CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05239468Updated Jul 16, 2026Results posted

Study of OCA in Combination With BZF Evaluating Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability in Participants With PBC

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bezafibrate 100 mg and Bezafibrate 200 mg in Primary Biliary Cholangitis, sponsored by Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 26 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Intercept Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study to determine the effect of the investigational drug bezafibrate (BZF) alone and in combination with the investigational drug obeticholic acid (OCA) in participants with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Keywords

  • Primary Biliary Cholangitis
  • Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
  • Hepatic Impairment
  • Cirrhosis
  • Liver
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary

208 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 150 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary studies →

Lead sponsor

Intercept Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A definite or probable diagnosis of PBC
  • Qualifying ALP and/or bilirubin liver biochemistry values
  • Taking ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months or no UDCA for 3 months before Day 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or presence of other concomitant liver diseases
  • Presence of clinical complications of PBC
  • History or presence of decompensating events
  • Current or history of gallbladder disease
  • If female, known pregnancy, or has a positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test), or lactating
  • Treatment with commercially available OCA or participation in a previous study involving OCA, or other farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, or peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-agonists within 3 months before Screening
  • Unable to tolerate BZF or other fibrates, treatment with commercially available fibrates, or participation in a previous study involving fibrate within 3 months before Screening.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Double Blind (DB) Phase Treatment A: BZF 100 milligrams (mg) Immediate Release (IR) tablet

    Each Participant will take one OCA placebo tablet, one BZF 100 mg IR tablet and one BZF placebo tablet daily.

    Drug: Bezafibrate 100 mg · Drug: Obeticholic Acid placebo · Drug: Bezafibrate Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Double Blind (DB) Phase Treatment B: BZF 400 mg IR tablet

    Each Participant will take one OCA placebo tablet and two BZF 200 mg IR tablets (to achieve 400 mg dose) daily.

    Drug: Bezafibrate 200 mg · Drug: Obeticholic Acid placebo

  • Experimental
    Double Blind (DB) Phase Treatment C: OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mg IR

    Each participant will take one OCA 5 mg tablet, one BZF 100 mg IR tablet and one BZF placebo tablet, daily.

    Drug: Bezafibrate 100 mg · Drug: Obeticholic Acid 5 mg · Drug: Bezafibrate Placebo

  • Experimental
    Double Blind (DB) Phase Treatment D: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg IR

    Each participant will take one OCA 5 mg tablet and two BZF 200 mg IR tablets (to achieve 400 mg dose) daily.

    Drug: Bezafibrate 200 mg · Drug: Obeticholic Acid 5 mg

  • Experimental
    Long Term Safety Extension (LTSE) Phase Treatment D of the DB phase: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg IR

    Each participant will take one OCA 5 mg tablet and two BZF 200 mg IR tablets (to achieve 400 mg dose) daily.

    Drug: Bezafibrate 200 mg · Drug: Obeticholic Acid 5 mg

Interventions

  • DrugBezafibrate 100 mg

    One tablet of bezafibrate 100 mg IR once daily

  • DrugBezafibrate 200 mg

    Two tablets of bezafibrate 200 mg IR once daily for BZF 400 mg IR

  • DrugObeticholic Acid 5 mg

    One tablet of obeticholic acid 5 mg tablet once daily.

  • DrugObeticholic Acid placebo

    One tablet of obeticholic acid placebo tablet once daily

  • DrugBezafibrate Placebo

    One tablet of bezafibrate placebo tablet once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

    Serum samples were collected at scheduled visits during the double-blind treatment period. Changes in ALP were evaluated using a mixed-effects repeated-measures model (MMRM) to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Response Rates of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30% and ≥40% Reduction From Baseline in ALP

    Responders were defined as participants achieving a ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40% reduction from baseline in serum ALP at week 12 during the DB treatment period with non-responder imputation applied. Baseline ALP was defined as the last evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. The percentage of responders were summarized by treatment group for each response threshold and compared using a Cochran Mantel Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

    Time frame: At Week 12

  2. Normalization Rates of ALP at Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving a response in serum ALP at week 12 during the DB treatment period was assessed using non-responder imputation. Analyses of ALP normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

    Time frame: At Week 12

  3. Normalization Rates of Biochemical Disease Markers

    Percentage of participants achieving a response in biochemical disease markers including ALP, alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total and conjugated bilirubin and lipid panel (cholesterol, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\] and low density lipoprotein \[LDL\]) at Week 12 during the DB treatment period has been presented. Analyses of response rates and normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

    Time frame: At Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in in GGT, ALT and AST Levels

    Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoint and Change from Baseline in GGT, ALT and AST were analyzed using the MMRM model and results were summarized in standard International System of Units (SI) by treatment group using descriptive statistics at baseline and at each on-study evaluation. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and At Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Total and Conjugated Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in total and conjugated bilirubin were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and At Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Lipid Panel

    Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in lipid panel including cholesterol, HDL and LDL were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and At Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline of the Plasma Value of 7 Alpha (α) Hydroxy 4 Cholesten-3 One (C4)

    Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the assessment of C4. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and At Week 12

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Bile Acids

    Blood samples were collected for the assessment of bile acids. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product.

    Time frame: At Week 12

07

Results

Posted Jul 16, 2026

Participant flow

This was a Phase 2a, double-blind (DB), randomized, active-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) administered in combination with Bezafibrate (BZF) doses compared to BZF alone in participants with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC). The eligible participants from double-blind phase entered the Long-Term Safety Extension (LTSE) phase.

DB Period: Up to Week 12
Participant flow — DB Period: Up to Week 12
MilestonePlacebo + BZF 100 Milligrams (mg)OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Started19161918
Completed17151916
Not completed2102
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1001
Withdrew: Sponsor's decision0001
Withdrew: Inclusion/exclusion criteria1000
Withdrew: Participant not eligible for rollover to phase 30100
LTSE Period: Week 12 to Week 156
Participant flow — LTSE Period: Week 12 to Week 156
MilestonePlacebo + BZF 100 Milligrams (mg)OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Started00067
Completed0000
Not completed00067
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0005
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0002
Withdrew: Investigator's decision0006
Withdrew: Sponsor's decision0002
Withdrew: Adverse event0002
Withdrew: Inclusion/exclusion criteria0002
Withdrew: Participants rolled over to phase 300048

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

Serum samples were collected at scheduled visits during the double-blind treatment period. Changes in ALP were evaluated using a mixed-effects repeated-measures model (MMRM) to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units per Liter (U/L)
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
Units per Liter (U/L)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)-87.2 ± 9.22-131.9 ± 9.84-163.9 ± 7.01-184.3 ± 7.49
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + BZF 100 mg vs OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mg · Mixed model of repeated measures · p = 0.003 · Least square mean difference: -44.7 · 95% CI -72.6 to -16.7
  • Placebo + BZF 400 mg vs OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg · Mixed model of repeated measures · p = 0.058 · Least square mean difference: -20.4 · 95% CI -41.6 to 0.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Response Rates of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30% and ≥40% Reduction From Baseline in ALP

Responders were defined as participants achieving a ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40% reduction from baseline in serum ALP at week 12 during the DB treatment period with non-responder imputation applied. Baseline ALP was defined as the last evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. The percentage of responders were summarized by treatment group for each response threshold and compared using a Cochran Mantel Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Response Rates of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30% and ≥40% Reduction From Baseline in ALP
percentage of participantsPlacebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
≥10% Reduction84.293.8100.088.9
≥20% Reduction68.487.5100.088.9
≥30% Reduction36.868.894.788.9
≥40% Reduction15.843.889.588.9
SecondaryNormalization Rates of ALP at Week 12

Percentage of participants achieving a response in serum ALP at week 12 during the DB treatment period was assessed using non-responder imputation. Analyses of ALP normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Normalization Rates of ALP at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Yes5.325.042.161.1
No94.775.057.938.9
SecondaryNormalization Rates of Biochemical Disease Markers

Percentage of participants achieving a response in biochemical disease markers including ALP, alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total and conjugated bilirubin and lipid panel (cholesterol, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\] and low density lipoprotein \[LDL\]) at Week 12 during the DB treatment period has been presented. Analyses of response rates and normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Normalization Rates of Biochemical Disease Markers
percentage of participantsPlacebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
ALP, Normalization (yes)5.325.042.161.1
ALP, Normalization (no)94.775.057.938.9
ALT, Normalization (yes)82.480.078.9100.0
ALT, Normalization (no)17.620.021.10.0
GGT, Normalization (yes)41.266.742.156.3
GGT, Normalization (no)58.833.357.943.8
AST, Normalization (yes)82.480.068.487.5
AST, Normalization (no)17.620.031.612.5
Total bilirubin, Normalization (yes)88.286.778.987.5
Total bilirubin, Normalization (no)11.813.321.112.5
Conjugated bilirubin, Normalization (yes)76.586.783.387.5
Conjugated bilirubin, Normalization (no)23.513.316.712.5
Cholesterol, Normalization (Yes)11.840.031.643.8
Cholesterol, Normalization (No)88.260.068.456.3
HDL, Normalization (Yes)100.093.394.787.5
HDL, Normalization (No)0.06.75.312.5
LDL, Normalization (Yes)11.813.315.825.0
LDL, Normalization (No)88.286.784.275.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in in GGT, ALT and AST Levels

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoint and Change from Baseline in GGT, ALT and AST were analyzed using the MMRM model and results were summarized in standard International System of Units (SI) by treatment group using descriptive statistics at baseline and at each on-study evaluation. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and At Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · International units per Liter (IU/L)
Change From Baseline in in GGT, ALT and AST Levels
International units per Liter (IU/L)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
GGT-51.06 ± 11.370-111.38 ± 12.138-118.45 ± 11.425-174.76 ± 12.251
ALT-7.1 ± 3.43-14.7 ± 3.66-13.7 ± 4.15-21.1 ± 4.51
AST-2.4 ± 2.47-8.2 ± 2.62-5.4 ± 2.58-10.4 ± 2.81
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total and Conjugated Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in total and conjugated bilirubin were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and At Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Total and Conjugated Bilirubin
micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Total Bilirubin-1.397 ± 0.467-2.133 ± 0.500-0.860 ± 0.967-2.867 ± 1.041
Conjugated Bilirubin0.164 ± 0.216-0.299 ± 0.2310.665 ± 0.798-1.394 ± 0.846
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lipid Panel

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in lipid panel including cholesterol, HDL and LDL were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and At Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Lipid Panel
millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Total Cholesterol-0.072 ± 0.218-0.929 ± 0.237-0.461 ± 0.184-0.560 ± 0.198
HDL0.053 ± 0.073-0.245 ± 0.0780.028 ± 0.074-0.240 ± 0.080
LDL-0.191 ± 0.157-0.515 ± 0.169-0.441 ± 0.139-0.344 ± 0.150
SecondaryChange From Baseline of the Plasma Value of 7 Alpha (α) Hydroxy 4 Cholesten-3 One (C4)

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the assessment of C4. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and At Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · moles per liter (mol/L)
Change From Baseline of the Plasma Value of 7 Alpha (α) Hydroxy 4 Cholesten-3 One (C4)
moles per liter (mol/L)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Change From Baseline of the Plasma Value of 7 Alpha (α) Hydroxy 4 Cholesten-3 One (C4)-0.534 ± 16.078-10.421 ± 13.779-8.378 ± 10.479-15.549 ± 18.026
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Bile Acids

Blood samples were collected for the assessment of bile acids. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Bile Acids
ParticipantsPlacebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Bile Acids0000

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 12 for DB period and Up to Week 156 for LTSE period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DB Period: Placebo + BZF 100 mg0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)13/19 (68.4%)
DB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mg0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)9/16 (56.3%)
DB Period: Placebo + BZF 400 mg0/19 (0%)3/19 (15.8%)16/19 (84.2%)
DB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)14/18 (77.8%)
LTSE Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg0/67 (0%)4/67 (6%)59/67 (88.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDB Period: Placebo + BZF 100 mgDB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgDB Period: Placebo + BZF 400 mgDB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgLTSE Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/190/161/190/180/67
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/190/161/190/180/67
Intraductal proliferative breast lesionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/190/161/190/180/67
Tooth abscessInfections and infestations0/190/160/190/181/67
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/190/160/190/181/67
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/190/160/190/181/67
Extradural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/190/160/190/181/67
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/190/160/190/181/67
Uterine leiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/190/160/190/181/67
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 234
Most frequent other events
EventDB Period: Placebo + BZF 100 mgDB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgDB Period: Placebo + BZF 400 mgDB Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgLTSE Period: OCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mg
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/195/166/198/1820/67
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/191/160/191/1812/67
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/190/162/191/1810/67
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/190/160/190/189/67
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/192/162/192/184/67
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/192/160/190/183/67
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/190/160/190/188/67
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/190/160/192/182/67
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/190/160/192/181/67
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/190/160/192/185/67

Baseline characteristics

Safety Population comprised all randomized participants who received at least one dose of BZF and/or OCA.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgTotal
Mean51.8 ± 9.1753.9 ± 12.6857.1 ± 10.7453.3 ± 8.8754.0 ± 10.36
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgTotal
Female1815171868
Male11204
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino588930
Not Hispanic or Latino14811841
Unknown or Not Reported00011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo + BZF 100 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 100 mgPlacebo + BZF 400 mgOCA 5 mg + BZF 400 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American00011
White1916181770
More than one race00101
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Southern California Gastrointestinal (GI) and Liver Centers (SCLC) - Coronado
    Coronado, California 92118, United States
  • Facey Medical Group
    Mission Hills, California 91345, United States
  • Schiff Center for Liver Diseases / University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Tampa General Medical Group
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60459, United States
  • Ochsner Medical Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Liver Research Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
    New York, New York 10016-6402, United States
  • Wake Endoscopy Center
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Gastro One
    Cordova, Tennessee 38018, United States
  • Gastrointestinal Associates of Northeast Tennessee
    Johnson City, Tennessee 37604, United States
  • Methodist Clinical Research Institute (CRI)
    Dallas, Texas 75203, United States
  • Houston Methodist Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030-2717, United States
  • American Research Corporation at the Texas Liver Institute
    San Antonio, Texas 78215, United States
  • Hospital Italiano La Plata
    La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • DIM Clinical Privada
    Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital Universitario Austral
    Pilar, Argentina
  • Hospital Provincial del Centenario
    Rosario, Argentina
  • The Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 287, Canada
  • Pacific Gastroenterology Associates
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2K5, Canada
  • University of Montreal
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
    Bologna, Italy
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 20, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 15, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05239468
Lead sponsor
Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2022
Start date
Mar 21, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Results posted
Jul 16, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Lynda Szczech, M.D.
study director · Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion