ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06117722ESTIAUpdated Jul 22, 2024

TorasEmide Induced Effect on QoL and Clinical parameterS in paTients With chronIc heArt Failure Receiving Eplerenone.

An observational study in Chronic Heart Failure, sponsored by Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-22.

Sponsored by Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure (HF) is a multisystemic disorder characterized by marked disturbances in the physiology of the circulatory system and a multitude of structural and functional changes in the myocardium that adversely affect the systolic function and diastolic filling of the heart. Heart failure is not a single pathologic diagnosis, but a clinical syndrome consisting of cardiac symptoms (eg, dyspnea, edema of the lower extremities, and fatigue) that may be accompanied by signs (eg, increased jugular venous pressure and peripheral edema).The diagnosis of CKD becomes more likely in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease (CHD), diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiotoxic chemotherapy, and in patients with a family history of cardiomyopathy or of sudden death. The diagnosis of HF requires the presence of HF symptoms and/or signs and objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction.

The main symptoms of HF are symptoms such as shortness of breath at rest or during exercise, difficulty breathing (dyspnea), rapid breathing (tachypnea), difficulty breathing when bending over (bendopnea), orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, fatigue , weight gain or weight loss, swelling (of the extremities, scrotum or elsewhere), wheezing, palpitations, syncope, history of Cheyne Stokes breathing during sleep (often reported by the family rather than the patient), cough, drowsiness.

The simplest terminology used to describe HF severity is the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification based on symptom severity and physical activity.

In Greece, it is estimated that the number of patients suffering from HF is 200,000.

In the vast majority of cases, transthoracic echocardiography is the initial cardiac imaging test used to evaluate patients with newly diagnosed or suspected heart failure. Echocardiography is particularly suitable for the evaluation of myocardial structure and function, valvular function and hemodynamic parameters .

Read the detailed description

Eplerenone is more specific in blocking aldosterone and therefore causes less gynecomastia. Eplerenone is indicated in addition to standard therapy including β-blockers to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in stable patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤40%) and clinical evidence of heart failure after recent myocardial infarction. In addition, eplerenone is indicated in standard optimal therapy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in adult patients with NYHA class II (chronic) HF and with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 30%).

Caution should be exercised when MRAs are used in patients with renal impairment and those with serum potassium concentrations >5.0 mmol/L.

Diuretics are drugs that are recommended or should be considered in selected HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. The goal of diuretic therapy is to achieve and maintain euvolemia with the lowest dose of diuretics.

Loop diuretics are recommended to reduce signs and/or symptoms of congestion in patients with HFrEF.

Transition to oral therapy should begin when the patient's clinical condition is stable .

Torasemide, one of the loop diuretics, is indicated in the treatment of edema due to congestive heart failure. The usual starting dose is 10 or 20 mg once a day. If the diuretic response is inadequate, the dose should be approximately doubled until an adequate response is achieved .

Among the potential advantages of torasemide in the treatment of HF are its beneficial pharmacological properties, which make it more suitable for the management of congestion ).

Torasemide may be less susceptible to diuretic resistance, has a prolonged half-life (3.5 hours), prolonged duration of effect (6-16 hours), and is less prone to hypokalemia .

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Heart Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is close to the median of 200 across 1,983 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with a diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) who are on treatment with torasemide added on to eplerenone treatment, from 1 to 7 days before study initiation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
  • Patients who are on treatment with torasemide added on to eplerenone treatment, from 1 to 7 days before study initiation.
  • Patients who are able to provide and follow study procedures and requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with to the active substance of torasemide, sulfonylureas or to any of the mentioned in torasemide SmPC.
  • Patients with renal failure with anuria.
  • Patients in hepatic coma, or pro-coma.
  • Patients with intolerance to galactose, complete lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption.
  • Patients with hypotension.
  • Patients with cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Patients with parallel treatment with aminoglycosides or cephalosporins.
  • Patients with kidney dysfunction due to drugs that cause kidney damage.
  • The addition during the study of other drugs with a direct effect on diuresis (such as other diuretics or SGLT2 inhibitors).
  • Patients who are unable to comply with the study protocol procedures and requirements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherEplerenone torasemide in chronic heart failure

    Heart Failure patients treated with eplerenone and torasemide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF)

    The change in the disease specific questionnaire - Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) - score from baseline to 6 months of treatment and between the visits.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. CHQ-SAS (Chronic Heart failure Questionnaire - Self Administered format, Standardized questions)

    Changes from baseline in the CHQ-SAS (Chronic Heart failure Questionnaire - Self Administered format, Standardized questions) to assess the degree of dyspnoea, between the visits and at 6 months from treatment initiation. Changes from baseline in patients' New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification between the visits and at 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification

    Changes from baseline in patients' New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification between the visits and at 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)

    The score of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) at 3 and 6 months from treatment initiation and its change between visits.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Body weight

    The change in patients' body weight from baseline, between the visits and at 6-months from treatment initiation.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Dosage scheme

    The record of torasemide titration.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Number of Adverse Events

    The record of Adverse Events during the study conduct.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Diwan, A. &. (2019). SECTION I Basic Mechanisms of Heart Failure. Heart Failure: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease, 1.
  • McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 21;42(48):4901. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab670. PubMed 34447992 ↗
  • Lam CSP, Voors AA, Piotr P, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Time to rename the middle child of heart failure: heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 1;41(25):2353-2355. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa158. No abstract available. PubMed 32227233 ↗
  • Mant J, Doust J, Roalfe A, Barton P, Cowie MR, Glasziou P, Mant D, McManus RJ, Holder R, Deeks J, Fletcher K, Qume M, Sohanpal S, Sanders S, Hobbs FD. Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnosis of heart failure, with modelling of implications of different diagnostic strategies in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jul;13(32):1-207, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta13320. PubMed 19586584 ↗
  • Davie AP, Francis CM, Caruana L, Sutherland GR, McMurray JJ. Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use? QJM. 1997 May;90(5):335-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/90.5.335. PubMed 9205668 ↗
  • Oudejans I, Mosterd A, Bloemen JA, Valk MJ, van Velzen E, Wielders JP, Zuithoff NP, Rutten FH, Hoes AW. Clinical evaluation of geriatric outpatients with suspected heart failure: value of symptoms, signs, and additional tests. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 May;13(5):518-27. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr021. Epub 2011 Mar 19. PubMed 21422000 ↗
  • Kelder JC, Cramer MJ, van Wijngaarden J, van Tooren R, Mosterd A, Moons KG, Lammers JW, Cowie MR, Grobbee DE, Hoes AW. The diagnostic value of physical examination and additional testing in primary care patients with suspected heart failure. Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2865-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.019216. Epub 2011 Nov 21. PubMed 22104551 ↗
  • Caraballo C, Desai NR, Mulder H, Alhanti B, Wilson FP, Fiuzat M, Felker GM, Pina IL, O'Connor CM, Lindenfeld J, Januzzi JL, Cohen LS, Ahmad T. Clinical Implications of the New York Heart Association Classification. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(23):e014240. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014240. Epub 2019 Nov 27. PubMed 31771438 ↗
  • Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, Mohseni H, Hedgecott D, Crespillo AP, Allison M, Hemingway H, Cleland JG, McMurray JJV, Rahimi K. Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):572-580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5. Epub 2017 Nov 21. PubMed 29174292 ↗
  • Dunlay SM, Roger VL. Understanding the epidemic of heart failure: past, present, and future. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014 Dec;11(4):404-15. doi: 10.1007/s11897-014-0220-x. PubMed 25182014 ↗
  • Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Murray CJ. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1333-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406656. PubMed 25830423 ↗
  • Savarese G, Lund LH. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2. PubMed 28785469 ↗
  • Meyer S, Brouwers FP, Voors AA, Hillege HL, de Boer RA, Gansevoort RT, van der Harst P, Rienstra M, van Gelder IC, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH, van der Meer P. Sex differences in new-onset heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Apr;104(4):342-50. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0788-x. Epub 2014 Nov 15. PubMed 25398254 ↗
  • Brouwers FP, de Boer RA, van der Harst P, Voors AA, Gansevoort RT, Bakker SJ, Hillege HL, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH. Incidence and epidemiology of new onset heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a community-based cohort: 11-year follow-up of PREVEND. Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1424-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht066. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PubMed 23470495 ↗
  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):e44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31047-5. PubMed 30496104 ↗
  • Cosin J, Diez J; TORIC investigators. Torasemide in chronic heart failure: results of the TORIC study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Aug;4(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00122-8. Erratum In: Eur J Heart Fail 2002 Oct;4(5):667. PubMed 12167392 ↗
  • World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available. PubMed 24141714 ↗
  • Moradi M, Daneshi F, Behzadmehr R, Rafiemanesh H, Bouya S, Raeisi M. Quality of life of chronic heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2020 Nov;25(6):993-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09890-2. PubMed 31745839 ↗
  • Plakas S, Mastrogiannis D, Mantzorou M, Adamakidou T, Fouka G, Bouziou A, et al. Validation of the 8-Item Morisky Medication adherence scale in chronically Ill ambulatory patients in Rural Greece. Open J Nurs. 2016;06:158-69.
  • Tan X, Patel I, Chang J. Review of the four item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-4) and eight item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Innov Pharm. 2014;5:11478.
  • Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 May;10(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x. PubMed 18453793 ↗
  • Krousel-Wood M, Islam T, Webber LS, Re RN, Morisky DE, Muntner P. New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):59-66. PubMed 19146365 ↗
  • Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available. PubMed 21144706 ↗
  • Martinez-Perez P, Orozco-Beltran D, Pomares-Gomez F, Hernandez-Rizo JL, Borras-Gallen A, Gil-Guillen VF, Quesada JA, Lopez-Pineda A, Carratala-Munuera C. Validation and psychometric properties of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) in type 2 diabetes patients in Spain. Aten Primaria. 2021 Feb;53(2):101942. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.09.007. Epub 2021 Jan 25. PubMed 33508739 ↗
  • Gupta S, Goren A. Application of item response theory in validating the Morisky medication adherence scale in patients with hypertension. Value Health. 2013;16:A4.
  • Naveiro-Rilo JC, Diez-Juarez DM, Romero Blanco A, Rebollo-Gutierrez F, Rodriguez-Martinez A, Rodriguez-Garcia MA. Validation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in primary care. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 Dec;63(12):1419-27. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(10)70276-0. English, Spanish. PubMed 21144402 ↗
  • Behlouli H, Feldman DE, Ducharme A, Frenette M, Giannetti N, Grondin F, Michel C, Sheppard R, Pilote L. Identifying relative cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6242-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334659. PubMed 19965089 ↗
  • Brokalaki H, Patelarou E, Giakoumidakis K, Kollia Z, Fotos NV, Vivilaki V, Brokalaki E, Chatzistamatiou E, Kallikazaros IE. Translation and validation of the Greek "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure" questionnaire. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;56(1):10-9. PubMed 25701967 ↗
  • Evans RA, Singh SJ, Williams JE, Morgan MD. The development of a self-reported version of the chronic heart questionnaire. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):365-72. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318228a31a. PubMed 21826017 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2025, 12 months after the start.

Of 182 industry-sponsored observational studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 975 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 89.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2023
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
StartActual
Mar 6, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jul 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06117722
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Mar 6, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2024

Study contacts

Polyanthi Papanastasiou
Contact
p.papanastasiou@elpen.gr
+302111865777
Alexandros Ginis
Contact
aginis@elpen.gr
Alexandros Ginis, MD
study director · Elpen Pharmaceutical Industry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion