ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05213936Updated Oct 16, 2026

Scalp Cooling for Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Patients of Color

An interventional study of Scalp cooling with hairstyle and Scalp cooling with conditioner and water emulsion in Alopecia, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate hairstyling techniques aimed at increasing efficacy of scalp cooling in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia, determine scalp cooling effect on persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia, and elucidate molecular mechanisms and predictive biomarkers associated with scalp cooling success in patients with skin of color receiving chemotherapy for breast or non-small cell lung cancer.

This study is being conducted because prior studies have found scalp cooling to be highly effective in preventing hair loss resulting from chemotherapy. However, minority representation was largely limited in completed trials. A recent study found that scalp cooling devices are less efficacious in patients with skin of color, likely because patients with skin of color have hair is predominantly types 3 (curly) and 4 (kinky), which tend to become bulkier when wet and can interfere with scalp cooling cap fitting. The investigators plan to test two techniques aimed at improving scalp cooling efficacy in patients with skin of color through hairstyling methods that minimize hair volume in order to increase cooling cap to scalp contact: 1) cornrows/braids/twists or 2) water/conditioner emulsion on hair. Preliminary data show that breast cancer patients with type 3 or 4 hair receiving taxane chemotherapy and scalp cooling using these techniques to prepare the hair for scalp cooling cap fitting all experienced hair preservation. Additionally, the investigators will also assess persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia outcomes and incidence by following patients up to 6 months after completing treatment. Finally, specific gene expression changes in taxane-induced chemotherapy-induced alopecia in vitro have been described previously. The investigators will test the hypothesis that scalp cooling reverses such changes in chemotherapy-induced alopecia, assess for biomarkers predictive for scalp cooling success, and investigate persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia molecular mechanisms using non-invasive transcriptome sequencing on plucked hair follicles.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alopecia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Alopecia

511 studies on the registry are indexed under Alopecia; 128 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 41 is below the median of 50 across 430 interventional studies indexed under Alopecia.

Browse Alopecia studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 87 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 76 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >= 18 years
  2. Female
  3. Hair type 3 (curly) or type 4 (kinky)
  4. Diagnosis of breast cancer or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or gynecologic cancer stage I-IV
  5. Patient will be starting >= 4 cycles of taxane-based chemotherapy treatment for curative intent after enrollment

    a. Concurrent HER, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide therapies and doxorubicin therapies allowed

  6. (ECOG) 0-2: fully active, restrictive in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and capable of self-care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hair type other than 3 or 4
  2. Male
  3. Use of hair weave or extensions without plans to remove
  4. Concurrent including hematologic malignancies (i.e. leukemia or lymphoma)
  5. Alopecia > grade 1 at baseline
  6. Past chemotherapy administration if past treatment was \<= 10 years ago
  7. History of migraines or cluster headaches, anorexia, severe anemia, uncontrolled diabetes, hepatitis, thyroid dysfunction, cold urticaria, cold agglutinin disease, scalp
  8. Planned bone marrow ablation chemotherapy or skull irradiation
  9. Pregnant patient
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
41 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Scalp cooling with hairstyle

    Scalp cooling with hairstyle (braids, twists, cornrows) to minimize hair volume and increase scalp cooling cap to scalp contact

    Device: Scalp cooling with hairstyle

  • Experimental
    Scalp Cooling with conditioner and water emulsion

    Scalp cooling after coating hair with conditioner and water emulsion to minimize hair volume and increase scalp cooling cap to scalp contact

    Device: Scalp cooling with conditioner and water emulsion

  • No intervention
    No Scalp Cooling

    Control with no scalp cooling

Interventions

  • DeviceScalp cooling with hairstyle

    Hair will be prepared accordingly for the cooling cap fitting based on which approach the patient prefers: braids/cornrows/twists

  • DeviceScalp cooling with conditioner and water emulsion

    Hair will be prepared accordingly for the fitting based on which approach the patient prefers: or conditioner and water emulsion to coat the hair.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of chemotherapy-induced alopecia - hair count density

    Severity of chemotherapy-induced alopecia, or CIA, as determined by hair count density from trichoscopy will be assessed. Hair count density (hair counts/cm\^2) will be summarized by study arm and analyzed using a T-test.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, up to ~6 months total

  2. Severity of chemotherapy-induced alopecia - adverse events

    Severity of CIA will also be evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 5.0) grading. Results will be summarized by study arm and analyzed Fisher's exact test.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, up to ~6 months total

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (PCIA) - hair count density

    Severity of PCIA, as determined by hair count density from trichoscopy will be assessed. Hair count density (hair counts/cm\^2) will be summarized by study arm and analyzed using a T-test.

    Time frame: 26 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, up to ~11 months total

  2. Severity of persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia - adverse events

    Severity of PCIA will also be evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 5.0) grading. Results will be summarized by study arm and analyzed Fisher's exact test.

    Time frame: 26 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, up to ~11 months total

  3. Patient distress after treatment

    Patient distress after treatment will be assessed by the Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) scale. CADS is a 17-item self-report tool used to measure distress related to chemotherapy-induced hair loss across four domains: physical, emotional, activity, and relationship. Participants rate experiences, difficulties, or distress due to hair loss using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"), yielding an overall scoring range of 17-68, such that higher CADS scores are associated with higher distress. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 26 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, up to ~11 months total (from the start to completion of chemotherapy)

Other outcomes

  1. Gene expression changes in chemotherapy-induced and persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia

    Using a non-invasive method of plucked hair follicles, the investigators will interrogate patients' hair follicle transcriptome at 26 weeks after chemotherapy completion to clarify persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia pathogenesis. The investigators will also identify predictive markers for cooling success through transcriptome profiling on hair follicles before and after chemotherapy in intervention and control groups.

    Time frame: 26 weeks after completion of chemotherapy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kiebert GM, Hanneke J, de Haes CJ, Kievit J, van de Velde CJ. Effect of peri-operative chemotherapy on the quality of life of patients with early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(10):1038-42. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90046-v. PubMed 2148877 ↗
  • Marks DH, Okhovat JP, Hagigeorges D, Manatis-Lornell AJ, Isakoff SJ, Lacouture ME, Senna MM. The effect of scalp cooling on CIA-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):267-276. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05169-0. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 30806923 ↗
  • Trueb RM. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010 Dec;4(4):281-4. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283409280. PubMed 21045702 ↗
  • Gianotti E, Razzini G, Bini M, Crivellaro C, Righi A, Darecchio S, Lui S, Basirico ML, Cocconi S, Cagossi K, Ferrari A, Artioli F. Scalp Cooling in Daily Clinical Practice for Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Interventional Study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jul-Sep;6(3):277-282. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_4_19. PubMed 31259224 ↗
  • Prevezas C, Matard B, Pinquier L, Reygagne P. Irreversible and severe alopecia following docetaxel or paclitaxel cytotoxic therapy for breast cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Apr;160(4):883-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09043.x. Epub 2009 Feb 16. No abstract available. PubMed 19222453 ↗
  • Cersosimo RJ, Hong WK. Epirubicin: a review of the pharmacology, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin analogue. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Mar;4(3):425-39. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.3.425. PubMed 3005521 ↗
  • Auvinen PK, Mahonen UA, Soininen KM, Paananen PK, Ranta-Koponen PH, Saavalainen IE, Johansson RT. The effectiveness of a scalp cooling cap in preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Tumori. 2010 Mar-Apr;96(2):271-5. doi: 10.1177/030089161009600214. PubMed 20572585 ↗
  • Mols F, van den Hurk CJ, Vingerhoets AJ, Breed WP. Scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced hair loss: practical and clinical considerations. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Feb;17(2):181-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0475-4. Epub 2008 Jun 17. PubMed 18560904 ↗
  • Kinahan KE, Sharp LK, Seidel K, Leisenring W, Didwania A, Lacouture ME, Stovall M, Haryani A, Robison LL, Krull KR. Scarring, disfigurement, and quality of life in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2466-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3611. Epub 2012 May 21. PubMed 22614987 ↗
  • Shin H, Jo SJ, Kim DH, Kwon O, Myung SK. Efficacy of interventions for prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E442-54. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29115. Epub 2014 Aug 11. PubMed 25081068 ↗
  • Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, Hurvitz SA, Melisko ME, Moore A, Park G, Mitchel J, Bageman E, D'Agostino RB Jr, Ver Hoeve ES, Esserman L, Cigler T. Association Between Use of a Scalp Cooling Device and Alopecia After Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. JAMA. 2017 Feb 14;317(6):606-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.21038. PubMed 28196257 ↗
  • Nangia J, Wang T, Osborne C, Niravath P, Otte K, Papish S, Holmes F, Abraham J, Lacouture M, Courtright J, Paxman R, Rude M, Hilsenbeck S, Osborne CK, Rimawi M. Effect of a Scalp Cooling Device on Alopecia in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: The SCALP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Feb 14;317(6):596-605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20939. PubMed 28196254 ↗
  • Grevelman EG, Breed WP. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced hair loss by scalp cooling. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):352-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi088. Epub 2005 Jan 10. PubMed 15642703 ↗
  • Erecinska M, Thoresen M, Silver IA. Effects of hypothermia on energy metabolism in Mammalian central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 May;23(5):513-30. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000066287.21705.21. PubMed 12771566 ↗
  • Friedrichs K, Carstensen MH. Successful reduction of alopecia induced by anthracycline and taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer - clinical evaluation of sensor-controlled scalp cooling. Springerplus. 2014 Sep 5;3:500. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-500. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25279292 ↗
  • Rice BA, Ver Hoeve ES, DeLuca AN, Esserman LJ, Rugo HS, Melisko ME. Registry study to assess hair loss prevention with the Penguin Cold Cap in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;167(1):117-122. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4506-z. Epub 2017 Sep 18. PubMed 28921303 ↗
  • Bajpai J, Kagwade S, Chandrasekharan A, Dandekar S, Kanan S, Kembhavi Y, Ghosh J, Banavali SD, Gupta S. "Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia". Breast. 2020 Feb;49:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004. Epub 2019 Dec 12. PubMed 31865282 ↗
  • Betticher DC, Delmore G, Breitenstein U, Anchisi S, Zimmerli-Schwab B, Muller A, von Moos R, Hugli-Dayer AM, Schefer H, Bodenmann S, Buhler V, Trueb RR. Efficacy and tolerability of two scalp cooling systems for the prevention of alopecia associated with docetaxel treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2565-73. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1804-9. Epub 2013 May 2. PubMed 23636645 ↗
  • Vasconcelos I, Wiesske A, Schoenegg W. Scalp cooling successfully prevents alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy. Breast. 2018 Aug;40:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 13. PubMed 29660543 ↗
  • Schaffrin-Nabe D, Schmitz I, Josten-Nabe A, von Hehn U, Voigtmann R. The Influence of Various Parameters on the Success of Sensor-Controlled Scalp Cooling in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia. Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(10):489-95. doi: 10.1159/000440636. Epub 2015 Sep 27. PubMed 26451590 ↗
  • Mayo TT, Callender VD. The art of prevention: It's too tight-Loosen up and let your hair down. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021 Jan 29;7(2):174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.01.019. eCollection 2021 Mar. PubMed 33937486 ↗
  • Araoye EF, Stearns V, Aguh C. Considerations for the Use of Scalp Cooling Devices in Black Patients. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 20;38(30):3575-3576. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02130. Epub 2020 Sep 8. No abstract available. PubMed 32897824 ↗
  • Katz A. Scalp Cooling: The Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia . Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug 1;21(4):413-415. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.413-415. PubMed 28738048 ↗
  • Komen MM, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJ, Nortier JW. Factors influencing the effectiveness of scalp cooling in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Oncologist. 2013;18(7):885-91. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0332. Epub 2013 May 6. PubMed 23650021 ↗
  • Teteh D, Ericson M, Monice S, Dawkins-Moultin L, Bahadorani N, Clark P, Mitchell E, Trevino LS, Llanos A, Kittles R, Montgomery S. The Black identity, hair product use, and breast cancer scale. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225305. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31800594 ↗
  • Dilawari A, Gallagher C, Alintah P, Chitalia A, Tiwari S, Paxman R, Adams-Campbell L, Dash C. Does Scalp Cooling Have the Same Efficacy in Black Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer? Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):292-e548. doi: 10.1002/onco.13690. Epub 2021 Feb 17. PubMed 33512741 ↗
  • Janssen FE, Van Leeuwen GM, Van Steenhoven AA. Modelling of temperature and perfusion during scalp cooling. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 7;50(17):4065-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/17/010. Epub 2005 Aug 17. PubMed 16177530 ↗
  • Nunez-Torres R, Martin M, Garcia-Saenz JA, Rodrigo-Faus M, Del Monte-Millan M, Tejera-Perez H, Pita G, de la Torre-Montero JC, Pinilla K, Herraez B, Peiro-Chova L, Bermejo B, Lluch A, Gonzalez-Neira A. Association Between ABCB1 Genetic Variants and Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Sep 1;156(9):987-991. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1867. PubMed 32756886 ↗
  • Silva GB, Ciccolini K, Donati A, Hurk CVD. Scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia. An Bras Dermatol. 2020 Sep-Oct;95(5):631-637. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Jun 16. PubMed 32622629 ↗
  • Freites-Martinez A, Shapiro J, van den Hurk C, Goldfarb S, Jimenez JJ, Rossi AM, Paus R, Lacouture ME. Hair disorders in cancer survivors. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1199-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.056. Epub 2018 Apr 14. PubMed 29660423 ↗
  • Kluger N, Jacot W, Frouin E, Rigau V, Poujol S, Dereure O, Guillot B, Romieu G, Bessis D. Permanent scalp alopecia related to breast cancer chemotherapy by sequential fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) and docetaxel: a prospective study of 20 patients. Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov;23(11):2879-2884. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds095. Epub 2012 May 9. PubMed 22571858 ↗
  • Slaught C, Roman M, Yashar S, Holland V, Goh C. Permanent Alopecia in Breast Cancer Patients: Role of Taxanes and Endocrine Therapies. Cutis. 2021 Mar;107(3):E17-E22. doi: 10.12788/cutis.0215. PubMed 33956617 ↗
  • Fonia A, Cota C, Setterfield JF, Goldberg LJ, Fenton DA, Stefanato CM. Permanent alopecia in patients with breast cancer after taxane chemotherapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy: Clinicopathologic findings in a cohort of 10 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):948-957. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Mar 8. PubMed 28284826 ↗
  • Tallon B, Blanchard E, Goldberg LJ. Permanent chemotherapy-induced alopecia: case report and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Aug;63(2):333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.063. Epub 2010 May 14. PubMed 20471136 ↗
  • Deutsch A, McLellan BN, Shinoda K. Single-cell transcriptomics in dermatology. JAAD Int. 2020 Oct 6;1(2):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.08.001. eCollection 2020 Dec. PubMed 34409338 ↗
  • Chew EG, Ho BS, Ramasamy S, Dawson T, Tennakoon C, Liu X, Leong WM, Yang SY, Lim SY, Jaffar H, Hillmer AM, Bigliardi-Qi M, Bigliardi PL. Comparative transcriptome profiling provides new insights into mechanisms of androgenetic alopecia progression. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jan;176(1):265-269. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14767. Epub 2016 Dec 10. No abstract available. PubMed 27239811 ↗
  • Shalbaf M, Alase AA, Berekmeri A, Md Yusof MY, Pistolic J, Goodfield MJ, Edward S, Botchkareva NV, Stacey M, Vital EM, Wittmann M. Plucked hair follicles from patients with chronic discoid lupus erythematosus show a disease-specific molecular signature. Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Jul 14;6(1):e000328. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000328. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31413850 ↗
  • Chen PH, Wang CY, Hsia CW, Ho MY, Chen A, Tseng MJ, Wu YF, Chen HM, Huang TH, Liu HT, Shui HA. Impact of taxol on dermal papilla cells--a proteomics and bioinformatics analysis. J Proteomics. 2011 Nov 18;74(12):2760-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 2. PubMed 21989266 ↗
  • Haslam IS, Smart E. Chemotherapy-Induced Hair Loss: The Use of Biomarkers for Predicting Alopecic Severity and Treatment Efficacy. Biomark Insights. 2019 Apr 17;14:1177271919842180. doi: 10.1177/1177271919842180. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31037027 ↗
  • Gho CG, Braun JE, Tilli CM, Neumann HA, Ramaekers FC. Human follicular stem cells: their presence in plucked hair and follicular cell culture. Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):860-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05862.x. PubMed 15149497 ↗
  • Batyrshina ZS, Yaakov B, Shavit R, Singh A, Tzin V. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis of wild and domesticated wheat genotypes reveals differences in chemical and physical defense responses against aphids. BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2214-z. PubMed 31931716 ↗
  • Bagale K, Paudel S, Cagle H, Sigel E, Kulkarni R. Electronic Cigarette (E-Cigarette) Vapor Exposure Alters the Streptococcus pneumoniae Transcriptome in a Nicotine-Dependent Manner without Affecting Pneumococcal Virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Jan 21;86(3):e02125-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02125-19. Print 2020 Jan 21. PubMed 31791951 ↗
  • Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519. Epub 2016 Apr 4. PubMed 27043002 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date and date precision
1 update, last Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05213936
Collaborators
Paxman Coolers Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2022
Start date
Oct 24, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2026
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Beth McLellan, MD
Contact
bmclella@montefiore.org
(718) 862-8840
Yana Kost, BA
Contact
yana.kost@einsteinmed.org
240-383-6896
Beth McLellan, MD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion