ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05229822Updated Jan 16, 2025Results posted

Bacterial Translocation Markers as Predictors of Infectious and Inflammatory Complications in Acute Bowel Obstruction

An observational study in Intestinal Obstruction, Colorectal Cancer and Post-Op Complication, sponsored by Karaganda Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Kazakhstan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-16.

Sponsored by Karaganda Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of acute bowel obstruction (ABO), postoperative mortality ranges from 5 to 32%, and complications occur up 23% of cases. One of the formidable infectious and inflammatory complications of ABO is sepsis. The main component of the development of sepsis in ABO is bacterial translocation (BT). BT is the migration of intestinal bacteria or their products through the intestinal mucosa into the mesenteric lymph nodes and further into normally sterile tissues and organs.

Today there are several methods for detecting BT:

  1. direct method - the detection of 16s rRNA (ribosomal ribonucleic acid) in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN);
  2. indirect method - the detection of serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and presepsin (Soluble CD14 subtype or sCD14-ST).

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic and prognostic significance of bacterial translocation as a predictor of the complications development in patients with malignant and benign acute bowel obstruction by assessing the relationship of biomarkers in the systemic circulation (LBP, sCD14-ST) with the detection of microorganism genes (16s rRNA) in mesenteric lymph nodes.

Read the detailed description

For the early diagnosis of infectious and inflammatory complications, it is necessary to study LBP, sCD-14 and 16sRNA as bacterial translocation markers in patients with malignant and benign acute bowel obstruction, as well as in patients after planned surgical intervention for colon tumors. Based on changes in bacterial translocation biomarkers in the blood serum, it's suggested that patients with researched pathology can be stratified according to the risk level of developing infectious and inflammatory complications.

The study materials are blood serum and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN). Venous blood sampling will be performed 1 hour before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after it. Venous blood will be collected in 5 ml vacutainers with a coagulation activator and a serum gel separator. It will be centrifuged for 20 minutes at 1000 x g, after which the gel completely separates the serum from the clot, forming a tight barrier.ELISA Kit for Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein (LBP, Human) and for Presepsin (sCD14-ST, Human), from Cloud-Clone Corp. will be used to determine any presence of LBP and sCD14-ST. The analysis will be performed according to the manufacturer's instructions for an ELISA EVOLIS robotic system from BioRad.

The operating surgeon will perform a MLN sampling in sterile conditions during surgery after resection of the intestine from the mesentery of the gross specimen. MLN will be placed in a sterile tube without any fillers. The DNA will be extracted by the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The 16s rRNA bacteria in MLN will be detected by using real-time PCR and BIO-RAD CFX96 amplifier with 16s rRNA forward and reverse primers (U16SRT-F FACTCCTACGGGAGGGAGGCAGGT and U16SRT-R TATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGGC).

During the implementation, the resources of the Collective Use Laboratory of Research Center Non-profit Joint Stock Company (NJSC) "Karaganda Medical University" will be used.

This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP09260597).

02

Conditions studied

  • Intestinal Obstruction
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Post-Op Complication
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
  • Colon Tumor

Keywords

  • acute bowel obstruction
  • colon tumor
  • bacterial translocation
  • presepsin
  • lipopolysaccharide-binding protein
  • 16s rRNA
  • post-operative complications
03

In context

Intestinal Obstruction

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Intestinal Obstruction; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 107 across 40 observational studies indexed under Intestinal Obstruction.

Browse Intestinal Obstruction studies →

Lead sponsor

Karaganda Medical University is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with malignant and benign acute bowel obstruction, colorectal cancer patients without acute bowel obstruction (planned operations) aged from 18, who are expected to undergo surgical treatment for this pathology.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with malignant acute bowel obstruction,
  • patients with benign acute bowel obstruction,
  • colorectal cancer patients without acute bowel obstruction (planned operations).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 18,
  • pregnancy,
  • patients with paralytic acute bowel obstruction,
  • patients with infection, liver cirrhosis,
  • patient with an infectious process due to another pathology.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Malignant ABO

    60 patients with malignant acute bowel obstruction

    Diagnostic Test: LBP · Diagnostic Test: sCD14-ST · Diagnostic Test: 16s rRNA

  • CRC without ABO (control)

    60 colorectal cancer patients without acute bowel obstruction (planned operations)

    Diagnostic Test: LBP · Diagnostic Test: sCD14-ST · Diagnostic Test: 16s rRNA

  • Benign ABO

    30 patients with benign acute bowel obstruction

    Diagnostic Test: LBP · Diagnostic Test: sCD14-ST · Diagnostic Test: 16s rRNA

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLBP

    Determine any presence of LBP in blood serum by ELISA method 1 hour before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after it.

  • Diagnostic testsCD14-ST

    Determine any presence of sCD14-ST in blood serum by ELISA method 1 hour before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after it.

  • Diagnostic test16s rRNA

    Determine any presence of 16s rRNA in mesenteric lymph nodes by PCR method.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Number of Participants With Post-operative Infectious and Inflammatory Complications

    Аny infectious and inflammatory complications in post-operative period (wound suppuration, anastomotic leak, аbdominal abscesses, peritonitis, sepsis, etc.)

    Time frame: Once (if any complication occurs during hospitalization - from 7 to 28 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. LBP Level in Serum Blood

    LBP levels will be compared between groups/ subgroups and in each group/subgroup in dynamic.

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery, 72 hours after surgery

  2. sCD14-ST Level in Serum Blood

    sCD14-ST levels will be compared between groups/ subgroups and in each group/subgroup in dynamic.

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery, 72 hours after surgery

  3. 16s rRNA in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes

    Presence or absence of 16s rRNA in mesenteric lymph nodes will be compared between groups/subgroups.

    Time frame: Once (MLN sampling in sterile conditions during surgery)

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCRC Without ABO (Control)Malignant ABOBenign ABO
Started606030
Completed606030
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Number of Participants With Post-operative Infectious and Inflammatory Complications

Аny infectious and inflammatory complications in post-operative period (wound suppuration, anastomotic leak, аbdominal abscesses, peritonitis, sepsis, etc.)

Time frame:
Once (if any complication occurs during hospitalization - from 7 to 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Number of Participants With Post-operative Infectious and Inflammatory Complications
ParticipantsMalignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABO
- Post-operative infectious complications434725
+ Post-operative infectious complications17135
SecondaryLBP Level in Serum Blood

LBP levels will be compared between groups/ subgroups and in each group/subgroup in dynamic.

Time frame:
1 hour before surgery, 72 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Median · ng/mL
LBP Level in Serum Blood
ng/mLMalignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABO
LBP before surgery (ng/mL)1164.4 (826.4 to 1509.7)971.4 (816.9 to 1277.5)1015.1 (486.4 to 1543.3)
LBP on the 3rd day after surgery (ng/mL)890.9 (703.2 to 1213.7)897.9 (712.5 to 1220.9)1180.0 (687.1 to 1392.3)
SecondarysCD14-ST Level in Serum Blood

sCD14-ST levels will be compared between groups/ subgroups and in each group/subgroup in dynamic.

Time frame:
1 hour before surgery, 72 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Median · pg/mL
sCD14-ST Level in Serum Blood
pg/mLMalignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABO
sCD14-ST before surgery (pg/mL)571.7 (342.5 to 990)245.7 (167.9 to 403.4)485.2 (277.9 to 771.0)
sCD14-ST on day 3 after surgery (pg/mL)527.8 (305.0 to 732.5)227.6 (163.5 to 419.8)386.5 (185.4 to 957.0)
Secondary16s rRNA in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes

Presence or absence of 16s rRNA in mesenteric lymph nodes will be compared between groups/subgroups.

Time frame:
Once (MLN sampling in sterile conditions during surgery)
Reported as:
Number · Count of Participants
16s rRNA in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes
Count of ParticipantsMalignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABO
Presence of 16s rRNA15160
Absence of 16s rRNA45445

Adverse events

Collected over During hospitalization (from 7 to 28 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Malignant ABO12/60 (20%)0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)
CRC Without ABO (Control)1/60 (1.7%)0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)
Benign ABO2/30 (6.7%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The acceptance criteria are as follows: patients undergoing planned surgical intervention for colorectal tumor, patients with ABO of tumor and non-tumor genesis over 18 years of age. The exclusion criteria included: age under 18 years, pregnant women, patients with paralytic/dynamic ABO, patients with HIV infection, liver cirrhosis as well as those patients with an ongoing infectious process due to another pathology.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years26262072
>=65 years34341078
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
Median67.5 (58.5 to 78)66.5 (54 to 73)59.5 (43 to 70)66 (56 to 73.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
Female39261580
Male21341570
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
Kazakhstan606030150
Stage of the tumor process
Stage of the tumor process(Participants)Malignant ABOCRC Without ABO (Control)Benign ABOTotal
I210012
II2026046
III1417031
IV247031
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NJSC Karaganda Medical University
    Karaganda, 100000, Kazakhstan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gore RM, Silvers RI, Thakrar KH, Wenzke DR, Mehta UK, Newmark GM, Berlin JW. Bowel Obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;53(6):1225-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.06.008. PubMed 26526435 ↗
  • Taylor MR, Lalani N. Adult small bowel obstruction. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):528-44. doi: 10.1111/acem.12150. PubMed 23758299 ↗
  • Roses RE, Folkert IW, Krouse RS. Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Reappraising the Value of Surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Oct;27(4):705-715. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jul 21. PubMed 30213414 ↗
  • Shwaartz C, Fields AC, Prigoff JG, Aalberg JJ, Divino CM. Should patients With obstructing colorectal cancer have proximal diversion? Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):742-747. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Sep 2. PubMed 27742029 ↗
  • Chiu HC, Lin YC, Hsieh HM, Chen HP, Wang HL, Wang JY. The impact of complications on prolonged length of hospital stay after resection in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of Taiwanese patients. J Int Med Res. 2017 Apr;45(2):691-705. doi: 10.1177/0300060516684087. Epub 2017 Feb 7. PubMed 28173723 ↗
  • Simillis C, Kalakouti E, Afxentiou T, Kontovounisios C, Smith JJ, Cunningham D, Adamina M, Tekkis PP. Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Incurable Localized or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1829-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04984-2. PubMed 30903246 ↗
  • Wancata LM, Abdelsattar ZM, Suwanabol PA, Campbell DA Jr, Hendren S. Outcomes After Surgery for Benign and Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Feb;21(2):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3307-8. Epub 2016 Oct 25. PubMed 27783343 ↗
  • Stubljar D, Skvarc M. Effective Strategies for Diagnosis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) due to Bacterial Infection in Surgical Patients. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2015;15(1):53-6. doi: 10.2174/1871526515666150320161804. PubMed 25809624 ↗
  • Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, Elinav E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Apr;17(4):219-232. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.7. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28260787 ↗
  • Piton G, Capellier G. Biomarkers of gut barrier failure in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Apr;22(2):152-60. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000283. PubMed 26808138 ↗
  • Tsujimoto H, Ono S, Mochizuki H. Role of translocation of pathogen-associated molecular patterns in sepsis. Dig Surg. 2009;26(2):100-9. doi: 10.1159/000206143. Epub 2009 Mar 2. PubMed 19252406 ↗
  • MacFie J, Reddy BS, Gatt M, Jain PK, Sowdi R, Mitchell CJ. Bacterial translocation studied in 927 patients over 13 years. Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):87-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5184. PubMed 16288452 ↗
  • Fang L, Xu Z, Wang GS, Ji FY, Mei CX, Liu J, Wu GM. Directed evolution of an LBP/CD14 inhibitory peptide and its anti-endotoxin activity. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e101406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101406. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25025695 ↗
  • Stehle JR Jr, Leng X, Kitzman DW, Nicklas BJ, Kritchevsky SB, High KP. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, a surrogate marker of microbial translocation, is associated with physical function in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Nov;67(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls178. Epub 2012 Sep 7. PubMed 22960476 ↗
  • Kell DB, Pretorius E. On the translocation of bacteria and their lipopolysaccharides between blood and peripheral locations in chronic, inflammatory diseases: the central roles of LPS and LPS-induced cell death. Integr Biol (Camb). 2015 Nov;7(11):1339-77. doi: 10.1039/c5ib00158g. PubMed 26345428 ↗
  • Mussap M, Noto A, Fravega M, Fanos V. Soluble CD14 subtype presepsin (sCD14-ST) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) in neonatal sepsis: new clinical and analytical perspectives for two old biomarkers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Oct;24 Suppl 2:12-4. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.601923. PubMed 21740312 ↗
  • van Maldeghem I, Nusman CM, Visser DH. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) as biomarker in neonatal early-onset sepsis and late-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Immunol. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12865-019-0298-8. PubMed 31159729 ↗
  • Hosomi S, Yamagami H, Itani S, Yukawa T, Otani K, Nagami Y, Tanaka F, Taira K, Kamata N, Tanigawa T, Shiba M, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y. Sepsis Markers Soluble IL-2 Receptor and Soluble CD14 Subtype as Potential Biomarkers for Complete Mucosal Healing in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Jan 5;12(1):87-95. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx124. PubMed 28961693 ↗
  • Endo S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi G, Shozushima T, Ishikura H, Murai A, Nishida T, Irie Y, Miura M, Iguchi H, Fukui Y, Tanaka K, Nojima T, Okamura Y. Presepsin as a powerful monitoring tool for the prognosis and treatment of sepsis: a multicenter prospective study. J Infect Chemother. 2014 Jan;20(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PubMed 24462421 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2021 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 31 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2025, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 21, 2022
First posted
Feb 8, 2022
StartActual
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2023
Results first posted
Jan 16, 2025
Last update
Jan 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05229822
Lead sponsor
Karaganda Medical University
Collaborators
Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Kazakhstan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Results posted
Jan 16, 2025
Last update
Jan 16, 2025

Study contacts

Yemek Turgunov, Pr.
study chair · NJSC Karaganda Medical University
Alina Ogizbayeva, PhD student
principal investigator · NJSC Karaganda Medical University
Lyudmila Akhmaltdinova, PhD
principal investigator · NJSC Karaganda Medical University
Kairat Shakeyev, Pr.
principal investigator · NJSC Karaganda Medical University
Dmitry Matyushko, PhD
principal investigator · Multidisciplinary hospital No. 1 of Karaganda
Miras Mugazov, PhD
principal investigator · NJSC Karaganda Medical University
Asylbek Zhumakaev, Master
principal investigator · Multidisciplinary hospital No. 3 of Karaganda
Irina Kadyrova, PhD
principal investigator · NJSC Karaganda Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion