CClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT05259631Updated Feb 1, 2023

Inhalational (Sevoflurane) Versus Intravenous (Propofol) Sedation in Adults With a Moderate Form of ARDS

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sevoflurane and Propofol in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute. Suspended at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-01.

Sponsored by Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was suspended
Financial problems
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The American European Consensus Conference (AECC) 1994 defined acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as an acute inflammatory syndrome manifesting as diffuse pulmonary edema and respiratory failure that cannot be explained by, but may co-exist with, left-sided heart failure. During the sequel Conference of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, in 2012 minor changes were made, and since that so-called Berlin definition of ARDS is used worldwide for the description of this severe disease. Three grades of severity were proposed to distinguish ARDS according to the level of hypoxemia with a mortality of 24% in patients with mild ARDS, rising to 48% in those with severe ones.

Systemic inflammation is considered to be the main reason of ARDS. Activated neutrophils interact with the alveolar-capillary membrane causing the increasing permeability with the sequence lung edema's development. Inflammatory exudate inactivates surfactant leading to collapse and consolidation of distal airspaces with progressive loss of the lung's gas exchange surface area. Unfortunately, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) simultaneously inhibits the mechanism of active pulmonary vasoconstriction and allows deoxygenated blood to pass through unventilated areas of the lung boosting the right-to-left shunt. Both mechanisms lead to hypoxemia, which is the main and obligatory feature of ARDS.

Actually, endothelial dysfunction and transcapillary leakage seem to be one of the main steps in the development of respiratory failure during ARDS. Last decades it was found out that glycocalyx is also participating in this process too.

Thus, it became clear that substances preserving endothelium and glycocalyx from SIRS-causing damage may have a beneficial effect in ARDS treatment. It seems to be crucially important so as the majority of drugs failed to demonstrate any positive effects in terms of ARDS treatment.

To the moment we have some evidence, which came from experimental studies, that halogenated anesthetics can preserve glycocalyx against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

The primary objective for the multicentral INVERSE Trial will be to determine the effects of inhalational (sevoflurane) versus intravenous (propofol) sedation on P/F ratio on the second day, hospital mortality and ICU (intensive care unit), and in-hospital length of stay in adults with a moderate form of ARDS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Sedation
  • Sevoflurane
  • Propofol
  • Volatile anesthetics
  • Intravenous anesthetics
  • Inhalational anesthetics
  • Intensive care unit
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 310 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18
  • Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy
  • Timing: Acute onset of new or worsening of chronic respiratory symptoms within 72 hours before the randomization
  • Chest imaging: Bilateral opacities-not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules
  • Origin of edema: Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
  • Oxygenation: 100 mm Hg \< PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg with PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or family history of malignant hyperthermia
  • History of propofol infusion syndrome
  • Documented or suspected increased intracranial pressure
  • Chronic restrictive pulmonary disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Chest wall disorder
  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • NYHA class ≥ 3
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 40 mmHg)
  • Documented ongoing COVID-19 infection
  • Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy
  • Previous randomization in this trial
  • Post randomization exclusion criterion: Documented ongoing COVID-19 infection during the first 48 hours after the randomization
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inhalational sedation

    Drug: Sevoflurane

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous sedation

    Drug: Propofol

Interventions

  • DrugSevoflurane

    Patients are to be sedated by sevoflurane inhalation. For this purpose, any certificated devices are suitable - AnaConDa or Mirus evenly. Starting dose of sevoflurane is to be 2 ml/h and may be modified at the discretion of the attending intensivist to achieve and maintain the target level of sedation

  • DrugPropofol

    Patients of this group will receive an intravenous infusion of propofol with starting dose of 1 mg/kg/h. The precise dose to maintain the desired level of sedation is left at the discretion of the attending intensivist and may be revised at any time. The upper dose limit for propofol is 4 mg/kg/h. In case of tolerance to propofol infusion, midazolam or antipsychotics (haloperidol) can be added to achieve the desired level of sedation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. P/F ratio

    PaO2 divided on FiO2

    Time frame: day 2 after the randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-days mortality

    number of deaths

    Time frame: 28 day

  2. 6-months mortality

    number of deaths

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. 1-year mortality

    number of death

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Length of stay in the intensive care unit

    number of days in the intensive care unit

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Length of hospitalization

    number of days in hospital

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Ventilator free days in ICU

    number of days in ICU - number of days on mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Ventilator free days during hospitalization

    Length of hospitalization - number of days on mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Demikhov Municipal Clinical Hospital 68
    Moscow, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05259631
Lead sponsor
Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute
Responsible party
Valery Likhvantsev, MD (Head of the Research V. Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute, Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2022
Start date
Mar 14, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 25, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 25, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 1, 2023

Study contacts

Valery Likhvantsev
principal investigator · Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion