ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05139511Updated Oct 18, 2022

Analysis of the Results of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment Previously to Laser Refractive Surgery

An interventional study of Study group and Control group in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Blepharitis, sponsored by Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-18.

Sponsored by Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Nov 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dry eye is often reported as the most common complication after a laser refractive surgery. Any refractive procedure can lead an impact on the corneal surface and the tear film.

The main cause of this dry eye is the corneal denervation caused by the destruction of the anterior stromal nerves during the ablative procedure. This loss of corneal sensitivity leads to a decrease in the blink reflex, a decrease in the secretion rate of the meibomian glands and finally an evaporated dry eye. There is also a chronic inflammation at the corneal surface that produces an increase of inflammatory cytokines and a dysfunction of the meibomian glands.

Yu et al have described incidences of dry eye closed to 60% after the first month of LASIK. Hovanesian et al have observed dry eye symptoms in 50% of patients 6 months after surgery. Donnenfeld et al describe 15% of moderate dry eye in the following 3 months and 5% of severe dry eye in the first 6 months. A small number of patients will present with chronic dry eye symptoms for more than 1 year. Bower et al analyzed its incidence in 0.8% Alterations in the tear film also decrease the quality of the retinal image and produce greater number of high-order due to the irregular.

Pulsed light therapy (IPL) applied preoperatively in patients who undergo a laser refractive surgery may prevent the post-surgical dry eye and improve the refractive results. The aim of our study is to evaluate the usefulness of the applied therapy for the prevention of dry eye in patients that undergo a corneal refractive procedure.

Read the detailed description
  1. Design Clinical experimental controlled trial, double-blind in which participants will be randomized into 2 groups: a study group (IPL + laser refractive surgery) and a control group (laser refractive surgery without IPL).

    The study will be conducted in accordance with Law 14/2007 of 3 July, on Biomedical Research, the Declaration of Helsinki (October 2013 version), standards of Good Clinical Practice and legislation in this area.

    All participants included in the study should read the Information Sheet and sign the informed and voluntary consent.

  2. Participants Participants from Vissum Clinic that present the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.

    The investigators will start the study with a preliminary project and depending on the results obtained, the investigators will apply these values to calculate the final sample size using the T-student-Fischer test for unilateral hypotheses and for a type 1 or α error of 5%. and a type 2 or β error of 20%.

  3. Parameters evaluated Primary measures: age, sex, skin phototype, visual acuity with and without correction, refraction, cycloplegic refraction, OSDI and VAS questionnaire, use of artificial tears, oxford scale, lacrimal meniscus height, tear break-up time, conjunctival hyperemia, meibography and slit lamp examination.

    Secondary measures: corneal topography and tomography (MS-39, CSO, Italy), corneal aberrometry (MS-39, CSO, Italy), ocular aberrometry (Osiris, CSO, Italy), analysis of contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000, Vector vision), photographic capture of the epithelial defect in PRK, pre-surgical and postsurgical photographic capture of the eyelid changes in PRK.

    The measurement of the different objective variables will be carried out in the clinic. The measurement of the subjective variables will be carried out by two ophthalmologists, both masked.

  4. Surgery and follow-up Participants who are candidates for a LASIK or SMILE procedure will receive, after randomization, IPL treatment in both eyes (experimental group) or sham IPL (control group). In the case of participant candidate for a PRK procedure, an intra-subject control group will be used, where one eye will receive the IPL treatment (right eyes) and the left contralateral eye the sham IPL treatment (control).

    Refractive surgeries will be performed exclusively two ophthalmologists following the same surgical protocol.

    IPL therapy (M22, Lumenis LTD, Israel) will be performed following the same protocol (standardized facial and periocular application with automatically adjusted energy according to Fitzpatrick skin classification). Three IPL sessions will be applied (simulated in the case of the control group): 7 days before the intervention, 7 days after the intervention, and 30 days after the intervention. The total postsurgical follow-up will be 6 months.

  5. Statistical analyses All demographic and clinical data will be collected in a database and analyzed with the SPSS statistical package for Windows version 22.0. A p \<0.05% will be considered significant.
02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Blepharitis

Keywords

  • Intense pulsed light
  • LASIK / SMILE
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age who are undergoing a corneal laser refractive surgery after a medical indication by the Vissum ophthalmologist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Piercings
  • Fitzpatrick skin classification V and VI
  • diseases
  • Epilepsy
  • Previous history of herpes or ocular pathology
  • Pathological or suspicious corneal topography
  • Treatment in the previous month with , antihistamines or topical vasoconstrictors.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study group

    IPL + laser refractive surgery

    Device: Study group

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Laser refractive surgery without IPL

    Other: Control group

Interventions

  • DeviceStudy group

    The IPL therapy consists in a polychromatic pulses of light not coherent and not collimated. The therapy leads to a series of processes such as the destruction of superficial blood vessels and thus the reduction of local inflammation, the liquefy of the meibum and an antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. The therapy is performed over the cheeks, nose and upper eyelids.

    Also known as: Intense pulsed light therapy (Lumenis M22)

  • OtherControl group

    Same procedure but without energy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. OSDI questionnaire

    It measures the severity of ocular surface symptoms and includes 12 items organized into 3 subscales; eye discomfort, functionality and environmental factors. After completing the questionnaire, a final score is obtained that when it is higher than 13 indicates ocular surface pathology.

    Time frame: 0 day

  2. Change from Baseline OSDI questionnaire

    It measures the severity of ocular surface symptoms and includes 12 items organized into 3 subscales; eye discomfort, functionality and environmental factors. After completing the questionnaire, a final score is obtained that when it is higher than 13 indicates ocular surface pathology.

    Time frame: 7 day

  3. Change from Baseline OSDI questionnaire

    It measures the severity of ocular surface symptoms and includes 12 items organized into 3 subscales; eye discomfort, functionality and environmental factors. After completing the questionnaire, a final score is obtained that when it is higher than 13 indicates ocular surface pathology.

    Time frame: 30 day

  4. Change from Baseline OSDI questionnaire

    It measures the severity of ocular surface symptoms and includes 12 items organized into 3 subscales; eye discomfort, functionality and environmental factors. After completing the questionnaire, a final score is obtained that when it is higher than 13 indicates ocular surface pathology.

    Time frame: 90 day

  5. Change from Baseline OSDI questionnaire

    It measures the severity of ocular surface symptoms and includes 12 items organized into 3 subscales; eye discomfort, functionality and environmental factors. After completing the questionnaire, a final score is obtained that when it is higher than 13 indicates ocular surface pathology.

    Time frame: 180 day

  6. Lacrimal meniscus height

    Measured in millimeters by Ocular Keratograph 5M, a value greater than 0.20 mm is considered normal

    Time frame: 0 day

  7. Change from Baseline Lacrimal meniscus height

    Measured in millimeters, a value greater than 0.20 mm is considered normal

    Time frame: 7 day

  8. Change from Baseline Lacrimal meniscus height

    Measured in millimeters, a value greater than 0.20 mm is considered normal

    Time frame: 30 day

  9. Change from Baseline Lacrimal meniscus height

    Measured in millimeters, a value greater than 0.20 mm is considered normal

    Time frame: 90 day

  10. Change from Baseline Lacrimal meniscus height

    Measured in millimeters, a value greater than 0.20 mm is considered normal

    Time frame: 180 day

  11. Tear Break-up-time

    Time elapsed from the last blink to the appearance of the first tear discontinuity measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. A title longer than 5 seconds is considered normal.

    Time frame: 0 day

  12. Change from Baseline Tear Break-up-time

    time elapsed from the last blink to the appearance of the first tear discontinuity measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. A title longer than 5 seconds is considered normal.

    Time frame: 7 day

  13. Change from Baseline Tear Break-up-time

    time elapsed from the last blink to the appearance of the first tear discontinuity measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. A title longer than 5 seconds is considered normal.

    Time frame: 30 day

  14. Change from Baseline Tear Break-up-time

    time elapsed from the last blink to the appearance of the first tear discontinuity measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. A title longer than 5 seconds is considered normal.

    Time frame: 90 day

  15. Change from Baseline Tear Break-up-time

    time elapsed from the last blink to the appearance of the first tear discontinuity measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. A title longer than 5 seconds is considered normal.

    Time frame: 180 day

  16. Conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia.

    Grade of red eye measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. Jenvis ranking from 0 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, severe)

    Time frame: 0 day

  17. Change from Baseline Conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia.

    Grade of red eye measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. Jenvis ranking from 0 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, severe)

    Time frame: 7 day

  18. Change from Baseline Conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia.

    Grade of red eye measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. Jenvis ranking from 0 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, severe)

    Time frame: 30 day

  19. Change from Baseline Conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia.

    Grade of red eye measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. Jenvis ranking from 0 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, severe)

    Time frame: 90 day

  20. Change from Baseline Conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia.

    Grade of red eye measured by Ocular Keratograph 5M. Jenvis ranking from 0 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, severe)

    Time frame: 180 day

  21. Upper and lower meibography

    Measured by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Observes and evaluates morphological changes of the meibomian glands Meiboscore classification * Grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands. * Grade 1: loss of less than 1/3 of the total surface of the meibomian glands. * Grade 2: loss of 1/3 to 2/3 of the total area. * Grade 3: loss of more than 2/3 of the surface.

    Time frame: 0 day

  22. Change from Baseline Upper and lower meibography

    Measured by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Observes and evaluates morphological changes of the meibomian glands Meiboscore classification * Grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands. * Grade 1: loss of less than 1/3 of the total surface of the meibomian glands. * Grade 2: loss of 1/3 to 2/3 of the total area. * Grade 3: loss of more than 2/3 of the surface.

    Time frame: 7 day

  23. Change from Baseline Upper and lower meibography

    Measured by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Observes and evaluates morphological changes of the meibomian glands Meiboscore classification * Grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands. * Grade 1: loss of less than 1/3 of the total surface of the meibomian glands. * Grade 2: loss of 1/3 to 2/3 of the total area. * Grade 3: loss of more than 2/3 of the surface.

    Time frame: 30 day

  24. Change from Baseline Upper and lower meibography

    Measured by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Observes and evaluates morphological changes of the meibomian glands Meiboscore classification * Grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands. * Grade 1: loss of less than 1/3 of the total surface of the meibomian glands. * Grade 2: loss of 1/3 to 2/3 of the total area. * Grade 3: loss of more than 2/3 of the surface.

    Time frame: 90 day

  25. Change from Baseline Upper and lower meibography

    Measured by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Observes and evaluates morphological changes of the meibomian glands Meiboscore classification * Grade 0: no loss of meibomian glands. * Grade 1: loss of less than 1/3 of the total surface of the meibomian glands. * Grade 2: loss of 1/3 to 2/3 of the total area. * Grade 3: loss of more than 2/3 of the surface.

    Time frame: 180 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual acuity

    Visual acuity with and without correction, measured on a decimal scale, determined by the Snellen panel, placing the examined person at a distance of 6 meters, will be collected by an optician.

    Time frame: 0 day

  2. Change from Baseline Visual acuity

    Visual acuity with and without correction, measured on a decimal scale, determined by the Snellen panel, placing the examined person at a distance of 6 meters, will be collected by an optician.

    Time frame: 180 day

  3. Corneal topography

    Performs an analysis of the cornea, which allows evaluating the shape and quantifying the power of the different curvatures

    Time frame: 0 day

  4. Change from Baseline Corneal topography

    Performs an analysis of the cornea, which allows evaluating the shape and quantifying the power of the different curvatures

    Time frame: 180 day

  5. Corneal aberrometry

    Technique that analyzes complex systems of light waves to quantify the set of optical aberrations that exist within the ocular structure.

    Time frame: 0 day

  6. Change from Baseline Corneal aberrometry

    Technique that analyzes complex systems of light waves to quantify the set of optical aberrations that exist within the ocular structure.

    Time frame: 180 day

  7. Analysis of contrast sensitivity

    Contrast Sensitivity is a test that assesses a person's ability to identify an object and separate it from the background Contrast sensitivity is evaluated with charts that can be used as projected or wall acuity charts.

    Time frame: 0 day

  8. Change from Baseline Analysis of contrast sensitivity

    Contrast Sensitivity is a test that assesses a person's ability to identify an object and separate it from the background Contrast sensitivity is evaluated with charts that can be used as projected or wall acuity charts.

    Time frame: 180 day

  9. VAS questionnaire

    investigates the intensity of the ocular surface symptoms from 0 to 100 (normal- severe)

    Time frame: 0 day

  10. Change from Baseline VAS questionnaire

    investigates the intensity of the ocular surface symptoms from 0 to 100 (normal- severe)

    Time frame: 180 day

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Alicante Vissum Miranza
    Alicante, 03016, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. The effects of LASIK on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2004 Jan;2(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70022-8. PubMed 17216074 ↗
  • Toda I. Dry Eye After LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Nov 1;59(14):DES109-DES115. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23538. PubMed 30481814 ↗
  • Ge J, Liu N, Wang X, Du Y, Wang C, Li Z, Li J, Wang L. Evaluation of the efficacy of optimal pulsed technology treatment in patients with cataract and Meibomian gland dysfunction in the perioperative period. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01357-5. PubMed 32188437 ↗
  • Jung JW, Han SJ, Nam SM, Kim TI, Kim EK, Seo KY. Meibomian gland dysfunction and tear cytokines after cataract surgery according to preoperative meibomian gland status. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;44(7):555-562. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12744. Epub 2016 May 1. PubMed 26989003 ↗
  • Yu EY, Leung A, Rao S, Lam DS. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. Ophthalmology. 2000 Dec;107(12):2131-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00388-2. PubMed 11097583 ↗
  • Hovanesian JA, Shah SS, Maloney RK. Symptoms of dry eye and recurrent erosion syndrome after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):577-84. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00835-x. PubMed 11311627 ↗
  • Nettune GR, Pflugfelder SC. Post-LASIK tear dysfunction and dysesthesia. Ocul Surf. 2010 Jul;8(3):135-45. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70224-0. PubMed 20712970 ↗
  • Cote S, Zhang AC, Ahmadzai V, Maleken A, Li C, Oppedisano J, Nair K, Busija L, Downie LE. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD013559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013559. PubMed 32182637 ↗
  • Rong B, Tang Y, Tu P, Liu R, Qiao J, Song W, Toyos R, Yan X. Intense Pulsed Light Applied Directly on Eyelids Combined with Meibomian Gland Expression to Treat Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Jun;36(6):326-332. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4402. Epub 2018 Apr 24. PubMed 29688838 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be anonymized by assigning a code file and only authorized personnel will have access to personally identifiable data. The highest levels of professional conduct and confidentiality will always be maintained, complying with Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05139511
Lead sponsor
Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Start date
Feb 15, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 15, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2022

Study contacts

Jorge Alió del Barrio, MD, PhD
Contact
jorge_alio@hotmail.com
965154062 ext. +34
Alejandra Rodriguez, MSc, PhD
Contact
clinicaltrials@vissum.com
965154062 ext. +34
Jorge Alió del Barrio, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Vissum Miranza
Maria Martinez Hergueta, MD
study chair · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Maria A Amesty, MD, PhD
study chair · Vissum Miranza
Mario Cantó Cerdan, MSc
study chair · Vissum Miranza
Alejandra Rodriguez, MSc, PhD
study chair · Vissum Miranza
Jorge L Alió y Sanz, MD, PhD
study chair · Vissum Miranza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion