CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07859319ERABLEUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Acceptability of a Phytotherapy Combining Devil's Claw, Blackcurrant and Meadowsweet for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Arthralgia in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant Setting

A Phase 4 interventional study of Phytotherapy Dietary Supplement (Harpagophytum, Meadowsweet, and Blackcurrant) and Patient Experience Questionnaire in Hormone Therapy-induced Arthralgia, Phytotherapy and Symptom Management, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Adjuvant hormonotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for localized hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, accounting for approximately 80% of patients. The main classes used are selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs, including tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane), with or without LH-RH agonists (leuprorelin, goserelin), administered daily for 5 to 8 years.

However, these treatments are frequently associated with adverse events, predominantly musculoskeletal disorders such as arthralgia, which can significantly impair quality of life. These symptoms cause functional impact and promote premature discontinuation of treatment, thereby compromising therapeutic adherence and increasing the risk of tumor relapse.

Current management strategies for these arthralgias, whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological, show limited efficacy or insufficient levels of evidence, with the exception of certain approaches like acupuncture. In the absence of satisfactory solutions, many patients turn to alternative medicines, notably phytotherapy. However, these practices raise safety concerns (drug interactions, misuse) and rely on limited scientific evidence, especially since they are often underreported to healthcare professionals.

In this context, there is a clear need to rigorously evaluate new therapeutic approaches. The non-randomized ERABLE study aims to explore the efficacy and acceptability of a phytotherapy selected for its analgesic properties on hormone therapy-induced arthralgia in patients treated for localized breast cancer. If positive, this study will be followed by a randomized trial to confirm efficacy and achieve a level of evidence compatible with clinical guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hormone Therapy-induced Arthralgia
  • Phytotherapy
  • Symptom Management
  • Adjuvant Treatment
  • Patient Acceptability
  • Joint Pain

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Adjuvant treatment
  • Hormone therapy-induced arthralgia
  • Phytotherapy
  • Quality of life
03

In context

Arthralgia

273 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthralgia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 105 is above the median of 63 across 219 interventional studies indexed under Arthralgia.

Browse Arthralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Common Inclusion Criteria (applicable to both cohorts):
  1. Age 18 years or older.
  2. Histologically or clinically confirmed localized breast cancer treated for at least 3 months with adjuvant hormone therapy according to standard clinical practices: selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs, e.g., tamoxifen alone), aromatase inhibitors (AIs, e.g., anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane alone), or in combination with an LH-RH agonist (goserelin or leuprorelin). Concomitant targeted therapy with ribociclib or abemaciclib is permitted.
  3. Suffering from hormone therapy-induced arthralgia with a severity score of $\ge 4/10$ on a numerical rating scale (NRS).
  4. For women of childbearing potential: use of a highly effective contraception method throughout the study duration (excluding hormonal options, prioritizing mechanical methods such as a copper intrauterine device, male/female condoms, surgical methods like bilateral tubal ligation, or true abstinence).

    • Specific Inclusion Criteria for the Interventional Cohort:
  5. Provided signed and dated written informed consent.
  6. Affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social security regime.

    • Specific Selection Criteria for the External Control Group:
  7. Availability of necessary clinical data required for the primary outcome evaluation (joint pain assessment at baseline/Day 0 and Day 21 $\pm 3$ days).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specific Exclusion Criteria for the Interventional Cohort:
  1. Presence of medical conditions contraindicating the active ingredients of the dietary supplement: active gastroduodenal ulcer, biliary disorders (gallstones), uncontrolled heart failure, or edematous renal failure.
  2. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the components of the dietary supplement (blackcurrant, meadowsweet, excipients, etc.).
  3. Hypersensitivity to salicylates.
  4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  5. Persons deprived of liberty or under legal guardianship/protection.
  6. Inability to complete the study diary during the follow-up period based on the investigator's judgment (e.g., non-French speaking/allophone, dementia).
  7. Impossibility to comply with the medical follow-up of the study for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.
  8. Concurrent participation in another clinical, drug, or cosmetic research study.

    • Specific Non-Selection Criteria for the External Control Group:
  9. Patient objection or refusal regarding the reuse of their medical data for research purposes.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Herbal dietary supplement group (interventional group)

    Patients in the interventional arm receive a daily oral herbal dietary supplement combining Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens), Meadowsweet (Filipendula ulmaria), and Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum). The intervention is administered in a capsule dosage form at a dose of 2 capsules twice daily (totaling 4 capsules per day) for a duration of 21 consecutive days. This supportive care treatment is taken concomitantly with the patient's ongoing, standard adjuvant hormone therapy (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or LH-RH analogues) to evaluate its efficacy in managing hormone therapy-induced arthralgia.

    Dietary Supplement: Phytotherapy Dietary Supplement (Harpagophytum, Meadowsweet, and Blackcurrant) · Other: Patient Experience Questionnaire

  • No intervention
    Standard of care (External control)

    Patients in the external control group receive standard of care management for their hormone therapy-induced arthralgia, with no experimental phytotherapeutic intervention administered. Data regarding their joint pain are collected from routine clinical practice medical records, including a baseline numerical pain rating scale assessment (Day 0) and a follow-up assessment conducted by telephone at Day 21 (+ 3 days) during routine oncology follow-up. This group is matched with the interventional cohort based on clinical criteria such as age, hormone therapy type, and treatment line.

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPhytotherapy Dietary Supplement (Harpagophytum, Meadowsweet, and Blackcurrant)

    Administration of an oral herbal dietary supplement combining Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens), Meadowsweet (Filipendula ulmaria), and Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum). The product is provided in capsule dosage form at a dose of 2 capsules twice daily (4 capsules per day) for a duration of 21 consecutive days, taken concomitantly with the patient's ongoing adjuvant hormone therapy to manage joint pain.

  • OtherPatient Experience Questionnaire

    Administration of an ad hoc questionnaire utilizing Likert scales, conducted via telephone interview at Day 21. This tool evaluates the patient's feedback on three key implementation dimensions based on Proctor's framework: acceptability (overall perception, perceived satisfaction, and encountered difficulties), appropriateness (perceived relevance and suitability of the intervention), and feasibility.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in joint pain score from baseline to day 21

    Joint pain intensity is self-reported by the patient using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain." The primary outcome is calculated as the change in the NRS score from baseline (Day 0) to Day 21, comparing the interventional group with the matched external control group.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 21 (+ 3 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in analgesic medication consumption

    Patient self-reported consumption of analgesic treatments (paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, codeine-containing paracetamol, morphine sulfate, or oxycodone) recorded prospectively via a daily tracking diary during the first week (Day 0 to Day 7) and the final week (Day 14 to Day 21) of the study period.

    Time frame: Daily tracking during the first week (Day 0 to Day 7) and final week (Day 14 to Day 21) of the 21-day intervention period

  2. Incidence and severity of adverse events (Tolerance)

    Assessment of adverse events and treatment safety evaluated through patient reporting in the study diary and clinical monitoring throughout the intervention period. Toxicity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v6.0).

    Time frame: Throughout the intervention and follow-up period, from Day 0 up to Day 28 (+ 3 days)

  3. Patient experience assessment: acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility

    Evaluation of the patient's feedback regarding the phytotherapy dietary supplement using an ad hoc questionnaire with Likert scales based on Proctor's implementation framework. The questionnaire assesses three core dimensions: acceptability (overall perception, satisfaction, and difficulties encountered), appropriateness (perceived relevance and suitability of the intervention), and feasibility.

    Time frame: Day 21 (+ 3 days) via telephone interview

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Oncology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon Est
    Bron, France
  • Oncology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon Nord
    Lyon, France
    • Eva KALFALA, PU, MD · Contact · Eva.kalfala@chu-lyon.fr · 04 26 73 26 12
    • Eva KALFALA, PU, MD · Principal investigator
  • Oncology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, France
08

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07859319
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Collaborators
IPHYM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Gilles FREYER, Pr
Contact
gilles.freyer@chu-lyon.fr
04 78 86 43 18 ext. +33
Angelique STUANI
Contact
angelique.stuani@chu-lyon.fr
04 78 86 23 76 ext. +33
Gilles FREYER, Pr
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion