ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05153954QUANTICOUpdated Dec 3, 2024

Quantitative ICG Fluorescence Angiography in Colorectal Surgery

An observational study in Colorectal Cancer and Anastomotic Leak, sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (ICG-FA) has gained increased popularity in colorectal surgery to check perfusion to the newly-formed anastomotic area and decrease the rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

While qualitative ICG assessment has the advantage to be used instantly during the operative procedure, it does bear drawbacks (subjective assessment, dependent on factors like camera distance, ICG dose and white-light contamination).

The alternative is quantitative ICG assessment, which is performed by evaluating the time-intensity curve of the ICG-FA with an external analyzing software. The procedure is showing promising results, but the methodology is still reported very heterogeneously.

This study is a multi-center, prospective, standardized, surgeon-blinded observational trial. The key aspect of this study is the non-interventional design with blinding of both the qualitative and quantitative results from the ICG perfusion measurement, providing no chance of influencing the course of the operation. Assessment of perfusion will be performed postoperatively blinded to the outcome. Assessment of the pre-anastomotic area is intraoperatively performed by an image analysis software that then calculates a perfusion score based on an algorithm integrating relevant perfusion metrics. The primary outcome is the combined rate of early and late anastomotic complications within 90 days postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Anastomotic Leak

Keywords

  • indocyanine green
  • colon cancer
  • primary anastomosis
  • anastomotic perfusion
  • anastomotic leak
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,734 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114 is below the median of 250 across 1,253 observational studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Zealand University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 236 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will include 115 participants undergoing elective resection with PME or TME for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer through a minimally invasive approach.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • ASA Classification: status I-III
  • Planned for PME or TME with minimally invasive approach and primary anastomosis
  • Strong suspicion of or biopsy-verified sigmoid or rectal cancer Stage I-IV cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to ICG or iodine
  • Emergency procedure
  • Pregnancy or if the patient is currently nursing
  • Surgeons decide to do unblinded quantitative or qualitative ICG-FA
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Colorectal cancer patients

    Patients who can be treated with either PME or TME and receive a primary anastomosis during surgery.

    Other: Quantitative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography

Interventions

  • OtherQuantitative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography

    Quantitative analyse of ICG around the proximal/oral part of the anastomosis pre-formation of the primary anasomosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative anastomotic complications

    combined rate of all anastomotic complications

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Number of participants with anastomotic leakage rate, severity (grade A-C)

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Number of participants with postoperative bleeding

    Time frame: 10 days

  4. Number of participants with postoperative paralytic ileus

    obstipation and intolerance of oral intake due to nonmechanical factors that disrupt the normal coordinated propulsive motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract following abdominal surgery

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Number of participants with wound dehiscence

    surgical complication in which a wound ruptures along a surgical incision

    Time frame: 1 month

  6. Comprehensive complications index

    Time frame: 90 days

  7. Duration of surgery

    Time frame: 1 day

  8. Reoperation rate

    Time frame: 1 month

  9. Hospital readmission

    Number of patients had have to be readmitted to the hospital due to postoperative complications

    Time frame: 1 month

  10. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. QT interval variability

    Continuous ECG-monitoring intraoperatively and postoperatively

    Time frame: 2 days

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital
    Køge, Region Sjælland 4200, Denmark
  • Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Aug 2024, 36 months.

Of 461 non-industry observational studies under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 132. This study's 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 562 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 103.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 24, 2021
First posted
Dec 10, 2021
StartActual
Aug 31, 2021
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 28, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05153954
Collaborators
Perfusion Tech Aps
Responsible party
Carolin Oppermann (Medical Doctor, PhD student, Zealand University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2021
Start date
Aug 31, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Nov 28, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Ismail Gögenur, DMSc, MD
principal investigator · Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital
Niclas Dohrn, MD
principal investigator · Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital
Mads Falk Klein, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion