening program including blood, urine, breastmilk, fecal screening and standard clinical investigation. Donor fecal samples will be collected from time of birth and with varying intervals for consecutive 3 years for 3 purposes: 1) to conduct safety studies in preterm piglets before transfer to preterm recipient infants, 2) to conduct FFT to preterm infants, and 3) to map normal microbiota development in healthy infants. The feces used for donation will be collected between 2-4 weeks after birth. After 1 year, donated feces will be released for FFT to preterm, but only if the donor infant at this time has been healthy and normally developed. Donors are followed up for consecutive 3 years after birth. Maternal fecal samples will be compared to infant samples, to investigate maternal to infant transfer of microbiota, as well as changes in infant microbiota in response to environment.

20 preterm infants with gestational age between 26 +0 - 30+6 weeks + days, are block randomized to either FFT or saline placebo within 24 hours after birth and the following 3 days, in total 4 donations. The recipients are clinically and biochemically closely monitored by attending staff and the group of investigators according to best clinical practice and predefined clinical observation. The recipients are followed up for consecutive 3 years to evaluate potential late side-effects and to monitor change in fecal microbiome after transplant or placebo.

The primary endpoint is to assess safety of FFT to preterm infants with expected no increase in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and death in the intervention group. The secondary endpoint is to assess if, FFT treatment will reduce incidence of feeding tolerance and improve healthy gut development in recipient preterm infants. The investigators expect to find FFT safe and with fewer cases of NEC and sepsis. The investigators do not expect to prove the effect of the intervention in this study. However, the investigators aim to follow up with a double-blinded multicenter randomized control trial - powered to document our hypothesis - that when colonizing with a healthy microbiome, it is possible decrease incidence of NEC in premature infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Microbial Substitution
03

In context

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

228 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 103 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing.

Browse Enterocolitis, Necrotizing studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria for participant preterm infants

  • Preterm infants born between GA 26+0 and 30+6
  • Delivery at RH or transferred to RH NICU within 24 hours of delivery
  • Children administered prophylactic antibiotics due to maternal risk factors, specifically: premature rupture of membranes, groub b streptococcus positive, feber during labour
  • Signed parental consent

Exclusion criteria for participant preterm infants

  • Major congenital anomalies or birth defects
  • Antibiotics for more than 72 hours after birthExtremely SGA infant (weight SD score \< -3 SD)
  • Need for mechanical ventilation or cardiovascular support before first FFT treatment

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for mothers of participants

  • Women aged 18-45
  • Ability to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria for participant mothers

● Mothers who have severe infection, defined by need for other treatment to support infection-related comorbidities, besides from antibiotics (e.g. inotropic treatment, iv fluid resuscitation)

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FFT treatment

    Treatment with fecal filtrate transfer in saline solution administered by nasogastric tube

    Other: Fecal Filtrate Transfer

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Treatment

    Treatment with saline solution administered by nasogastric tube

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherFecal Filtrate Transfer

    Treatment with donated fecal samples filtered to contain practically no bacteria and mainly viruses, including bacteriophages

  • OtherPlacebo

    Saline solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. No serious adverse events

    No increased incidence of sepsis, NEC and death in the treatment group

    Time frame: 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feeding tolerance

    Using a standardized clinical scoring system, nurses at our NICU will evaluate any negative reactions to enteral feeding. It includes evaluation of aspirate, feces, amount of enteral nutrition administered, objective evaluation of the abdomen, and signs of obstipation

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Microbiota Composition

    Total genomic DNA will be subjected to deep metagenome sequencing and related to the study outcomes. When extracting faecal DNA as well as viral DNA/RNA, physical fractionation or selective lysis will be employed to ensure host DNA is kept to a minimum. Remaining host DNA material will be removed during bioinformatics filtering and mapping of the shotgun metagenomics data.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Time to full enteral feeding

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Blood pressure

    Blood pressure in mmHg

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Temperature

    Rectal temperature in degrees celsius

    Time frame: 1 month

  6. Pulse

    Pulse measured using samsung monitoring equipment according to standard at our NICU

    Time frame: 1 month

  7. Length

    Length in cm

    Time frame: 1 month

  8. Weight

    Weight in kilograms

    Time frame: 1 month

  9. Stool characteristics - Amount

    Score from 1-4 using Amsterdam stool scale

    Time frame: 1 month

  10. Stool characteristics - Consistency

    Score from 1-6 using diapered infant stool scale

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. Stool characteristics - Color

    Score from 1-6 using Amsterdam Stool Scale

    Time frame: 1 month

  12. Days of hospitalization

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — An anonomized version of the data will be published along with the main report from the intervention study

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05272579
Collaborators
Lise Aunsholt, Neonatologist, Clinical Professor
Responsible party
Gustav Riemer Jakobsen (Medical Doctor, Ph.d-student, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 9, 2022
Start date
Nov 7, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 15, 2024

Study contacts

Gustav R Jakobsen, md
Contact
gustav.riemer.jakobsen@regionh.dk
+4550569536
Lise Aunsholt, md, phd
Contact
lise.aunsholt@regionh.dk
+4561991137
Lise Aunsholt, md, phd
principal investigator · Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion