ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05247853Updated Oct 16, 2025

HPV Vaccine Effectiveness Study in Rwandan Women Living With HIV

An observational study in Cervical Cancer, Human Papilloma Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Rwanda. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-16.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
3,127
Ages
18 Years to 28 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Our study will assess and measure population effectiveness of prophylactic HPV vaccine in reducing cervical, anal, and/or oral prevalent and 6-month persistent infections among HPV-vaccinated and 757 HPV-unvaccinated Rwandan WLWH aged 18-26 years. Additional objectives include the quantification \& examination of long-term antibody (into young adulthood) responses to HPV vaccination and to validate the performance (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) of a low-cost, POC (point-of-care) anti-HPV16 antibody test to determine/confirm HPV vaccination status. The findings for this study will provide necessary evidence regarding the long-term protection afforded by HPV vaccination in WLWH living in SSA, who are at the greatest risk of HPV-related cancers.

Read the detailed description

Cervical cancer is the 4th most common cancer and cause of cancer-related death in women globally; in many lower-resource settings, especially sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), it is the most common. Virtually all cervical cancer and precancer are caused by 12-15 high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types. HPV16 causes approximately 55-60% and HPV18 causes approximately 10-15% of cervical cancer while the remaining 12 HPV types cause the remaining 25-30% of cervical cancer. High-risk HPV, predominately HPV16, also causes most anal, vulvar, vaginal, and penile cancers and a significant proportion of oropharyngeal cancers. Prophylactic HPV vaccines have been developed and have been shown to be nearly 100% protective against incident HPV infection and related abnormalities in the general population. However, the evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic HPV vaccines in women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (WLWH) is less clear. HIV infection increases the risk of cervical cancer due to an impaired immune response to HPV.

Rwanda is a high-burden cervical cancer country where the prevalence of HIV is 3.7% among adult women, with higher HIV prevalence among young women (1). In 2011, Rwanda implemented a national HPV vaccination program with Gardasil®, which protects against HPV16 and HPV18, the two HPV types that cause \~70% of cervical cancer, and HPV6 and HPV11, the two types that cause \~90% of anogenital warts (HPV6/11/16/18). Their program has achieved >90% coverage of the target population, primarily girls aged 12 years, annually. The implementation of a highly successful HPV vaccination program and the high prevalence of HIV, in addition to the research and medical capacity that Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Einstein) has helped to build at the Rwanda Military Hospital (RMH) and University of Rwanda (UR), makes Rwanda the ideal locale to study the long-term effects of HPV vaccination in WLWH.

To answer questions about HPV vaccine effectiveness and immunity in Rwandan WLWH, collaborators at Einstein, RMH, and UR will conduct an observational study of WLWH and HIV-negative (HIV[-]) women who did (birth cohorts 1997 and later) and WLWH who did not (birth cohorts before 1997) receive HPV vaccination through the national vaccination program. The investigators will compare cervicovaginal, anal, and oral prevalent and 6-month persistent HPV6/11/16/18 infections in 757 HPV-vaccinated WLWH to those in 757 unvaccinated WLWH and 757 HPV-vaccinated HIV[-] women. The investigators will also compare the HPV immune response in 548 HPV-vaccinated WLWH to 548 HPV-vaccinated HIV[-] women and the impact of switching from 3 doses to 2 doses of Gardasil® in 2015. Finally, the investigators will investigate the risk factors, including the cervicovaginal microbiome, for prevalent and 6-month persistent HPV infection in young WLWH and HIV[-] women. The long-term goal is to establish a cohort of WLWH in whom we can examine the long-term effectiveness of HPV vaccination in WLWH now and in the future. This contribution is significant as it will establish the population effectiveness of HPV vaccination in WLWH living in SSA, the group of women at the highest risk of cervical cancer, for which there is a dearth of evidence. The proposed research is innovative as it leverages and expands the local research and medical capacity in Rwanda to examine one of the critically unanswered questions about HPV vaccine effectiveness in the context of the World Health Organization's (WHO) call for the elimination of cervical cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Human Papilloma Virus
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus
  • HPV-Related Carcinoma
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,127 is above the median of 225 across 529 observational studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 87 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 76 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 28 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will recruit women attending collaborating clinics and women from the communities surrounding those clinics into three groups: HPV-vaccinated WLWH (Group 1); HPV-unvaccinated WLWH (Group 2); and HIV[-] women who are HPV-vaccinated (Group 3). The number of doses of HPV vaccination received is dictated by introduction of HPV vaccination in Rwanda. In general, most Rwandan women born in 2003 or later will have been vaccinated with two doses of Gardasil®, women born between 1996 and 2002 will have been vaccinated with three doses of Gardasil®, and women born in 1995 or earlier will be unvaccinated. Therefore, we will recruit by age, which will serve as a useful and very good proxy for HPV vaccination status, which otherwise would be difficult to confirm in real time at enrollment.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • 18-28 years. The age of inclusion criteria will likely be restricted as age-specific enrollment goals are met.
  • Physically and mentally able and willing to participate in the study.
  • Willing to provide written and signed or thumb printed, .
  • Known to be living with (i.e., enrolled in a treatment program), or consent to HIV testing to confirm HIV status.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have positive pregnancy test or report to be pregnant at the time of visit or less than 6 weeks post-partum (will be asked to make an appointment 6 or more weeks post-partum)
  • Report to be menstruating at the time of visit (will be asked to make new appointment)
  • History of hysterectomy and no longer have a cervix
  • History of treatment for cervical abnormalities after cervical screening
  • History of cervical cancer
  • Report no previous sexual activity
  • status is unknown, and date of birth is 12/31/1995 or earlier
  • Because this study has age-specific enrollment goals for WLWH and HIV[-] women, once those enrollment goals are met for each study group, the respective cohorts will be closed and other eligible women will be excluded.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
3,127 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1

    HPV-vaccinated women living with HIV

    Procedure: Blood collection · Procedure: Oral, cervicovaginal and anal specimen collection · Procedure: Anoscopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions · Procedure: Colposcopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions · Procedure: Ablative Treatment · Procedure: LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure)

  • Group 2

    HPV-unvaccinated women living with HIV

    Procedure: Blood collection · Procedure: Oral, cervicovaginal and anal specimen collection · Procedure: Anoscopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions · Procedure: Colposcopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions · Procedure: Ablative Treatment · Procedure: LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure)

  • Group 3

    HIV\[-\] women who are HPV-vaccinated

    Procedure: Blood collection · Procedure: Oral, cervicovaginal and anal specimen collection · Procedure: Colposcopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions

Interventions

  • ProcedureBlood collection

    Blood collection at enrollment visit

  • ProcedureOral, cervicovaginal and anal specimen collection

    Oral, cervicovaginal and anal specimen collection at enrollment and follow-up visits

  • ProcedureAnoscopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions

    Used for management in follow-up visits of persistent anal HPV16/18+ in WLWH

  • ProcedureColposcopy & Biopsy of Acetowhite Lesions

    Used for management in follow-up visits of persistent type-specific high-risk HPV cervicovaginal HPV

  • ProcedureAblative Treatment

    Use for management in follow-up visits of persistent cervicovaginal HPV 16/18+ in WLWH, as identified in colposcopy and biopsy

  • ProcedureLEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure)

    Use for management in follow-up visits of persistent cervicovaginal HPV 16/18+ in WLWH, as identified in colposcopy and biopsy that ablation ineligible

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in vaccine effectiveness of prophylactic HPV vaccine

    To measure population effectiveness of prophylactic HPV vaccine in reducing cervicovaginal, anal, and/or oral prevalent and 6-12 month persistent infections by HPV6/11/16/18

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 12 months

  2. Change in long-term antibody responses to HPV vaccination

    To quantify, and examine the determinants of, long-term antibody (into young adulthood) responses to HPV vaccination

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in HPV natural history study at 6 months

    Conduct a natural history study to investigate determinants, including cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM), of short-term HPV persistence in young WLWH and HIV\[-\] women living in a SSA setting

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rwanda Military Hospital
    Kigali, Rwanda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kundrod KA, Jeronimo J, Vetter B, Maza M, Murenzi G, Phoolcharoen N, Castle PE. Toward 70% cervical cancer screening coverage: Technical challenges and opportunities to increase access to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;3(8):e0001982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001982. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37585432 ↗
  • Murenzi G, Mungo C. Impact of the human papillomavirus vaccine in low-resource settings. Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jul;11(7):e997-e998. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00203-6. Epub 2023 May 16. No abstract available. PubMed 37207682 ↗
  • Murangwa A, Desai KT, Gage JC, Murenzi G, Tuyisenge P, Kanyabwisha F, Musafili A, Kubwimana G, Mutesa L, Anastos K, Kim HY, Castle PE. Agreement between Xpert and AmpFire tests for high-risk human papillomavirus among HIV-positive women in Rwanda. Afr J Lab Med. 2022 Oct 19;11(1):1827. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1827. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36353194 ↗
  • Murenzi G, Shumbusho F, Hansen N, Munyaneza A, Gage JC, Muhoza B, Kanyabwisha F, Pierz A, Tuyisenge P, Anastos K, Castle PE. Long-term human papillomavirus vaccination effectiveness and immunity in Rwandan women living with and without HIV: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 25;12(8):e061650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061650. PubMed 36008069 ↗
  • Mukherjee A, Ye Y, Wiener HW, Kuniholm MH, Minkoff H, Michel K, Palefsky J, D'Souza G, Rahangdale L, Butler KR, Kempf MC, Sudenga SL, Aouizerat BE, Ojesina AI, Shrestha S. Variations in Genes Encoding Human Papillomavirus Binding Receptors and Susceptibility to Cervical Precancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Sep 1;32(9):1190-1197. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0300. PubMed 37410084 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 37 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2022
First posted
Feb 21, 2022
StartActual
Nov 3, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 12, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 12, 2024
Last update
Oct 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05247853
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rwanda Military Hospital, University of Rwanda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2022
Start date
Nov 3, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2024
Completion
Dec 12, 2024
Last update
Oct 16, 2025

Study contacts

Marcel Yotebieng, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion