CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05137652Updated Aug 27, 2024

One-Needle Vs Three-Needle Radiofrequency in Low Back Pain Due to Facet Joint Arthritis

An interventional study of Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using single needle approach and Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using three needle approach in Lumbar Facet Joint Pain, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-27.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is more accurately called lumbago or lumbosacral pain, which is defined as discomfort, tension, or stiffness below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. In Egypt, patients with LBP constituted a high percentage of patients seeking medical care at outpatient's clinics reaching about 48% making it one of the most common causes of disability in the working population. no large-scale retrospective studies have investigated long-term clinical predictors of success in individuals receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches for facet joint arthropathy. Employees who are unable to work due to back pain spend a significant amount of time on sick leave, which impacts the productivity in the work place. Risk factors for LBP are multifactorial, including exercise, obesity, smoking, age, and sex, and these can be grouped together as individual fa pctors. Low back pain can arise from multiple anatomic locations: the intervertebral discs that are positioned between the vertebral bodies of the spine, the facet joint, but also non bony structures such as the paravertebral muscles, ligaments, and fascia. Postmortem studies have revealed that intervertebral discs and facet joints exhibit the greatest degree of degeneration within the spine, thus indicating the potential role of these structures in causing low back pain. In patients with a structural cause of low back pain, up to 40% of cases likely arise from the lumbar facet joints. The etiology of lumbar facet-joint pain is thought to be stress and trauma to the joint, which subsequently leads to inflammation of the joint capsule. Treatment options for facet arthropathy range from conservative management with medications and physical therapy to interventional management, including facet-joint injections and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches of the posterior rami to the facet joints. RFA of the medial branches of the dorsal rami is thought to be the most effective interventional treatment for facet joint pain and has been reported to relieve pain for 6 months to 1 year in 60% of patients. Although providing benefit in a significant proportion of patients, there remains a group of patients who do not experience any pain relief from RFA or experience only benefit from the ablation for a short period.

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

The aim of this technical note is to detail a two-needle approach to lumbar medial branch RF denervation to maximize lesion size along the course of the medial branch nerve.

VAS scores were based on self-reported measures of lumbar back pain and were recorded as a continuum between 2 ends of a scale, with "no pain" corresponding to the left end of the scale (0 cm) and "worst pain" corresponding to the right end of the scale (10 cm). The VAS is a validated, subjective tool to measure both acute and chronic pain. Pre-procedural VAS pain scores were documented prior to the lumbar RFA procedure (pre-VAS) and during the following time points after lumbar medial branch RFA was performed: short-term (1-week to 1-month), 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Facet Joint Pain
03

In context

Arthralgia

273 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthralgia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 63 across 219 interventional studies indexed under Arthralgia.

Browse Arthralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group of 18-60 yrs who are complaining of chronic lower back pain due to lumbar facet joint arthritis not responded to medical treatment for more than 6 months.
  • Failed back surgery syndrome without instrumentation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or relative in charge refusal.
  • Associated lumbar disc prolapse.
  • Negative diagnostic test.
  • Contraindication for radiological exposure as pregnancy and osteoporosis.
  • Inability to lie in a prone position.
  • Failed back surgery syndrome with previous instrumentation insertion
  • Contraindications for regional techniques
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Control group

    single needle approach for 40 patients in which nerve is traditionally been targeted.

    Device: Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using single needle approach

  • Experimental
    Study group

    40 patients will receive the three needle approach.

    Device: Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using three needle approach

Interventions

  • DeviceRadiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using single needle approach

    The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique which creates a lesion that we estimate to be 11.0-mm wide and 11.6-mm long along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score. Responder status was defined as a 30% or greater improvement in VAS pain score from the pre-procedural VAS pain score. Outcomes were summarized by means and standard deviations for continuous outcomes, and frequencies (%) for categorical outcomes.

    Also known as: Control group

  • DeviceRadiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using three needle approach

    The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique by maximizing the lesion size (compared to control group) along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score.

    Also known as: Study group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in VAS pain score.

    Responder status was defined as a 30% or greater improvement in pain Visual Analogue Score from the pre-procedural pain VAS score. The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, which has been widely used in diverse adult diseases including low back pain. The pain VAS originated from continuous visual analog scales developed in the field of psychology to measure well-being. the first reported use of the VAS pain scale was with the descriptor extremes "no pain at all" and "my pain is as bad as it could possibly be" in patients with a variety of conditions.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decrease the rate of recurrence of low back pain due to facet arthritis

    regarding low back pain of lumbar facet arthritis, the secondary outcome is to decrease the rate of recurrence, the need of prolonged periods of adjuvant pharmacological treatment, the need of future surgical intervention or even the need of further sessions of radiofrequency ablation.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Assiut University
    Asyūţ, Asyut 71111, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05137652
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Amani Hassan Abdel-Wahab (Professor of anesthesia, ICU and pain management, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2021
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2024
Completion
Aug 25, 2024
Last update
Aug 27, 2024

Study contacts

Hamdy Abbas Youssef, Professor
study director · Professor of anesthesia, intensive care and Pain Relief, Assiut University
Abdelraheem Elawamy, Ass. prof.
study director · Associate Professor of anesthesia, intensive care and Pain Relief, Assiut University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion