ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05168215CUREUpdated Nov 1, 2023

Effectiveness of Bosentan Therapy in Patients With Systemic scleRosis and Progressive Digital ulcEr Disease.

An observational study in Scleroderma, Digital Ulcer and Autoimmune Diseases, sponsored by Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-01.

Sponsored by Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2022; still recruiting 4 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Digital Ulcers (DEs), are painful open sores on the fingers and toes and are due to limited perfusion of blood vessels in patients with Scleroderma. In particular, ulcers are caused by narrowing of the arteries, resulting in reduced blood supply to the fingers, causing pain and difficult to heal leaving deep scars. DEs may be present on the rails or fingertips, on the extensor surfaces of the joints, and depending on the underlying calcification. The etiology of ulcers is multifactorial. Raynaud's ischemia, sclerosis, dry skin, calcification and local trauma can all contribute to the onset of Digital Ulcers. Spontaneous fissures or ruptures can also develop into ulcers in patients with scleroderma and severe Raynaud's disease. Whatever the reason for their appearance, DEs negatively affect the quality of life of patients as they complicate even simple daily activities, while they can lead to serious complications such as osteomyelitis or other serious soft tissue infections, up to amputation. Over the last decade, in several randomized clinical trials, DEs have been studied in detail, which are defined or classified differently in each case. The clinical treatment of patients with DE would be facilitated by the availability of specific criteria for the classification of DE. Internationally, the classification of pressure ulcers is usually followed, but this classification is not sufficient for all types of DE observed in Scleroderma. The lack of a clear classification of DEs prompted researchers to evaluate the frequency and morphology of lesions, their characteristics, their physical course, and their healing time in groups of patients with Scleroderma. In a recent study, three categories of classification of digital ulcers based on the patient's clinical picture were proposed by the UK Scleroderma Study Group (UKSSG).

Read the detailed description
  1. Digital Ulcers: Lesions (on the fingers or peripheral to the metacarpophalangeal joint), with loss of surface epithelialization and visually distinct depth. The ulcer substrate is often superficially liquid with a scaly surface. The damaged skin surrounding the DE is not unusually erythematous and / or impregnated (absence of additional infection). Also, DE often has an overlying crust and patients report severe pain. The most common signs of DE are the fingertips and over the extensor muscle of the (dorsal / back) fold of the hands in relation to subcutaneous calcification. Less commonly, DEs may occur in other places on the hands, such as above the lateral folds of the fingers and at the base of the nail.
  2. Healed Ulcer: Damage with complete surface epithelialization (in any other case it will be classified as DE).
  3. No Ulcer: Any lesions that do not meet the definitions of either DEs or healed DEs, including (not only) phalangeal pitting scars, hyperkeratosis and fissures.

In general, targeted future research is needed to improve the reliability of the clinical evaluation of Finger Ulcers for their treatment and to optimize the quality of life of patients.

Systemic Sclerosis Criteria (Scleroderma) In 1980, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), in conjunction with the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), defined the classification criteria for Systemic Sclerosis / Scleroderma. Due to the lack of sensitivity in locating the early stages of Scleroderma and especially the limited cutaneous Systemic Scleroderma, the classification criteria were revised in 2013. It has been found that the thickening of the skin of the fingers that extends near the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient to classify the patient with Scleroderma, if this is not obvious, seven additional elements apply, each with a different severity. Specifically, the data are: thickening of the skin of the fingers, finger lesions, teleangiectasia, abnormal capillaries, interstitial pneumonia or Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon and autoantibodies associated with All cases of patients with Scleroderma according to the ACR criteria of 1980 were also classified with Scleroderma and the new criteria of 2013, where several additional cases of patients with Systemic Sclerosis were added.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scleroderma
  • Digital Ulcer
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
  • Reynold Syndrome
03

In context

Scleroderma, Diffuse

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 113 across 68 observational studies indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse.

Browse Scleroderma, Diffuse studies →

Lead sponsor

Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients who have been diagnosed with scleroderma (both types:diffuse or limited) and at least one digital ulcer. These patients have been categorised with a total score of ≥ 9 according to 2013 ACR / EULAR Classification Criteria. Regarding current treatment sceme theya are already taking Bosentan (Klimurtan®)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • Patients diagnosed with scleroderma (diffuse or limited)
  • Patients with at least one digital ulcer, whether or not it is due to scleroderma
  • Patients with 2013 ACR / EULAR Classification Criteria with a total score of ≥ 9
  • Patients already taking Bosentan (Klimurtan®)
  • Patients who will sign the consent form for their participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with digital ulcers of other etiology, other than scleroderma
  • Patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (severe PAH- Category 3-4 according to WHO)
  • Patients who do not meet the criteria for taking the study drug, according to the Summary of Product Characteristics
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Digital Ulcers

    The change in the number of finger ulcers and the appearance or not of new ones.

    Time frame: 0-18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Rodnan Skin Score (ΜRSS)

    The change in the rating on the modified Rodnan leather scale

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Raynaud's Condition Score RCS

    The change in the rating on the Raynaud scale

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  3. EUSTAR activity index

    The change in the score on the EUSTAR activity scale

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  4. Adverse Events, AE

    Number of Adverse Events during the study period

    Time frame: 0-18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Laikon Hospital of Athens
    Athens, Greece
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Makela M, Heliovaara M, Sievers K, Knekt P, Maatela J, Aromaa A. Musculoskeletal disorders as determinants of disability in Finns aged 30 years or more. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;46(6):549-59. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90128-n. PubMed 8501482 ↗
  • J. H. Kellgren, J. S. Lawrence, and Jean Aitken-Swan, Rheumatic complaints in an urban population, From the Walkden Miners' Clinic and the Departments of Rheumatism Research and Occupational Health, University of Manchester (January 24, 1953).
  • Frederick B. Vivino, Sjogren's syndrome: Clinical aspects, S1521-6616(16)30678-7, doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.04.005,Clinical Immunology, 14 April 2017.
  • P.Vlachogiannopoulos, H.M. Moutsopoulos, Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma), Orphanet Encyclopedia, November 2001.
  • van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Naden RP, Medsger TA Jr, Carreira PE, Riemekasten G, Clements PJ, Denton CP, Distler O, Allanore Y, Furst DE, Gabrielli A, Mayes MD, van Laar JM, Seibold JR, Czirjak L, Steen VD, Inanc M, Kowal-Bielecka O, Muller-Ladner U, Valentini G, Veale DJ, Vonk MC, Walker UA, Chung L, Collier DH, Csuka ME, Fessler BJ, Guiducci S, Herrick A, Hsu VM, Jimenez S, Kahaleh B, Merkel PA, Sierakowski S, Silver RM, Simms RW, Varga J, Pope JE. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2737-47. doi: 10.1002/art.38098. Epub 2013 Oct 3. PubMed 24122180 ↗
  • Steen V, Denton CP, Pope JE, Matucci-Cerinic M. Digital ulcers: overt vascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jun;48 Suppl 3:iii19-24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep105. PubMed 19487218 ↗
  • Tsifetaki N, Georgiadis AN, Alamanos Y, Fanis S, Argyropoulou MI, Drosos AA. Subclinical atherosclerosis in scleroderma patients. Scand J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;39(4):326-9. doi: 10.3109/03009741003605648. PubMed 20476856 ↗
  • Guiducci S, Giacomelli R, Cerinic MM. Vascular complications of scleroderma. Autoimmun Rev. 2007 Sep;6(8):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Jan 12. PubMed 17854742 ↗
  • EMA, Guideline on the clinical investigations of medicinal products for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, November 2008.
  • Korn JH, Mayes M, Matucci Cerinic M, Rainisio M, Pope J, Hachulla E, Rich E, Carpentier P, Molitor J, Seibold JR, Hsu V, Guillevin L, Chatterjee S, Peter HH, Coppock J, Herrick A, Merkel PA, Simms R, Denton CP, Furst D, Nguyen N, Gaitonde M, Black C. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec;50(12):3985-93. doi: 10.1002/art.20676. PubMed 15593188 ↗
  • Amanzi L, Braschi F, Fiori G, Galluccio F, Miniati I, Guiducci S, Conforti ML, Kaloudi O, Nacci F, Sacu O, Candelieri A, Pignone A, Rasero L, Conforti D, Matucci-Cerinic M. Digital ulcers in scleroderma: staging, characteristics and sub-setting through observation of 1614 digital lesions. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jul;49(7):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq097. Epub 2010 Apr 16. PubMed 20400463 ↗
  • Romanelli, M., Clark, M., Cherry, G.W., Colin, D., Defloor, T. (Eds.), © 2006 Science and Practice of Pressure Ulcer Management.
  • Hughes M, Tracey A, Bhushan M, Chakravarty K, Denton CP, Dubey S, Guiducci S, Muir L, Ong V, Parker L, Pauling JD, Prabu A, Rogers C, Roberts C, Herrick AL. Reliability of digital ulcer definitions as proposed by the UK Scleroderma Study Group: A challenge for clinical trial design. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018 Jun 1;3(2):170-174. doi: 10.1177/2397198318764796. Epub 2018 Mar 27. PubMed 29876526 ↗
  • ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc, Scleroderma), https://www.rheumatology.org/Portals/0/Files/SSc%20Class%20Criteria%20slides.pdf.
  • . Sakkas L. & Vaiopoulos G. The new 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis pave the way for treatment in pre-scleroderma patients. 21;1;2015
  • Tingey T, Shu J, Smuczek J, Pope J. Meta-analysis of healing and prevention of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Sep;65(9):1460-71. doi: 10.1002/acr.22018. PubMed 23554239 ↗
  • Mayes MD. Endothelin and endothelin receptor antagonists in systemic rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 May;48(5):1190-9. doi: 10.1002/art.10895. No abstract available. PubMed 12746891 ↗
  • Wigley FM, Korn JH, Csuka ME, Medsger TA Jr, Rothfield NF, Ellman M, Martin R, Collier DH, Weinstein A, Furst DE, Jimenez SA, Mayes MD, Merkel PA, Gruber B, Kaufman L, Varga J, Bell P, Kern J, Marrott P, White B, Simms RW, Phillips AC, Seibold JR. Oral iloprost treatment in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Apr;41(4):670-7. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199804)41:43.0.CO;2-I. PubMed 9550476 ↗
  • Valentini G, Iudici M, Walker UA, Jaeger VK, Baron M, Carreira P, Czirjak L, Denton CP, Distler O, Hachulla E, Herrick AL, Kowal-Bielecka O, Pope J, Muller-Ladner U, Riemekasten G, Avouac J, Frerix M, Jordan S, Minier T, Siegert E, Ong VH, Vettori S, Allanore Y. The European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) task force for the development of revised activity criteria for systemic sclerosis: derivation and validation of a preliminarily revised EUSTAR activity index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):270-276. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209768. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PubMed 27621285 ↗
  • Valentini G, D'Angelo S, Della Rossa A, Bencivelli W, Bombardieri S. European Scleroderma Study Group to define disease activity criteria for systemic sclerosis. IV. Assessment of skin thickening by modified Rodnan skin score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):904-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.904. No abstract available. PubMed 12922969 ↗
  • Valentini G, Della Rossa A, Bombardieri S, Bencivelli W, Silman AJ, D'Angelo S, Cerinic MM, Belch JF, Black CM, Bruhlmann P, Czirjak L, De Luca A, Drosos AA, Ferri C, Gabrielli A, Giacomelli R, Hayem G, Inanc M, McHugh NJ, Nielsen H, Rosada M, Scorza R, Stork J, Sysa A, van den Hoogen FH, Vlachoyiannopoulos PJ. European multicentre study to define disease activity criteria for systemic sclerosis. II. Identification of disease activity variables and development of preliminary activity indexes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Jun;60(6):592-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.6.592. PubMed 11350848 ↗

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2024, 29 months after the start.

Of 32 observational studies under Scleroderma, Diffuse, half reached primary completion within 80 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 44. This study's planned 29 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2021
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
StartActual
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 1, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05168215
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
Start date
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 1, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion