CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05218421CAP-VALUEUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Carotid Artery Plaque Vulnerability Assessment Using Ultrafast Ultrasound Techniques

An observational study in Carotid Artery Plaque, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: To explore the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis, and post-stenosis) and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Secondary, to assess the association between ultrasound elastography and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Furthermore, to assess the association between blood flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS), vector complexity and vorticity, and plaque vulnerability. To evaluate the hemodynamic consequences of a CEA. Last, to explore whether the presence of circulating biomarkers is related to the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound).

Study design: A multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study in a total of 70 patients.

Study population: Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.

Intervention (observational): A carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care. The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure. Besides, clinical parameters will be subtracted from electronic health record or, if missing, anamnestically collected from the patient.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, maximum stenosis and post-stenosis), measured by ultrafast ultrasound measurements, and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carotid Artery Plaque

Keywords

  • Ultrasound
  • Shear wave elastography
  • Atherosclerotic plaques
  • Strain elastography
  • Ultrafast ultrasound flow imaging
  • Histological plaque characterization
03

In context

Carotid Stenosis

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 173 across 144 observational studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.

Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of carotid artery stenosis (≥50%) according to conventional clinically performed imaging (duplex/CT(A)/MR(A)) and scheduled for a CEA;
  • Possibility to perform carotid ultrasound ≤2 weeks before the CEA
  • ≥18 years old;
  • Able to provide signed or oral informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hampered carotid blood flow imaging during clinically performed duplex/doppler measurements due to near to total carotid occlusion at the side of interest or a calcified plaque;
  • Restenosis after carotid revascularisation at side of interest;
  • Participating in another clinical study, interfering on outcomes;
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants

    Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.

    Diagnostic Test: Carotid ultrasound · Other: Biospecimen collection and examination · Other: Blood sample collection

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCarotid ultrasound

    Carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure.

  • OtherBiospecimen collection and examination

    The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability.

  • OtherBlood sample collection

    In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assocation between 2D blood flow velocities and plaque vulnerability

    Explore the association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis and post-stenosis) and atherosclerotic carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association strain and plaque vulnerability

    Association between strain parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining.

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA

  2. Association shear wave elastography measures and plaque vulnerability

    Association between shear wave parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining. (only Radboudumc)

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA

  3. Association blood flow-related parameters and plaque vulnerability

    Association between blood flow-related parameters, including WSS, vector complexity and vorticity and carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining.

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA

  4. Comparison predictive value for plaque vulnerability ultrafast imaging techniques vs clinically-used measurements

    Comparison between the predictive value for plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) of ultrafast imaging techniques (i.e. flow, strain and shear wave elastography) with that of clinically-used duplex measurements.

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA

  5. Status 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters prior- and post-CEA

    Status of 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters (WSS, vector complexity and vorticity) prior- and post-CEA.

    Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA and 6 weeks after CEA

  6. Association circulating inflammatory cytokines and plaque vulnerability

    Association between the presence of circulating inflammatory cytokines and the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound)

    Time frame: Time Frame: During CEA

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rijnstate Hospital
    Arnhem, Netherlands
  • Radboud university medical center
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05218421
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Rijnstate Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion