ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07841132CEST-PROTECTUpdated Sep 25, 2026

CEST-PROTECT: Proximal Flow Control With a Balloon Guide Catheter Plus Distal Embolic Protection: a Randomised, Open-label Trial Evaluating Cerebral Protection Techniques

An interventional study of BGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting and Single distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting in Carotid Artery Stenosis (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic), sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 25, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy can reduce the occurrence of new cerebral ischemic lesions compared with a single cerebral protection strategy in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dual cerebral protection using proximal flow control combined with a distal embolic protection device or conventional single cerebral protection. Brain magnetic resonance imaging will be performed after the procedure to assess new ischemic lesions. The study will also evaluate peri-procedural neurological events and other safety and efficacy outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Carotid artery stenting is an established treatment for selected patients with carotid artery stenosis, but peri-procedural cerebral embolization remains an important concern. Distal embolic protection devices are commonly used during carotid artery stenting; however, embolization may occur during lesion crossing or device manipulation before complete distal protection is established.

The CEST-PROTECT trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study designed to investigate whether a proximal-distal dual cerebral protection strategy provides additional cerebral protection compared with a conventional single protection strategy during carotid artery stenting. Participants will be randomly assigned to the dual-protection group or the single-protection group.

In the dual-protection group, proximal flow control will be combined with a distal embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting. In the single-protection group, carotid artery stenting will be performed using conventional distal embolic protection alone.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion-weighted imaging, will be performed after the procedure to identify new cerebral ischemic lesions. Clinical neurological outcomes, procedural outcomes, and safety events will also be assessed during follow-up. The study is intended to determine whether the dual-protection strategy can reduce peri-procedural cerebral embolic injury without increasing procedure-related complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carotid Artery Stenosis (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic)

Keywords

  • Carotid artery stenting
  • Embolic protection device
  • Proximal protection
  • Distal protection
  • Carotid artery stenosis
  • New cerebral infarction
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • stroke
03

In context

Carotid Stenosis

364 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 103 across 189 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.

Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 363 studies on the registry; 230 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 to 80 years, regardless of sex.
  2. Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70%, with the degree of stenosis determined according to the prespecified NASCET method and confirmed by CTA, DSA, or MRA.
  3. Presence of at least one protocol-defined complex high-risk carotid stenosis feature confirmed by carotid ultrasonography, CTA, DSA, HR-VWI, or other protocol-specified imaging modalities.
  4. Written provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other cerebrovascular lesions that may substantially increase peri-procedural risk or interfere with assessment of the primary outcome, including an untreated ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm >5 mm, cerebral arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, or other vascular lesions considered to pose significant risk by multidisciplinary assessment.
  2. Severe ipsilateral intracranial tandem stenosis ≥70% that is related to a recent ischemic event, is planned for intervention during the study follow-up period, or may interfere with attribution of post-procedural stroke; or complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery with an unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest.
  3. Technical conditions precluding carotid artery stenting or preventing safe implementation of either randomized cerebral protection strategy, including target-vessel occlusion or near-occlusion with distal collapse; free-floating thrombus or high-burden active intraluminal thrombus; absence of an appropriate landing zone for the distal embolic protection device or balloon flow-control segment in the common carotid artery; inability to safely cross, deploy, or retrieve the distal protection device; inability to safely and stably position the balloon guide catheter; severe aortic arch, supra-aortic, carotid-origin, or iliofemoral disease resulting in unacceptable transfemoral access risk; severe vascular tortuosity, angulation, or calcification resulting in unacceptable device-passage, vascular-injury, or stent-deployment risk; unacceptable risk of intolerance to proximal flow arrest; or any other condition preventing safe implementation of either randomized strategy.
  4. Previous stenting, angioplasty, or other endovascular mechanical treatment of the target carotid artery; or carotid lesions not prespecified for inclusion in the etiologic complex-lesion cohort, including carotid dissection, vasculitis, traumatic or infectious lesions, pseudoaneurysm, or fibromuscular dysplasia other than carotid web.
  5. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3 after a recent stroke, or the presence of a large cerebral infarction, significant cerebral edema or mass effect, hemorrhagic transformation, impaired consciousness, progressive neurological deficits, or clinically unstable neurological status.
  6. to contrast agents, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, or medications required during the procedure that cannot be adequately managed; or inability or expected inability to receive or complete protocol-required dual antiplatelet therapy.
  7. A recent ischemic event considered primarily cardioembolic, or the presence of a high-risk cardiac source of embolism such as left atrial or left ventricular thrombus, infective endocarditis, a mechanical heart valve with inadequate anticoagulation, or an intracardiac mass. Atrial fibrillation alone is not an absolute exclusion criterion unless it is considered the primary cause of the qualifying ischemic event or required anticoagulation cannot be safely combined with the protocol-required antiplatelet regimen.
  8. A serious medical condition precluding elective carotid artery stenting, including active bleeding, uncorrectable coagulopathy, severe renal dysfunction without adequate risk-control measures, persistent uncontrolled severe hypertension, active severe infection, myocardial infarction within 6 weeks before screening, unstable acute coronary syndrome, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled severe arrhythmia, or another serious systemic disease.
  9. Contraindication to MRI or anticipated inability to complete the protocol-required baseline and post-procedural MRI/DWI examinations.
  10. Current participation, or participation within 3 months before screening, in another clinical study that may affect the study intervention, safety assessment, or primary outcome evaluation; or planned major surgery or endovascular treatment during the peri-procedural period or 30-day follow-up that may interfere with assessment of study outcomes.
  11. Inability to understand or comply with study procedures, provide valid , complete the 30-day clinical follow-up or neurological assessments, or provide reliable primary outcome data; or shorter than the required study follow-up period.
  12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study, substantially increases study-related risk, or may compromise the reliability of the study results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device

    Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device, allowing the procedure to be performed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection

    Procedure: BGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting

  • Active comparator
    Single distal filter embolic protection device

    Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully documented.

    Procedure: Single distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting

Interventions

  • ProcedureBGC proximal flow control plus distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting

    Carotid artery stenting will be performed via a transfemoral approach. Proximal flow control will be established using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and combined with a distal filter embolic protection device. Carotid artery stenting will then be completed under dual proximal and distal cerebral protection.

  • ProcedureSingle distal filter embolic protection device during carotid artery stenting

    Carotid artery stenting will be performed according to a standardized procedure under the protection of a distal embolic protection device. The selection criteria for the distal protection device and stent will be consistent with those used in the experimental group. The brand, model, size, rationale for selection, and details of device use will be fully

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Ipsilateral Cerebral Ischemic Lesion on Diffusion-Weighted MRI

    The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one new cerebral ischemic lesion on the side of the target carotid artery detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) after carotid artery stenting, compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. New ischemic lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite of Any Stroke or All-Cause Death Within 30 Days

    First occurrence of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after carotid artery stenting. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  2. Number and Distribution of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI

    The number and distribution of new cerebral ischemic lesions detected on post-procedural diffusion-weighted MRI compared with the pre-procedural baseline MRI. Distribution of new ischemic lesions according to laterality (ipsilateral or contralateral to the target carotid artery) and vascular territory involvement (single or multiple vascular territories). Lesions will be assessed by an independent central imaging core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

  3. Characteristics of New Cerebral Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI

    New cerebral ischemic lesions will be classified as cortical or subcortical. Lesions will also be categorized according to the maximum lesion diameter.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

  4. Proportion of Participants With New Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Cerebral Infarction

    The proportions of participants with newly developed symptomatic cerebral infarction and newly developed asymptomatic cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting will be assessed separately. Symptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction associated with corresponding new neurological symptoms, whereas asymptomatic cerebral infarction is defined as a new cerebral infarction without corresponding new neurological symptoms.

    Time frame: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  5. Incidence of Ipsilateral Ischemic Stroke

    The incidences of ipsilateral ischemic stroke will be assessed individually.

    Time frame: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  6. Incidence of Ipsilateral TIA

    The incidences of ipsilateral TIA will be assessed individually.

    Time frame: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  7. Incidence of All-cause Death

    The incidences of all-cause death will be assessed individually.

    Time frame: Within 7 (±2) and 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  8. NIHSS Score and Change From Baseline

    Neurological impairment will be assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 7 days or hospital discharge and again at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

    Time frame: At 7 (±2) days or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first, and at 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  9. Modified Rankin Scale Score and Change From Baseline

    Functional status will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS score and its change from the pre-procedural baseline will be evaluated at 30 days after carotid artery stenting.

    Time frame: At 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  10. Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage

    The proportion of participants experiencing any intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after carotid artery stenting

  11. Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    The proportion of participants experiencing any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) after carotid artery stenting.

    Time frame: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

  12. Incidence of Device- or Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    The proportion of participants experiencing adverse events or serious adverse events considered related to the study device or study procedure.

    Time frame: Within 30 (±7) days after carotid artery stenting

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Deidentified individual participant data will not be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Apr 2029, 30 months later.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carotid Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2026
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2029
CompletionEst.
May 2029
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07841132
Collaborators
Union hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Zhangzhou hospital, People's Hospital of Gaomi City, The First Affiliated Hospital of Haerbin Medical University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Heze Municipal Hospital, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Linyi People's Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Mianyang, Nanyang Central Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Jinan Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Xinqiao Hospital, Baoji third people's hospital, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng Brains Hospital / Liaocheng People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2029 (estimated)
Completion
May 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Jichang Luo, MD.
Contact
luojichang_dr@sina.com
+86 13120136577
Lingyan Meng, MD
Contact
lingyanmeng2001@163.com
+86 15015519994

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion