CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06121375Updated Jul 7, 2026Results posted

Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) Compared to Placebo in Pediatric Participants With Biliary Atresia, Post-hepatoportoenterostomy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of OCA and Matching Placebo in Biliary Atresia, sponsored by Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 24 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Intercept Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Intercept made a business decision to terminate the study based on FDA's request for voluntary withdrawal of Ocaliva and the issuance of clinical hold on studies under US IND involving OCA.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability, as well as PK/PD of OCA in eligible pediatric participants with biliary atresia with successful hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE, also known as a Kasai portoenterostomy). The double-blind period comprises of 2 phases: dose titration phase and age expansion treatment phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biliary Atresia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biliary Atresia
  • Placebo-controlled
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Obeticholic Acid
  • Efficacy
  • Post-hepatoportoenterostomy
03

In context

Biliary Atresia

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Biliary Atresia; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 43 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Biliary Atresia.

Browse Biliary Atresia studies →

Lead sponsor

Intercept Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female pediatric participants from birth to \<18 years old. Note: Participants aged \<2 years old will not be enrolled until after review of safety data during the planned interim analysis and agreement from the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) that there is sufficient safety data to enroll this age group.
  • Diagnosis of non-syndromic biliary atresia.
  • Demonstrated successful HPE as defined by total bilirubin \<2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (34.2 micromoles per liter [μmol/L]) at least 3 months post-HPE procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior liver transplant or active status on transplant list.
  • Participants diagnosed with biliary atresia splenic malformation (BASM).
  • Conjugated (direct) bilirubin ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) of site-specific reference range. If conjugated bilirubin is not available: total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL (34.2 mol/L).
  • Platelets \<120,000/μL
  • International normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5.
  • Current or history of complications of decompensated chronic liver disease including:

    1. Gastroesophageal varices and/or variceal bleeding
    2. Clinically evident ascites related to portal hypertension
    3. Hepatic encephalopathy
    4. Prior placement of portosystemic shunt
    5. Hepatopulmonary syndrome or portopulmonary hypertension
    6. Hepatorenal syndrome
    7. Any evidence of portal hypertension based on imaging (e.g., cavernous transformation of portal vein, abdominal varices, etc.)
    8. Hepatocellular carcinoma
    9. Childs-Pugh B or C
  • Height and weight Z-score \<-2 per site-specific reference ranges.
  • Acholic (pale) stools.
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >4x ULN.
  • Alanine aminotransferase >4x ULN
  • GGT >500 Units per Liter (U/L)
  • On anticoagulation therapy
  • Albumin \<3.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL).
  • Inability to swallow tablets (i.e., tablet or mini-tablet formulations).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Participants receiving OCA

    Participants will be randomized to receive OCA (starting at 1.5 milligrams \[mg\] adult equivalent dose \[AED\]) orally, with water, once daily. Dose will be titrated every 2 weeks in a stepwise manner for the first 6 weeks, starting at 1.5 mg AED and titrating through 3 mg AED to a maximum of 5 mg AED, as tolerated; a discussion with the Medical Monitor is encouraged when determining uptitration if considerable signs or symptoms have arisen. Following the 6-week dose titration phase, participants will continue at the tolerated dose for approximately 24 months in Age Expansion Treatment Phase.

    Drug: OCA

  • Placebo comparator
    Participants receiving Matching placebo

    Participants will be randomized to receive matching placebo orally, with water, once daily. Dose will be titrated every 2 weeks in a stepwise manner for the first 6 weeks, starting at 1.5 mg AED and titrating through 3 mg AED to a maximum of 5 mg AED, as tolerated; a discussion with the Medical Monitor is encouraged when determining uptitration if considerable signs or symptoms have arisen. Following the 6-week dose titration phase, participants will continue at the tolerated dose for approximately 24 months in Age Expansion Treatment Phase.

    Drug: Matching Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOCA

    OCA will be administered.

  • DrugMatching Placebo

    Matching Placebo will be administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events

    Number of participants experiencing any of the following: All-cause death; Liver transplantation; Hospitalization (≥24 hours) for variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; Clinically relevant ascites requiring therapeutic paracentesis have been presented. No clinical outcome events were reported at the time of the study termination; hence It was not possible to conduct the planned primary efficacy analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) Score

    The Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in pediatric participants younger than 12 years of age. The total PELD score ranges from negative values to positive values, with no absolute minimum or maximum, with higher scores indicating more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is calculated using total bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, age at listing, and growth failure. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Model of End-stage Liver Disease With Sodium (MELD-NA) Score

    The Model of End-stage Liver Disease with Sodium (MELD-Na) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in participants 12 years of age and older, ranging from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill). Higher scores indicate more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is derived from total bilirubin, serum creatinine, INR, and serum sodium. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in GGT and Direct Bilirubin (Composite Responder Endpoint)

    Participants were considered responders if both of the following criteria were met at EOS: ≥40% reduction from baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), and ≥25% reduction from baseline in direct (conjugated) bilirubin. Participants with missing values were considered non-responders.

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in GGT

    Blood samples were collected to assess GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Total and Direct (Conjugated) Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected to assess direct bilirubin levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline in Endogenous Bile Acids

    Plasma samples were collected to assess endogenous bile acids. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Assessed by Transient Elastography

    Liver stiffness was measured using ultrasound elastography. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

  6. Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    TEAEs were defined as adverse events that were reported or worsened on or after the first dose of study treatment. Serious adverse events are adverse events resulting in death, are immediately life threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin D

    Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamins D. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin K

    Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamin K. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

07

Results

Posted Jul 7, 2026

Participant flow

This was a global, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) in pediatric participants with biliary atresia with successful Hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE).

Dose Titration Phase (Up to 6 Weeks)
Participant flow — Dose Titration Phase (Up to 6 Weeks)
MilestoneObeticholic AcidPlacebo
Started1414
Completed1112
Not completed32
Withdrew: Sponsor decision22
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Age Expansion Phase (Up to 24 Months)
Participant flow — Age Expansion Phase (Up to 24 Months)
MilestoneObeticholic AcidPlacebo
Started1112
Completed00
Not completed1112
Withdrew: Sponsor decision1111
Withdrew: Investigator's decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events

Number of participants experiencing any of the following: All-cause death; Liver transplantation; Hospitalization (≥24 hours) for variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; Clinically relevant ascites requiring therapeutic paracentesis have been presented. No clinical outcome events were reported at the time of the study termination; hence It was not possible to conduct the planned primary efficacy analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events
ParticipantsObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Number of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events00
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) Score

The Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in pediatric participants younger than 12 years of age. The total PELD score ranges from negative values to positive values, with no absolute minimum or maximum, with higher scores indicating more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is calculated using total bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, age at listing, and growth failure. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) Score
score on a scaleObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) Score0.8 ± 2.560.8 ± 3.10
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Model of End-stage Liver Disease With Sodium (MELD-NA) Score

The Model of End-stage Liver Disease with Sodium (MELD-Na) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in participants 12 years of age and older, ranging from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill). Higher scores indicate more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is derived from total bilirubin, serum creatinine, INR, and serum sodium. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Model of End-stage Liver Disease With Sodium (MELD-NA) Score
score on a scaleObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Model of End-stage Liver Disease With Sodium (MELD-NA) Score0.0 ± 0.00-0.3 ± 0.29
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in GGT and Direct Bilirubin (Composite Responder Endpoint)

Participants were considered responders if both of the following criteria were met at EOS: ≥40% reduction from baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), and ≥25% reduction from baseline in direct (conjugated) bilirubin. Participants with missing values were considered non-responders.

Time frame:
Up to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in GGT and Direct Bilirubin (Composite Responder Endpoint)
percentage of participantsObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in GGT and Direct Bilirubin (Composite Responder Endpoint)00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in GGT

Blood samples were collected to assess GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · Units/liter (U/L)
Change From Baseline in GGT
Units/liter (U/L)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in GGT3.6 ± 28.30-7.8 ± 25.28
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total and Direct (Conjugated) Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to assess direct bilirubin levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · micromol/liter (mcmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Total and Direct (Conjugated) Bilirubin
micromol/liter (mcmol/L)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Total Bilirubin-1.0 ± 1.92-0.6 ± 3.18
Direct Bilirubin-1.2 ± 0.69-1.1 ± 1.36
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Endogenous Bile Acids

Plasma samples were collected to assess endogenous bile acids. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · micromol/liter (mcmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Endogenous Bile Acids
micromol/liter (mcmol/L)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Endogenous Bile Acids-8.4 ± 19.70-9.7 ± 15.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Assessed by Transient Elastography

Liver stiffness was measured using ultrasound elastography. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · kilopascals (kPa)
Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Assessed by Transient Elastography
kilopascals (kPa)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Assessed by Transient Elastography-1.0 ± 3.930.6 ± 4.03
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that were reported or worsened on or after the first dose of study treatment. Serious adverse events are adverse events resulting in death, are immediately life threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.

Time frame:
Up to Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
ParticipantsObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Any TEAE1311
Any Serious TEAE30
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin D

Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamins D. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · nanomoles/L (nmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin D
nanomoles/L (nmol/L)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin D8.1 ± 14.8515.8 ± 23.95
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin K

Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamin K. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms/millilitres (ng/mL)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin K
nanograms/millilitres (ng/mL)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin K0.1 ± 0.400.1 ± 1.43

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 48. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Obeticholic Acid (OCA)0/14 (0%)3/14 (21.4%)13/14 (92.9%)
Placebo0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)11/14 (78.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Infected aural fistulaInfections and infestations1/140/14
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/140/14
Rhinovirus infectionInfections and infestations1/140/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent other events
EventObeticholic Acid (OCA)Placebo
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations3/145/14
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/144/14
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/141/14
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increasedInvestigations4/141/14
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/141/14
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/142/14
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/142/14
Viral infectionInfections and infestations0/142/14
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/142/14
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/142/14

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat (ITT) Population included all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)PlaceboTotal
Mean7.4 ± 4.318.6 ± 5.178.0 ± 4.71
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)PlaceboTotal
Female5611
Male9817
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino141428
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Obeticholic Acid (OCA)PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101020
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander202
Black or African American000
White123
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Queensland Childrens Hospital
    South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
  • Women's and Children's Hospital
    North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia
  • Royal Childrens Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3104, Australia
  • Alberta Childrens Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Stollery Children's Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China
  • Guangzhou Women And Childrens Medical Center
    Guangzhou, China
  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University
    Shanghai, China
  • Childrens Hospital of Shanghai
    Shanghai, China
  • Children's Hospital of Shanxi
    Taiyuan, China
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Hadassah Medical Center
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Shaare-Zedek Medical Center
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Hospital Raja Perempuan Azinab II
    Kota Bharu, Kelantan 15586, Malaysia
  • University Malaya Medical Center
    Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
  • Starship Child Health
    Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
    Taichung, Taiwan
  • National Chen Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taiwan
  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Pediatrik Gastroenteroloji
    Konyaalti, Antalya 07050, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Ege Üniversitesi Hastanesi Pediatrik Gastroenteroloji Bölümü
    Bornova, İzmir 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Hacettepe Universitesi ihsan Dogramaci Cocuk Hastansesi
    Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 14, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 21, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06121375
Lead sponsor
Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Sep 2, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2025
Completion
Oct 21, 2025
Results posted
Jul 7, 2026
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Lynda Szczech, MD
study director · Intercept Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion