ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02932852A-ADAS-CT-CDUpdated Oct 13, 2016

Autologous Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cell Transplantation for Corneal Diseases

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Lipoaspiration and Transplantation in Hereditary Corneal Dystrophy and Keratoconus, sponsored by Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante. Status unknown at 1 site in Lebanon. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-13.

Sponsored by Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Transplantation of cellularized human cornea impregnated and populated by mesenchymal stem cells derived from the patient's adipose tissue. The purpose of the study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of transplantation of a single dose of autologous mesenchymal adipose tissue derived adult stem cells (ADAS) cellularized into laminas for subjects with corneal defects. 3 groups will be included in the study: (1) transplantation of ADAS alone without scaffold, (2) transplantation of scaffold (human corneal decellularized lamina) without ADAS, and (3) transplantation of ADAS cellularized on scaffold (the human corneal decellularized lamina)

Read the detailed description

Different types of stem cells have been used in various ways in several research projects in order to find the optimal procedure to regenerate the human corneal stroma. It included several approaches which can be classified as intrastromal implantation of stem cells (1) alone, (2) together with a biodegradable scaffold, (3) with a non-biodegradable scaffold, or (4) with a decellularized corneal stromal scaffold. In fact, the complex structure of the corneal stroma has not been yet replicated, and there are well known drawbacks to the use of synthetic scaffold-based designs. Recently, several corneal decellularization techniques have been described, which provide an acellular corneal extracellular matrix (ECM). These scaffolds have gained attention in the last few years as they provide a more natural environment for the growth and differentiation of cells when compared with synthetic scaffolds. In addition, components of the ECM are generally conserved among species and are tolerated well even by xenogeneic recipients. Keratocytes are essential for remodeling the corneal stroma and for normal epithelial physiology. This highlights the importance of transplanting a cellular substitute together with the structural support (acellular ECM) to undertake these critical functions in corneal homeostasis. To the best of the investigators knowledge, all attempts to repopulate decellularized corneal scaffolds have used corneal cells, but these cells have major drawbacks that preclude their autologous use in clinical practice (damage of the donor tissue, lack of cells and inefficient cell subcultures), thus the efforts to find an extraocular source of autologous cells. A recent study by the investigators has shown a perfect biointegration of human decellularized corneal stromal sheets (100µm thickness) with and without h-ADASC colonization inside the rabbit cornea in vivo, without observing any rejection response despite the graft being xenogeneic. The investigators also demonstrated the differentiation of h-ADASCs into functional keratocytes inside these implants in vivo, which then achieved their proper biofunctionalization. According to the investigator's opinion the transplant of stem cells together with decellularized corneal ECM would be the best technique to effectively restore the thickness of a diseased human cornea, like in keratoconus. Through this technique, and using extraocular mesenchymal stem cells from patients, it is possible to transform allergenic grafts into functional autologous grafts, theoretically avoiding the risk of rejection.

The process flow is defined as following: (1) the file study: which start by receiving the file of the patient, the file will be forwarded to appointed physicians coordinators for review and submission of medical report, then the medical report will be evaluated within the cell therapy committee and the patient will be asked for clinical examination, and after consultation a reply to the patient with medical decision will follow with an approval or not to be recruited and if yes, a brief report about the procedure will be submitted and explained in details to the patient, a consent form must be signed if the patient agree to be included in the study, (2) the patient admission: which may start by completion of the procedure forms and doing the pre-op evaluation (initial work up defined as a clinical and biological assessment upon C.A.S which may include unaided and best spectacle corrected visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure, fundoscopy, corneal topography, aberrometry, endothelial cell count (specular microscopy) as well as blood tests) by an ophthalmologist, followed by lipoaspiration of the subcutaneous adipose tissue to be performed by a plastic surgeon, then sample processing at a cGMP facility for isolation and characterization of the stromal vascular fraction enriched with ADAS as well as laminas preparing (the quality control assessment will be realized before and after all the steps of the procedure starting from the ADAS collection to transplantation including cell culture, cell quiescence, decellularization of human corneal lamina, recellularization of the laminas with ADAS, and transplantation; the assessment will include cell viability, cell number, cell apoptosis, immunophenotyping, infection, inflammation by analyzing the secreted cytokines from ADAS, lamina cutting, lamina thickness, immunostaining, confocal microscopy, etc.); (3) the delivery (transplantation) which starts by a peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia where the patient is placed under operating microscope, followed by a femtosecond laser assisted mid-stromal lamellar dissection, then the ADAS or laminas or recellularized laminas will be placed within the pocket, and finally closed by a superior incision closure. The patient will be putted under antibiotic/steroids for a defined period and followed by the team at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

This protocol of cell therapy will be applied exclusively at Laser Vision (Hazmieh-Lebanon) and prepared at Reviva Regenerative Medicine Center in affiliation with VISSUM (Alicante-Spain) and Optica General (Saida-Lebanon).

The patient's recruitment will take place: for the lipoaspiration, processing, preparing the celluraized laminas and quality control assessments, at the Middle East Institute of Health the Reviva Center (Bsalim-Lebanon) under the regulations of the hospital and the Reviva Center; for injection, at Laser vision (Hazmieh-Lebanon); and for follow-up, at Laser vision \& optica general. All these steps are managed by VISSUM (Prof. J. ALIO).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hereditary Corneal Dystrophy
  • Keratoconus

Keywords

  • stem cell
  • mesenchymal
  • ADASc
  • transplantation
  • cornea
  • corneal defects
  • keratoconus
  • scaffold
  • lamina
03

In context

Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 25 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary.

Browse Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary studies →

Lead sponsor

Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients affected by corneal stromas dystrophies of any type, but particularly keratoconus, showing clear evidence at the ophthalmic examination of the presence and clear expression of the disease
  • Age : ≥ 18 years
  • Gender: any
  • Willing to collaborate and to attend to the clinical follow ups for the next five years
  • Patients willing to sign
  • Able and willing to comply with all study requirements
  • Patients with and no worse than 0.6 for the better vision patients
  • Comprehensive clinical ophthalmological including slit lamp photography of the cornea of either eye
  • Corneal topography map including both anterior and posterior corneal surfaces
  • Specular microscopy
  • Confocal microscopy of the centre of the cornea
  • Absence of anterior segment inflammation
  • Medically suitable to undergo corneal graft surgery with local anesthesia
  • Medically suitable for general anesthesia or waking sedation, if needed
  • Normal serum chemistry and hematology screening tests
  • Negative (HIV), (HBV), (HCV) serology
  • No history of
  • Complete history \& physical examination
  • Negative chest roentgenogram (CXR)
  • Negative urinalysis (U/A)
  • Normal thyroid exam

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients not willing to sign
  • Defects in corneal transparency with a potential to affect the visual outcome
  • Vision of 0.05 or less
  • Severe corneal deformation
  • Infection
  • Moderate or severe dry eye
  • Chronic ocular surface inflammation of any origin
  • Previous ocular surgery other than cataract
  • Presence of cataract or other media opacity that would influence ocular fundus documentation and adequate ERG and visual field evaluation.
  • Other ophthalmic comorbidity like glaucoma and uveitis
  • Known allergy: example to propacaine, ciprofloxacin, fluorescein , indocyanine green, or others to specify
  • Known coagulation abnormalities
  • Any medical condition likely interferes to cause serious adverse events during the study
  • Presence of active or inactive choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the eye to be treated
  • History of
  • History of cognitive impairments or dementia which may impact the patient's ability to participate in the informed consent process and to appropriately complete evaluations
  • Any immunodeficiency
  • Any current therapy other than intermittent or low dose
  • Renal insufficiency, as defined by creatine level >1.3 mg/dL.
  • Serologic evidence of infection with , , or
  • If female, pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any other medical condition, which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromises patient safety, or interferes with the interpretation of the study results.corneal dystrophies of any type, in a stage which either could be prevented in progression (with best corrected visual acuity superior to 0.6) or with indication for keratoplasty (best corrected visual acuity \<0.2). The cases should not have defects in corneal transparency which would lead to vision of 0.05 or less or severe corneal optical deformation (in the case of keratoconus).
  • The visual acuity of the eye to receive the transplant will be no better than 20/400
  • The visual acuity of the eye in the better vision cohort to receive the transplant will be no better than 0.1 at the Snellen charts
  • The visual acuity of the eye that is not to receive the transplant will be no better than 0.2 for the worse vision patients
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    GROUP I

    lipoaspiration and transplantation of ADAS alone without scaffold

    Procedure: Lipoaspiration · Procedure: Transplantation

  • Active comparator
    GROUP II

    Lipoaspiration and transplantation of scaffold (human corneal decellularized lamina) without ADAS

    Procedure: Lipoaspiration · Procedure: Transplantation

  • Active comparator
    GROUP III

    Lipoaspiration and transplantation of ADAS cellularized on scaffold (the human corneal decellularized lamina)

    Procedure: Lipoaspiration · Procedure: Transplantation

Interventions

  • ProcedureLipoaspiration

    The patient will have a liposuction surgery from which the autologous ADAS cell to transplant in the cornea will be obtained.

  • ProcedureTransplantation

    The ophthalmologist will carry out the transplantation of the ADAS cells with or without scaffold in the intrastromal cornea of the patient

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vision recovery (Corrected Distance Visual Acuity)

    The Best Corrected Visual Acuity will be measured in each postoperative visit to control any important decrease relative to the surgery

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Corneal Thickness

    At each post operative visit a measurement of corneal pachymetry of the transplanted cornea will be carried out to detect any abnormal evolution

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

  2. Topopgraphy

    At each post operative visit a measurement of Anterior surface topography of the transplanted cornea will be carried out to detect any abnormal evolution

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

  3. Anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography

    At each post operative visit a measurement anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography of the transplanted cornea will be carried out to detect any abnormal evolution

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

  4. Slit Lamp Observation

    At each post operative visit, the corneal aspect relative to new tissue will be evaluated by slit lamp observation

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

  5. refraction measurement

    At each post operative visit, the corneal aspect relative to increase in irregular astigmatism will be evaluated by refraction measurement

    Time frame: post operative visit at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alio del Barrio JL, Chiesa M, Garagorri N, Garcia-Urquia N, Fernandez-Delgado J, Bataille L, Rodriguez A, Arnalich-Montiel F, Zarnowski T, Alvarez de Toledo JP, Alio JL, De Miguel MP. Acellular human corneal matrix sheets seeded with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells integrate functionally in an experimental animal model. Exp Eye Res. 2015 Mar;132:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Jan 24. PubMed 25625506 ↗
  • De Miguel MP, Alio JL, Arnalich-Montiel F, Fuentes-Julian S, de Benito-Llopis L, Amparo F, Bataille L. Cornea and ocular surface treatment. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010 Jun;5(2):195-204. doi: 10.2174/157488810791268663. PubMed 19941445 ↗
  • Alio del Barrio JL, Chiesa M, Gallego Ferrer G, Garagorri N, Briz N, Fernandez-Delgado J, Sancho-Tello Valls M, Botella CC, Garcia-Tunon I, Bataille L, Rodriguez A, Arnalich-Montiel F, Gomez Ribelles JL, Antolinos-Turpin CM, Gomez-Tejedor JA, Alio JL, De Miguel MP. Biointegration of corneal macroporous membranes based on poly(ethyl acrylate) copolymers in an experimental animal model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Mar;103(3):1106-18. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35249. Epub 2014 Jun 18. PubMed 24910285 ↗
  • El Zarif M, Alio JL, Alio Del Barrio JL, Abdul Jawad K, Palazon-Bru A, Abdul Jawad Z, De Miguel MP, Makdissy N. Corneal Stromal Regeneration Therapy for Advanced Keratoconus: Long-term Outcomes at 3 Years. Cornea. 2021 Jun 1;40(6):741-754. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002646. PubMed 33591032 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02932852
Lead sponsor
Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante
Collaborators
Reviva Pharmaceuticals, Hospital Universitario La Paz, LASER VISION CENTER IN LIBANON, OPTICA GENERAL IN LIBANON
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2016
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2016

Study contacts

Jorge Alio Sanz, MD, PhD
Contact
jlalio@vissum.com
+34 902333344
Nehman Makdissy, PhD
Contact
almakdissy@hotmail.com
+96171210250
Mona El Zarif, OD
study chair · Optica General

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion