An interventional study of RITA (App) in Multiple Myeloma, Solitary Plasmacytoma and Amyloidosis, sponsored by Advice Pharma Group srl. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-06.
Sponsored by Advice Pharma Group srl · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 287 studies in Multiple Myeloma with a site in Italy — 58 open to participants now, 99 under way, 44 of them phase 3. Multiple Myeloma · Italy.
Among the 287 studies in Multiple Myeloma with a site in Italy, this one is the 126th largest by enrollment of the 228 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 21 that started in 2022, is one of 8 with no phase, and was the 209th registered.
3,763 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 770 are open to participants now.
Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →58 of the 287 studies in Multiple Myeloma with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto · Sites in Italy
Ages 18–75 · Healthy volunteers
AstraZeneca · Sites in Italy, United States, Australia and 15 more countries
Ages 18–130
CSL Behring · Sites in Italy, United States, Belgium and 8 more countries
Ages 18+
Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Sites in Italy, Australia, Czechia and 11 more countries
Ages 18+
AstraZeneca · Sites in Italy, United States, Australia and 12 more countries
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →
Of the 585 Multiple Myeloma studies recruiting now, 430 (74%) set no upper age limit and 106 (18%) stop at 75 or younger; 36 take children under 18; 24 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
287 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 66 · Phase 2 96 · Phase 3 96 · Phase 4 1
First in 1997; this study’s year is marked. 21 started in 2022.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 41 across 3,008 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.
Median enrollment 169 across the 228 interventional studies, 198 across the 56 observational. Of the 173 that completed or were terminated, 69 (40%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
162 of 287 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Advice Pharma Group srl is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Advice Pharma Group srl has 1 study filed under Multiple Myeloma — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
23 of the studies in Multiple Myeloma with a site in Italy that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 6 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05519085Phase 3CelgeneA Study to Evaluate Mezigdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) | 2027-01-10 |
| NCT03319667Phase 3SanofiA Study to Investigate the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab in Combination With Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for Transplant | 2027-04-05 |
| NCT05455320Phase 3Janssen Research & Development, LLCA Study Comparing Talquetamab in Combination With Daratumumab or in Combination With Daratumumab and Pomalidomide Versus Daratumumab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Multiple Myeloma That Returns After Treatment or is Resistant to Treatment | 2027-07-30 |
| NCT05317416Phase 3PfizerStudy With Elranatamab Versus Lenalidomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma After Transplant | 2027-08-04 |
| NCT04096066Phase 3Fondazione EMN Italy OnlusA Trial That Compare Two Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Not Eligible for Transplant | 2027-09-01 |
Add all 23 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 287 studies in Multiple Myeloma with a site in Italy, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
It is essential to improve clinical efficiency and management of hematological and oncological patients treated on an outpatient basis. The most promising operative way to achieve this result is the development of tele-oncology platforms, that allow not only a telemedicine visit, but also the patient support in the daily management of the disease and related disorders, as well as treatments and their complications. In this perspective, the RITA communication platform should be able to support the patient, the caregiver, the physician and the general practitioner in the management of the disease and its treatments.
Summary description of the investigational device:
The RITA "Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence" application was designed, on the doctor's side, as a support for the management of the onco-hematological patient and, on the patient's side, as a first aid tool for the management of the most common problems, as well as an efficient and "non-invasive" means of communication with the doctor. The system also allows the caregiver and general practitioner to be included in the communication group.
The added value of the app consists in improving the relationship between the patient and the doctor, creating an effective communication channel, increasing the safety the patient has when facing his difficult path, reducing the number of visits to the facility and, in general, making those visits more efficient, thus creating savings both in terms of time and resources. RITA is also designed to communicate and receive information on the quality of life and side effects, thus making the medical doctor aware of the progress of treatments in his patient population.
Often occurs that the mild drug/disease related symptoms that the patient perceive during the treatment period are underestimated, leading to a more severe symptomatology that could impair the patient adherence to treatment. Thanks to the app RITA, on the patients side it will be easier to notify their daily physical condition, while on the physician side it will be easier to manage and solve the mild symptoms the patient could face during the treatment period, improving the overall adherence to the treatment.
The mobile app, which can also be used on a conventional desktop or laptop, aims to optimize the interaction between the onco-hematological patient and the referring physician. The hospital doctor will have access to the website, in order to manage all the functions through the appropriate dashboard.
Intended purpose of the investigational device in the proposed clinical investigation:
The application allows, on the patient side, to:
While, on the hospital doctor side, the website allows to:
Description of the specific medical procedures involved in the use of the investigational device:
Possible features of the RITA app:
Rationale for benefit-risk ratio.
The major risk for onco-hematologic patients is the progression of their underlying disease and the consequent reduction in the quality of life, which can be accelerated by a reduced adherence to the therapy. Risks associated with participation in the clinical investigation are the same as the risks identified for the general use. No additional risk is identified, specifically related to the participation in the clinical investigation, as the patient does not receive a lowered standard of care. Moreover, no special risks are reported due to the use of applications for adherence to treatment.
Therefore, the potential risks identified in association with the treatment administered with the App RITA are justified by the anticipated benefits resulting from the implementation of the standard of care aiming at improving the patients' involvement in their own health management and intended increase of adherence to treatment.
Primary Objective
The primary objective is the evaluation of patients' compliance to treatment through the use of the app RITA, thanks to more efficient management of the patients' mild symptoms that could, if not promptly treated, lead to a more severe condition and sometimes to the treatment interruption.
Secondary Objectives
Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is the evaluation of the therapeutic adherence measured as at least the 80% of the relative dose intensity (defined as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the prescribed referenced dose intensity, expressed as a percentage) during the study period. The effectiveness of the RITA app use will be evaluated by comparing results on therapeutic adherence with a historical group of cancer patients.
Secondary Endpoint
Secondary endpoints based on the comparisons between groups:
Secondary endpoints on the safety assessment of RITA APP:
Medical Device CLASS IIA
Determination of Sample Size With a total of 112 patients (56 patients in the interventional arm and 56 in the patient-level historical group), this investigation will have 80% power to detect a 20% improvement in treatment adherence (i.e., in the intervention group, 90% or more as compared to 70%) (Passardi et al., 2022), with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05. We set a goal of enrolling 124 patients to account for a drop-out rate of 10% (Passardi et al., 2022), with a consequent enrollment of 62 patients per arm.
Statistical Analyses
In the primary analysis, all the patients observed until the end of the study will be included.
Patients in the historical group will be matched with patients in the prospective interventional study according to cancer diagnosis and type of anticancer treatment.
The main characteristics of the patients will be reported using descriptive analyses by tabulating frequencies and percentages (categorical variables) and mean and median values, standard deviations (SD), quartiles and extreme values (continuous variables). With reference to comparison between groups, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of the RITA app, using logistic regression models. The statistical significance limit will be accepted as 5%, and the results below this value (P \< .05) will be considered statistically significant. Comparisons within group (i.e., in the interventional study group) will be performed by using the paired t-test or the corresponding Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric test for paired samples, after checking data were normally distributed (based on the Shapiro-Wilk statistic). Comparisons between groups (i.e., interventional and historical) for continuous data will be analysed using a two-sided Student's t-test, after checking data were normally distributed (based on the Shapiro-Wilk statistic) and a two-sided Wilcoxon's rank-sum test otherwise. For categorical data comparisons between groups will be performed by using the contingency table analysis with the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, when appropriate. Explorative analyses, with descriptive purpose only, will be performed in the subgroups of potential determinants of adherence of anticancer treatments, including age, gender, educational status, stage of disease, comorbidities, poly-pharmacy and complexity of oral anticancer regimens(weekly/daily). Adverse events occurring during the study follow-up will be tabulated.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
All participant data relating to the study will be recorded on eCRF. The investigator is responsible for verifying that data entries are accurate and correct by electronically signing the eCRF.
The investigator must maintain accurate documentation (source data) that supports the information entered in the eCRF.
The investigator must permit study-related monitoring, audits, IRB/IEC review, and regulatory agency inspections and provide direct access to source data documents.
Monitoring details describing strategy (eg, risk-based initiatives in operations and quality such as Risk Management and Mitigation Strategies and Analytical Risk-Based Monitoring), methods, responsibilities, and requirements, including handling of noncompliance issues and monitoring techniques (central, remote, or on-site monitoring) are provided in the monitoring plan.
The sponsor or designee is responsible for the data management of this study including quality checking of the data.
The sponsor assumes accountability for actions delegated to other individuals (eg, Contract Research Organizations).
Study monitors will perform ongoing source data verification to confirm that data entered into the eCRF by authorised site personnel are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents; that the safety and rights of participants are being protected; and that the study is being conducted in accordance with the currently approved protocol and any other study agreements, ICH GCP, and all applicable regulatory requirements.
Data Management System The CRFs in this trial are implemented electronically using a dedicated EDC system (ICE, Integrated Clinical Trial Environment, Advice Pharma) that fulfils the legal requirements for clinical trials. The EDC system is activated for the user only after successfully passing a formal test procedure. All data entered in the EDC are stored on a Linux server in a dedicated Oracle database.
Monitoring The study will be monitored on a regular basis by the Sponsor's adequately qualified and trained clinical Monitors throughout the study period to ensure the proper conduct of the clinical Investigation.
The purposes of study monitoring are to verify that the rights and well-being of study subjects are protected, that the reported study data are accurate, complete and verifiable against the source documents, and that the study is conducted in accordance with the current clinical investigation plan, Good Clinical Practice guideline (UNI EN ISO 14155) and applicable regulatory requirements.
Audits and Inspections Upon request by the Sponsor, on-site study audits may be conducted in order to ensure the study is in compliance with GCP, applicable regulatory requirements, and the clinical investigation plan. The auditing activities may also be conducted after study completion.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Line of therapy
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The interventional study group will use the Device Rita, an application that allow the oncological and onco-hematological patients to receive and communicate information about the quality of life and about the treatment related adverse events, providing a support in the therapy management. The access to the app functionalities is granted when the physician habilitates the personal profile. The app can be also used from people designated from the patient as caregiver, who can view the data inserted by the patient and, if enabled, they can insert the data for the patient.
Device: RITA (App)
This clinical trial has no control intervention; on the other hand, the clinical outcomes of this treatment will be compared with the retrospective clinical data obtained from a historical group of comparison. The historic control used in this clinical trial is specifically selected to reflect the endpoints. According to a feasibility phase of this study, the information on the date of start and end of treatments is routinely collected in the medical records of patients, and for this reason, these data are potentially already available for the historical control group.
The RITA "Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence" application was designed, on the doctor's side, as a support for the management of the onco-hematological patient and, on the patient's side, as a first aid tool for the management of the most common problems, as well as an efficient and "non-invasive" means of communication with the doctor. The system also allows the caregiver and general practitioner to be included in the communication group. The added value of the app consists in improving the relationship between the patient and the doctor, creating an effective communication channel, increasing the safety the patient has when facing his difficult path, reducing the number of visits to the facility and, in general, making those visits more efficient, thus creating savings both in terms of time and resources.
Evaluating changes in actual dose intensity
The primary outcome is defined as the comparison between the proportion of patients with at least 20% of increase in the relative dose intensity (defined as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the prescribed referenced dose intensity, expressed as a percentage) of anticancer treatment during the study period in the two arms (i.e., intervention and historical group). The actual delivered dose intensity will be evaluated at each follow up visit through the drug accountability performed onsite.
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Number of grade 3-4 adverse events
Incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Number of visits to the Emergency Room
Number of visits to the emergency room for complications not requiring hospitalization Number of visits to the emergency room for severe complications requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Number of days in hospital
Average number of days in hospital stay
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Quality of life change - Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L
Evaluation of changes in the quality of life perceived by the patients using the validated questionnaire for data collection EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Quality of life change - Questionnaire EORTC QLQC30
Evaluation of changes in the quality of life perceived by the cancer patients using the validated questionnaire for data collection EORTC QLQC30
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
RITA APP Experience evaluation
User Experience in using the RITA APP, through the questions proposed by the app about the user satisfaction
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Minor complications
Number of AE/minor complications not requiring assistance notified by the patient during the study period, through the app RITA and directly during the clinical visit, compared to the historical control group
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Safety Outcome - Adverse events
Occurrence of individual adverse events (%) reported during the follow up period, during the use session, and during intervals between one use session and the following Occurrence of device adverse events (%) during the use session
Time frame: Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Jan 2023, 7 months.
Of 186 interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Myeloma, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 79. This study's 7 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Advice Pharma Group srl